Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT01308567 · OUTCOME

Skeletal Related Events (SRE) Free Survival

Cabazitaxel Versus Docetaxel Both With Prednisone in Patients With Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer · Source last updated 2019-06-05

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
MEDIAN
Unit
months
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
Baseline until occurrence of first SRE or death (maximum duration: 51 months)

What was measured

SRE free survival was defined as the time interval between the date of randomization and the date of the occurrence of the first event defining a SRE or death due to any cause, whichever was earlier. SRE were assessed by clinical evaluation. Occurrence of SRE was defined as: pathological fracture(s) and/or spinal cord compression; need for bone irradiation, including radioisotopes or bone surgery; and change of antineoplastic therapy (including introduction of bisphosphonates or denosumab in the setting of increased pain) to treat bone pain. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

Analysis population: Analysis was performed on ITT population which included all randomized participants.

Groups in this outcome

Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2

Docetaxel (TXT) 75 mg/m\^2 IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with Prednisone 10 mg orally, once daily until DP, unacceptable toxicity or participant's refusal.

Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2

Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m\^2 IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21 -day cycle in combination with Prednisone 10 mg orally, once daily until DP, unacceptable toxicity or participant's refusal.

Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2

Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m\^2 IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with Prednisone 10 mg orally, once daily until DP, unacceptable toxicity or participant's refusal.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2391
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2389
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2388

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Docetaxel 75 mg/m^219.0Not reported15.2422.44Not reported
Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^219.2Not reported15.2124.61Not reported
Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^217.1Not reported14.5920.50Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.886
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.417
    estimate Comment
    Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m\^2 vs Docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2
    group Description
    Hazard ratio was estimated using a Cox Proportional Hazards regression model. The Cox proportional hazard model was adjusted by ECOG PS score at baseline, measurable disease at baseline, and region with commercial availability of cabazitaxel at the time of randomization.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG002
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    1.121
  2. ci Lower Limit
    0.798
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.288
    estimate Comment
    Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m\^2 vs Docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2
    group Description
    Hazard ratio was estimated using a Cox Proportional Hazards regression model. The Cox proportional hazard model was adjusted by ECOG PS score at baseline, measurable disease at baseline, and region with commercial availability of cabazitaxel at the time of randomization.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    1.014
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.886
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.417
    estimate Comment
    Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m\^2 vs Docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2
    group Description
    Hazard ratio was estimated using a Cox Proportional Hazards regression model. The Cox proportional hazard model was adjusted by ECOG PS score at baseline, measurable disease at baseline, and region with commercial availability of cabazitaxel at the time of randomization.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG002
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    1.121
  2. ci Lower Limit
    0.798
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.288
    estimate Comment
    Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m\^2 vs Docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2
    group Description
    Hazard ratio was estimated using a Cox Proportional Hazards regression model. The Cox proportional hazard model was adjusted by ECOG PS score at baseline, measurable disease at baseline, and region with commercial availability of cabazitaxel at the time of randomization.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    1.014
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        15.24
        upper Limit
        22.44
        value
        19.0
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        15.21
        upper Limit
        24.61
        value
        19.2
      3. group Id
        OG002
        lower Limit
        14.59
        upper Limit
        20.50
        value
        17.1
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      391
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      389
    3. group Id
      OG002
      value
      388
    units
    Participants
description
SRE free survival was defined as the time interval between the date of randomization and the date of the occurrence of the first event defining a SRE or death due to any cause, whichever was earlier. SRE were assessed by clinical evaluation. Occurrence of SRE was defined as: pathological fracture(s) and/or spinal cord compression; need for bone irradiation, including radioisotopes or bone surgery; and change of antineoplastic therapy (including introduction of bisphosphonates or denosumab in the setting of increased pain) to treat bone pain. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Docetaxel (TXT) 75 mg/m\^2 IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with Prednisone 10 mg orally, once daily until DP, unacceptable toxicity or participant's refusal.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2
  2. description
    Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m\^2 IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21 -day cycle in combination with Prednisone 10 mg orally, once daily until DP, unacceptable toxicity or participant's refusal.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2
  3. description
    Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m\^2 IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with Prednisone 10 mg orally, once daily until DP, unacceptable toxicity or participant's refusal.
    id
    OG002
    title
    Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2
param Type
MEDIAN
population Description
Analysis was performed on ITT population which included all randomized participants.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Baseline until occurrence of first SRE or death (maximum duration: 51 months)
title
Skeletal Related Events (SRE) Free Survival
type
SECONDARY
unit Of Measure
months

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice