HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING
Encorafenib plus binimetinib
Source: Melanoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 2, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.
Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary.
Encorafenib is a small-molecule BRAF inhibitor, and binimetinib is a small-molecule MEK inhibitor. The combination of these two agents is approved for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K pathogenic variants, as detected by an FDA-approved test. The combination has demonstrated improved PFS and OS compared with vemurafenib. However, neither is approved as single-agent therapy.
Evidence (encorafenib plus binimetinib):
Previously untreated or progression on or after first-line immunotherapy. An international, open-label, phase III trial (COLUMBUS [NCT01909453]) included 577 patients with stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV melanoma and BRAF V600 pathogenic variants. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive encorafenib (450 mg every day) plus binimetinib (45 mg twice a day), encorafenib monotherapy (300 mg every day), or vemurafenib monotherapy (960 mg twice a day).[33,34] The primary end point was PFS for the combination versus vemurafenib alone as assessed by a blinded IRC with a secondary end point of OS.
Previously untreated or progression on or after first-line immunotherapy. An international, open-label, phase III trial (COLUMBUS [NCT01909453]) included 577 patients with stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV melanoma and BRAF V600 pathogenic variants. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive encorafenib (450 mg every day) plus binimetinib (45 mg twice a day), encorafenib monotherapy (300 mg every day), or vemurafenib monotherapy (960 mg twice a day).[33,34] The primary end point was PFS for the combination versus vemurafenib alone as assessed by a blinded IRC with a secondary end point of OS.
Approximately 5% of patients had received previous checkpoint inhibitor therapy.
Previously untreated or progression on or after first-line immunotherapy. An international, open-label, phase III trial (COLUMBUS [NCT01909453]) included 577 patients with stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV melanoma and BRAF V600 pathogenic variants. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive encorafenib (450 mg every day) plus binimetinib (45 mg twice a day), encorafenib monotherapy (300 mg every day), or vemurafenib monotherapy (960 mg twice a day).[33,34] The primary end point was PFS for the combination versus vemurafenib alone as assessed by a blinded IRC with a secondary end point of OS.
With a median follow-up of 16.6 months, the median PFS was 14.9 months (95% CI, 11.0–18.5) with the combination versus 7.3 months (95% CI, 5.6–8.2) with vemurafenib alone. The HRprogression or death was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.41–0.71; 2-sided P < .0001).
Previously untreated or progression on or after first-line immunotherapy. An international, open-label, phase III trial (COLUMBUS [NCT01909453]) included 577 patients with stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV melanoma and BRAF V600 pathogenic variants. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive encorafenib (450 mg every day) plus binimetinib (45 mg twice a day), encorafenib monotherapy (300 mg every day), or vemurafenib monotherapy (960 mg twice a day).[33,34] The primary end point was PFS for the combination versus vemurafenib alone as assessed by a blinded IRC with a secondary end point of OS.
With a median follow-up of 36.8 months for the secondary end point of OS, the median OS was 33.6 months (95% CI, 24.4–39.2) for patients in the combination arm and 16.9 months (95% CI, 14.0–24.5) for patients treated with vemurafenib alone (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47–0.79; P < .0001). Subsequent treatments after discontinuation of the study drug were received by 42% of patients in the combination group and 62% of patients in the vemurafenib-alone group.[33,34][Level of evidence A1]
Source links and citations
Previously untreated or progression on or after first-line immunotherapy. An international, open-label, phase III trial (COLUMBUS [NCT01909453]) included 577 patients with stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV melanoma and BRAF V600 pathogenic variants. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive encorafenib (450 mg every day) plus binimetinib (45 mg twice a day), encorafenib monotherapy (300 mg every day), or vemurafenib monotherapy (960 mg twice a day).[33,34] The primary end point was PFS for the combination versus vemurafenib alone as assessed by a blinded IRC with a secondary end point of OS.
The incidence of grade 3 to 4 adverse events was 58% with combination therapy and 63% with vemurafenib alone. Serious adverse events occurred in 34% of the combination group and 37% of the vemurafenib-alone group. The most common adverse events in the combination group included gastrointestinal symptoms and elevation of gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), elevation of creatine phosphokinase (CPK), left ventricular dysfunction (8%), and serous retinopathy (20%), mostly grade 1 to 2 (monitoring guidelines are provided in the drug label). Patients who received vemurafenib had more pyrexia and cutaneous toxicities. Study drug discontinuations from adverse events occurred in 15% of patients in the combination group and 17% of patients in the vemurafenib-alone group. No deaths were related to treatment; however, one death from suicide occurred in the combination arm.
Studies cited in this source section
Source citation is not a determination that a study applies to you.
Publication references
Read the original reference and check its publication notices.
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle