Skip to content
Triangle logo TriangleGet started
← Full study record

NCT00047008 · OUTCOME

Local-regional Failure (Alternate Definition) [Percentage of Participants With Local-regional Failure]

Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy With or Without Surgery in Treating Patients With Head and Neck Cancer · Source last updated 2023-07-07

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
NUMBER
Unit
percentage of participants
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule from end of treatment: 6-8 weeks, every 3 mo. for 2 yr., then every 6 mo. for 3 yr., then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 6.5 years. Three-year rates are reported here.

What was measured

Local-regional failure time is defined as time from randomization to relapse/progression in the primary tumor or regional nodes (event), death due to study cancer or unknown causes (event), death due to other causes (competing event), distant metastasis (competing event), or last follow-up (censored). Progression is defined as an estimated increase in the size of the tumor of greater than 25% or appearance of new areas of malignant disease. The full distribution is the outcome of interest, and the protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Three-year estimates are provided as a summary of the distributions. Analysis was planned to occur after 309 deaths had been reported.

Analysis population: Eligible patients who did not withdraw consent

Groups in this outcome

Standard Fractionation RT + Cisplatin

Standard fractionation radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin followed by conventional surgery for select patients.

Accelerated Fractionation RT + Cisplatin

Accelerated fractionation radiation therapy by concomitant boost with concurrent cisplatin followed by conventional surgery for select patients.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Standard Fractionation RT + Cisplatin361
Accelerated Fractionation RT + Cisplatin360

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Standard Fractionation RT + Cisplatin25.6Not reported21.130.1Not reported
Accelerated Fractionation RT + Cisplatin28.2Not reported23.632.9Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.85
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.44
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.80
    p Value Comment
    One-sided significance level = 0.05
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    1.11
    statistical Method
    Gray's test
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.85
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.44
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.80
    p Value Comment
    One-sided significance level = 0.05
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    1.11
    statistical Method
    Gray's test
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        21.1
        upper Limit
        30.1
        value
        25.6
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        23.6
        upper Limit
        32.9
        value
        28.2
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      361
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      360
    units
    Participants
description
Local-regional failure time is defined as time from randomization to relapse/progression in the primary tumor or regional nodes (event), death due to study cancer or unknown causes (event), death due to other causes (competing event), distant metastasis (competing event), or last follow-up (censored). Progression is defined as an estimated increase in the size of the tumor of greater than 25% or appearance of new areas of malignant disease. The full distribution is the outcome of interest, and the protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Three-year estimates are provided as a summary of the distributions. Analysis was planned to occur after 309 deaths had been reported.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Standard fractionation radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin followed by conventional surgery for select patients.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Standard Fractionation RT + Cisplatin
  2. description
    Accelerated fractionation radiation therapy by concomitant boost with concurrent cisplatin followed by conventional surgery for select patients.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Accelerated Fractionation RT + Cisplatin
param Type
NUMBER
population Description
Eligible patients who did not withdraw consent
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule from end of treatment: 6-8 weeks, every 3 mo. for 2 yr., then every 6 mo. for 3 yr., then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 6.5 years. Three-year rates are reported here.
title
Local-regional Failure (Alternate Definition) [Percentage of Participants With Local-regional Failure]
type
SECONDARY
unit Of Measure
percentage of participants

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-25a395029948b04d52b1253f

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice