European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC ) QLQ-C30 - Summary Statistics by Treatment Group
Panobinostat or Placebo With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma · Source last updated 2020-03-17
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
Measure
LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
Unit
score on a scale
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
12, 24 and 48 weeks
What was measured
The EORTC QLQ-C30 measures functional dimensions (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social), three multi-item symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), six single-item symptom scales (dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact) and a global health status/QoL scale. Disease Symptom is the sum of 30 questions, total score ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 100 (worst possible outcome)", All subscales of EORTC QLQ-C30 have the same score range of 0 -100. For global health status and other functional scales,an increase from baseline indicates improvement of QoL. Whereas for symptoms scales, fatigue, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation and diarrhea, decrease in scores from baseline indicate improvement in symptoms.
Analysis population: Full Analysis Set
Groups in this outcome
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
Panobinostat was given 20 mg hard gelatin capsules . Bortezomib was given at 1.3 mg/m2 as a 3 to 5 second bolus intravenous (IV)injection. Dexamethasone was given as an oral dose of 20 mg/day.
Placebo + Bortezomib
Placebo was given as a hard gelatin capsule in the image of Panobinostat . Bortezomib was given at 1.3 mg/m2 as a 3 to 5 second bolus intravenous (IV) injection. Dexamethasone was given as an oral dose of 20 mg/day.
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
387
Placebo + Bortezomib
381
Reported measurements
Global health wk 12 change baseline (n=216,239)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
-9.853
Not reported
-12.50
-7.20
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
-4.044
Not reported
-6.60
-1.49
Not reported
Global health wk 24 change baseline (n=150,176)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
-7.867
Not reported
-10.7
-5.08
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
-1.518
Not reported
-4.11
-1.075
Not reported
Global health wk 48 change baseline (n=38,26)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
-2.986
Not reported
-7.21
1.237
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
4.345
Not reported
-0.416
9.106
Not reported
Physical functioning wk 12 chge (n=217,242)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
-9.67
Not reported
-12.00
-7.38
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
-5.393
Not reported
-76.3
-3.16
Not reported
Physical functioning wk 24 chge (n=151,177)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
-9.516
Not reported
-12.20
-7.38
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
-6.456
Not reported
-8.98
-3.93
Not reported
Physical functioning wk 48 chge (n=38,26)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
-2.88
Not reported
-6.41
0.651
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
2.037
Not reported
-2.07
6.147
Not reported
Role functioning wk 12 chge (n=215,237)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
-11.159
Not reported
-14.6
-7.74
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
-6.762
Not reported
-10.1
-3.45
Not reported
Role functioning wk 24 chge (n=150,176)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
-11.875
Not reported
-15.7
-8.01
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
-11.263
Not reported
-14.9
-7.61
Not reported
Role functioning wk 48 chge (n=38,26)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
-5.927
Not reported
-11.4
-0.424
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
-0.401
Not reported
-6.73
5.924
Not reported
Cognitive functioning wk 12 chge (n=216,240)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
-4.464
Not reported
-6.89
-2.04
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
-1.023
Not reported
-3.36
1.318
Not reported
Cognitive functioning wk 24 chge (n=149,176)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
-6.053
Not reported
-8.87
-3.24
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
-3.542
Not reported
-6.22
-0.865
Not reported
Cognitive functioning wk 48 chge (n=38,26)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
-5.568
Not reported
-9.79
-1.34
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
-4.042
Not reported
-8.99
0.902
Not reported
Social functioning wk 12 chge (n=216,240)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
-8.502
Not reported
-11.6
-5.44
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
-3.991
Not reported
-6.97
1.02
Not reported
Social functioning wk 24 chge (n=148,171)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
-8.925
Not reported
-12.4
-5.42
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
-6.338
Not reported
-9.66
-3.02
Not reported
Social functioning wk 48 chge (n=37,26)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
-6.104
Not reported
-11.0
-1.22
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
4.617
Not reported
-0.930
10.16
Not reported
Fatigue wk 12 chge (n=217,241)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
15.122
Not reported
12.27
17.98
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
7.939
Not reported
5.174
10.70
Not reported
Fatigue wk 24 chge (n=151,176)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
12.677
Not reported
9.419
15.94
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
9.203
Not reported
6.136
12.27
Not reported
Fatigue wk 48 chge(n=38,26)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
4.646
Not reported
0.086
9.206
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
-2.625
Not reported
-7.88
2.628
Not reported
Dyspnea wk 12 chge (n=217,240)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
13.964
Not reported
10.60
17.33
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
6.266
Not reported
3.012
9.521
Not reported
Dyspnea wk 24 chge (n=151,177)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
7.939
Not reported
4.639
11.24
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
5.308
Not reported
2.221
8.394
Not reported
Dyspnea wk 48 chge (n=38,26)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
4.118
Not reported
-1.58
9.813
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
2.82
Not reported
-3.88
9.523
Not reported
Insomnia wk 12 chge (n=216,239)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
6.283
Not reported
2.851
9.715
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
7.625
Not reported
4.331
10.92
Not reported
Insomnia wk 24 chge (n=149,176)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
10.023
Not reported
6.038
14.01
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
6.104
Not reported
2.381
9.827
Not reported
Insomnia wk 48 chge (n=38,26)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
-2.464
Not reported
-8.74
3.811
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
-3.442
Not reported
-10.9
4.017
Not reported
Appetite loss wk 12 chge (n=217,239)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
15.167
Not reported
11.60
18.74
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
5.383
Not reported
1.925
8.841
Not reported
Appetite loss wk 24 chge (n=151,176)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
16.574
Not reported
12.39
20.76
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
5.861
Not reported
1.918
9.804
Not reported
Appetite loss wk 48 chge (n=38,26)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
3.999
Not reported
-2.08
10.07
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
-2.963
Not reported
-9.99
4.061
Not reported
Constipation wk 12 chge (n=215,240)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
4.135
Not reported
0.667
7.603
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
6.42
Not reported
3.104
9.735
Not reported
Constipation wk 24 chge (n=151,177)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
-0.153
Not reported
-3.64
3.337
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
0.524
Not reported
-2.73
5.782
Not reported
Constipation wk 48 chge (n=38,25)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
-0.358
Not reported
-5.57
4.851
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
-0.946
Not reported
-7.26
5.373
Not reported
Diarrhea wk 12 chge (n=217,241)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
18.888
Not reported
15.04
22.74
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
10.206
Not reported
6.452
13.96
Not reported
Diarrhea wk 24 chge (n=150,177)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
23.163
Not reported
18.46
27.87
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
16.406
Not reported
11.98
20.83
Not reported
Diarrhea wk 48 chge (n=38,26)
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
20.48
Not reported
14.02
26.94
Not reported
Placebo + Bortezomib
10.996
Not reported
3.422
18.57
Not reported
Complete source fields
classes
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
-12.50
upper Limit
-7.20
value
-9.853
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
-6.60
upper Limit
-1.49
value
-4.044
title
Global health wk 12 change baseline (n=216,239)
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
-10.7
upper Limit
-5.08
value
-7.867
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
-4.11
upper Limit
-1.075
value
-1.518
title
Global health wk 24 change baseline (n=150,176)
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
-7.21
upper Limit
1.237
value
-2.986
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
-0.416
upper Limit
9.106
value
4.345
title
Global health wk 48 change baseline (n=38,26)
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
-12.00
upper Limit
-7.38
value
-9.67
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
-76.3
upper Limit
-3.16
value
-5.393
title
Physical functioning wk 12 chge (n=217,242)
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
-12.20
upper Limit
-7.38
value
-9.516
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
-8.98
upper Limit
-3.93
value
-6.456
title
Physical functioning wk 24 chge (n=151,177)
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
-6.41
upper Limit
0.651
value
-2.88
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
-2.07
upper Limit
6.147
value
2.037
title
Physical functioning wk 48 chge (n=38,26)
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
-14.6
upper Limit
-7.74
value
-11.159
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
-10.1
upper Limit
-3.45
value
-6.762
title
Role functioning wk 12 chge (n=215,237)
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
-15.7
upper Limit
-8.01
value
-11.875
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
-14.9
upper Limit
-7.61
value
-11.263
title
Role functioning wk 24 chge (n=150,176)
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
-11.4
upper Limit
-0.424
value
-5.927
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
-6.73
upper Limit
5.924
value
-0.401
title
Role functioning wk 48 chge (n=38,26)
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
-6.89
upper Limit
-2.04
value
-4.464
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
-3.36
upper Limit
1.318
value
-1.023
title
Cognitive functioning wk 12 chge (n=216,240)
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
-8.87
upper Limit
-3.24
value
-6.053
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
-6.22
upper Limit
-0.865
value
-3.542
title
Cognitive functioning wk 24 chge (n=149,176)
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
-9.79
upper Limit
-1.34
value
-5.568
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
-8.99
upper Limit
0.902
value
-4.042
title
Cognitive functioning wk 48 chge (n=38,26)
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
387
group Id
OG001
value
381
units
Participants
description
The EORTC QLQ-C30 measures functional dimensions (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social), three multi-item symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), six single-item symptom scales (dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact) and a global health status/QoL scale. Disease Symptom is the sum of 30 questions, total score ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 100 (worst possible outcome)", All subscales of EORTC QLQ-C30 have the same score range of 0 -100. For global health status and other functional scales,an increase from baseline indicates improvement of QoL. Whereas for symptoms scales, fatigue, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation and diarrhea, decrease in scores from baseline indicate improvement in symptoms.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
description
Panobinostat was given 20 mg hard gelatin capsules . Bortezomib was given at 1.3 mg/m2 as a 3 to 5 second bolus intravenous (IV)injection. Dexamethasone was given as an oral dose of 20 mg/day.
id
OG000
title
Panobinostat + Bortezomib
description
Placebo was given as a hard gelatin capsule in the image of Panobinostat . Bortezomib was given at 1.3 mg/m2 as a 3 to 5 second bolus intravenous (IV) injection. Dexamethasone was given as an oral dose of 20 mg/day.
id
OG001
title
Placebo + Bortezomib
param Type
LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
population Description
Full Analysis Set
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
12, 24 and 48 weeks
title
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC ) QLQ-C30 - Summary Statistics by Treatment Group