Skip to content
← Study library

NCT03682536 · CITED IN SOURCE DOCUMENTS

A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept (ACE-536) Versus Epoetin Alfa for the Treatment of Anemia Due to IPSS-R Very Low, Low, or Intermediate Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Participants Who Require Red Blood Cell Transfusions and Are ESA Naïve

An NCI or FDA source cites this study. A citation does not establish that it applies to an individual diagnosis.

Phase
PHASE3
Status at capture
ACTIVE NOT RECRUITING
Registry last update
2024-11-20

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of luspatercept (ACE-536) compared to epoetin alfa on red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence (for at least 12 weeks) with a concurrent hemoglobin increase of at least 1.5 g/dL in participants with anemia due to revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) very low, low, or intermediate risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) who require RBC transfusions and have never been exposed to erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA).

Open the original ClinicalTrials.gov record → · Download preserved record

What did the study report?

Outcomes, safety and baseline populations are separate source sections. Quality-of-life measures appear under their original outcome titles.

flow

Participant flow

→

baseline

Baseline characteristics

→

outcome · POSTED

Percentage of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for 12 Weeks (84 Days) With a Mean Hemoglobin Increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL

→

outcome · POSTED

Percentage of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for 24 Weeks

→

outcome · POSTED

Mean Hemoglobin Change Over 24 Weeks

→

outcome · POSTED

Percentage of Participants Achieving Hematologic Improvement - Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per IWG

→

outcome · POSTED

Time to Hematologic Improvement - Erythroid Response (HI-E)

→

outcome · POSTED

Percentage of Participants Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for ≥ 12 Weeks (84 Days)

→

outcome · POSTED

Duration of Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 12 Weeks (84 Days)

→

outcome · POSTED

Time to Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 12 Weeks (84 Days)

→

outcome · POSTED

Time to First Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion

→

outcome · POSTED

The Number of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Units Transfused Within the First 24 Weeks of Treatment

→

outcome · POSTED

Percentage of Participants Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for ≥ 56 Days (8 Weeks)

→

outcome · POSTED

Percentage of Participants Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for a Consecutive 24-week Period

→

outcome · POSTED

The Number of Participants With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Progression

→

outcome · POSTED

Median Time to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Progression

→

outcome · POSTED

Overall Survival (OS)

→

outcome · POSTED

The Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

→

outcome · POSTED

Number of Participants With a Positive Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Test

→

outcome · POSTED

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)

→

outcome · POSTED

Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia Version 4 (FACT-An)

→

outcome · NOT POSTED

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve [AUC]

→

outcome · NOT POSTED

Maximum Plasma Concentration of Drug [Cmax]

→

adverse events

Adverse events

→

more info

Limitations, agreements, and source contact

→
Who could take part
eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Documented diagnosis of Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) according to WHO 2016 classification that meets revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) classification of very low, low, or intermediate risk disease, and have \< 5% blasts in bone marrow * Endogenous serum erythropoietin (sEPO) level of \< 500 U/L * Requires Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, as documented by the criteria: Average transfusion requirement of 2 - 6 units/8 weeks of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) confirmed for a minimum of 8 weeks immediately preceding randomization * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0, 1, or 2 Exclusion Criteria: * Clinically significant anemia due to iron, vitamin B12, or folate deficiencies, or autoimmune or hereditary hemolytic anemia, or hypothyroidism, or any type of known clinically significant bleeding or sequestration or drug induced anemia * Known history of diagnosis of Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) * Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as repeated elevations of systolic blood pressure (SBP) of ≥ 150 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 100 mmHg despite adequate treatment Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply
healthy Volunteers
false
minimum Age
18 Years
sex
ALL
std Ages
  1. ADULT
  2. OLDER_ADULT
Treatment arms and interventions
arm Groups
  1. intervention Names
    1. Drug: Luspatercept
    label
    Luspatercept
    type
    EXPERIMENTAL
  2. intervention Names
    1. Drug: Epoetin alfa
    label
    Epoetin alfa
    type
    ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
interventions
  1. arm Group Labels
    1. Luspatercept
    description
    Specified dose on specified days
    name
    Luspatercept
    other Names
    1. ACE-536
    type
    DRUG
  2. arm Group Labels
    1. Epoetin alfa
    description
    Specified dose on specified days
    name
    Epoetin alfa
    other Names
    1. EPREX®
    2. ERYPO®
    3. PROCRIT®
    type
    DRUG
Study design
allocation
RANDOMIZED
intervention Model
PARALLEL
masking Info
masking
NONE
primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Enrollment
count
363
type
ACTUAL
Registered outcome plans (not posted results)
primary Outcomes
  1. description
    Percentage of participants who are RBC transfusion-free for any 12-week period associated with a concurrent mean hemoglobin (Hgb) increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL compared to baseline. After applying below 14/3-day rule, the baseline Hgb value is defined as the lowest Hgb value from the central, local laboratory, or pre transfusion Hgb from transfusion records that is within 56 days on or prior to the first dose of treatment, or randomization date if participants were not treated. 4/3-day rule: only Hgb values that are at least 14 days after a transfusion may be used unless there is another transfusion within 3 days after the Hgb assessment. If this occurs, that Hgb value will be used despite being \< 14 days after the previous transfusion.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for 12 Weeks (84 Days) With a Mean Hemoglobin Increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL
    time Frame
    Week 1 through Week 24
secondary Outcomes
  1. description
    Red blood cell transfusion independence (RBC-TI) for 24 weeks is defined as the percentage of participants who did not receive RBC transfusions from Week 1 through Week 24.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for 24 Weeks
    time Frame
    Week 1 through Week 24
  2. description
    Mean hemoglobin (Hgb) change over the 24-week period of Week 1 through Week 24 compared to baseline. After applying below 14/3-day rule, the baseline Hgb value is defined as the lowest Hgb value from the central, local laboratory, or pre transfusion Hgb from transfusion records that is within 56 days on or prior to the first dose of treatment, or randomization date if participants were not treated. 4/3-day rule: only Hgb values that are at least 14 days after a transfusion may be used unless there is another transfusion within 3 days after the Hgb assessment. If this occurs, that Hgb value will be used despite being \< 14 days after the previous transfusion.
    measure
    Mean Hemoglobin Change Over 24 Weeks
    time Frame
    Week 1 through Week 24
  3. description
    The percentage of participants meeting the modified HI-E criteria per the International Working Group (IWG) sustained over any consecutive 56-day period in Week 1-24: For participants with baseline red blood cell (RBC) transfusion burden of \>= 4 units/8 weeks, a reduction of at least 4 units RBC transfusion; for participants with baseline RBC transfusion burden of \< 4 units/8 weeks, mean increase of hemoglobin of at least 1.5 g/dL in the absence of transfusions.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants Achieving Hematologic Improvement - Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per IWG
    time Frame
    Week 1 through Week 24
  4. description
    Time from first dose to first onset of achieving modified HI-E. The modified HI-E criteria per the International Working Group (IWG) sustained over any consecutive 56-day period in Week 1-24: For participants with baseline red blood cell (RBC) transfusion burden of \>= 4 units/8 weeks, a reduction of at least 4 units RBC transfusion; for participants with baseline RBC transfusion burden of \< 4 units/8 weeks, mean increase of hemoglobin of at least 1.5 g/dL in the absence of transfusions.
    measure
    Time to Hematologic Improvement - Erythroid Response (HI-E)
    time Frame
    Week 1 through Week 24
  5. description
    Percentage of participants who are RBC transfusion-free over a consecutive 84-day period.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for ≥ 12 Weeks (84 Days)
    time Frame
    Week 1 through Week 24
  6. description
    Maximum duration of RBC transfusion independence for participants who achieve RBC-TI ≥ 84 days.
    measure
    Duration of Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 12 Weeks (84 Days)
    time Frame
    Week 1 through End of Treatment (Up to approximately an average of 66 weeks and a maximum of 202 weeks)
  7. description
    Time from first dose to first onset of transfusion independence ≥ 84 days.
    measure
    Time to Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 12 Weeks (84 Days)
    time Frame
    Week 1 through Week 24
  8. description
    Time to first RBC transfusion is defined as time from Week 1 to first RBC transfusion on treatment. Participants who maintain RBC-TI through the end of the Treatment Period or time of analysis will be censored at EOT visit date, subsequent MDS therapy start date, study discontinuation date, analysis cutoff date or death, whichever occurs first. Median is from un-stratified Kaplan-Meier method.
    measure
    Time to First Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion
    time Frame
    Week 1 through End of Treatment (Up to approximately an average of 66 weeks and a maximum of 202 weeks)
  9. description
    RBC transfusion burden on treatment is defined as total number of packed red blood cell (pRBC) units transfused within the first 24 weeks of treatment since Week 1.
    measure
    The Number of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Units Transfused Within the First 24 Weeks of Treatment
    time Frame
    Week 1 through Week 24
  10. description
    Defined as percentage of participants achieving RBC-TI for \>= 56 days during any consecutive 56-day period from Week 1 through Week 24.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for ≥ 56 Days (8 Weeks)
    time Frame
    Week 1 through Week 24
  11. description
    Defined as percentage of participants achieving RBC-TI for \>= 168 days during any consecutive 168-day period from Week 1 through Week 48.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for a Consecutive 24-week Period
    time Frame
    Week 1 through Week 48
  12. description
    Progression to AML is defined as a diagnosis of AML as per WHO classification of ≥ 20% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow.
    measure
    The Number of Participants With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Progression
    time Frame
    From randomization to 5 years from first dose or 3 years from last dose (whichever occurs later), unless the participant withdraws consent from the study, dies or is lost to follow-up. (Up to approximately 221 weeks)
Full study description
brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of luspatercept (ACE-536) compared to epoetin alfa on red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence (for at least 12 weeks) with a concurrent hemoglobin increase of at least 1.5 g/dL in participants with anemia due to revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) very low, low, or intermediate risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) who require RBC transfusions and have never been exposed to erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA).
Source references
references
  1. citation
    Komrokji RS, Hayati S, Ugidos M, Garcia-Manero G, Della Porta MG, Zeidan AM, Santini V, Platzbecker U, Gandhi AK, Suragani RNVS. Impact of Mutational Landscape and Burden on RBC Transfusion Response in Patients With Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) in the COMMANDS Study. Am J Hematol. 2026 Mar;101(3):427-438. doi: 10.1002/ajh.70171. Epub 2026 Jan 19.
    pmid
    41549790
    type
    DERIVED
  2. citation
    Garcia-Manero G, Santini V, Zeidan AM, Komrokji RS, Pozharskaya V, Rose S, Keeperman K, Lai Y, Kalsekar S, Aggarwal B, Miteva D, Valcarcel D, Fenaux P, Shortt J, Della Porta MG, Platzbecker U. Long-Term Transfusion Independence with Luspatercept Versus Epoetin Alfa in Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent-Naive, Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes in the COMMANDS Trial. Adv Ther. 2025 Jul;42(7):3576-3589. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03208-5. Epub 2025 May 16.
    pmid
    40377899
    type
    DERIVED
  3. citation
    Della Porta MG, Garcia-Manero G, Santini V, Zeidan AM, Komrokji RS, Shortt J, Valcarcel D, Jonasova A, Dimicoli-Salazar S, Tiong IS, Lin CC, Li J, Zhang J, Pilot R, Kreitz S, Pozharskaya V, Keeperman KL, Rose S, Prebet T, Lai Y, Degulys A, Paolini S, Cluzeau T, Fenaux P, Platzbecker U. Luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): primary analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Haematol. 2024 Sep;11(9):e646-e658. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00203-5. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
    pmid
    39038479
    type
    DERIVED
  4. citation
    Platzbecker U, Della Porta MG, Santini V, Zeidan AM, Komrokji RS, Shortt J, Valcarcel D, Jonasova A, Dimicoli-Salazar S, Tiong IS, Lin CC, Li J, Zhang J, Giuseppi AC, Kreitz S, Pozharskaya V, Keeperman KL, Rose S, Shetty JK, Hayati S, Vodala S, Prebet T, Degulys A, Paolini S, Cluzeau T, Fenaux P, Garcia-Manero G. Efficacy and safety of luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): interim analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2023 Jul 29;402(10399):373-385. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00874-7. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
    pmid
    37311468
    type
    DERIVED
see Also Links
Source notices and limitations
    Discovery and provenance
    1. release id
      ctgov-registry-7ad944f6deaf1f5cd6122126
      edge id
      nct-edge-46d6fb03249ba9d9d6c4
      requested nct id
      NCT03682536
      primary nct id
      NCT03682536
      source kind
      fda_spl_label
      source url
      https://api.fda.gov/drug/label.json?search=%28indications_and_usage%3Acancer+OR+indications_and_usage%3Acarcinoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Acarcinomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Alymphoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Alymphomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aleukemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aleukaemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Asarcoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Asarcomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amelanoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyeloma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumor+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumors+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumour+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumours+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneoplasm+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneoplasms+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amalignant+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amalignancy+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyelodysplastic+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyelofibrosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amastocytosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aglioma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aglioblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneuroblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aretinoblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Apheochromocytoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aparaganglioma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyeloproliferative+OR+indications_and_usage%3Awaldenstrom+OR+indications_and_usage%3Apolycythemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Athrombocythemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Adesmoid+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneurofibromatosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Ahistiocytosis%29+AND+%28openfda.application_number%3ANDA%2A+OR+openfda.application_number%3ABLA%2A%29&limit=100&skip=400&sort=id%3Aasc
      source record id
      769ec39a-61bd-4726-b14a-9594897baa67
      source file sha256
      a4bef6778baed183e5bcf581938b0b23d3576dfd9eb6150f2904934a750c5fef
      payload sha256
      9d2a48f290f4982bc371142cb4cc6ec0251032af2bf7800aed9a00d4e5c1ab16
      payload
      application numbers
      1. BLA761136
      clinical indication matching status
      not_inferred
      end exclusive
      true
      id
      nct-edge-46d6fb03249ba9d9d6c4
      link basis
      explicit_NCT_identifier_in_acquired_source
      nct id
      NCT03682536
      occurrences
      1. context exact
        ) 0.0017 14.2 Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes with Associated Anemia in ESA-naïve Patients The efficacy of REBLOZYL was evaluated in the COMMANDS trial (NCT03682536), a multi‑center, open‑label, randomized active‑controlled trial comparing REBLOZYL versus epoetin alfa in patients with anemia due to IPSS‑R very low, low, or
        end
        3661
        exact text
        NCT03682536
        start
        3650
      offset unit
      unicode_code_points
      source file
      /tmp/cancer-full-research/indications/raw/labels-00400.json
      source file sha256
      a4bef6778baed183e5bcf581938b0b23d3576dfd9eb6150f2904934a750c5fef
      source json pointer
      /results/61/clinical_studies/0
      source kind
      fda_spl_label
      source record id
      769ec39a-61bd-4726-b14a-9594897baa67
      source string basis
      parsed_JSON_string_unmodified
      source string sha256
      3aab92eb527e18a0977f71c0e4f6c0ea8beca436866e06ef72f589cc8ed70705
      source url
      https://api.fda.gov/drug/label.json?search=%28indications_and_usage%3Acancer+OR+indications_and_usage%3Acarcinoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Acarcinomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Alymphoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Alymphomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aleukemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aleukaemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Asarcoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Asarcomas+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amelanoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyeloma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumor+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumors+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumour+OR+indications_and_usage%3Atumours+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneoplasm+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneoplasms+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amalignant+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amalignancy+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyelodysplastic+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyelofibrosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amastocytosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aglioma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aglioblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneuroblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aretinoblastoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Apheochromocytoma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aparaganglioma+OR+indications_and_usage%3Amyeloproliferative+OR+indications_and_usage%3Awaldenstrom+OR+indications_and_usage%3Apolycythemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Athrombocythemia+OR+indications_and_usage%3Adesmoid+OR+indications_and_usage%3Aneurofibromatosis+OR+indications_and_usage%3Ahistiocytosis%29+AND+%28openfda.application_number%3ANDA%2A+OR+openfda.application_number%3ABLA%2A%29&limit=100&skip=400&sort=id%3Aasc
      spl effective time
      20260227
      spl set id
      82f4d266-3f52-41eb-86ba-0abf3cf468e8

    Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice