HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING
Cytogenetic/molecular features of AML
Source: Childhood Cancer Genomics (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 30, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.
Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary. Independent clinical review is pending.
Context: Leukemias / Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Genetic analysis of leukemia blast cells (using both conventional cytogenetic methods and molecular methods) is performed on children with AML because both chromosomal and molecular abnormalities are important diagnostic and prognostic markers.[209-213] Clonal chromosomal abnormalities are identified in the blasts of about 75% of children with AML and are useful in defining subtypes with both prognostic and therapeutic significance. Detection of molecular abnormalities can also aid in risk stratification and treatment allocation. For example, variants of NPM and CEBPA are associated with favorable outcomes, while certain variants of FLT3 portend a high risk of relapse. Identifying the latter variants may allow for targeted therapy.[214-217]
Comprehensive molecular profiling of pediatric and adult AML has shown that AML is a disease demonstrating both commonalities and differences across the age spectrum.[218,219]
Pediatric AML, in contrast to AML in adults, is typically a disease of recurring chromosomal alterations. For a list of common gene fusions and other recurring genomic alterations, see Table 3.[2,213,218] Within the pediatric age range, certain gene fusions occur primarily in children younger than 5 years (e.g., NUP98, KMT2A, and CBFA2T3::GLIS2 gene fusions), while others occur primarily in children aged 5 years and older (e.g., RUNX1::RUNX1T1, CBFB::MYH11, and PML::RARA gene fusions).
In general, pediatric patients with AML have low rates of variants. Most cases show less than one somatic change in protein-coding regions per megabase.[219] This variant rate is somewhat lower than that observed in adult AML and is much lower than the variant rate for cancers that respond to checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., melanoma).[219]
The pattern of gene variants differs between pediatric and adult AML cases. For example, IDH1, IDH2, TP53, RUNX1, and DNMT3A variants are more common in adult AML than in pediatric AML, while NRAS and WT1 variants are significantly more common in pediatric AML.[218-220]
The genomic landscape of pediatric AML cases can change from diagnosis to relapse, with variants detectable at diagnosis dropping out at relapse and, conversely, with new variants appearing at relapse. In a study of 20 cases for which sequencing data were available at diagnosis and relapse, a key finding was that the variant allele frequency at diagnosis strongly correlated with persistence of variants at relapse.[221] Approximately 90% of the diagnostic variants with variant allele frequency greater than 0.4 persisted to relapse, compared with only 28% with variant allele frequency less than 0.2 (P < .001). This observation is consistent with previous results showing that presence of a variant in the FLT3 gene resulting from internal tandem duplications (ITD) predicted for poor prognosis only when there was a high FLT3 ITD allelic ratio.
Source links and citations
The 5th edition (2022) of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Hematolymphoid Tumors, as well as the Inaugural WHO Classification of Pediatric Tumors, emphasize a multilayered approach to AML classification. These classifications consider multiple clinico-pathological parameters and seek a genetic basis for disease classification wherever possible.[222,223] These karyotypic abnormalities and other genomic alterations are used to define specific pediatric AML entities and are outlined in Table 3.[222,223]
In addition to the cytogenetic/molecular abnormalities that aid AML diagnosis, as defined by the WHO, there are additional entities that, while not disease-defining, have prognostic significance in pediatric AML. All prognostic abnormalities, both those defined by the WHO and these additional abnormalities, have been clustered according to favorable or unfavorable prognosis, as defined by contemporary Children's Oncology Group (COG) clinical trials. These entities are summarized below. After these entities are described, information about additional cytogenetic/molecular and phenotypic features associated with pediatric AML will be described. However, these additional features may not, at present, be used to aid in risk stratification and treatment.
While the t(15;17) fusion that results in the PML::RARA gene product is defined as a pediatric AML risk-defining lesion, given its association with acute promyelocytic leukemia, it is discussed in Childhood Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia.
| Diagnostic Category | Approximate Prevalence in Pediatric AML |
|---|---|
| aAdapted from Pfister et al.[222] | |
| bCryptic chromosomal translocation. | |
| AML with t(8;21)(q22;q22); RUNX1::RUNX1T1 | 13%–14% |
| AML with inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22); CBFB::MYH11 | 4%–9% |
| APL with t(15;17)(q24.1;q21.2); PML::RARA | 6%–11% |
| AML with KMT2A rearrangement | 25% |
| AML with t(6;9)(p23;q34.1); DEK::NUP214 | 1.7% |
| AML with inv(3)(q21q26)/t(3;3)(q21;q26); GATA2, RPN1::MECOM | <1% |
| AML with ETV6 fusion | 0.8% |
| AML with t(8;16)(p11.2;p13.3); KAT6A::CREBBP | 0.5% |
| AML with t(1;22)(p13.3;q13.1); RBM15::MRTFA (MKL1) | 0.8% |
| AML with CBFA2T3::GLIS2 (inv(16)(p13q24))b | 3% |
| AML with NUP98 fusionb | 10% |
| AML with t(16;21)(p11;q22); FUS::ERG | 0.3%–0.5% |
| AML with NPM1 variant | 8% |
| AML with variants in the bZIP domain of CEBPA | 5% |
Source links and citations
Specific recurring cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities are briefly described below. The abnormalities are listed by those in clinical use that identify patients with favorable or unfavorable prognosis, followed by other abnormalities. The nomenclature of the 5th edition of the WHO classification is incorporated for disease entities where relevant.
Publication references
Read the original reference and check its publication notices.
- PubMed 16912228 · Original source
- PubMed 17440048 · Original source
- PubMed 22879540 · Original source
- PubMed 25435113 · Original source
- PubMed 26941285 · Original source
- PubMed 29227476 · Original source
- PubMed 34921008 · Original source
- PubMed 35732831 · Original source
- PubMed 37019972 · Original source
- PubMed 37267439 · Original source
- PubMed 9746770 · Original source
Preserved source evidence · Independent clinical review pending · Not medical advice
Triangle