Skip to content
← Study library

NCT03154190 · REGISTRY CONDITION SEARCH

Health Care Coach Support in Reducing Acute Care Use and Cost in Patients With Cancer

Found through the registry condition index, not selected as a treatment recommendation. This discovery collection was restricted to studies with posted results.

Phase
NA
Status at capture
COMPLETED
Registry last update
2025-01-24

This randomized pilot clinical trial studies health care coach support in reducing acute care use and cost in patients with cancer. Health care coach support may help cancer patients to make decisions about their care that matches what is important to them with symptom management.

Open the original ClinicalTrials.gov record → · Download preserved record

What did the study report?

Outcomes, safety and baseline populations are separate source sections. Quality-of-life measures appear under their original outcome titles.

Who could take part
eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Newly diagnosed patients for the following conditions * Colon cancer stage III and IV * Rectal cancer stage II, III, IV * Glioblastoma multiforme (brain) -- no stage * Non-small cell lung cancer stage IIIA, IIIB, IV * Small cell lung cancer, limited stage and extensive stage * Castration-resistant prostate cancer * Head and neck cancer stage III and IV * Gastric cancer stage III and IV * Esophageal cancer stage III and IV * Pancreatic cancer stage II, III, IV * Renal cell carcinoma, stage IV * Breast cancer, stage IV, if triple negative ER/PR/H2N negative or on systemic chemotherapy * Sarcoma, stage IV * Bladder carcinoma, stage IV * Acute myeloid leukemia * Melanoma, stage III and IV * Ovarian cancer, stage III and IV * High grade myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) * Any patient with recurrent or progressive cancer * Patients must have the ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent document * Patient must have ongoing oncologic needs and plan to receive all care at the study institution and not already be in hospice or home-care Exclusion Criteria: * Patients must have capacity to consent * Pregnant patients are excluded
healthy Volunteers
false
minimum Age
18 Years
sex
ALL
std Ages
  1. ADULT
  2. OLDER_ADULT
Treatment arms and interventions
arm Groups
  1. description
    Patients receive usual care.
    intervention Names
    1. Other: Best Practice
    2. Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
    3. Other: Survey Administration
    label
    Arm A (usual care)
    type
    ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
  2. description
    Patients undergo health care coach support with a baseline introduction (either telephonic or in-person) of the program followed by a visit (telephonic or in-person) with the health care coach after the first oncology appointment to discuss goals of care. The health care coach will contact patient based on patients' ongoing needs (weekly to monthly) and will conduct symptom assessments based on patients' treatment plans and symptoms.
    intervention Names
    1. Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
    2. Procedure: Supportive Care
    3. Other: Survey Administration
    label
    Arm B (health care coach support)
    type
    EXPERIMENTAL
interventions
  1. arm Group Labels
    1. Arm A (usual care)
    description
    Receive usual care
    name
    Best Practice
    other Names
    1. standard of care
    2. standard therapy
    type
    OTHER
  2. arm Group Labels
    1. Arm A (usual care)
    2. Arm B (health care coach support)
    description
    Correlative studies
    name
    Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
    type
    OTHER
  3. arm Group Labels
    1. Arm B (health care coach support)
    description
    Undergo health care coach support
    name
    Supportive Care
    other Names
    1. Supportive Therapy
    2. Symptom Management
    3. Therapy, Supportive
    type
    PROCEDURE
  4. arm Group Labels
    1. Arm A (usual care)
    2. Arm B (health care coach support)
    description
    Ancillary studies
    name
    Survey Administration
    type
    OTHER
Study design
allocation
RANDOMIZED
intervention Model
PARALLEL
masking Info
masking
NONE
primary Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Enrollment
count
128
type
ACTUAL
Registered outcome plans (not posted results)
primary Outcomes
  1. description
    Mean emergency department visits for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 6 months after enrollment. We will evaluate comparisons of mean numbers of emergency department visits between study arms.
    measure
    Number of Emergency Department Visits (Chart Review)
    time Frame
    6 months after patient enrollment
  2. description
    Mean Hospitalization use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 6 months after enrollment. We will evaluate comparisons of mean numbers of hospitalizations between the two study arms.
    measure
    Number of Hospitalization Visits (Chart Review)
    time Frame
    6 months after patient enrollment
secondary Outcomes
  1. description
    Each patient will receive a satisfaction with decision-making survey (The Satisfaction with Decision Survey) at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Satisfaction with Decision was assessed using the Satisfaction with Decision scale, which measured rating of decision-making. Questions were assessed with responses on a scale of "strongly disagree," "disagree," "neither agree nor disagree," "agree," or "strongly agree." Results are expressed as proportion of participants who responded "strongly agree."
    measure
    Change in Patient Satisfaction With Care and Decision Making Among Patients Undergoing Health Care Coach Support as Assessed by Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems-G and Patient Satisfaction With Decision Scale
    time Frame
    Change in patient satisfaction with care and decision making from baseline to 6 and 12 months
  2. description
    Each patient will receive a satisfaction with care survey (The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems-G) at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Overall Health and Overall Mental or Emotional health was assessed using the Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems-Clinician and Group Survey version 2.0 (cite) questions #26, which measured rating of overall health with responses, "excellent," "very good," "fair," or "poor." Questions were assessed with responses "never", "sometimes," "usually," or "always," or care rated as "worst," "fair," good", or "best." Results are expressed as proportion of participants who responded "always", or "best care."
    measure
    Change in Patient Satisfaction With Care Among Patients Undergoing Health Care Coach Support as Assessed by Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems-G.
    time Frame
    Change in patient satisfaction with care from baseline to 6 and 12 months
  3. description
    Emergency Department use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment. We will evaluate comparisons of emergency department visits between study arms.
    measure
    Mean Emergency Department Visits (Chart Review)
    time Frame
    12 months after patient enrollment
  4. description
    Number of people with Emergency Department use in the 30 days before death will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient who has died. We will evaluate comparisons of the number of people with emergency department visits between study arms.
    measure
    Number of People With Emergency Department Visit (Chart Review)
    time Frame
    30 days prior to death
  5. description
    Hospital use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment. We will evaluate comparisons of hospitalization use between study arms.
    measure
    Hospitalization Visits (Chart Review)
    time Frame
    12 months after patient enrollment
  6. description
    Number of patients with hospital use in the 30 days before death will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient who has died. We will evaluate comparisons of proportion of people with hospitalization use between study arms in the 30 days before death.
    measure
    Number of Patients With Hospital Use (Chart Review)
    time Frame
    30 days prior to death
  7. description
    Hospice use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment. We will evaluate comparisons of hospice use between study arms.
    measure
    Hospice Consult (Chart Review)
    time Frame
    6 months after patient enrollment
  8. description
    Hospice use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment. We will evaluate comparisons of hospice use between study arms.
    measure
    Hospice Consult (Chart Review)
    time Frame
    12 months after patient enrollment
  9. description
    Hospice use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient who has died. We will evaluate comparisons of hospice use between study arms.
    measure
    Hospice Consult (Chart Review)
    time Frame
    30 days prior to death
  10. description
    Palliative Care consult for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment. We will evaluate comparisons of palliative care use between study arms.
    measure
    Palliative Care Consult (Chart Review)
    time Frame
    6 months after patient enrollment
  11. description
    Palliative Care consult for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment. We will evaluate comparisons of palliative care use between study arms.
    measure
    Palliative Care Consult (Chart Review)
    time Frame
    12 months after patient enrollment
  12. description
    Palliative Care consult for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient who has died. We will evaluate comparisons of palliative care use between study arms.
    measure
    Palliative Care Consult (Chart Review)
    time Frame
    30 days prior to death
Full study description
brief Summary
This randomized pilot clinical trial studies health care coach support in reducing acute care use and cost in patients with cancer. Health care coach support may help cancer patients to make decisions about their care that matches what is important to them with symptom management.
detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To reduce acute care utilization by 2-5% for advanced cancer patients by training and deploying health care coaches who help patients and families discuss care goals, virtual modalities, engage in shared-decision-making, and participate in educational activities. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To improve patients' experience of their care. II. Improve patient understanding of advanced care planning. III. To improve the receipt of goal concordant care. IV. To reduce total healthcare costs. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM A: Patients receive usual care. ARM B: Patients undergo health care coach support with a baseline introduction (either telephonic or in-person) of the program followed by a visit (telephonic or in-person) with the health care coach after the first oncology appointment to discuss goals of care. The health care coach will contact patient based on patients' ongoing needs (weekly to monthly) and will conduct symptom assessments based on patients' treatment plans and symptoms. After completion of study, patients are followed up for 6 months.
Source references
references
  1. citation
    Patel MI, Kapphahn K, Dewland M, Aguilar V, Sanchez B, Sisay E, Murillo A, Smith K, Park DJ. Effect of a Community Health Worker Intervention on Acute Care Use, Advance Care Planning, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Adults With Advanced Stages of Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2022 Aug 1;8(8):1139-1148. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.1997.
    pmid
    35771552
    type
    DERIVED
  2. citation
    Patel MI, Aguilar V, Sanchez B, Sisay E, Park DJ. Health care coach support to assist with advance care planning and symptom management -A randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Dec;111:106617. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106617. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
    pmid
    34749008
    type
    DERIVED
Source notices and limitations
    Discovery and provenance
    1. release id
      ctgov-registry-1336d216cbd1bbff780dac70
      edge id
      nct-edge-2350e8a9b6c6a3313b29
      requested nct id
      NCT03154190
      primary nct id
      NCT03154190
      source kind
      ctgov_condition_query
      source record id
      Source null
      source file sha256
      69c40ed34b17434f684079ec5635264bc5ad292871a86b835704fc99fa9d8157
      payload sha256
      b463dc7aa0b71068932cc989fd545154e36919a53d043442b6ebb1b2194f3b7b
      payload
      clinical indication matching status
      condition_index_match_asserted_by_registry_not_reviewed
      end exclusive
      true
      id
      nct-edge-2350e8a9b6c6a3313b29
      link basis
      returned_by_explicit_condition_and_posted_results_filter_query
      nct id
      NCT03154190
      occurrences
      1. context exact
        NCT03154190
        end
        11
        exact text
        NCT03154190
        start
        0
      offset unit
      unicode_code_points
      query cond
      Small Intestine Cancer
      query disease state id
      ds-small-intestine-cancer
      source file
      /Users/arunverma/Documents/ChatGPT/Cancer Statistics Website/research-data/2026-09-10/clinicaltrials-condition/round-0000/raw/cond-small-intestine-cancer-000.json
      source file sha256
      69c40ed34b17434f684079ec5635264bc5ad292871a86b835704fc99fa9d8157
      source json pointer
      /studies/65/protocolSection/identificationModule/nctId
      source kind
      ctgov_condition_query
      source record id
      Source null
      source string basis
      parsed_JSON_string_unmodified
      source string sha256
      fea620c44bf8b03564b7e7e18be8e60074b3b326bde00b3ecc2319fcf2aafde1
    2. release id
      ctgov-registry-1336d216cbd1bbff780dac70
      edge id
      nct-edge-52e4b3ebf34780523f61
      requested nct id
      NCT03154190
      primary nct id
      NCT03154190
      source kind
      ctgov_condition_query
      source record id
      Source null
      source file sha256
      359ee71d54598877a70c4f96300e96532a9c096cf831e27a29687916b1e2237d
      payload sha256
      01a008c15869a4991962bad88093705d50ead35df7324e6aac181711035cb438
      payload
      clinical indication matching status
      condition_index_match_asserted_by_registry_not_reviewed
      end exclusive
      true
      id
      nct-edge-52e4b3ebf34780523f61
      link basis
      returned_by_explicit_condition_and_posted_results_filter_query
      nct id
      NCT03154190
      occurrences
      1. context exact
        NCT03154190
        end
        11
        exact text
        NCT03154190
        start
        0
      offset unit
      unicode_code_points
      query cond
      Ovarian Germ Cell Tumors
      query disease state id
      ds-ovarian-germ-cell-tumors
      source file
      /Users/arunverma/Documents/ChatGPT/Cancer Statistics Website/research-data/2026-09-10/clinicaltrials-condition/round-0000/raw/cond-ovarian-germ-cell-tumors-000.json
      source file sha256
      359ee71d54598877a70c4f96300e96532a9c096cf831e27a29687916b1e2237d
      source json pointer
      /studies/50/protocolSection/identificationModule/nctId
      source kind
      ctgov_condition_query
      source record id
      Source null
      source string basis
      parsed_JSON_string_unmodified
      source string sha256
      fea620c44bf8b03564b7e7e18be8e60074b3b326bde00b3ecc2319fcf2aafde1

    Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice