Skip to content
← Study library

NCT02874742 · CITED IN SOURCE DOCUMENTS

Study Comparing Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (D-RVd) Versus Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (RVd) in Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

An NCI or FDA source cites this study. A citation does not establish that it applies to an individual diagnosis.

Phase
PHASE2
Status at capture
COMPLETED
Registry last update
2025-02-04

The purpose of this study is to determine if the addition of daratumumab to lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (RVd) will increase the proportion of participants achieving stringent complete response (sCR), as defined by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria, by the time of completion of post autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) consolidation treatment, compared with RVd alone.

Open the original ClinicalTrials.gov record → · Download preserved record

What did the study report?

Outcomes, safety and baseline populations are separate source sections. Quality-of-life measures appear under their original outcome titles.

Who could take part
eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Considered by the investigator to be eligible for high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) according to the institution's criteria based on age, medical history, cardiac and pulmonary status, overall health and condition, co-morbid condition(s), physical examination, and laboratory studies * Has not had prior systemic therapy for multiple myeloma. An emergency course of steroids (defined as no greater than 40 milligram \[mg\] of dexamethasone, or equivalent per day for a maximum of 4 days (that is, a total of 160 mg) is permitted. In addition, radiation therapy is permitted prior to study entry, during screening, and during Cycles 1-2 of study treatment as needed for lytic bone disease * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0, 1, or 2 * Woman of childbearing potential must have 2 negative highly sensitive serum (beta-human chorionic gonadotropin \[b-hCG\]) during screening, the first one within 10 to 14 days prior to the first dose of any component of study treatment and the second within 24 hours prior to the first dose of any component of study treatment * A woman must agree not to donate eggs (ova, oocytes) for the purposes of assisted reproduction during the study (including during dose interruptions), and for 4 weeks following discontinuation of lenalidomide, and if receiving daratumumab, for 3 months after the last dose Exclusion Criteria: * Diagnosed or treated for malignancy other than multiple myeloma, except: a) Malignancy treated with curative intent and with no known active disease present for more than equal to (\>= )3 years before randomization; b) Adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer, lentigo maligna or in situ malignancies (including but not limited to, cervical, breast) with no evidence of disease * Exhibiting clinical signs of or has a known history of meningeal or central nervous system involvement by multiple myeloma * Known chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) less than (\<)50 percent (%) of predicted normal * Known moderate or severe persistent asthma within the past 2 years or currently has uncontrolled asthma of any classification * Known to be seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus, known to have hepatitis B surface antigen positivity, or known to have a history of hepatitis C. Participants who completed treatment for hepatitis C at least 6 months prior to screening and have no detectable circulating hepatitis C virus (HCV) at screening, may participate in the study. Such participants will be required to undergo regular assessment for HCV reactivation during their participation in the study. Participants who test positive for HCV at any time during these assessments will be withdrawn from the study
healthy Volunteers
false
maximum Age
70 Years
minimum Age
18 Years
sex
ALL
std Ages
  1. ADULT
  2. OLDER_ADULT
Treatment arms and interventions
arm Groups
  1. description
    Participants will receive lenalidomide, bortezomib, dexamethasone and daratumumab.
    intervention Names
    1. Drug: Lenalidomide
    2. Drug: Bortezomib
    3. Drug: Dexamethasone
    4. Drug: Daratumumab
    label
    Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd)
    type
    EXPERIMENTAL
  2. description
    Participants will receive lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone.
    intervention Names
    1. Drug: Lenalidomide
    2. Drug: Bortezomib
    3. Drug: Dexamethasone
    label
    Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd)
    type
    EXPERIMENTAL
interventions
  1. arm Group Labels
    1. Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd)
    2. Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd)
    description
    Cycles 1 through 6: lenalidomide 25 (milligram) mg orally on Days 1 through 14 and each cycle is of 21-days followed by maintenance treatment with lenalidomide 10 mg on days 1-21 throughout each 28-day cycle on Cycles 7 through 9. Beginning at Cycle 10, the lenalidomide dose will be increased to 15 mg unless there is a tolerability concern.
    name
    Lenalidomide
    type
    DRUG
  2. arm Group Labels
    1. Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd)
    2. Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd)
    description
    Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m\^2 subcutaneously on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 during Cycles 1-6.
    name
    Bortezomib
    type
    DRUG
  3. arm Group Labels
    1. Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd)
    2. Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd)
    description
    Dexamethasone 40 mg orally every week (20 mg on Days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16).
    name
    Dexamethasone
    type
    DRUG
  4. arm Group Labels
    1. Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd)
    description
    Daratumumab intravenously at a dose of 16 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) weekly during induction treatment (Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycles 1 through 4), and every 3 weeks during consolidation treatment (Day 1 of Cycles 5 and 6), followed by maintenance treatment with daratumumab every 4 or 8 weeks.
    name
    Daratumumab
    type
    DRUG
Study design
allocation
RANDOMIZED
intervention Model
PARALLEL
masking Info
masking
NONE
primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Enrollment
count
224
type
ACTUAL
Registered outcome plans (not posted results)
primary Outcomes
  1. description
    Percentage of participants who had achieved sCR as determined by the validated computer algorithm according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria, by the end of post-autologous stem cell transplantation (post-ASCT) consolidation treatment were reported. Complete response (CR) is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and less than (\<) 5 percent (%) PCs in bone marrow. sCR is defined as in addition to CR a normal FLC ratio, and absence of clonal plasma cells (PCs) by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence or 2 to 4-color flow cytometry.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants With Stringent Complete Response (sCR)
    time Frame
    From randomization to post-ASCT consolidation (after Cycle 6) before maintenance treatment (up to 10 months)
secondary Outcomes
  1. description
    CR or better rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve CR or sCR, according to the IMWG criteria. CR is negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and \< 5% PCs in bone marrow. sCR is defined as in addition to CR a normal FLC ratio, and absence of clonal plasma cells (PCs) by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence or 2 to 4-color flow cytometry. For 2 participants (1 in each randomized treatment group), data were updated by the study sites which resulted in their inclusion to the response-evaluable analysis set after the primary analysis.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Better
    time Frame
    From randomization to end of following: induction treatment, ASCT, post-ASCT consolidation (after Cycle 6) and at the end of maintenance period of 24 months (overall duration up to 34 months)
  2. description
    Overall sCR rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved sCR, according to the IMWG criteria. CR is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and \< 5 % PCs in bone marrow. sCR is defined as in addition to CR a normal FLC ratio, and absence of clonal PCs by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence or 2 to 4-color flow cytometry.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants With Overall Stringent Complete Response (sCR)
    time Frame
    From randomization to end of following: induction treatment, ASCT, post-ASCT consolidation (after Cycle 6) and at the end of maintenance treatment of 24 months (overall duration up to 34 months)
  3. description
    ORR- percentage of participants who achieved partial response (PR) or better (PR, Very Good Partial Response \[VGPR\], CR or sCR) based on computerized algorithm as per IMWG criteria. PR -greater than or equal to (\>=) 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by \>=90% or to \<200 mg//24 hours. If serum and urine M-protein are not measurable, a decrease of \>=50% in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels is required. A \>=50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required; VGPR-serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis, or \>= 90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein \<100 mg/24 hours; CR-negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and \<5% PCs in bone marrow. sCR- in addition to CR a normal FLC ratio, and absence of clonal PCs by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence or 2 to 4-color flow cytometry.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants With Overall Response Rate (ORR)
    time Frame
    From randomization to end of following: induction treatment, ASCT, post-ASCT consolidation (after Cycle 6) and at the end of maintenance treatment of 24 months (overall duration up to 34 months)
  4. description
    VGPR or better rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved VGPR or better, according to the IMWG criteria. VGPR is defined as serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis, or \>= 90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein \<100 mg/24 hours.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better
    time Frame
    From randomization to end of following: induction treatment, ASCT, post-ASCT consolidation (after Cycle 6) and at the end of maintenance period of 24 months (overall duration up to 34 months)
  5. description
    Minimal residual disease negative rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve MRD negative status by the respective time point. Minimal residual disease was evaluated in participants who achieved CR or sCR (including participants with VGPR or better and suspected daratumumab interference) using next-generation sequencing which utilizes multiple myeloma cell DNA from bone marrow aspirates at a threshold of less than (\<) 10\^5.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)
    time Frame
    From randomization to end of following: induction treatment, post-ASCT consolidation (after Cycle 6) (up to 4.5 months), and at the end of maintenance period of 24 months (overall duration up to 34 months)
  6. description
    Duration of CR or better is the duration from the date of initial documentation of a CR or sCR response, according to the IMWG criteria, to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease (PR), or relapse from CR. PD is defined as an increase of 25 % from the lowest response value in one of the following: serum and urine M-component (absolute increase must be greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 0.5 gram per deciliter \[g/dL\] and \>=200 milligrams \[mg\]/24 hours respectively); Only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase must be \> 10 mg/dL); Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dL) that can be attributed solely to plasma cells (PCs) proliferative disorder.
    measure
    Duration of Complete Response or Better
    time Frame
    From randomization to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease or relapse from CR (up to 5 years)
  7. description
    Duration of sCR is the duration from the date of initial documentation of a sCR response, according to the IMWG criteria, to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease, or relapse from sCR. PD is defined as an increase of 25 % from the lowest response value in one of the following: serum and urine M component (absolute increase must be \>= 0.5 g/dL and \>=200 mg/24 hours respectively); Only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase must be \> 10 mg/dL); Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dL) that can be attributed solely to PC proliferative disorder.
    measure
    Duration of Stringent Complete Response (sCR)
    time Frame
    From randomization to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease or relapse from sCR (up to 5 years)
  8. description
    Time to sCR is the duration from the date of randomization to the date of initial documentation of sCR, which was confirmed by a repeated measurement as required by the IMWG criteria.
    measure
    Time to Stringent Complete Response (sCR)
    time Frame
    From randomization to the date of initial documentation of sCR (up to 5 years)
  9. description
    Time to CR or better is the duration from the date of randomization to the date of initial documentation of CR or better, which was confirmed by a repeated measurement as required by the IMWG criteria.
    measure
    Time to Complete Response or Better
    time Frame
    From randomization to the date of initial documentation of CR (up to 5 years)
  10. description
    Time to VGPR or better is the duration from the date of randomization to the date of initial documentation of VGPR or better, which was confirmed by a repeated measurement as required by the IMWG criteria.
    measure
    Time to Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better
    time Frame
    From randomization to the date of initial documentation of VGPR or better (up to 5 years)
  11. description
    Time to PR or better is the duration from the date of randomization to the date of initial documentation of PR or better, which was confirmed by a repeated measurement as required by the IMWG criteria.
    measure
    Time to Partial Response (PR) or Better
    time Frame
    From randomization to the date of initial documentation of PR or better (up to 5 years)
  12. description
    PFS is defined as the duration from the date of randomization to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease or death, whichever comes first. PD is defined as an increase of 25 % from the lowest response value in one of the following: serum and urine M-component (absolute increase must be \>= 0.5 g/dL and \>=200 mg/24 hours respectively); Only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase must be \> 10 mg/dL); Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dL) that can be attributed solely to PC proliferative disorder.
    measure
    Progression-free Survival (PFS)
    time Frame
    From randomization to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease or death (up to 5 years)
Full study description
brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if the addition of daratumumab to lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (RVd) will increase the proportion of participants achieving stringent complete response (sCR), as defined by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria, by the time of completion of post autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) consolidation treatment, compared with RVd alone.
Source references
references
  1. citation
    Voorhees PM, Sborov DW, Laubach J, Kaufman JL, Reeves B, Rodriguez C, Silbermann R, Costa LJ, Anderson LD Jr, Nathwani N, Shah N, Bumma N, Efebera YA, Holstein SA, Costello C, Jakubowiak A, Wildes TM, Orlowski RZ, Shain KH, Cowan AJ, Dinner S, Gries KS, Pei H, Cortoos A, Patel S, Lin TS, Usmani SZ, Richardson PG. A plain language summary of the final analysis of the GRIFFIN study of daratumumab plus lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for people with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Future Oncol. 2025 Jan;21(1):25-49. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2408909. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
    pmid
    39452950
    type
    DERIVED
  2. citation
    Sonneveld P, Dimopoulos MA, Boccadoro M, Quach H, Ho PJ, Beksac M, Hulin C, Antonioli E, Leleu X, Mangiacavalli S, Perrot A, Cavo M, Belotti A, Broijl A, Gay F, Mina R, van de Donk NWCJ, Katodritou E, Schjesvold F, Balari AS, Rosinol L, Delforge M, Roeloffzen W, Silzle T, Vangsted A, Einsele H, Spencer A, Hajek R, Jurczyszyn A, Lonergan S, Ahmadi T, Liu Y, Wang J, Vieyra D, van Brummelen EMJ, Vanquickelberghe V, Sitthi-Amorn A, de Boer CJ, Carson R, Rodriguez-Otero P, Blade J, Moreau P. A plain language summary of the PERSEUS study of daratumumab plus bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for treating newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Future Oncol. 2024;20(38):3043-3063. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2394323. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
    pmid
    39287147
    type
    DERIVED
  3. citation
    Chari A, Kaufman JL, Laubach J, Sborov DW, Reeves B, Rodriguez C, Silbermann R, Costa LJ, Anderson LD Jr, Nathwani N, Shah N, Bumma N, Holstein SA, Costello C, Jakubowiak A, Wildes TM, Orlowski RZ, Shain KH, Cowan AJ, Pei H, Cortoos A, Patel S, Lin TS, Voorhees PM, Usmani SZ, Richardson PG. Daratumumab in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: final analysis of clinically relevant subgroups in GRIFFIN. Blood Cancer J. 2024 Jul 8;14(1):107. doi: 10.1038/s41408-024-01088-6.
    pmid
    38977707
    type
    DERIVED
  4. citation
    Callander NS, Silbermann R, Kaufman JL, Godby KN, Laubach J, Schmidt TM, Sborov DW, Medvedova E, Reeves B, Dhakal B, Rodriguez C, Chhabra S, Chari A, Bal S, Anderson LD Jr, Dholaria BR, Nathwani N, Hari P, Shah N, Bumma N, Holstein SA, Costello C, Jakubowiak A, Wildes TM, Orlowski RZ, Shain KH, Cowan AJ, Pei H, Cortoos A, Patel S, Lin TS, Giri S, Costa LJ, Usmani SZ, Richardson PG, Voorhees PM. Daratumumab-based quadruplet therapy for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with high cytogenetic risk. Blood Cancer J. 2024 Apr 22;14(1):69. doi: 10.1038/s41408-024-01030-w.
    pmid
    38649340
    type
    DERIVED
  5. citation
    Silbermann R, Laubach J, Kaufman JL, Sborov DW, Reeves B, Rodriguez C, Chari A, Costa LJ, Anderson LD Jr, Nathwani N, Shah N, Bumma N, Holstein SA, Costello C, Jakubowiak A, Orlowski RZ, Shain KH, Cowan AJ, Gries KS, Pei H, Cortoos A, Patel S, Lin TS, Voorhees PM, Usmani SZ, Richardson PG. Health-related quality of life in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated with daratumumab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone: Patient-reported outcomes from GRIFFIN. Am J Hematol. 2024 Jul;99(7):1257-1268. doi: 10.1002/ajh.27326. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
    pmid
    38622840
    type
    DERIVED
  6. citation
    Voorhees PM, Sborov DW, Laubach J, Kaufman JL, Reeves B, Rodriguez C, Chari A, Silbermann R, Costa LJ, Anderson LD Jr, Nathwani N, Shah N, Bumma N, Efebera YA, Holstein SA, Costello C, Jakubowiak A, Wildes TM, Orlowski RZ, Shain KH, Cowan AJ, Dinner S, Pei H, Cortoos A, Patel S, Lin TS, Usmani SZ, Richardson PG. Addition of daratumumab to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (GRIFFIN): final analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2023 Oct;10(10):e825-e837. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(23)00217-X. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
    pmid
    37708911
    type
    DERIVED
  7. citation
    Nooka AK, Kaufman JL, Rodriguez C, Jakubowiak A, Efebera Y, Reeves B, Wildes T, Holstein SA, Anderson LD Jr, Badros A, Shune L, Chari A, Pei H, Cortoos A, Patel S, Lin TS, Richardson PG, Voorhees P. A plain language summary of daratumumab plus lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone in transplant-eligible Black patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the GRIFFIN study. Future Oncol. 2022 Dec;18(40):4443-4456. doi: 10.2217/fon-2022-0775. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
    pmid
    36799429
    type
    DERIVED
  8. citation
    Sborov DW, Baljevic M, Reeves B, Laubach J, Efebera YA, Rodriguez C, Costa LJ, Chari A, Silbermann R, Holstein SA, Anderson LD Jr, Kaufman JL, Shah N, Pei H, Patel S, Cortoos A, Bartlett JB, Vermeulen J, Lin TS, Voorhees PM, Richardson PG. Daratumumab plus lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Analysis of vascular thrombotic events in the GRIFFIN study. Br J Haematol. 2022 Nov;199(3):355-365. doi: 10.1111/bjh.18432. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
    pmid
    36111391
    type
    DERIVED
  9. citation
    Swan D, Henderson R, McEllistrim C, Naicker SD, Quinn J, Cahill MR, Mykytiv V, Lenihan E, Mulvaney E, Nolan M, Parker I, Natoni A, Lynch K, Ryan AE, Szegezdi E, Krawczyk J, Murphy P, O'Dwyer M. CyBorD-DARA in Newly Diagnosed Transplant-Eligible Multiple Myeloma: Results from the 16-BCNI-001/CTRIAL-IE 16-02 Study Show High Rates of MRD Negativity at End of Treatment. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022 Nov;22(11):847-852. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.07.011. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
    pmid
    35985959
    type
    DERIVED
  10. citation
    Voorhees PM, Rodriguez C, Reeves B, Nathwani N, Costa LJ, Lutska Y, Bobba P, Hoehn D, Pei H, Ukropec J, Qi M, Lin TS, Richardson PG. Daratumumab plus RVd for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: final analysis of the safety run-in cohort of GRIFFIN. Blood Adv. 2021 Feb 23;5(4):1092-1096. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003642.
    pmid
    33606004
    type
    DERIVED
  11. citation
    Voorhees PM, Kaufman JL, Laubach J, Sborov DW, Reeves B, Rodriguez C, Chari A, Silbermann R, Costa LJ, Anderson LD Jr, Nathwani N, Shah N, Efebera YA, Holstein SA, Costello C, Jakubowiak A, Wildes TM, Orlowski RZ, Shain KH, Cowan AJ, Murphy S, Lutska Y, Pei H, Ukropec J, Vermeulen J, de Boer C, Hoehn D, Lin TS, Richardson PG. Daratumumab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the GRIFFIN trial. Blood. 2020 Aug 20;136(8):936-945. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020005288.
    pmid
    32325490
    type
    DERIVED
Source notices and limitations
    Discovery and provenance
    1. release id
      ctgov-registry-7ad944f6deaf1f5cd6122126
      edge id
      nct-edge-d666ee4ff242b0292191
      requested nct id
      NCT02874742
      primary nct id
      NCT02874742
      source kind
      nci_explicit_reference_or_link
      source record id
      Source null
      source file sha256
      d6d5c80c67e5b4a0e31dcb23f10af8ee613bf3cdea28b12cf6edeec4e8cb5efd
      payload sha256
      e9a94f3ad48655ba9cdb26a47ae1f2401a77334f5d44b32d848e6d94cbaa0d76
      payload
      clinical indication matching status
      not_inferred
      end exclusive
      true
      id
      nct-edge-d666ee4ff242b0292191
      link basis
      explicit_NCT_identifier_in_acquired_source
      nct id
      NCT02874742
      occurrences
      1. context exact
        penia, which occurred in 62% of patients who received D-VRd and 51% of patients who received VRd.</li></ul></div></li><li>The phase II <a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT02874742">GRIFFIN</a> trial (NCT02874742) enrolled 207 patients with newly diagnosed transplant-eligible multiple myeloma. Patients were randomly assigned to receive in
        end
        156880
        exact text
        NCT02874742
        start
        156869
      2. context exact
        patients who received D-VRd and 51% of patients who received VRd.</li></ul></div></li><li>The phase II <a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT02874742">GRIFFIN</a> trial (NCT02874742) enrolled 207 patients with newly diagnosed transplant-eligible multiple myeloma. Patients were randomly assigned to receive induction therapy with either D-VR
        end
        156912
        exact text
        NCT02874742
        start
        156901
      offset unit
      unicode_code_points
      source file
      /tmp/cancer-full-research/nci/raw/f296c0ceec7921f192.html
      source file sha256
      d6d5c80c67e5b4a0e31dcb23f10af8ee613bf3cdea28b12cf6edeec4e8cb5efd
      source json pointer
      Source null
      source kind
      nci_explicit_reference_or_link
      source record id
      Source null
      source retrieved at
      2026-09-09T23:22:07.301466+00:00
      source string basis
      UTF-8_text_with_universal_newline_translation
      source string sha256
      06d77adc5701fe0c36d2266d613a483252a6113e6a22b8858db2d23882bdc33b
      source title
      Plasma Cell Neoplasms (Including Multiple Myeloma) Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version
      source update dates
      1. context
        Updated: April 25, 2025
        datetime
        2025-04-25T12:00:00Z
        display
        April 25, 2025

    Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice