Skip to content
← Study library

NCT01308567 · CITED IN SOURCE DOCUMENTS

Cabazitaxel Versus Docetaxel Both With Prednisone in Patients With Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer

An NCI or FDA source cites this study. A citation does not establish that it applies to an individual diagnosis.

Phase
PHASE3
Status at capture
COMPLETED
Registry last update
2019-06-05

Primary Objective: * To demonstrate the superiority of cabazitaxel plus prednisone at 25 mg/m\^2 (Arm A) or 20 mg/m\^2 (Arm B) versus docetaxel plus prednisone (Arm C) in term of overall survival (OS) in participants with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and not previously treated with chemotherapy. Secondary Objectives: * To evaluate safety in the 3 treatment arms. * To compare efficacy of cabazitaxel at 20 mg/m\^2 and 25 mg/m\^2 to docetaxel for: * Progression Free Survival (PFS) (RECIST 1.1) * Tumor progression free survival (RECIST 1.1) * Tumor response in participants with measurable disease (RECIST 1.1), * PSA response * PSA-Progression free survival (PSA-PFS). * Pain response in participants with stable pain at baseline * Pain progression free survival * Time to occurrence of any skeletal related events (SRE) * To compare Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL). * To assess the pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics of cabazitaxel.

Open the original ClinicalTrials.gov record → · Download preserved record

What did the study report?

Outcomes, safety and baseline populations are separate source sections. Quality-of-life measures appear under their original outcome titles.

Who could take part
eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria : * I 01. Histologically- or cytologically-confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma. * I 02. Metastatic disease. * I 03. Progressive disease while receiving hormonal therapy or after surgical castration. * I 04. Effective castration (serum testosterone levels ≤0.50 ng/mL) by orchiectomy and/or luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists or antagonist with or without anti-androgens. Exclusion criteria: * E 01. Prior chemotherapy for prostate cancer, * E 02. Less than 28 days elapsed from prior treatment with estramustine, radiotherapy or surgery to the time of randomization. Participants on biphosphonates prior to study entry. * E 03. Prior isotope therapy, whole pelvic radiotherapy, or radiotherapy to \>30% of bone marrow. * E 04. Adverse events (excluding alopecia and those listed in the specific exclusion criteria) from any prior anticancer therapy of grade \>1(National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria \[NCI CTCAE\] v4.03) at the time of randomization. * E 05. Less than 18 years (or country's legal age of majority if the legal age is \>18 years). * E 06. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status \>2. * E 07. History of brain metastases, uncontrolled spinal cord compression, or carcinomatous meningitis or new evidence of brain or leptomeningeal disease. * E 08. Prior malignancy. * E 09. Participation in another clinical trial and any concurrent treatment with any investigational drug within 30 days prior to randomization. * E 10. Any of the following within 6 months prior to study enrollment: myocardial infarction, severe/unstable angina pectoris, coronary/peripheral artery bypass graft, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV congestive heart failure, stroke or transient ischemic attack. * E 11. Any of the following within 3 months prior to randomization: treatment resistant peptic ulcer disease, erosive esophagitis or gastritis, infectious or inflammatory bowel disease, diverticulitis, pulmonary embolism, or other uncontrolled thromboembolic event. * E 12. Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS-related illnesses) or known HIV disease requiring antiretroviral treatment. * E 13. Any severe acute or chronic medical condition which could impair the ability of the participant to participate to the study or interfere with interpretation of study results, or participants unable to comply with the study procedures. * E 14. Absence of signed and dated Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved participant informed consent form prior to enrollment into the study. * E 15. Participants with reproductive potential who did not agree to use accepted and effective method of contraception during the study treatment period. * E 16. History of hypersensitivity to docetaxel, or polysorbate 80. * E 17. Inadequate organ and bone marrow function * E 18. Contraindications to the use of corticosteroid treatment. * E 19. Symptomatic peripheral neuropathy grade \>2 (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria \[NCI CTCAE\] v.4.03). The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.
healthy Volunteers
false
minimum Age
18 Years
sex
MALE
std Ages
  1. ADULT
  2. OLDER_ADULT
Treatment arms and interventions
arm Groups
  1. description
    Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m\^2 intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with Prednisone 10 mg orally, once daily until disease progression (DP), unacceptable toxicity or participant's refusal.
    intervention Names
    1. Drug: Cabazitaxel (XRP6258)
    2. Drug: Prednisone
    label
    Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2
    type
    EXPERIMENTAL
  2. description
    Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m\^2 IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21 -day cycle in combination with Prednisone 10 mg orally, once daily until DP, unacceptable toxicity or participant's refusal.
    intervention Names
    1. Drug: Cabazitaxel (XRP6258)
    2. Drug: Prednisone
    label
    Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2
    type
    EXPERIMENTAL
  3. description
    Docetaxel (TXT) 75 mg/m\^2 IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with Prednisone 10 mg orally, once daily until DP, unacceptable toxicity or participant's refusal.
    intervention Names
    1. Drug: Docetaxel (XRP6976)
    2. Drug: Prednisone
    label
    Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2
    type
    ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
interventions
  1. arm Group Labels
    1. Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2
    2. Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2
    description
    Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection; Route of administration: Intravenous
    name
    Cabazitaxel (XRP6258)
    type
    DRUG
  2. arm Group Labels
    1. Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2
    description
    Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection'; Route of administration: Intravenous
    name
    Docetaxel (XRP6976)
    type
    DRUG
  3. arm Group Labels
    1. Cabazitaxel 20 mg/m^2
    2. Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m^2
    3. Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2
    description
    Pharmaceutical form: Tablet; Route of administration: Oral
    name
    Prednisone
    type
    DRUG
Study design
allocation
RANDOMIZED
intervention Model
PARALLEL
masking Info
masking
NONE
primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Enrollment
count
1168
type
ACTUAL
Registered outcome plans (not posted results)
primary Outcomes
  1. description
    OS was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date participant was known to be alive, or at the cut-off date if the participant's last contact was after the cut-off date. The study cut-off date for the final analysis of OS was the date when the 774th death had been observed. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
    measure
    Overall Survival (OS)
    time Frame
    Baseline up to death or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 51 months )
secondary Outcomes
  1. description
    PFS: time interval between date of randomization to date of first occurrence of any of following events: tumor progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1; Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) progression; pain progression or death due to any cause. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
    measure
    Progression Free Survival (PFS)
    time Frame
    Baseline up to tumor progression, PSA progression, pain progression or death (maximum duration: 51 months)
  2. description
    Time to tumor progression free survival was defined as the time interval between randomization and the date of first occurrence of tumor progression (assessed using RECIST version 1.1) or death, whichever was earlier. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
    measure
    Time to Tumor Progression Free Survival
    time Frame
    Baseline up to tumor progression or death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 51 months)
  3. description
    Overall objective tumor response was defined as having a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) according to the RECIST version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants With Overall Objective Tumor Response
    time Frame
    Baseline up to DP or death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 51 months)
  4. description
    Time to PSA-PFS: time interval between date of randomization \& first occurrence of PSA progression/ death, whichever was earlier. PSA progression:1) In PSA responders(≥50% decline from baseline PSA of ≥10 ng/mL):increase of ≥25%(at least 2 ng/mL)over nadir value, confirmed by second PSA value at least 3 weeks later;2)In PSA non-responders(not achieved ≥50% decline from baseline PSA ≥10 ng/mL):increase of ≥25% (at least 2 ng/mL) over baseline value, confirmed by second PSA value at least 3 weeks later;3)In participants not eligible for PSA response(baseline PSA \<10 ng/mL):(a)in participants with baseline PSA\>0 ng/mL\&\<10 ng/mL: increase in PSA by 25% (at least 2 ng/mL) above baseline level, confirmed by second PSA value at least 3weeks apart;(b)in participants with baseline value=0ng/mL: a post baseline PSA value ≥2ng/mL.Early rise in PSA only indicated progression if it was associated with another sign of DP or if it continued beyond 12 weeks. Analysis performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
    measure
    Time to Prostate Serum Antigen Progression Free Survival (PSA-PFS)
    time Frame
    Baseline up to PSA progression or death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 51 months)
  5. description
    PSA response was defined as ≥50% decrease from baseline in serum PSA levels, confirmed by a second PSA value at least 3 weeks later in participants with baseline PSA value ≥10 ng/mL.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants With PSA Response
    time Frame
    Baseline up to PSA progression or death due to any cause or study cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration: 51 months)
  6. description
    Time to pain PFS was defined as the time interval between date of randomization and the date of the first occurrence of pain progression or death, whichever was earlier. Pain progression was defined as an increase of ≥1 point in the median present pain intensity (PPI) score from the nadir confirmed by a second assessment at least 3 weeks later or ≥25 % increase in the mean analgesic score from baseline, due to cancer related pain confirmed by a second assessment at least 3 weeks later or requirement for local palliative radiotherapy. PPI was rated by participant in a diary using a scale of 0=no pain, 1=mild, 2=discomforting, 3=distressing, 4=horrible 5=excruciating. Analgesic use was recorded by the participant in a diary. Analgesic score was calculated from the analgesic use data based on a table of analgesic medications, with non-narcotic medications assigned a value of 1 point and narcotic medications assigned a value of 4 points. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
    measure
    Time to Pain Progression Free Survival (Pain PFS)
    time Frame
    Baseline until disease progression, death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 51 months)
  7. description
    Pain response was defined as either a ≥2-point decrease from baseline median PPI score without increase in analgesic score, or a ≥50% decrease in analgesic use from baseline mean analgesic score (only in participants with baseline mean analgesic score≥10) without increase in the pain. Either criterion was maintained for 2 consecutive evaluations at least 3 weeks apart. PPI was rated by participant in a diary using a scale of 0=no pain, 1=mild, 2=discomforting, 3=distressing, 4=horrible 5=excruciating. Analgesic use was recorded by the participant in a diary. Analgesic score was calculated from the analgesic use data based on a table of analgesic medications, with non-narcotic medications assigned a value of 1 point and narcotic medications assigned a value of 4 points.
    measure
    Percentage of Participants With Pain Response
    time Frame
    Baseline until pain progression, death or study cut-off date (maximum duration: 51 months)
  8. description
    SRE free survival was defined as the time interval between the date of randomization and the date of the occurrence of the first event defining a SRE or death due to any cause, whichever was earlier. SRE were assessed by clinical evaluation. Occurrence of SRE was defined as: pathological fracture(s) and/or spinal cord compression; need for bone irradiation, including radioisotopes or bone surgery; and change of antineoplastic therapy (including introduction of bisphosphonates or denosumab in the setting of increased pain) to treat bone pain. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
    measure
    Skeletal Related Events (SRE) Free Survival
    time Frame
    Baseline until occurrence of first SRE or death (maximum duration: 51 months)
  9. description
    FACT-P was a 39-item participant rated questionnaire that measures the concerns of participants with prostate cancer. It consisted of 5 sub-scales assessing physical well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and prostate-specific concerns (12 items). FACT-P total score was the sum of all 5 subscale scores. It ranged from 0 to156 with higher score indicated better quality of life with fewer symptoms.
    measure
    Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Total Score as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
    time Frame
    Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 (each cycle 21-day); post-treatment follow up 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (each up to 12 weeks)
  10. description
    FACT-P was a 39-item participant rated questionnaire that measures the concerns of participants with prostate cancer. It consisted of 5 sub-scales assessing physical well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and prostate-specific concerns (12 items). Physical well being, functional well being, and prostate-specific concerns sub-scales of the FACT-P questionnaire were combined to calculate TOI. Total TOI score ranges from 0 to 104, with higher scores representing a better quality of life with fewer symptoms.
    measure
    Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P):Trial Outcome Index (TOI) as a Measure of HRQoL
    time Frame
    Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 (each cycle 21-day); post-treatment follow up 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (each up to 12 weeks)
Full study description
brief Summary
Primary Objective: * To demonstrate the superiority of cabazitaxel plus prednisone at 25 mg/m\^2 (Arm A) or 20 mg/m\^2 (Arm B) versus docetaxel plus prednisone (Arm C) in term of overall survival (OS) in participants with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and not previously treated with chemotherapy. Secondary Objectives: * To evaluate safety in the 3 treatment arms. * To compare efficacy of cabazitaxel at 20 mg/m\^2 and 25 mg/m\^2 to docetaxel for: * Progression Free Survival (PFS) (RECIST 1.1) * Tumor progression free survival (RECIST 1.1) * Tumor response in participants with measurable disease (RECIST 1.1), * PSA response * PSA-Progression free survival (PSA-PFS). * Pain response in participants with stable pain at baseline * Pain progression free survival * Time to occurrence of any skeletal related events (SRE) * To compare Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL). * To assess the pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics of cabazitaxel.
detailed Description
Participants were treated until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or participant's refusal of further study treatment. All participants were followed when on study treatment and after completion of study treatment during follow up period until death or the study cutoff date, whichever comes first.
Source references
references
  1. citation
    Carrot A, Oudard S, Colomban O, Fizazi K, Maillet D, Sartor O, Freyer G, You B. Prognostic Value of the Modeled Prostate-Specific Antigen KELIM Confirmation in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With Taxanes in FIRSTANA. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024 Feb;8:e2300208. doi: 10.1200/CCI.23.00208.
    pmid
    38364191
    type
    DERIVED
  2. citation
    Thiery-Vuillemin A, Fizazi K, Sartor O, Oudard S, Bury D, Thangavelu K, Ozatilgan A, Poole EM, Eisenberger M, de Bono J. An analysis of health-related quality of life in the phase III PROSELICA and FIRSTANA studies assessing cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. ESMO Open. 2021 Apr;6(2):100089. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100089. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
    pmid
    33740734
    type
    DERIVED
  3. citation
    Mehra N, Dolling D, Sumanasuriya S, Christova R, Pope L, Carreira S, Seed G, Yuan W, Goodall J, Hall E, Flohr P, Boysen G, Bianchini D, Sartor O, Eisenberger MA, Fizazi K, Oudard S, Chadjaa M, Mace S, de Bono JS. Plasma Cell-free DNA Concentration and Outcomes from Taxane Therapy in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer from Two Phase III Trials (FIRSTANA and PROSELICA). Eur Urol. 2018 Sep;74(3):283-291. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
    pmid
    29500065
    type
    DERIVED
  4. citation
    Oudard S, Fizazi K, Sengelov L, Daugaard G, Saad F, Hansen S, Hjalm-Eriksson M, Jassem J, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Caffo O, Castellano D, Mainwaring PN, Bernard J, Shen L, Chadjaa M, Sartor O. Cabazitaxel Versus Docetaxel As First-Line Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Phase III Trial-FIRSTANA. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;35(28):3189-3197. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.72.1068. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
    pmid
    28753384
    type
    DERIVED
  5. citation
    de Liano AG, Reig O, Mellado B, Martin C, Rull EU, Maroto JP. Prognostic and predictive value of plasma testosterone levels in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Br J Cancer. 2014 Apr 29;110(9):2201-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.189. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
    pmid
    24722180
    type
    DERIVED
  6. citation
    Winquist E, Rodrigues G. Open clinical uro-oncology trials in Canada. Can J Urol. 2012 Dec;19(6):6587-91. No abstract available.
    pmid
    23228299
    type
    DERIVED
Source notices and limitations
    Discovery and provenance
    1. release id
      ctgov-registry-7ad944f6deaf1f5cd6122126
      edge id
      nct-edge-f5fec623febf8b952a1b
      requested nct id
      NCT01308567
      primary nct id
      NCT01308567
      source kind
      nci_explicit_reference_or_link
      source record id
      Source null
      source file sha256
      89c3cbcb10a3e14c5ee4b607046c929e5902a798e71e758f8a712b0ae71413cf
      payload sha256
      49bd8d2c7fc084a969713f1314cb074e69466663206f2b8260c70402bd90e1a8
      payload
      clinical indication matching status
      not_inferred
      end exclusive
      true
      id
      nct-edge-f5fec623febf8b952a1b
      link basis
      explicit_NCT_identifier_in_acquired_source
      nct id
      NCT01308567
      occurrences
      1. context exact
        rovide similar results with respect to OS.[<a href="#cit/section_8.64">64</a>]<div class="pdq-content-list"><ul id="_3030"><li> In the <a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT01308567">FIRSTANA</a> trial (NCT01308567), 1,168 men with mCRPC were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive cabazitaxel 20 mg/m<span class="sup">2</span>, cabaz
        end
        587518
        exact text
        NCT01308567
        start
        587507
      2. context exact
        ct to OS.[<a href="#cit/section_8.64">64</a>]<div class="pdq-content-list"><ul id="_3030"><li> In the <a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT01308567">FIRSTANA</a> trial (NCT01308567), 1,168 men with mCRPC were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive cabazitaxel 20 mg/m<span class="sup">2</span>, cabazitaxel 25 mg/m<span class="sup">2
        end
        587551
        exact text
        NCT01308567
        start
        587540
      offset unit
      unicode_code_points
      source file
      /tmp/cancer-full-research/nci/raw/48a3f061dd2bbd22e8.html
      source file sha256
      89c3cbcb10a3e14c5ee4b607046c929e5902a798e71e758f8a712b0ae71413cf
      source json pointer
      Source null
      source kind
      nci_explicit_reference_or_link
      source record id
      Source null
      source retrieved at
      2026-09-09T23:22:14.334045+00:00
      source string basis
      UTF-8_text_with_universal_newline_translation
      source string sha256
      351f45145a6c8591cdadd072763243033f8e1fa33cafecd55e4bac86e2b9edf3
      source title
      Prostate Cancer Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version
      source update dates
      1. context
        Updated: May 14, 2025
        datetime
        2025-05-14T12:00:00Z
        display
        May 14, 2025

    Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice