Change From Baseline in Health Status as Assessed by EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Across Time
A Study Of Lorlatinib Versus Crizotinib In First Line Treatment Of Patients With ALK-Positive NSCLC · Source last updated 2025-11-25
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
Measure
MEAN
Unit
Units on a scale
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
Baseline, Day 1 of all cycles from Cycle 2 to Cycle 38, and End of Treatment
What was measured
The EuroQol EQ-5D-5L is a participant-completed questionnaire designed to assess health status. There are 2 components to the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L: a descriptive system in which individuals rate their level of problems (none, slight, moderate, severe, extreme/unable) in 5 areas (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) and a VAS. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state) and higher scores indicate better health state.
Analysis population: "Number of Participants Analyzed" included all participants in the EQ-5D-5L PRO analysis population within each treatment group. "Number Analyzed" included all participants with at least a baseline and postbaseline assessment at the visit.
Groups in this outcome
Lorlatinib
Lorlatinib monotherapy at the recommended Phase 2 dose of 100 mg, was administered orally once daily (QD) at approximately the same time of the day on a continuous daily dosing schedule. Each treatment cycle was defined as 28 days. Treatment continued until confirmation of RECIST version 1.1 defined disease progression assessed by the blinded independent central review (unless clinical benefit was still achievable), participant refusal, participant lost to follow-up, unacceptable toxicity, death, or the study was terminated by the sponsor, whichever occurred first.
Crizotinib
Crizotinib monotherapy at the registered dose of 250 mg, was administered orally twice daily (BID) at approximately the same time in the morning and evening (12 hours apart) on a continuous daily dosing schedule. Each treatment cycle was defined as 28 days. Treatment continued until confirmation of RECIST version 1.1 defined disease progression assessed by the blinded independent central review (unless clinical benefit was still achievable), participant refusal, participant lost to follow-up, unacceptable toxicity, death, or the study was terminated by the sponsor, whichever occurred first.
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
147
Crizotinib
138
Reported measurements
Cycle 2 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
143
Crizotinib
133
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
6.0
Not reported
3.33
8.72
Not reported
Crizotinib
3.1
Not reported
0.19
5.92
Not reported
Cycle 3 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
137
Crizotinib
124
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
6.0
Not reported
3.30
8.75
Not reported
Crizotinib
5.3
Not reported
2.37
8.18
Not reported
Cycle 4 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
133
Crizotinib
122
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
7.1
Not reported
3.71
10.41
Not reported
Crizotinib
5.6
Not reported
2.77
8.47
Not reported
Cycle 5 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
130
Crizotinib
115
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
4.3
Not reported
0.39
8.13
Not reported
Crizotinib
5.1
Not reported
1.88
8.26
Not reported
Cycle 6 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
127
Crizotinib
105
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
6.5
Not reported
3.11
9.85
Not reported
Crizotinib
4.5
Not reported
1.08
7.91
Not reported
Cycle 7 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
122
Crizotinib
100
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
5.5
Not reported
1.95
9.13
Not reported
Crizotinib
4.0
Not reported
0.35
7.55
Not reported
Cycle 8 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
125
Crizotinib
94
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
6.7
Not reported
2.95
10.37
Not reported
Crizotinib
4.2
Not reported
0.63
7.68
Not reported
Cycle 9 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
120
Crizotinib
82
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
6.4
Not reported
2.47
10.33
Not reported
Crizotinib
3.9
Not reported
0.09
7.69
Not reported
Cycle 10 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
116
Crizotinib
74
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
7.2
Not reported
3.22
11.20
Not reported
Crizotinib
3.9
Not reported
-0.02
7.75
Not reported
Cycle 11 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
117
Crizotinib
73
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
8.1
Not reported
4.27
11.83
Not reported
Crizotinib
2.0
Not reported
-1.62
5.59
Not reported
Cycle 12 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
117
Crizotinib
61
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
7.6
Not reported
3.82
11.41
Not reported
Crizotinib
4.8
Not reported
0.95
8.59
Not reported
Cycle 13 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
114
Crizotinib
56
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
7.5
Not reported
3.91
11.11
Not reported
Crizotinib
5.8
Not reported
1.99
9.51
Not reported
Cycle 14 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
110
Crizotinib
48
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
6.7
Not reported
3.06
10.32
Not reported
Crizotinib
2.3
Not reported
-1.33
5.91
Not reported
Cycle 15 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
111
Crizotinib
43
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
6.1
Not reported
2.33
9.96
Not reported
Crizotinib
1.5
Not reported
-3.14
6.07
Not reported
Cycle 16 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
104
Crizotinib
39
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
6.9
Not reported
2.71
11.04
Not reported
Crizotinib
2.4
Not reported
-2.89
7.71
Not reported
Cycle 17 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
93
Crizotinib
32
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
8.3
Not reported
4.08
12.46
Not reported
Crizotinib
1.1
Not reported
-5.05
7.17
Not reported
Cycle 18 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
83
Crizotinib
29
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
8.7
Not reported
4.17
13.28
Not reported
Crizotinib
1.3
Not reported
-5.01
7.56
Not reported
Cycle 19 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
78
Crizotinib
23
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
6.8
Not reported
1.86
11.70
Not reported
Crizotinib
2.8
Not reported
-2.79
8.44
Not reported
Cycle 20 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
69
Crizotinib
19
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
7.9
Not reported
2.83
13.06
Not reported
Crizotinib
3.4
Not reported
-3.59
10.44
Not reported
Cycle 21 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
65
Crizotinib
17
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
7.2
Not reported
1.96
12.44
Not reported
Crizotinib
3.3
Not reported
-4.06
10.64
Not reported
Cycle 22 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
56
Crizotinib
14
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
4.5
Not reported
-0.51
9.48
Not reported
Crizotinib
1.9
Not reported
-6.69
10.54
Not reported
Cycle 23 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
48
Crizotinib
12
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
5.2
Not reported
-0.68
11.14
Not reported
Crizotinib
-0.6
Not reported
-10.97
9.81
Not reported
Cycle 24 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
44
Crizotinib
10
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
4.9
Not reported
-1.22
11.09
Not reported
Crizotinib
-3.0
Not reported
-21.43
15.43
Not reported
Cycle 25 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
39
Crizotinib
9
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
4.0
Not reported
-2.13
10.18
Not reported
Crizotinib
1.4
Not reported
-11.86
14.75
Not reported
Cycle 26 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
35
Crizotinib
9
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
7.9
Not reported
1.00
14.77
Not reported
Crizotinib
2.0
Not reported
-11.84
15.84
Not reported
Cycle 27 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
30
Crizotinib
7
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
4.6
Not reported
-2.37
11.57
Not reported
Crizotinib
3.0
Not reported
-12.79
18.79
Not reported
Cycle 28 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
23
Crizotinib
6
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
6.0
Not reported
-3.75
15.66
Not reported
Crizotinib
2.7
Not reported
-13.20
18.54
Not reported
Cycle 29Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
20
Crizotinib
5
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
7.4
Not reported
-3.78
18.48
Not reported
Crizotinib
8.2
Not reported
-11.18
27.58
Not reported
Cycle 30 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
14
Crizotinib
4
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
9.1
Not reported
-5.66
23.95
Not reported
Crizotinib
2.8
Not reported
-22.92
28.42
Not reported
Cycle 31 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
12
Crizotinib
2
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
7.8
Not reported
-11.84
27.51
Not reported
Crizotinib
0.0
Not reported
-190.59
190.59
Not reported
Cycle 32 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
10
Crizotinib
2
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
7.9
Not reported
-11.65
27.45
Not reported
Crizotinib
2.5
Not reported
-156.33
161.33
Not reported
Cycle 33 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
8
Crizotinib
2
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
4.4
Not reported
-21.74
30.49
Not reported
Crizotinib
-2.5
Not reported
-224.86
219.86
Not reported
Cycle 34 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
6
Crizotinib
1
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
-0.5
Not reported
-32.20
31.20
Not reported
Crizotinib
20.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 35 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
4
Crizotinib
1
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
0.0
Not reported
-32.48
32.48
Not reported
Crizotinib
20.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 36 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
2
Crizotinib
1
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
-4.5
Not reported
-315.80
306.80
Not reported
Crizotinib
15.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 37 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
2
Crizotinib
0
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
-17.5
Not reported
-176.33
141.33
Not reported
Cycle 38 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
1
Crizotinib
0
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
25.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
End of Treatment
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Lorlatinib
27
Crizotinib
82
Values in Units on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Lorlatinib
-3.7
Not reported
-13.66
6.33
Not reported
Crizotinib
-1.3
Not reported
-5.43
2.80
Not reported
Complete source fields
classes
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
3.33
upper Limit
8.72
value
6.0
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
0.19
upper Limit
5.92
value
3.1
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
143
group Id
OG001
value
133
units
Participants
title
Cycle 2 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
3.30
upper Limit
8.75
value
6.0
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
2.37
upper Limit
8.18
value
5.3
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
137
group Id
OG001
value
124
units
Participants
title
Cycle 3 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
3.71
upper Limit
10.41
value
7.1
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
2.77
upper Limit
8.47
value
5.6
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
133
group Id
OG001
value
122
units
Participants
title
Cycle 4 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
0.39
upper Limit
8.13
value
4.3
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
1.88
upper Limit
8.26
value
5.1
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
130
group Id
OG001
value
115
units
Participants
title
Cycle 5 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
3.11
upper Limit
9.85
value
6.5
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
1.08
upper Limit
7.91
value
4.5
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
127
group Id
OG001
value
105
units
Participants
title
Cycle 6 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
1.95
upper Limit
9.13
value
5.5
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
0.35
upper Limit
7.55
value
4.0
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
122
group Id
OG001
value
100
units
Participants
title
Cycle 7 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
2.95
upper Limit
10.37
value
6.7
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
0.63
upper Limit
7.68
value
4.2
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
125
group Id
OG001
value
94
units
Participants
title
Cycle 8 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
2.47
upper Limit
10.33
value
6.4
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
0.09
upper Limit
7.69
value
3.9
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
120
group Id
OG001
value
82
units
Participants
title
Cycle 9 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
3.22
upper Limit
11.20
value
7.2
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
-0.02
upper Limit
7.75
value
3.9
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
116
group Id
OG001
value
74
units
Participants
title
Cycle 10 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
4.27
upper Limit
11.83
value
8.1
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
-1.62
upper Limit
5.59
value
2.0
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
117
group Id
OG001
value
73
units
Participants
title
Cycle 11 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
3.82
upper Limit
11.41
value
7.6
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
0.95
upper Limit
8.59
value
4.8
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
117
group Id
OG001
value
61
units
Participants
title
Cycle 12 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
3.91
upper Limit
11.11
value
7.5
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
1.99
upper Limit
9.51
value
5.8
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
114
group Id
OG001
value
56
units
Participants
title
Cycle 13 Day 1
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
147
group Id
OG001
value
138
units
Participants
description
The EuroQol EQ-5D-5L is a participant-completed questionnaire designed to assess health status. There are 2 components to the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L: a descriptive system in which individuals rate their level of problems (none, slight, moderate, severe, extreme/unable) in 5 areas (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) and a VAS. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state) and higher scores indicate better health state.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
description
Lorlatinib monotherapy at the recommended Phase 2 dose of 100 mg, was administered orally once daily (QD) at approximately the same time of the day on a continuous daily dosing schedule. Each treatment cycle was defined as 28 days. Treatment continued until confirmation of RECIST version 1.1 defined disease progression assessed by the blinded independent central review (unless clinical benefit was still achievable), participant refusal, participant lost to follow-up, unacceptable toxicity, death, or the study was terminated by the sponsor, whichever occurred first.
id
OG000
title
Lorlatinib
description
Crizotinib monotherapy at the registered dose of 250 mg, was administered orally twice daily (BID) at approximately the same time in the morning and evening (12 hours apart) on a continuous daily dosing schedule. Each treatment cycle was defined as 28 days. Treatment continued until confirmation of RECIST version 1.1 defined disease progression assessed by the blinded independent central review (unless clinical benefit was still achievable), participant refusal, participant lost to follow-up, unacceptable toxicity, death, or the study was terminated by the sponsor, whichever occurred first.
id
OG001
title
Crizotinib
param Type
MEAN
population Description
"Number of Participants Analyzed" included all participants in the EQ-5D-5L PRO analysis population within each treatment group. "Number Analyzed" included all participants with at least a baseline and postbaseline assessment at the visit.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of all cycles from Cycle 2 to Cycle 38, and End of Treatment
title
Change From Baseline in Health Status as Assessed by EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Across Time