Skip to content
← Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING

Cytogenetics/genomic alterations

Source: Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.

Source updated: April 21, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.

Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary.

Context: Treatment of Relapsed Childhood ALL / Prognostic Factors After First Relapse of Childhood ALL

Cytogenetic aberrations have been shown to be significant prognostic factors in B-ALL.

In a study of 2,053 patients with ALL initially treated in COG studies who subsequently experienced a relapse, several recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities were significant predictors of OS. Patients with either ETV6::RUNX1 gene fusions or high hyperdiploidy with trisomies 4 and 10 had a longer median time to first relapse (43 months) and superior 5-year postrelapse OS rates (74.4% and 70.2%, respectively), compared with other patients. Conversely, those with hypodiploidy, KMT2A rearrangements, or TCF3::PBX1 gene fusions were more likely to have earlier relapses and had inferior 5-year postrelapse OS rates (14.2% ± 6.1%, 31.9% ± 7.7%, and 36.8% ± 6.6%, respectively). In multivariable analysis controlling for time to relapse, each of these cytogenetic abnormalities retained significance as an independent prognostic factor after relapse.[15]

Source links and citations

Other studies have also demonstrated that patients with ETV6::RUNX1 gene fusions have a more favorable prognosis after relapse.[15,32,33]

Source links and citations

In the ALL-REZ BFM 2002 (NCT00114348) study, an EFS rate of 84% (± 7%) was observed for patients with ETV6::RUNX1 ALL with bone marrow relapse.[32] In this study, 94% of patients with ETV6::RUNX1 had a duration of first remission that extended at least 6 months beyond completion of their primary treatment, and on multivariate analysis, time to relapse (and not the presence of ETV6::RUNX1) was an independent predictor of outcome.

Source links and citations

Similarly, the 5-year OS rate was 81% for patients with ETV6::RUNX1 enrolled on the French Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia Study Group (FRALLE) 93 trial who relapsed at any site more than 36 months after diagnosis. The presence of ETV6::RUNX1 was associated with a favorable survival outcome compared with other late relapsing patients.[33] However, the 3-year OS rate was only 31% for patients with ETV6::RUNX1 who experienced an early relapse (<36 months).

Source links and citations

Changes in variant profiles from diagnosis to relapse have been identified by gene sequencing.[34,35] While oncogenic gene fusions (e.g., TCF3::PBX1, ETV6::RUNX1) are almost always observed between the time of initial diagnosis and relapse, single nucleotide variants and copy number variants may be present at diagnosis, but not at relapse, and vice versa.[34,36] For example, while RAS family variants are common at both diagnosis and relapse, the specific RAS family variants may change from diagnosis to relapse as specific leukemic subclones rise and fall during the course of treatment.[34] By contrast, relapse-specific variants in NT5C2 (a gene involved in nucleotide metabolism) have been noted in as many as 45% of ALL cases with early relapse.[34,37,38]

Source links and citations

TP53 alterations (variants and/or copy number alterations) are observed in approximately 10% of patients with ALL at first relapse and have been associated with an increased likelihood of persistent leukemia after initial reinduction and poor event-free survival (EFS) rates.[21,39] In one study, approximately one-half of the TP53 alterations were present at initial diagnosis and half were newly observed at time of relapse.[39]

Source links and citations

IKZF1 deletions have also been reported to be associated with a poor prognosis in patients with B-ALL in first bone marrow relapse.[32] However, in a BFM study of patients with B-ALL who experienced a late first marrow relapse, IKZF1 deletions were not prognostically significant.[21]

Source links and citations

RAS pathway variants (KRAS, NRAS, FLT3, and PTPN11) are common at relapse in B-ALL patients, and they were found in approximately 40% of patients at first relapse in one study of 206 children.[34,40] As observed at diagnosis, the frequency of RAS pathway variants at relapse differs by cytogenetic subtype (e.g., high frequency in hyperdiploid cases and low frequency in ETV6::RUNX1 cases). The presence of RAS pathway variants at relapse was associated with early relapse. However, presence of RAS pathway variants at relapse was not an independent predictor of outcome.

Source links and citations

Studies cited in this source section

Source citation is not a determination that a study applies to you.

Publication references

Read the original reference and check its publication notices.

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice