Skip to content
← Rectal Cancer

HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING

Surgery

Source: Rectal Cancer Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.

Source updated: February 12, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.

Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary. Independent clinical review is pending.

Context: Treatment of Stage IV and Recurrent Rectal Cancer / Treatment of Liver Metastasis

Hepatic metastasis may be considered resectable on the basis of the following factors:[65,85-97]

Source links and citations

Limited number of lesions.

Intrahepatic locations of lesions.

Lack of major vascular involvement.

Absent or limited extrahepatic disease.

Sufficient functional hepatic reserve.

For patients with resectable hepatic metastasis, a negative margin resection has been associated with 5-year survival rates of 25% to 40% in mostly nonrandomized studies, such as the North Central Cancer Treatment Group trial NCCTG-934653 (NCT00002575).[98-102][Level of evidence C3] Improved surgical techniques and advances in preoperative imaging have improved patient selection for resection. In addition, multiple studies with multiagent chemotherapy have demonstrated that patients with metastatic disease isolated to the liver, which historically would be considered unresectable, can occasionally be made resectable after the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.[103]

Source links and citations

For patients with unresectable liver metastases, excellent outcomes have been achieved with liver transplant. The optimal patient cohort for this therapy is still being determined, but in general, the goal is to achieve good initial systemic control with chemotherapy, followed by transplant. In one study of 91 patients, 11% underwent live donor liver transplant. At a median follow-up of 1.5 years after transplant, the recurrence-free survival rate was 62%, and the OS rate was 100%.[104][Level of evidence C3]

Source links and citations

In the TRANSMET study (NCT02597348), published in abstract form, 94 patients were randomly assigned to receive either chemotherapy and liver transplant (n = 47) or chemotherapy alone (n = 47). In an intent-to-treat analysis, the 5-year OS rate was 57% in the chemotherapy and liver transplant arm and 13% in the chemotherapy-alone arm. In a per-protocol analysis, the 5-year OS rate was 73% in the chemotherapy and liver transplant arm and 9% in the chemotherapy-alone arm.[105][Level of evidence A1]

Source links and citations

Studies cited in this source section

Source citation is not a determination that a study applies to you.

Publication references

Read the original reference and check its publication notices.

Preserved source evidence · Independent clinical review pending · Not medical advice