Skip to content
← Study library

NCT02631070 · CITED IN SOURCE DOCUMENTS

A Study of Luspatercept (ACE-536) to Treat Anemia Due to Very Low, Low, or Intermediate Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

An NCI or FDA source cites this study. A citation does not establish that it applies to an individual diagnosis.

Phase
PHASE3
Status at capture
COMPLETED
Registry last update
2021-12-17

The study will be conducted in compliance with the International Council on Harmonisation (ICH) of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use/Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and applicable regulatory requirements. This is a Phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to determine the efficacy and safety of luspatercept (ACE-536) versus placebo in participants with anemia due to the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) very low, low, or intermediate MDS with ring sideroblasts who require red blood cell (RBC) transfusions.

Open the original ClinicalTrials.gov record → · Download preserved record

What did the study report?

Outcomes, safety and baseline populations are separate source sections. Quality-of-life measures appear under their original outcome titles.

flow

Participant flow

→

baseline

Baseline characteristics

→

outcome · POSTED

Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 8 Weeks From Week 1 to Week 24

→

outcome · POSTED

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 12 Weeks From Week 1 to Week 24

→

outcome · POSTED

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 12 Weeks From Week 1 to Week 48

→

outcome · POSTED

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 8 Weeks From Week 1 Through Week 48

→

outcome · POSTED

Change From Baseline in RBC Units Transfused Over Fixed 16-Week Period

→

outcome · POSTED

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Modified Hematologic Erythroid Response (mHI-E) Over Any Consecutive 56-Day Period

→

outcome · POSTED

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Mean Hemoglobin (Hgb) Increase of at Least 1.0 g/dL Over Any Consecutive 56-Day Period in Absence of Red Blood Cells (RBC) Transfusions

→

outcome · POSTED

Duration of Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) - Week 1 Through Week 24

→

outcome · POSTED

Duration of Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) - Week 1 Through Week 48

→

outcome · POSTED

Mean Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Quality of Life Score

→

outcome · POSTED

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Hematologic Improvement in Neutrophil Response (HI-N) Over Any Consecutive 56-day Period

→

outcome · POSTED

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Hematologic Improvement in Platelet Response (HI-P) Over Any Consecutive 56-day Period

→

outcome · POSTED

Change From Baseline in Mean Serum Ferritin

→

outcome · POSTED

Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Dose of Iron Chelation Therapy (ICT)

→

outcome · POSTED

Time to Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) - Week 1 Through Week 24

→

outcome · POSTED

Time to Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) - Week 1 Through Week 48

→

outcome · POSTED

Percentage of Participants Who Progressed to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

→

outcome · POSTED

Time to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Progression

→

outcome · POSTED

Overall Survival

→

outcome · POSTED

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

→

outcome · POSTED

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Apparent Clearance (CL/F)

→

outcome · POSTED

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Apparent Volume of Distribution of the Central Compartment (V1/F)

→

outcome · POSTED

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Elimination Half-life (t1/2)

→

outcome · POSTED

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax)

→

outcome · POSTED

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Maximum Concentration for the First Dose (Cmax)

→

outcome · POSTED

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Maximum Concentration for the Starting Dose (Cmax) at Steady State

→

outcome · POSTED

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Maximum Concentration for the Area Under the Curve at Steady State for Starting Dose (AUC^ss)

→

outcome · POSTED

Participants With Pre-Existing and/or Treatment-Emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA)

→

adverse events

Adverse events

→

more info

Limitations, agreements, and source contact

→
Who could take part
eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subjects must satisfy the following criteria to be enrolled in the study: 1. Subject is ≥ 18 years of age the time of signing the informed consent form (ICF). 2. Documented diagnosis of MDS according to World Health Organization (WHO)/French American British (FAB) classification that meets IPSS R classification of very low, low, or intermediate risk disease, and: Ring sideroblast ≥ 15% of erythroid precursors in bone marrow or ≥ 5% (but \< 15%) if SF3B1 mutation is present. * \< 5% blasts in bone marrow * Peripheral blood white blood cell (WBC) count \< 13,000/µL 3. Requires red blood cell RBC transfusions 4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0, 1, or 2 5. Subjects who are refractory/intolerant/ineligible to prior erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESA) treatment, defined as: * Refractory to prior - erythropoietin stimulating agents treatment: documentation of non-response or response that is no longer maintained to prior ESA-containing regimen, either as single agent or combination (eg, with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF); ESA regimen must have been either recombinant human erythropoietin (rHu EPO) ≥ 40,000 IU/wk for at least 8 doses or equivalent OR darbepoetin alpha ≥ 500 μg Q3W for at least 4 doses or equivalent * Intolerant to prior ESA treatment: documentation of discontinuation of prior ESA-containing regimen, either as single agent or combination (eg, with G-CSF), at any time after introduction due to intolerance or an adverse event * ESA ineligible: low chance of response to ESA base on endogenous serum erythropoietin level \> 200 U/L for subjects not previously treated with ESAs Exclusion Criteria: The presence of any of the following will exclude a subject from enrollment: 1. Prior therapy with disease modifying agents for underlying MDS disease. 2. Previously treated with either luspatercept (ACE-536) or sotatercept (ACE-011) 3. MDS associated with del 5q cytogenetic abnormality 4. Secondary MDS, ie, MDS that is known to have arisen as the result of chemical injury or treatment with chemotherapy and/or radiation for other diseases. 5. Known clinically significant anemia due to iron, vitamin B12, or folate deficiencies, or autoimmune or hereditary hemolytic anemia, or gastrointestinal bleeding \- iron deficiency to be determined by serum ferritin less than or equal to 15 ug/L and additional testing if clinically indicated (eg, calculated transferrin saturation \[iron/total iron binding capacity less than or equal to 20%\] or bone marrow aspirate stain for iron). 6. Prior allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplant 7. Known history of diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) 8. Use of any of the following within 5 weeks prior to randomization: * anticancer cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agent or treatment * corticosteroid, except for subjects on a stable or decreasing dose for ≥ 1 week prior to randomization for medical conditions other than MDS * iron-chelating agents, except for subjects on a stable or decreasing dose for at least 8 weeks prior to randomization * other RBC hematopoietic growth factors (eg, Interleukin-3) * investigational drug or device, or approved therapy for investigational use. If the half-life of the previous investigational product is known, use within 5 times the half-life prior to randomization or within 5 weeks, whichever is longer is excluded. 9. Prior history of malignancies, other than MDS, unless the subject has been free of the disease (including completion of any active or adjuvant treatment for prior malignancy) for ≥ 5 years. However, subjects with the following history/concurrent conditions are allowed: * Basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin * Carcinoma in situ of the cervix * Carcinoma in situ of the breast * Incidental histologic finding of prostate cancer (T1a or T1b using the tumor, nodes, metastasis \[TNM\] clinical staging system) 10. Major surgery within 8 weeks prior to randomization. Subjects must have completely recovered from any previous surgery prior to randomization
healthy Volunteers
false
minimum Age
18 Years
sex
ALL
std Ages
  1. ADULT
  2. OLDER_ADULT
Treatment arms and interventions
arm Groups
  1. description
    Starting dose of 1.0 mg/kg subcutaneous injection every 3 weeks
    intervention Names
    1. Drug: Luspatercept
    label
    Experimental Arm - Luspatercept (ACE-536)
    type
    EXPERIMENTAL
  2. description
    Subcutaneous injection every 3 weeks
    intervention Names
    1. Other: Placebo
    label
    Control Arm: Placebo
    type
    PLACEBO_COMPARATOR
interventions
  1. arm Group Labels
    1. Experimental Arm - Luspatercept (ACE-536)
    name
    Luspatercept
    other Names
    1. ACE-536
    type
    DRUG
  2. arm Group Labels
    1. Control Arm: Placebo
    name
    Placebo
    type
    OTHER
Study design
allocation
RANDOMIZED
intervention Model
PARALLEL
masking Info
masking
QUADRUPLE
who Masked
  1. PARTICIPANT
  2. CARE_PROVIDER
  3. INVESTIGATOR
  4. OUTCOMES_ASSESSOR
primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Enrollment
count
229
type
ACTUAL
Registered outcome plans (not posted results)
primary Outcomes
  1. description
    RBC-TI response was defined as the absence of any Red Blood Cells (RBC) transfusion during any consecutive 56-day (8-week) period (ie, Days 1 to 56, Days 2 to 57, Days 3 to 58, etc.) during the first 24 weeks of study treatment. Participants had to have at least 56 days (≥ 8 weeks) of transfusion independence prior to (and including) the Week 24 cut-off date to qualify as a responder. Participants who failed to achieve RBC-TI at least 56 days prior to or on the cut-off date were counted as non-responders.
    measure
    Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 8 Weeks From Week 1 to Week 24
    time Frame
    From Week 1 through Week 24 of study treatment
secondary Outcomes
  1. description
    RBC-TI Response was defined as the absence of any Red Blood Cells (RBC) transfusion during any consecutive 84-day (12-week) period (ie, Days 1 to 84, Days 2 to 85, Days 3 to 86, etc.) during the first 24 weeks of treatment.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 12 Weeks From Week 1 to Week 24
    time Frame
    From Week 1 through Week 24 of study treatment
  2. description
    RBC-TI Response was defined as the absence of any Red Blood Cells (RBC) transfusion during any consecutive 84-day (12-week) period (ie, Days 1 to 84, Days 2 to 85, Days 3 to 86, etc.) during the first 48 weeks of treatment.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 12 Weeks From Week 1 to Week 48
    time Frame
    From Week 1 through Week 48 of study treatment
  3. description
    RBC-TI response was defined as the absence of any Red Blood Cells (RBC) transfusion during any consecutive 56-day (8-week) period (ie, Days 1 to 56, Days 2 to 57, Days 3 to 58, etc.) during Week 1 through Week 48. Participants had to have at least 56 days (≥ 8 weeks) of transfusion independence prior to (and including) the Week 48 cut-off date to qualify as a responder. Participants who failed to achieve RBC-TI at least 56 days prior to Week 48 were counted as non-responders.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 8 Weeks From Week 1 Through Week 48
    time Frame
    From Week 1 through Week 48 of study treatment
  4. description
    Mean change in total number of Red Blood Cells (RBC) units transfused over a fixed 16-week period (Week 9-24 or Week 33-48) from the total number of RBC units transfused in the 16 weeks immediately on or prior to first dose of study treatment.
    measure
    Change From Baseline in RBC Units Transfused Over Fixed 16-Week Period
    time Frame
    At Baseline (16 weeks prior to first dose of study treatment) and Weeks 9 to 24 or Weeks 33 to 48
  5. description
    A modified HI-E response was defined as the percentage of participants meeting the modified HI-E per the International Working Group (IWG) sustained over 56-day consecutive period during the Treatment period. For participants with a baseline RBC transfusion burden of ≥ 4 units/8 weeks, a mHI-E was defined as a reduction in RBC transfusion of at least 4 units/8 weeks; for participants with baseline RBC transfusion burden of \<4 units/8 weeks, mHI-E, was defined as a mean increase in hemoglobin of ≥ 1.5 g/dL for 8 weeks in the absence of RBC transfusions.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Modified Hematologic Erythroid Response (mHI-E) Over Any Consecutive 56-Day Period
    time Frame
    Week 1 through 24 or Week 1 Through Week 48
  6. description
    A mean hgb increase of ≥ 1.0 g/dL was analyzed as the percentage of participants with a hgb increase ≥ 1.0 g/dL compared with baseline (after applying the 14/3 day rule) that was sustained over any consecutive 56-day (8-week) period in the absence of RBC transfusions during the treatment period. (Week 1 through Week 24 and Week 1 through Week 48).
    measure
    Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Mean Hemoglobin (Hgb) Increase of at Least 1.0 g/dL Over Any Consecutive 56-Day Period in Absence of Red Blood Cells (RBC) Transfusions
    time Frame
    Week 1 though Week 24 and Week 1 through 48
  7. description
    Duration of RBC-TI was defined as the longest duration of response for participants who achieved RBC-TI of ≥ 8 weeks during the treatment period Week 1 through Week 24. Participants who maintained RBC-TI through the end of the treatment period were censored at the date of IP discontinuation or death, whichever occurred first. Median was estimated from unstratified Kaplan Meier method.
    measure
    Duration of Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) - Week 1 Through Week 24
    time Frame
    From start of study treatment to 16 weeks after last dose, up to approximately 93 weeks
  8. description
    Duration of RBC-TI was defined as the longest duration of response for participants who achieved RBC-TI of ≥ 8 weeks during the treatment period Week 1 through Week 48. Participants who maintained RBC-TI through the end of the treatment period were censored at the date of IP discontinuation or death, whichever occurred first. Median was estimated from unstratified Kaplan Meier method.
    measure
    Duration of Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) - Week 1 Through Week 48
    time Frame
    From start of study treatment to 16 weeks after last dose, up to approximately 93 weeks
  9. description
    The EORTC questionnaire is a validated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure applicable to participants with any cancer diagnosis. Version 3.0 of the questionnaire was used in the study. It is composed of 30 items that address 15 domains, including one global health status, functional domains, and symptom domains. Domain scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, where higher scores on the global quality of life score indicate better function. As such, a positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement in quality of life.
    measure
    Mean Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Quality of Life Score
    time Frame
    Baseline and Cycle 3, Day 1 (C3 D1), C5 D1, C7 D1, Week 25, every other cycle during extension phase (C1 D1, C3 D1, C5 D1, etc. up to C59 D1) and end of treatment. Each cycle is composed of 21 days.
  10. description
    Percentage of participants who achieved a hematologic improvement in neutrophil response (HI-N) per IWG criteria sustained over any consecutive 56-day (8-week) period, during the treatment period (Week 1 to Week 24 and Week 1 to Week 48) HI-N was defined as at least a 100% increase and an absolute increase \> 0.5 X 10\^9/L.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Hematologic Improvement in Neutrophil Response (HI-N) Over Any Consecutive 56-day Period
    time Frame
    Week 1 through Week 24 or Week 1 Through Week 48 of study treatment
  11. description
    Percentage of participants who achieved a hematologic improvement platelet response (HI-P) was defined as the percentage of participants meeting the HI-P criteria per the IWG sustained over any consecutive 56-day (8-week) period (Week 1 to Week 24 and Week 1 to Week 48) during the treatment period. HI - P reponse was defined as: * Absolute increase of ≥ 30 X 10\^9/L in platelets for participants starting with \> 20 X 10\^9/L platelets * Increase in platelets from \< 20 X 10\^9/L to \> 20 X 10\^9/L and by at least 100%
    measure
    Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Hematologic Improvement in Platelet Response (HI-P) Over Any Consecutive 56-day Period
    time Frame
    Week 1 through Week 24 or Week 1 Through Week 48 of study treatment
  12. description
    Mean change from baseline in mean serum ferritin was calculated as the difference of postbaseline mean serum ferritin (averaged over the specified timepoints) and baseline mean serum ferritin.
    measure
    Change From Baseline in Mean Serum Ferritin
    time Frame
    Baseline and Week 9 through Week 24 and Week 33 through Week 48
Full study description
brief Summary
The study will be conducted in compliance with the International Council on Harmonisation (ICH) of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use/Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and applicable regulatory requirements. This is a Phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to determine the efficacy and safety of luspatercept (ACE-536) versus placebo in participants with anemia due to the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) very low, low, or intermediate MDS with ring sideroblasts who require red blood cell (RBC) transfusions.
detailed Description
Anemia is considered to be one of the most prevalent cytopenias in patients who have myelodysplastic syndromes, an umbrella term used to describe disorders relating to the ineffective production of red blood cells, white blood cells, and/or platelets. Ranging in severity from mild (asymptomatic) to severe, anemia can result in patients requiring regular red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, which can lead to further complications from iron overload. The goal of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of luspatercept versus placebo in anemic patients who are categorized as International Prognostic Scoring System-Revised (IPSS-R) very low, low, or intermediate risk Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), have ring sideroblasts present, and require constant RBC transfusions. The design of the study will allow a period of initial randomization of patients into either the luspatercept or placebo arm, followed by a double-blind treatment period, and then an MDS disease assessment visit. For those patients that are determined to be experiencing clinical benefit as judged from the study Investigator by this disease assessment visit, they will be permitted to enter the double-blind Extension Phase of the study. Once patients are discontinued from study treatment, they will enter a post treatment follow-up period.
Source references
references
  1. citation
    Porter J. Beyond transfusion therapy: new therapies in thalassemia including drugs, alternate donor transplant, and gene therapy. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2018 Nov 30;2018(1):361-370. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2018.1.361.
    pmid
    30504333
    type
    BACKGROUND
  2. citation
    Piga A, Perrotta S, Gamberini MR, Voskaridou E, Melpignano A, Filosa A, Caruso V, Pietrangelo A, Longo F, Tartaglione I, Borgna-Pignatti C, Zhang X, Laadem A, Sherman ML, Attie KM. Luspatercept improves hemoglobin levels and blood transfusion requirements in a study of patients with beta-thalassemia. Blood. 2019 Mar 21;133(12):1279-1289. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-10-879247. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
    pmid
    30617198
    type
    BACKGROUND
  3. citation
    Fenaux P, Platzbecker U, Mufti GJ, Garcia-Manero G, Buckstein R, Santini V, Diez-Campelo M, Finelli C, Cazzola M, Ilhan O, Sekeres MA, Falantes JF, Arrizabalaga B, Salvi F, Giai V, Vyas P, Bowen D, Selleslag D, DeZern AE, Jurcic JG, Germing U, Gotze KS, Quesnel B, Beyne-Rauzy O, Cluzeau T, Voso MT, Mazure D, Vellenga E, Greenberg PL, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Zeidan AM, Ades L, Verma A, Savona MR, Laadem A, Benzohra A, Zhang J, Rampersad A, Dunshee DR, Linde PG, Sherman ML, Komrokji RS, List AF. Luspatercept in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jan 9;382(2):140-151. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908892.
    pmid
    31914241
    type
    RESULT
  4. citation
    Komrokji RS. Luspatercept in Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Who and When? Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2020 Apr;34(2):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2019.10.004. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
    pmid
    32089218
    type
    RESULT
  5. citation
    Fenaux P, Kiladjian JJ, Platzbecker U. Luspatercept for the treatment of anemia in myelodysplastic syndromes and primary myelofibrosis. Blood. 2019 Feb 21;133(8):790-794. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-11-876888. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
    pmid
    30602619
    type
    RESULT
  6. citation
    Germing U, Fenaux P, Platzbecker U, Buckstein R, Santini V, Diez-Campelo M, Yucel A, Tang D, Fabre S, Zhang G, Zoffoli R, Ha X, Miteva D, Hughes C, Komrokji RS, Zeidan AM, Garcia-Manero G. Improved benefit of continuing luspatercept therapy: sub-analysis of patients with lower-risk MDS in the MEDALIST study. Ann Hematol. 2023 Feb;102(2):311-321. doi: 10.1007/s00277-022-05071-8. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
    pmid
    36635381
    type
    DERIVED
Source notices and limitations
    Discovery and provenance
    1. release id
      ctgov-registry-7ad944f6deaf1f5cd6122126
      edge id
      nct-edge-c35d07784d043fe1bbdb
      requested nct id
      NCT02631070
      primary nct id
      NCT02631070
      source kind
      fda_spl_label
      source url
      https://api.fda.gov/drug/label.json?search=%28indications_and_usage%3Acancer+OR+indications_and_usage%3Acarcinoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Acarcinomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Alymphoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Alymphomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aleukemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aleukaemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Asarcoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Asarcomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amelanoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyeloma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumor+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumors+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumour+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumours+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneoplasm+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneoplasms+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amalignant+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amalignancy+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyelodysplastic+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyelofibrosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amastocytosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aglioma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aglioblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneuroblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aretinoblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Apheochromocytoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aparaganglioma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyeloproliferative+OR+indications_and_usage%3Awaldenstrom+OR+indications_and_usage%3Apolycythemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Athrombocythemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Adesmoid+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneurofibromatosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Ahistiocytosis%29+AND+%28openfda.application_number%3ANDA%2A+OR+openfda.application_number%3ABLA%2A%29&limit=100&skip=400&sort=id%3Aasc
      source record id
      769ec39a-61bd-4726-b14a-9594897baa67
      source file sha256
      a4bef6778baed183e5bcf581938b0b23d3576dfd9eb6150f2904934a750c5fef
      payload sha256
      e23930fede802f2d08b9ef8179adb18a8c8a4ee13e3bbf5443e2b8d01372a849
      payload
      application numbers
      1. BLA761136
      clinical indication matching status
      not_inferred
      end exclusive
      true
      id
      nct-edge-c35d07784d043fe1bbdb
      link basis
      explicit_NCT_identifier_in_acquired_source
      nct id
      NCT02631070
      occurrences
      1. context exact
        Ring Sideroblasts and Thrombocytosis Associated Anemia in ESA-refractory or -intolerant Patients The efficacy of REBLOZYL was evaluated in the MEDALIST trial (NCT02631070), a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with IPSS-R very low, low, or intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromes who
        end
        9488
        exact text
        NCT02631070
        start
        9477
      offset unit
      unicode_code_points
      source file
      /tmp/cancer-full-research/indications/raw/labels-00400.json
      source file sha256
      a4bef6778baed183e5bcf581938b0b23d3576dfd9eb6150f2904934a750c5fef
      source json pointer
      /results/61/clinical_studies/0
      source kind
      fda_spl_label
      source record id
      769ec39a-61bd-4726-b14a-9594897baa67
      source string basis
      parsed_JSON_string_unmodified
      source string sha256
      3aab92eb527e18a0977f71c0e4f6c0ea8beca436866e06ef72f589cc8ed70705
      source url
      https://api.fda.gov/drug/label.json?search=%28indications_and_usage%3Acancer+OR+indications_and_usage%3Acarcinoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Acarcinomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Alymphoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Alymphomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aleukemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aleukaemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Asarcoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Asarcomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amelanoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyeloma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumor+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumors+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumour+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumours+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneoplasm+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneoplasms+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amalignant+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amalignancy+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyelodysplastic+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyelofibrosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amastocytosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aglioma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aglioblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneuroblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aretinoblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Apheochromocytoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aparaganglioma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyeloproliferative+OR+indications_and_usage%3Awaldenstrom+OR+indications_and_usage%3Apolycythemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Athrombocythemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Adesmoid+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneurofibromatosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Ahistiocytosis%29+AND+%28openfda.application_number%3ANDA%2A+OR+openfda.application_number%3ABLA%2A%29&limit=100&skip=400&sort=id%3Aasc
      spl effective time
      20260227
      spl set id
      82f4d266-3f52-41eb-86ba-0abf3cf468e8

    Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice