NCT03154190 · REGISTRY CONDITION SEARCH
Health Care Coach Support in Reducing Acute Care Use and Cost in Patients With Cancer
Found through the registry condition index, not selected as a treatment recommendation. This discovery collection was restricted to studies with posted results.
- Phase
- NA
- Status at capture
- COMPLETED
- Registry last update
- 2025-01-24
This randomized pilot clinical trial studies health care coach support in reducing acute care use and cost in patients with cancer. Health care coach support may help cancer patients to make decisions about their care that matches what is important to them with symptom management.
Open the original ClinicalTrials.gov record → · Download preserved record
What did the study report?
Outcomes, safety and baseline populations are separate source sections. Quality-of-life measures appear under their original outcome titles.
Participant flow
Baseline characteristics
Number of Emergency Department Visits (Chart Review)
Number of Hospitalization Visits (Chart Review)
Change in Patient Satisfaction With Care and Decision Making Among Patients Undergoing Health Care Coach Support as Assessed by Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems-G and Patient Satisfaction With Decision Scale
Change in Patient Satisfaction With Care Among Patients Undergoing Health Care Coach Support as Assessed by Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems-G.
Mean Emergency Department Visits (Chart Review)
Number of People With Emergency Department Visit (Chart Review)
Hospitalization Visits (Chart Review)
Number of Patients With Hospital Use (Chart Review)
Hospice Consult (Chart Review)
Hospice Consult (Chart Review)
Hospice Consult (Chart Review)
Palliative Care Consult (Chart Review)
Palliative Care Consult (Chart Review)
Palliative Care Consult (Chart Review)
Adverse events
Limitations, agreements, and source contact
Who could take part
- eligibility Criteria
- Inclusion Criteria: * Newly diagnosed patients for the following conditions * Colon cancer stage III and IV * Rectal cancer stage II, III, IV * Glioblastoma multiforme (brain) -- no stage * Non-small cell lung cancer stage IIIA, IIIB, IV * Small cell lung cancer, limited stage and extensive stage * Castration-resistant prostate cancer * Head and neck cancer stage III and IV * Gastric cancer stage III and IV * Esophageal cancer stage III and IV * Pancreatic cancer stage II, III, IV * Renal cell carcinoma, stage IV * Breast cancer, stage IV, if triple negative ER/PR/H2N negative or on systemic chemotherapy * Sarcoma, stage IV * Bladder carcinoma, stage IV * Acute myeloid leukemia * Melanoma, stage III and IV * Ovarian cancer, stage III and IV * High grade myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) * Any patient with recurrent or progressive cancer * Patients must have the ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent document * Patient must have ongoing oncologic needs and plan to receive all care at the study institution and not already be in hospice or home-care Exclusion Criteria: * Patients must have capacity to consent * Pregnant patients are excluded
- healthy Volunteers
- false
- minimum Age
- 18 Years
- sex
- ALL
- std Ages
- ADULT
- OLDER_ADULT
Treatment arms and interventions
- arm Groups
- description
- Patients receive usual care.
- intervention Names
- Other: Best Practice
- Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
- Other: Survey Administration
- label
- Arm A (usual care)
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- description
- Patients undergo health care coach support with a baseline introduction (either telephonic or in-person) of the program followed by a visit (telephonic or in-person) with the health care coach after the first oncology appointment to discuss goals of care. The health care coach will contact patient based on patients' ongoing needs (weekly to monthly) and will conduct symptom assessments based on patients' treatment plans and symptoms.
- intervention Names
- Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
- Procedure: Supportive Care
- Other: Survey Administration
- label
- Arm B (health care coach support)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- interventions
- arm Group Labels
- Arm A (usual care)
- description
- Receive usual care
- name
- Best Practice
- other Names
- standard of care
- standard therapy
- type
- OTHER
- arm Group Labels
- Arm A (usual care)
- Arm B (health care coach support)
- description
- Correlative studies
- name
- Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
- type
- OTHER
- arm Group Labels
- Arm B (health care coach support)
- description
- Undergo health care coach support
- name
- Supportive Care
- other Names
- Supportive Therapy
- Symptom Management
- Therapy, Supportive
- type
- PROCEDURE
- arm Group Labels
- Arm A (usual care)
- Arm B (health care coach support)
- description
- Ancillary studies
- name
- Survey Administration
- type
- OTHER
Study design
- allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- masking Info
- masking
- NONE
- primary Purpose
- HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Enrollment
- count
- 128
- type
- ACTUAL
Registered outcome plans (not posted results)
- primary Outcomes
- description
- Mean emergency department visits for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 6 months after enrollment. We will evaluate comparisons of mean numbers of emergency department visits between study arms.
- measure
- Number of Emergency Department Visits (Chart Review)
- time Frame
- 6 months after patient enrollment
- description
- Mean Hospitalization use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 6 months after enrollment. We will evaluate comparisons of mean numbers of hospitalizations between the two study arms.
- measure
- Number of Hospitalization Visits (Chart Review)
- time Frame
- 6 months after patient enrollment
- secondary Outcomes
- description
- Each patient will receive a satisfaction with decision-making survey (The Satisfaction with Decision Survey) at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Satisfaction with Decision was assessed using the Satisfaction with Decision scale, which measured rating of decision-making. Questions were assessed with responses on a scale of "strongly disagree," "disagree," "neither agree nor disagree," "agree," or "strongly agree." Results are expressed as proportion of participants who responded "strongly agree."
- measure
- Change in Patient Satisfaction With Care and Decision Making Among Patients Undergoing Health Care Coach Support as Assessed by Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems-G and Patient Satisfaction With Decision Scale
- time Frame
- Change in patient satisfaction with care and decision making from baseline to 6 and 12 months
- description
- Each patient will receive a satisfaction with care survey (The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems-G) at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Overall Health and Overall Mental or Emotional health was assessed using the Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems-Clinician and Group Survey version 2.0 (cite) questions #26, which measured rating of overall health with responses, "excellent," "very good," "fair," or "poor." Questions were assessed with responses "never", "sometimes," "usually," or "always," or care rated as "worst," "fair," good", or "best." Results are expressed as proportion of participants who responded "always", or "best care."
- measure
- Change in Patient Satisfaction With Care Among Patients Undergoing Health Care Coach Support as Assessed by Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems-G.
- time Frame
- Change in patient satisfaction with care from baseline to 6 and 12 months
- description
- Emergency Department use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment. We will evaluate comparisons of emergency department visits between study arms.
- measure
- Mean Emergency Department Visits (Chart Review)
- time Frame
- 12 months after patient enrollment
- description
- Number of people with Emergency Department use in the 30 days before death will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient who has died. We will evaluate comparisons of the number of people with emergency department visits between study arms.
- measure
- Number of People With Emergency Department Visit (Chart Review)
- time Frame
- 30 days prior to death
- description
- Hospital use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment. We will evaluate comparisons of hospitalization use between study arms.
- measure
- Hospitalization Visits (Chart Review)
- time Frame
- 12 months after patient enrollment
- description
- Number of patients with hospital use in the 30 days before death will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient who has died. We will evaluate comparisons of proportion of people with hospitalization use between study arms in the 30 days before death.
- measure
- Number of Patients With Hospital Use (Chart Review)
- time Frame
- 30 days prior to death
- description
- Hospice use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment. We will evaluate comparisons of hospice use between study arms.
- measure
- Hospice Consult (Chart Review)
- time Frame
- 6 months after patient enrollment
- description
- Hospice use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment. We will evaluate comparisons of hospice use between study arms.
- measure
- Hospice Consult (Chart Review)
- time Frame
- 12 months after patient enrollment
- description
- Hospice use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient who has died. We will evaluate comparisons of hospice use between study arms.
- measure
- Hospice Consult (Chart Review)
- time Frame
- 30 days prior to death
- description
- Palliative Care consult for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment. We will evaluate comparisons of palliative care use between study arms.
- measure
- Palliative Care Consult (Chart Review)
- time Frame
- 6 months after patient enrollment
- description
- Palliative Care consult for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment. We will evaluate comparisons of palliative care use between study arms.
- measure
- Palliative Care Consult (Chart Review)
- time Frame
- 12 months after patient enrollment
- description
- Palliative Care consult for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient who has died. We will evaluate comparisons of palliative care use between study arms.
- measure
- Palliative Care Consult (Chart Review)
- time Frame
- 30 days prior to death
Full study description
- brief Summary
- This randomized pilot clinical trial studies health care coach support in reducing acute care use and cost in patients with cancer. Health care coach support may help cancer patients to make decisions about their care that matches what is important to them with symptom management.
- detailed Description
- PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To reduce acute care utilization by 2-5% for advanced cancer patients by training and deploying health care coaches who help patients and families discuss care goals, virtual modalities, engage in shared-decision-making, and participate in educational activities. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To improve patients' experience of their care. II. Improve patient understanding of advanced care planning. III. To improve the receipt of goal concordant care. IV. To reduce total healthcare costs. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM A: Patients receive usual care. ARM B: Patients undergo health care coach support with a baseline introduction (either telephonic or in-person) of the program followed by a visit (telephonic or in-person) with the health care coach after the first oncology appointment to discuss goals of care. The health care coach will contact patient based on patients' ongoing needs (weekly to monthly) and will conduct symptom assessments based on patients' treatment plans and symptoms. After completion of study, patients are followed up for 6 months.
Source references
- references
- citation
- Patel MI, Kapphahn K, Dewland M, Aguilar V, Sanchez B, Sisay E, Murillo A, Smith K, Park DJ. Effect of a Community Health Worker Intervention on Acute Care Use, Advance Care Planning, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Adults With Advanced Stages of Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2022 Aug 1;8(8):1139-1148. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.1997.
- pmid
- 35771552
- type
- DERIVED
- citation
- Patel MI, Aguilar V, Sanchez B, Sisay E, Park DJ. Health care coach support to assist with advance care planning and symptom management -A randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Dec;111:106617. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106617. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
- pmid
- 34749008
- type
- DERIVED
Source notices and limitations
Discovery and provenance
- release id
- ctgov-registry-1336d216cbd1bbff780dac70
- edge id
- nct-edge-2350e8a9b6c6a3313b29
- requested nct id
- NCT03154190
- primary nct id
- NCT03154190
- source kind
- ctgov_condition_query
- source record id
- Source null
- source file sha256
- 69c40ed34b17434f684079ec5635264bc5ad292871a86b835704fc99fa9d8157
- payload sha256
- b463dc7aa0b71068932cc989fd545154e36919a53d043442b6ebb1b2194f3b7b
- payload
- clinical indication matching status
- condition_index_match_asserted_by_registry_not_reviewed
- end exclusive
- true
- id
- nct-edge-2350e8a9b6c6a3313b29
- link basis
- returned_by_explicit_condition_and_posted_results_filter_query
- nct id
- NCT03154190
- occurrences
- context exact
- NCT03154190
- end
- 11
- exact text
- NCT03154190
- start
- 0
- offset unit
- unicode_code_points
- query cond
- Small Intestine Cancer
- query disease state id
- ds-small-intestine-cancer
- source file
- /Users/arunverma/Documents/ChatGPT/Cancer Statistics Website/research-data/2026-09-10/clinicaltrials-condition/round-0000/raw/cond-small-intestine-cancer-000.json
- source file sha256
- 69c40ed34b17434f684079ec5635264bc5ad292871a86b835704fc99fa9d8157
- source json pointer
- /studies/65/protocolSection/identificationModule/nctId
- source kind
- ctgov_condition_query
- source record id
- Source null
- source string basis
- parsed_JSON_string_unmodified
- source string sha256
- fea620c44bf8b03564b7e7e18be8e60074b3b326bde00b3ecc2319fcf2aafde1
- release id
- ctgov-registry-1336d216cbd1bbff780dac70
- edge id
- nct-edge-52e4b3ebf34780523f61
- requested nct id
- NCT03154190
- primary nct id
- NCT03154190
- source kind
- ctgov_condition_query
- source record id
- Source null
- source file sha256
- 359ee71d54598877a70c4f96300e96532a9c096cf831e27a29687916b1e2237d
- payload sha256
- 01a008c15869a4991962bad88093705d50ead35df7324e6aac181711035cb438
- payload
- clinical indication matching status
- condition_index_match_asserted_by_registry_not_reviewed
- end exclusive
- true
- id
- nct-edge-52e4b3ebf34780523f61
- link basis
- returned_by_explicit_condition_and_posted_results_filter_query
- nct id
- NCT03154190
- occurrences
- context exact
- NCT03154190
- end
- 11
- exact text
- NCT03154190
- start
- 0
- offset unit
- unicode_code_points
- query cond
- Ovarian Germ Cell Tumors
- query disease state id
- ds-ovarian-germ-cell-tumors
- source file
- /Users/arunverma/Documents/ChatGPT/Cancer Statistics Website/research-data/2026-09-10/clinicaltrials-condition/round-0000/raw/cond-ovarian-germ-cell-tumors-000.json
- source file sha256
- 359ee71d54598877a70c4f96300e96532a9c096cf831e27a29687916b1e2237d
- source json pointer
- /studies/50/protocolSection/identificationModule/nctId
- source kind
- ctgov_condition_query
- source record id
- Source null
- source string basis
- parsed_JSON_string_unmodified
- source string sha256
- fea620c44bf8b03564b7e7e18be8e60074b3b326bde00b3ecc2319fcf2aafde1
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle