HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING
Molecular Features of Ewing Sarcoma
Source: Childhood Cancer Genomics (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 30, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.
Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary. Independent clinical review is pending.
Context: Sarcomas / Ewing Sarcoma
The World Health Organization identifies the presence of a gene fusion involving EWSR1 or FUS and a gene in the ETS family as a defining element of Ewing sarcoma.[26] The EWSR1 gene located on chromosome 22 band q12 is a member of the FET family (FUS, EWSR1, TAF15) of RNA-binding proteins.[27] Characteristically, the amino terminus of the EWSR1 gene is juxtaposed with the carboxy terminus of a gene from the ETS family of DNA-binding transcription factors (see Table 6). The FLI1 gene located on chromosome 11 band q24 is a member of the ETS family and is the ETS family fusion partner for EWSR1 in 85% to 90% of pediatric cases of Ewing sarcoma.[28-30] Other ETS family members that may combine with the EWSR1 gene are ERG, ETV1, ETV4, and FEV.[31] Rarely, FUS, another FET family member, can substitute for EWSR1.[32] Finally, there are a few rare cases in which EWSR1 has translocated with partners that are not members of the ETS family of oncogenes. These tumors are thought to be distinct from Ewing sarcoma and are discussed separately. For more information, see the Undifferentiated Small Round Cell (Ewing-Like) Sarcomas section.
The EWSR1::FLI1 translocation associated with Ewing sarcoma can occur at several potential breakpoints in each of the genes that join to form the novel segment of DNA. Once thought to be significant,[33] two large series have shown that the EWSR1::FLI1 translocation breakpoint site is not an adverse prognostic factor.[34,35]
Besides the consistent aberrations involving the EWSR1 gene, secondary numerical and structural chromosomal aberrations are observed in most cases of Ewing sarcoma. Chromosome gains are more common than chromosome losses, and structural chromosome imbalances are also observed.[36] Two of the more common chromosome aberrations are those involving chromosome 8 or chromosomes 1 and 16.[36]
Gain of whole chromosome 8 (trisomy 8). Trisomy 8 is the most frequent chromosomal alteration in Ewing sarcoma, occurring in nearly 50% of tumors.[28,29] Gain of chromosome 8 does not appear to have prognostic significance.[28,37]
Gain of chromosome 1q and loss of chromosome 16q. These occur in approximately 20% of patients and often occur together. Gain of chromosome 1q and/or deletion of chromosome 16q has been associated with inferior prognosis for patients with Ewing sarcoma in several cohorts.[28,38,39] These two chromosomal alterations commonly occur together across a range of cancer types, including Ewing sarcoma.[40] Their co-occurrence is likely a result of their derivation from an unbalanced t(1;16) translocation resulting in gain of chromosome 1q together with loss of chromosomal material from 16q.[37,41]
The genomic landscape of Ewing sarcoma is characterized by a relatively silent genome, with a paucity of variants in pathways that might be amenable to treatment with novel targeted therapies.[28-30] Recurring genomic alterations are described below. For some of these genomic alterations, claims of prognostic significance have been made. However, these claims need to be viewed cautiously because of the relatively small size of most studies, the low frequency of many of the genomic alterations, the variable use of tumor tissue from diagnosis versus relapse specimens, and the need to consider clinical prognostic factors such as tumor size and the presence of metastatic disease.
STAG2 variants. Variants in STAG2, a member of the cohesin complex, occur in about 15% to 20% of the cases.[28-30] These variants lead to loss of STAG2 expression and function in tumor cells.[30] Loss of STAG2 expression (detected by immunohistochemistry [IHC]) has been observed in tumors in which a STAG2 variant cannot be detected. In one report, loss of STAG2 expression by IHC was associated with inferior prognosis.[42]
CDKN2A deletions.CDKN2A deletions have been noted in 12% to 22% of cases.[28-30]
TP53 variants.TP53 variants were identified in about 6% to 7% of Ewing sarcoma cases reported by pediatric research teams.[28-30] Higher rates of TP53 variants (up to 19%) have been described in cohorts from single institutions that contain higher proportions of adult patients.[43,44] The coexistence of STAG2 and TP53 variants has been associated with a poor clinical outcome in one retrospective report.
ERF alterations. Genomic alterations in ERF leading to loss of function (frameshift, missense, and deep deletion) were reported in 7% of Ewing sarcoma tumors.[43] A second report observed ERF alterations at a rate of 3% in another Ewing sarcoma cohort.[29]
Other genes with recurring genomic alterations in Ewing sarcoma. Recurring genomic alterations present in fewer than 5% of Ewing sarcoma patients were reported: EZH2,[28,44] BCOR,[28] SMARCA4,[44] CREBBP,[44] TERT, and FGFR1.[43]
Ewing sarcoma translocations can all be found with standard cytogenetic analysis. A fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) rapid analysis looking for a break apart of the EWSR1 gene is now frequently done to confirm the diagnosis of Ewing sarcoma molecularly.[45] This test result must be considered with caution, however. Ewing sarcomas that harbor FUS translocations will have negative tests because the EWSR1 gene is not translocated in those cases. In addition, other small round tumors also contain translocations of different ETS family members with EWSR1, such as desmoplastic small round cell tumor, clear cell sarcoma, extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma, and myxoid liposarcoma, all of which may be positive with a EWSR1 FISH break-apart probe. A detailed analysis of 85 patients with small round blue cell tumors that were negative for EWSR1 rearrangement by FISH (with an EWSR1 break-apart probe) identified eight patients with FUS rearrangements.[46] Four patients who had EWSR1::ERG fusions were not detected by FISH with an EWSR1 break-apart probe. The authors do not recommend relying solely on EWSR1 break-apart probes for analyzing small round blue cell tumors with strong immunohistochemical positivity for CD99. Next-generation sequencing assays, including dedicated fusion panels, are now commonly used in the evaluation of these tumors.
| FET Family Partner | Fusion With ETS-Like Oncogene Partner | Translocation | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| aThese partners are not members of the ETS family of oncogenes; therefore, these tumors are not classified as Ewing sarcoma. | |||
| EWSR1 | EWSR1::FLI1 | t(11;22)(q24;q12) | Most common; approximately 85% to 90% of cases |
| EWSR1::ERG | t(21;22)(q22;q12) | Second most common; approximately 10% of cases | |
| EWSR1::ETV1 | t(7;22)(p22;q12) | Rare | |
| EWSR1::ETV4 | t(17;22)(q12;q12) | Rare | |
| EWSR1::FEV | t(2;22)(q35;q12) | Rare | |
| EWSR1::NFATC2a | t(20;22)(q13;q12) | Rare | |
| EWSR1::POU5F1a | t(6;22)(p21;q12) | ||
| EWSR1::SMARCA5a | t(4;22)(q31;q12) | Rare | |
| EWSR1::PATZ1a | t(6;22)(p21;q12) | ||
| EWSR1::SP3a | t(2;22)(q31;q12) | Rare | |
| FUS | FUS::ERG | t(16;21)(p11;q22) | Rare |
| FUS::FEV | t(2;16)(q35;p11) | Rare | |
For information about the treatment of Ewing sarcoma, see Ewing Sarcoma and Undifferentiated Small Round Cell Sarcomas of Bone and Soft Tissue Treatment.
Source links and citations
Publication references
Read the original reference and check its publication notices.
- PubMed 10078922 · Original source
- PubMed 10451705 · Original source
- PubMed 12087464 · Original source
- PubMed 18064647 · Original source
- PubMed 20308669 · Original source
- PubMed 20308673 · Original source
- PubMed 21822310 · Original source
- PubMed 21872822 · Original source
- PubMed 25010205 · Original source
- PubMed 25186949 · Original source
- PubMed 25223734 · Original source
- PubMed 25494299 · Original source
- PubMed 26690869 · Original source
- PubMed 3163262 · Original source
- PubMed 35952322 · Original source
- PubMed 36221002 · Original source
- PubMed 37888109 · Original source
- PubMed 8946192 · Original source
- PubMed 9552022 · Original source
- PubMed 9714002 · Original source
Preserved source evidence · Independent clinical review pending · Not medical advice
Triangle