Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) as Measured by the Global Health Status (GHS)
A Study of Oral Ixazomib Maintenance Therapy in Participants With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Not Treated With Stem Cell Transplantation (SCT) · Source last updated 2023-09-21
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. The change from baseline in GHS (EORTC QLQ-C30) score is presented. Participant responses to the question "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" are scored on a 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better overall GHS.
Analysis population: ITT Population included all participants who were randomized and had post-randomization data. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses for the specified time point.
Groups in this outcome
Placebo
Ixazomib 3 mg, capsule, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle from Cycles 1 through 26.
Ixazomib
Ixazomib 3 mg, capsule, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle from Cycles 1 to 4 that may have been escalated to 4 mg thereafter up to Cycle 26.
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo
257
Ixazomib
391
Reported measurements
Cycle 2
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo
257
Ixazomib
391
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo
1.7
16.63
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ixazomib
-0.1
16.77
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 3
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo
257
Ixazomib
375
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo
2.1
15.74
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ixazomib
-1.2
17.14
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 4
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo
245
Ixazomib
360
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo
1.5
16.80
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ixazomib
-0.6
16.53
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 5
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo
227
Ixazomib
340
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo
1.8
15.79
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ixazomib
0.6
16.33
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 6
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo
213
Ixazomib
307
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo
1.0
18.33
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ixazomib
-1.5
16.56
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 7
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo
202
Ixazomib
292
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo
3.1
16.32
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ixazomib
-0.7
17.28
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 8
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo
186
Ixazomib
273
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo
0.9
18.07
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ixazomib
-0.4
17.44
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 9
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo
173
Ixazomib
258
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo
1.4
16.67
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ixazomib
0.1
16.57
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 10
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo
163
Ixazomib
245
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo
2.0
16.38
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ixazomib
-1.6
17.82
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 11
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo
152
Ixazomib
233
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo
3.9
17.37
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ixazomib
0.2
17.75
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 12
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo
143
Ixazomib
228
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo
3.9
14.53
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ixazomib
0.3
16.26
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 13
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo
132
Ixazomib
218
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo
4.2
16.13
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ixazomib
-0.5
16.85
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 14
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo
126
Ixazomib
204
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo
3.1
16.99
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ixazomib
-1.1
17.45
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 15
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo
115
Ixazomib
194
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo
2.2
16.74
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ixazomib
-0.7
17.65
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 16
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo
104
Ixazomib
184
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo
2.5
15.57
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ixazomib
0.5
17.03
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 17
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo
100
Ixazomib
182
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo
2.4
15.09
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ixazomib
-0.2
18.09
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 18
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo
91
Ixazomib
182
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo
0.5
18.40
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ixazomib
1.7
16.87
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 19
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo
82
Ixazomib
172
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo
1.6
18.07
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ixazomib
1.1
17.24
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 20
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo
74
Ixazomib
161
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo
1.1
17.95
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ixazomib
0.4
16.13
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 21
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo
72
Ixazomib
153
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo
1.5
16.39
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ixazomib
1.3
16.19
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 22
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo
72
Ixazomib
147
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo
1.6
15.55
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ixazomib
1.0
17.13
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 23
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo
68
Ixazomib
137
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo
2.1
19.01
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ixazomib
0.9
16.96
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 24
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo
64
Ixazomib
132
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo
-0.3
20.46
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ixazomib
2.3
15.65
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 25
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo
56
Ixazomib
125
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo
0.0
18.80
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ixazomib
0.3
17.52
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 26
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo
47
Ixazomib
106
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo
2.8
17.49
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ixazomib
0.9
17.26
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Complete source fields
classes
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
16.63
value
1.7
group Id
OG001
spread
16.77
value
-0.1
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
257
group Id
OG001
value
391
units
Participants
title
Cycle 2
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
15.74
value
2.1
group Id
OG001
spread
17.14
value
-1.2
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
257
group Id
OG001
value
375
units
Participants
title
Cycle 3
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
16.80
value
1.5
group Id
OG001
spread
16.53
value
-0.6
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
245
group Id
OG001
value
360
units
Participants
title
Cycle 4
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
15.79
value
1.8
group Id
OG001
spread
16.33
value
0.6
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
227
group Id
OG001
value
340
units
Participants
title
Cycle 5
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
18.33
value
1.0
group Id
OG001
spread
16.56
value
-1.5
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
213
group Id
OG001
value
307
units
Participants
title
Cycle 6
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
16.32
value
3.1
group Id
OG001
spread
17.28
value
-0.7
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
202
group Id
OG001
value
292
units
Participants
title
Cycle 7
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
18.07
value
0.9
group Id
OG001
spread
17.44
value
-0.4
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
186
group Id
OG001
value
273
units
Participants
title
Cycle 8
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
16.67
value
1.4
group Id
OG001
spread
16.57
value
0.1
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
173
group Id
OG001
value
258
units
Participants
title
Cycle 9
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
16.38
value
2.0
group Id
OG001
spread
17.82
value
-1.6
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
163
group Id
OG001
value
245
units
Participants
title
Cycle 10
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
17.37
value
3.9
group Id
OG001
spread
17.75
value
0.2
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
152
group Id
OG001
value
233
units
Participants
title
Cycle 11
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
14.53
value
3.9
group Id
OG001
spread
16.26
value
0.3
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
143
group Id
OG001
value
228
units
Participants
title
Cycle 12
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
16.13
value
4.2
group Id
OG001
spread
16.85
value
-0.5
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
132
group Id
OG001
value
218
units
Participants
title
Cycle 13
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
257
group Id
OG001
value
391
units
Participants
description
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. The change from baseline in GHS (EORTC QLQ-C30) score is presented. Participant responses to the question "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" are scored on a 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better overall GHS.
dispersion Type
Standard Deviation
groups
description
Ixazomib 3 mg, capsule, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle from Cycles 1 through 26.
id
OG000
title
Placebo
description
Ixazomib 3 mg, capsule, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle from Cycles 1 to 4 that may have been escalated to 4 mg thereafter up to Cycle 26.
id
OG001
title
Ixazomib
param Type
MEAN
population Description
ITT Population included all participants who were randomized and had post-randomization data. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses for the specified time point.
Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) as Measured by the Global Health Status (GHS)