Skip to content
← Plasma Cell Neoplasms (Including Multiple Myeloma)

HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING

Induction therapy

Source: Plasma Cell Neoplasms (Including Multiple Myeloma) Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.

Source updated: April 25, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.

Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary.

Context: Treatment of Amyloidosis Associated With Plasma Cell Neoplasms / Treatment Options for Amyloidosis Associated With Plasma Cell Neoplasms

As is true for all plasma cell dyscrasias, responses have been reported for patients treated with all the same regimens active in multiple myeloma.[4-12] Lower doses of lenalidomide or pomalidomide must be used in patients with renal dysfunction.[13] Patients with amyloidosis respond to treatment with daratumumab, with or without other active agents. Daratumumab is usually combined with other agents used for myeloma.[14-20] Rapid responses to induction therapy may result in improvement of renal or cardiac function.[21,22]

Source links and citations

Evidence (chemotherapy):

A prospective trial (NCT03201965) included 388 previously untreated patients with immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis (excluding symptomatic myeloma). Patients were randomly assigned to receive bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone with or without subcutaneous daratumumab.[23]Daratumumab combined with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone is considered a standard regimen for previously untreated patients who are eligible to receive this regimen. When using daratumumab induction therapy, the fluorescence in situ hybridization–detected cytogenetic abnormality of t(11;14) no longer confers an adverse prognostic impact. However, the presence of 1q gain continues to be associated with a lower response rate and hematologic event-free survival during treatment of amyloid light chain amyloidosis.[24]

Source links and citations

A prospective trial (NCT03201965) included 388 previously untreated patients with immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis (excluding symptomatic myeloma). Patients were randomly assigned to receive bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone with or without subcutaneous daratumumab.[23]Daratumumab combined with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone is considered a standard regimen for previously untreated patients who are eligible to receive this regimen. When using daratumumab induction therapy, the fluorescence in situ hybridization–detected cytogenetic abnormality of t(11;14) no longer confers an adverse prognostic impact. However, the presence of 1q gain continues to be associated with a lower response rate and hematologic event-free survival during treatment of amyloid light chain amyloidosis.[24]

With a median follow-up of 11.4 months, the hematologic complete response rate was 53% for patients in the daratumumab group and 18.1% for patients in the control group (relative risk, 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1–4.1; P < .001). A landmark analysis at 6 months was also performed.[23][Level of evidence B3]

Source links and citations

A prospective trial (NCT03201965) included 388 previously untreated patients with immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis (excluding symptomatic myeloma). Patients were randomly assigned to receive bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone with or without subcutaneous daratumumab.[23]Daratumumab combined with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone is considered a standard regimen for previously untreated patients who are eligible to receive this regimen. When using daratumumab induction therapy, the fluorescence in situ hybridization–detected cytogenetic abnormality of t(11;14) no longer confers an adverse prognostic impact. However, the presence of 1q gain continues to be associated with a lower response rate and hematologic event-free survival during treatment of amyloid light chain amyloidosis.[24]

Survival free from organ deterioration, hematologic progression, or death favored the daratumumab arm (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36–0.93; P = .02).

A prospective trial (NCT03201965) included 388 previously untreated patients with immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis (excluding symptomatic myeloma). Patients were randomly assigned to receive bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone with or without subcutaneous daratumumab.[23]Daratumumab combined with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone is considered a standard regimen for previously untreated patients who are eligible to receive this regimen. When using daratumumab induction therapy, the fluorescence in situ hybridization–detected cytogenetic abnormality of t(11;14) no longer confers an adverse prognostic impact. However, the presence of 1q gain continues to be associated with a lower response rate and hematologic event-free survival during treatment of amyloid light chain amyloidosis.[24]

The cardiac and renal responses were doubled for patients in the daratumumab group, but no statistical analysis was provided.

Studies cited in this source section

Source citation is not a determination that a study applies to you.

Publication references

Read the original reference and check its publication notices.

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice