Skip to content
← Childhood Cancer Genomics (PDQ®)

HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING

Cytogenetic/molecular features of AML

Source: Childhood Cancer Genomics (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.

Source updated: April 30, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.

Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary. Independent clinical review is pending.

Context: Leukemias / Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Genetic analysis of leukemia blast cells (using both conventional cytogenetic methods and molecular methods) is performed on children with AML because both chromosomal and molecular abnormalities are important diagnostic and prognostic markers.[209-213] Clonal chromosomal abnormalities are identified in the blasts of about 75% of children with AML and are useful in defining subtypes with both prognostic and therapeutic significance. Detection of molecular abnormalities can also aid in risk stratification and treatment allocation. For example, variants of NPM and CEBPA are associated with favorable outcomes, while certain variants of FLT3 portend a high risk of relapse. Identifying the latter variants may allow for targeted therapy.[214-217]

Source links and citations

Comprehensive molecular profiling of pediatric and adult AML has shown that AML is a disease demonstrating both commonalities and differences across the age spectrum.[218,219]

Source links and citations

Pediatric AML, in contrast to AML in adults, is typically a disease of recurring chromosomal alterations. For a list of common gene fusions and other recurring genomic alterations, see Table 3.[2,213,218] Within the pediatric age range, certain gene fusions occur primarily in children younger than 5 years (e.g., NUP98, KMT2A, and CBFA2T3::GLIS2 gene fusions), while others occur primarily in children aged 5 years and older (e.g., RUNX1::RUNX1T1, CBFB::MYH11, and PML::RARA gene fusions).

Source links and citations

In general, pediatric patients with AML have low rates of variants. Most cases show less than one somatic change in protein-coding regions per megabase.[219] This variant rate is somewhat lower than that observed in adult AML and is much lower than the variant rate for cancers that respond to checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., melanoma).[219]

Source links and citations

The pattern of gene variants differs between pediatric and adult AML cases. For example, IDH1, IDH2, TP53, RUNX1, and DNMT3A variants are more common in adult AML than in pediatric AML, while NRAS and WT1 variants are significantly more common in pediatric AML.[218-220]

Source links and citations

The genomic landscape of pediatric AML cases can change from diagnosis to relapse, with variants detectable at diagnosis dropping out at relapse and, conversely, with new variants appearing at relapse. In a study of 20 cases for which sequencing data were available at diagnosis and relapse, a key finding was that the variant allele frequency at diagnosis strongly correlated with persistence of variants at relapse.[221] Approximately 90% of the diagnostic variants with variant allele frequency greater than 0.4 persisted to relapse, compared with only 28% with variant allele frequency less than 0.2 (P < .001). This observation is consistent with previous results showing that presence of a variant in the FLT3 gene resulting from internal tandem duplications (ITD) predicted for poor prognosis only when there was a high FLT3 ITD allelic ratio.

Source links and citations

The 5th edition (2022) of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Hematolymphoid Tumors, as well as the Inaugural WHO Classification of Pediatric Tumors, emphasize a multilayered approach to AML classification. These classifications consider multiple clinico-pathological parameters and seek a genetic basis for disease classification wherever possible.[222,223] These karyotypic abnormalities and other genomic alterations are used to define specific pediatric AML entities and are outlined in Table 3.[222,223]

Source links and citations

In addition to the cytogenetic/molecular abnormalities that aid AML diagnosis, as defined by the WHO, there are additional entities that, while not disease-defining, have prognostic significance in pediatric AML. All prognostic abnormalities, both those defined by the WHO and these additional abnormalities, have been clustered according to favorable or unfavorable prognosis, as defined by contemporary Children's Oncology Group (COG) clinical trials. These entities are summarized below. After these entities are described, information about additional cytogenetic/molecular and phenotypic features associated with pediatric AML will be described. However, these additional features may not, at present, be used to aid in risk stratification and treatment.

While the t(15;17) fusion that results in the PML::RARA gene product is defined as a pediatric AML risk-defining lesion, given its association with acute promyelocytic leukemia, it is discussed in Childhood Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia.

Table 3. Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) With Recurrent Gene Alterations Included in the WHO Classification of Pediatric Tumorsa
Diagnostic CategoryApproximate Prevalence in Pediatric AML
aAdapted from Pfister et al.[222]
bCryptic chromosomal translocation.
AML with t(8;21)(q22;q22); RUNX1::RUNX1T113%–14%
AML with inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22); CBFB::MYH114%–9%
APL with t(15;17)(q24.1;q21.2); PML::RARA6%–11%
AML with KMT2A rearrangement25%
AML with t(6;9)(p23;q34.1); DEK::NUP2141.7%
AML with inv(3)(q21q26)/t(3;3)(q21;q26); GATA2, RPN1::MECOM<1%
AML with ETV6 fusion0.8%
AML with t(8;16)(p11.2;p13.3); KAT6A::CREBBP0.5%
AML with t(1;22)(p13.3;q13.1); RBM15::MRTFA (MKL1)0.8%
AML with CBFA2T3::GLIS2 (inv(16)(p13q24))b3%
AML with NUP98 fusionb10%
AML with t(16;21)(p11;q22); FUS::ERG0.3%–0.5%
AML with NPM1 variant8%
AML with variants in the bZIP domain of CEBPA5%
Source links and citations

Specific recurring cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities are briefly described below. The abnormalities are listed by those in clinical use that identify patients with favorable or unfavorable prognosis, followed by other abnormalities. The nomenclature of the 5th edition of the WHO classification is incorporated for disease entities where relevant.

Publication references

Read the original reference and check its publication notices.

Preserved source evidence · Independent clinical review pending · Not medical advice