Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT03041311 · OUTCOME

Number of Participants With at Least 1 Occurrence of RBC Transfusion on/After Week 5 (Proportion of Patients)

Carboplatin, Etoposide, and Atezolizumab With or Without Trilaciclib (G1T28), a CDK4/6 Inhibitor, in Extensive-Stage SCLC · Source last updated 2025-09-25

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
Unit
Participants
Interval / dispersion
Not reported
Time frame
Induction Period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles to a maximum of 4 cycles or until (if earlier) disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 374 days.

What was measured

For this endpoint, the occurrence during the Induction Period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes, if total number of events ≥1 was observed, No for other scenarios. If a patient did not have an event, a value of 0 was assigned to that patient. Each red blood cell transfusion with a unique start date on/after Week 5 on study during the Induction was defined as a separate event.

Analysis population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all randomized patients. Analysis using the ITT analysis set were conducted on the basis of the randomly assigned treatment.

Groups in this outcome

Trilaciclib+Etoposide/Carboplatin/Atezolizumab

Induction: Patients received trilaciclib 240 mg/m² administered IV once daily prior to E/P/A on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day E/P/A therapy cycle (up to 4 cycles in total). Etoposide 100 mg/m² was administered IV daily on Days 1, 2, and 3 of each 21-day cycle. Carboplatin was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle using the Calvert formula with a target AUC = 5 mg/mL/min to calculate the dose. Atezolizumab 1200 mg was administered as an IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Maintenance: Following the induction phase, patients received maintenance atezolizumab at a dose of 1200 mg on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator.

Placebo+Etoposide/Carboplatin/Atezolizumab

Induction: Patients received placebo administered IV once daily prior to E/P/A on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day E/P/A therapy cycle (up to 4 cycles in total). Etoposide 100 mg/m² was administered IV daily on Days 1, 2, and 3 of each 21-day cycle. Carboplatin was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle using the Calvert formula with a target AUC = 5 mg/mL/min to calculate the dose. Atezolizumab 1200 mg was administered as an IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Maintenance: Following the induction phase, patients received maintenance atezolizumab at a dose of 1200 mg on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Trilaciclib+Etoposide/Carboplatin/Atezolizumab54
Placebo+Etoposide/Carboplatin/Atezolizumab53

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Trilaciclib+Etoposide/Carboplatin/Atezolizumab7Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Placebo+Etoposide/Carboplatin/Atezolizumab11Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. group Description
    Treatment group difference was analyzed using a modified Poisson regression model. The model included baseline hemoglobin as a covariate, the stratification factors of ECOG performance status (0 to 1 versus 2) and brain metastases (Yes versus No) and treatment as a fixed effect. The logarithm transformation of the number of weeks on treatment was included as an offset variable in the model.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.1335
    p Value Comment
    A Hochberg-based gatekeeping procedure was used to control the global familywise error rate across the multiple null hypotheses (for 2 primary and 3 key secondary endpoints) in a strong sense at a 1-sided 0.025 level.
    statistical Comment
    Hochberg-based gatekeeping procedure
    statistical Method
    Modified Poisson
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. group Description
    Treatment group difference was analyzed using a modified Poisson regression model. The model included baseline hemoglobin as a covariate, the stratification factors of ECOG performance status (0 to 1 versus 2) and brain metastases (Yes versus No) and treatment as a fixed effect. The logarithm transformation of the number of weeks on treatment was included as an offset variable in the model.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.1335
    p Value Comment
    A Hochberg-based gatekeeping procedure was used to control the global familywise error rate across the multiple null hypotheses (for 2 primary and 3 key secondary endpoints) in a strong sense at a 1-sided 0.025 level.
    statistical Comment
    Hochberg-based gatekeeping procedure
    statistical Method
    Modified Poisson
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        7
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        11
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      54
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      53
    units
    Participants
description
For this endpoint, the occurrence during the Induction Period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes, if total number of events ≥1 was observed, No for other scenarios. If a patient did not have an event, a value of 0 was assigned to that patient. Each red blood cell transfusion with a unique start date on/after Week 5 on study during the Induction was defined as a separate event.
groups
  1. description
    Induction: Patients received trilaciclib 240 mg/m² administered IV once daily prior to E/P/A on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day E/P/A therapy cycle (up to 4 cycles in total). Etoposide 100 mg/m² was administered IV daily on Days 1, 2, and 3 of each 21-day cycle. Carboplatin was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle using the Calvert formula with a target AUC = 5 mg/mL/min to calculate the dose. Atezolizumab 1200 mg was administered as an IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Maintenance: Following the induction phase, patients received maintenance atezolizumab at a dose of 1200 mg on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Trilaciclib+Etoposide/Carboplatin/Atezolizumab
  2. description
    Induction: Patients received placebo administered IV once daily prior to E/P/A on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day E/P/A therapy cycle (up to 4 cycles in total). Etoposide 100 mg/m² was administered IV daily on Days 1, 2, and 3 of each 21-day cycle. Carboplatin was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle using the Calvert formula with a target AUC = 5 mg/mL/min to calculate the dose. Atezolizumab 1200 mg was administered as an IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Maintenance: Following the induction phase, patients received maintenance atezolizumab at a dose of 1200 mg on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Placebo+Etoposide/Carboplatin/Atezolizumab
param Type
COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
population Description
Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all randomized patients. Analysis using the ITT analysis set were conducted on the basis of the randomly assigned treatment.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Induction Period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles to a maximum of 4 cycles or until (if earlier) disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 374 days.
title
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Occurrence of RBC Transfusion on/After Week 5 (Proportion of Patients)
type
SECONDARY
unit Of Measure
Participants

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice