Skip to content
← TECENTRIQ: unresectable metastatic Melanoma with BRAF V600

NCT01909453 · STUDY IN CONTEXT

Study Comparing Combination of LGX818 Plus MEK162 Versus Vemurafenib and LGX818 Monotherapy in BRAF Mutant Melanoma

Draft scope assessment: unclear. Attached because the study's own record names BRAF and describes metastatic disease. The study was not selected for this indication by its sponsor, and its eligibility has not been reconciled against this page in full. Found because this study's registry identifier is printed in an FDA approval notice, an FDA product label or an NCI summary held by this site. The citing document and the exact position of the identifier inside it are recorded. Being cited is not a statement that the study supports this treatment.

Read the full study record and all posted results →

Linked outcomes

Measures are not ranked. Open each original source section for treatment groups, denominators, units and results.

primary · POSTED

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS was determined based on tumor assessment (RECIST version 1.1 criteria) as per BIRC/central review and survival information. If a participant did not had an event at the time of the analysis cut-off or at the start of any new anti-cancer therapy, data was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 square millimeter (mm\^2).

FAS included all randomized participants.

→

primary · POSTED

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS was determined based on tumor assessment (RECIST version 1.1 criteria) as per BIRC and survival information. If a participant did not had an event at the time of the analysis cut-off or at the start of any new anti-cancer therapy, data was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm\^2.

FAS included all randomized participants.

→

secondary · POSTED

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS was determined based on tumor assessment (RECIST version 1.1 criteria) as per BIRC and survival information. If a participant did not had an event at the time of the analysis cut-off or at the start of any new anti-cancer therapy, data was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm\^2.

FAS included all randomized participants. It was planned to report combined result data of Part 1 and Part 2 for LGX818 300 mg arm.

→

secondary · POSTED

Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. If a death was not observed by the date of analysis cutoff, OS was censored at the date of last contact.

FAS included all randomized participants.

→

secondary · POSTED

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent/significant disability/incapacity; results in congenital anomaly/birth defect or an important medical event. As per NCI-CTCAE version 4.03, severity was graded as Grade 1: asymptomatic/mild symptoms; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe/medically significant; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence; Grade 5: death. AEs and SAEs of all grades combined were reported.

Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and have at least one valid post-baseline safety evaluation.

→

secondary · POSTED

Laboratory parameters were graded using NCI-CTCAE v4.03 where, Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5: death. Clinically notable shift from baseline in laboratory parameter = worsening by at least 2 grades or to \>=grade 3. Only categories with non-zero values for any reporting arm are reported.

Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and have at least one valid post-baseline safety evaluation. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.

→

Reported safety

Serious events are not the same as severe events. Compare the original safety groups and their at-risk populations.

Open the study safety table →

Quality of life and patient-reported measures

FACT · Part 1 and Part 2: Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in the Function Assessment Cancer Therapy-melanoma (FACT-M) Subscale

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
nct id
NCT01909453
qol key
qol-0023
source section id
NCT01909453-om-0023
source outcome index
23
instrument
FACT
instrument basis
matched 'fact-m' in the study's own wording
scale title
Part 1 and Part 2: Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in the Function Assessment Cancer Therapy-melanoma (FACT-M) Subscale
measure definition
FACT-M:melanoma specific questionnaire to assess participant health-related quality of life(QoL).Melanoma specific 16 subscale :signs,symptoms,physical/social activities most relevant to participants with advanced-stage melanoma.Other items :physical,functional and social/family well-being(7 items each),emotional well-being(6 items),surgery specific concerns related to melanoma(8 items,not included in this study).Each item range 0(not at all)to 4(very much),combined to produce subscale scores.Total score range for FACT-M excluding surgery specific items is 0 to172,higher scores:better QoL.Melanoma subscale score range from0(worst)to 64(best response),higher score:better QoL.Time to definitive 10% deterioration:time from date of randomization to date of event with at least 10% relative to baseline worsening of corresponding scale score with no later improvement or death due to any cause.All collected data up to pre-specified collection period(i.e.,end of study)are reported for this OM.
time frame
Date of randomization to date of event or death due to any cause, which ever occurred first (up to 29 months for Part 1, excluding Part 1: LGX818 300 mg group; up to 35 months for Part 2 and Part 1 LGX 300 mg group)
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher scores:better
population note
FAS included all randomized participants. It was planned to report combined result data of Part 1 and Part 2 for LGX818 300 mg arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Part 1 and Part 2: Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in the Global Health Status Score of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
nct id
NCT01909453
qol key
qol-0024
source section id
NCT01909453-om-0024
source outcome index
24
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Part 1 and Part 2: Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in the Global Health Status Score of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 is 30 item questionnaire composed of 5 multi-item functional subscales (physical,role,cognitive,emotional,social functioning), 3 multi-item symptom scales (fatigue,nausea/vomiting, and pain),global health/quality of life (QOL) subscale and 6 single items assessing other cancer related symptoms (dyspnea,sleep disturbance, appetite, diarrhea, constipation and financial impact of cancer). It employed twenty-eight 4 point Likert scales with responses from "not at all" to "very much" and two 7 point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Global health status scale score ranged from 0 to 100. Higher score: better level of functioning. Time to definitive 10% deterioration: time from date of randomization to date of event with at least 10% relative to baseline worsening of corresponding scale score with no later improvement or death due to any cause. All collected data up to the pre-specified collection period (i.e., end of study) are reported for this outcome measure.
time frame
Date of randomization to date of event or death due to any cause, which ever occurred first (maximum up to 29 months for Part 1, excluding Part 1: LGX818 300 mg group; up to 35 months for Part 2 and Part 1 LGX 300 mg group)
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
Higher score: better
population note
FAS included all randomized participants. It was planned to report combined result data of Part 1 and Part 2 for LGX818 300 mg arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
FACT · Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in the FACT-M Subscale at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
nct id
NCT01909453
qol key
qol-0025
source section id
NCT01909453-om-0025
source outcome index
25
instrument
FACT
instrument basis
matched 'fact-m' in the study's own wording
scale title
Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in the FACT-M Subscale at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit
measure definition
FACT-M: melanoma specific questionnaire to assess participant health-related quality of life. Melanoma specific subscale consists of 16 items related to signs, symptoms, physical/social activities most relevant to participants with advanced-stage melanoma. Other items include physical, functional and social/family well-being (7 items each), emotional well-being (6 items), surgery specific concerns related to melanoma (8 items, not included in this study). Each item ranged from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much), combined to produce subscale scores. Total score range for FACT-M excluding surgery specific items is 0 to 172, higher scores represented better quality of life. Melanoma subscale score ranged from 0 (worst response) to 64 (best response), higher score indicated better quality of life.
time frame
Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and end of treatment visit (within14 days after the last dose of study drug)
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher scores represented better
population note
FAS included all randomized participants. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for each specified row. It was planned to report combined result data of Part 1 and Part 2 for LGX818 300 mg arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EQ-5D · Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
nct id
NCT01909453
qol key
qol-0026
source section id
NCT01909453-om-0026
source outcome index
26
instrument
EQ-5D
instrument basis
matched 'eq-5d' in the study's own wording
scale title
Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit
measure definition
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized participant completed questionnaire that measures health status in terms of a single index value or utility score. EQ-5D-5L consisted of two components: a health state profile (descriptive system) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) in which participants rate their overall health status from 0 (worst imaginable) to 100 (best imaginable), where higher scores indicated better health status. EQ-5D health state profile is comprised of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. EQ-5D-5L health status index score range between 0 to 1. Higher score indicated better health status.
time frame
Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and end of treatment visit (within14 days after the last dose of study drug)
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher scores indicated better
population note
FAS included all randomized participants. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for each specified row. It was planned to report combined result data of Part 1 and Part 2 for LGX818 300 mg arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
nct id
NCT01909453
qol key
qol-0027
source section id
NCT01909453-om-0027
source outcome index
27
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items and is composed of multi-item and single-item measures. These include 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact) and a global health status/quality of life (QOL) scale. The questionnaire employs 28 4-point Likert scales with responses from "not at all" to "very much" and two 7-point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Responses to all items converted to 0 to 100 scale. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represent a better level of functioning/QOL. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represents more severe symptoms.
time frame
Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and end of treatment visit (within14 days after the last dose of study drug)
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher scores represent a better
population note
FAS included all randomized participants. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for each specified row. It was planned to report combined result data of Part 1 and Part 2 for LGX818 300 mg arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in Emotional Functioning Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30 at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
nct id
NCT01909453
qol key
qol-0028
source section id
NCT01909453-om-0028
source outcome index
28
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in Emotional Functioning Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30 at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items and is composed of multi-item and single-item measures. These include 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact) and a global health status/ QOL scale. The questionnaire employs 28 4-point Likert scales with responses from "not at all" to "very much" and two 7-point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Responses to all items converted to 0 to 100 scale. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represent a better level of functioning/QOL. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represented more severe symptoms.
time frame
Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and end of treatment visit (within14 days after the last dose of study drug)
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher scores represent a better
population note
FAS included all randomized participants. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for each specified row. It was planned to report combined result data of Part 1 and Part 2 for LGX818 300 mg arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30 at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
nct id
NCT01909453
qol key
qol-0029
source section id
NCT01909453-om-0029
source outcome index
29
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30 at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items and is composed of multi-item and single-item measures. These include 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact) and a global health status/QOL scale. The questionnaire employs 28 4-point Likert scales with responses from "not at all" to "very much" and two 7-point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Responses to all items converted to 0 to 100 scale. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represented a better level of functioning/QOL. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represented more severe symptoms.
time frame
Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and end of treatment visit (within14 days after the last dose of study drug)
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher scores represented a better
population note
FAS included all randomized participants. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for each specified row. It was planned to report combined result data of Part 1 and Part 2 for LGX818 300 mg arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in Social Functioning Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30 at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit

Score direction: Higher is better, according to the source. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
nct id
NCT01909453
qol key
qol-0030
source section id
NCT01909453-om-0030
source outcome index
30
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in Social Functioning Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30 at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit
measure definition
EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items and is composed of multi-item and single-item measures. These include 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact) and a global health status/QOL scale. The questionnaire employs 28 4-point Likert scales with responses from "not at all" to "very much" and two 7-point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Responses to all items converted to 0 to 100 scale. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represented a better level of functioning/QOL. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represented more severe symptoms.
time frame
Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and end of treatment visit (within14 days after the last dose of study drug)
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
1
direction quote
higher scores represented a better
population note
FAS included all randomized participants. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for each specified row. It was planned to report combined result data of Part 1 and Part 2 for LGX818 300 mg arm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
Full draft applicability and source-link record
trial
release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
nct id
NCT01909453
trial label
Study Comparing Combination of LGX818 Plus MEK162 Versus Vemurafenib and LGX818 Monotherapy in BRAF Mutant Melanoma
applicability
unclear
applicability note
Attached because the study's own record names BRAF and describes metastatic disease. The study was not selected for this indication by its sponsor, and its eligibility has not been reconciled against this page in full.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
provenance class
regulator-cited
discovery note
Found because this study's registry identifier is printed in an FDA approval notice, an FDA product label or an NCI summary held by this site. The citing document and the exact position of the identifier inside it are recorded. Being cited is not a statement that the study supports this treatment.
outcome Count
6
harms Count
5
qol Count
8
outcomes
  1. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    outcome key
    om-0000
    source section id
    NCT01909453-om-0000
    source outcome index
    0
    endpoint
    Part 1: Progression Free Survival (PFS) by BIRC in Combo 450 Group as Compared to Vemurafenib Group
    endpoint definition
    PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS was determined based on tumor assessment (RECIST version 1.1 criteria) as per BIRC/central review and survival information. If a participant did not had an event at the time of the analysis cut-off or at the start of any new anti-cancer therapy, data was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 square millimeter (mm\^2).
    time origin
    From randomization until documented disease progression (PD), initiation of new anti-cancer therapy, censoring date or death, whichever occurred first (up to 29 months)
    analysis role
    primary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    FAS included all randomized participants.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  2. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    outcome key
    om-0001
    source section id
    NCT01909453-om-0001
    source outcome index
    1
    endpoint
    Part 1: PFS by BIRC in Combo 450 Group as Compared to LGX818 Group
    endpoint definition
    PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS was determined based on tumor assessment (RECIST version 1.1 criteria) as per BIRC and survival information. If a participant did not had an event at the time of the analysis cut-off or at the start of any new anti-cancer therapy, data was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm\^2.
    time origin
    From randomization until documented PD, initiation of new anti-cancer therapy, censoring date or death, whichever occurred first (up to 29 months), excluding Part 1: LGX818 300 mg group; up to 35 months for Part 1: LGX 300 mg group
    analysis role
    primary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    FAS included all randomized participants.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  3. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    outcome key
    om-0002
    source section id
    NCT01909453-om-0002
    source outcome index
    2
    endpoint
    Part 2: PFS by BIRC in Combo 300 Group as Compared to LGX818 Group
    endpoint definition
    PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS was determined based on tumor assessment (RECIST version 1.1 criteria) as per BIRC and survival information. If a participant did not had an event at the time of the analysis cut-off or at the start of any new anti-cancer therapy, data was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm\^2.
    time origin
    From randomization until documented PD, initiation of new anti-cancer therapy, censoring date or death, whichever occurred first (up to 35 months)
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    FAS included all randomized participants. It was planned to report combined result data of Part 1 and Part 2 for LGX818 300 mg arm.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  4. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    outcome key
    om-0003
    source section id
    NCT01909453-om-0003
    source outcome index
    3
    endpoint
    Part 1: Overall Survival (OS)
    endpoint definition
    Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. If a death was not observed by the date of analysis cutoff, OS was censored at the date of last contact.
    time origin
    From randomization until censoring date/death, whichever occurred first (up to 117.8 months [M] of treatment exposure for LGX818 +MEK162; up to 111.4 months of treatment exposure for LGX818; up to 110.5 months of treatment exposure for Vemurafenib)
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    FAS included all randomized participants.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  5. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    outcome key
    om-0004
    source section id
    NCT01909453-om-0004
    source outcome index
    4
    endpoint
    Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as Graded by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
    endpoint definition
    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent/significant disability/incapacity; results in congenital anomaly/birth defect or an important medical event. As per NCI-CTCAE version 4.03, severity was graded as Grade 1: asymptomatic/mild symptoms; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe/medically significant; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence; Grade 5: death. AEs and SAEs of all grades combined were reported.
    time origin
    Baseline up to 30 days from last dose of study drug (up to 117.8 months of treatment exposure for LGX818+MEK162 45 mg [combo 450]; up to 111.4 months of treatment exposure for LGX818 300 mg; up to 110.5 months of treatment exposure for Vemurafenib 960 mg)
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and have at least one valid post-baseline safety evaluation.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  6. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    outcome key
    om-0005
    source section id
    NCT01909453-om-0005
    source outcome index
    5
    endpoint
    Part 1: Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Shift From Baseline in Laboratory Parameter Values Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03
    endpoint definition
    Laboratory parameters were graded using NCI-CTCAE v4.03 where, Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5: death. Clinically notable shift from baseline in laboratory parameter = worsening by at least 2 grades or to \>=grade 3. Only categories with non-zero values for any reporting arm are reported.
    time origin
    Baseline up to 30 days from last dose of study drug (up to 117.8 months of treatment exposure for LGX818+MEK162 45 mg [combo 450]; up to 111.4 months of treatment exposure for LGX818 300 mg; up to 110.5 months of treatment exposure for Vemurafenib 960 mg)
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and have at least one valid post-baseline safety evaluation. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
arms
  1. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    outcome key
    om-0000
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    Part 1:LGX818 450 mg QD+MEK162 45 mg BID (Combo 450)
    regimen
    Participants received 450 milligram (mg) of LGX818 orally once daily (QD) along with 45 mg of MEK162 twice daily (BID) for each 28 day treatment cycle until progressive disease (PD) as confirmed by Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC), withdrawal of consent, intolerable toxicity, study discontinuation, lost to follow-up or death.
    analyzed count
    192
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT01909453-om-0000#groups/OG000
  2. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    outcome key
    om-0000
    arm key
    OG001
    arm label
    Part 1: Vemurafenib 960 mg BID
    regimen
    Participants received 960 mg of Vemurafenib according to the locally approved prescribing information twice daily for each 28 day treatment cycle until PD as confirmed by BIRC, withdrawal of consent, intolerable toxicity, study discontinuation, lost to follow-up or death.
    analyzed count
    191
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT01909453-om-0000#groups/OG001
  3. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    outcome key
    om-0001
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    Part 1:LGX818 450 mg QD+MEK162 45 mg BID (Combo 450)
    regimen
    Participants received 450 milligram (mg) of LGX818 orally once daily (QD) along with 45 mg of MEK162 twice daily (BID) for each 28 day treatment cycle until progressive disease (PD) as confirmed by Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC), withdrawal of consent, intolerable toxicity, study discontinuation, lost to follow-up or death.
    analyzed count
    192
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT01909453-om-0001#groups/OG000
  4. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    outcome key
    om-0001
    arm key
    OG001
    arm label
    Part 1: LGX818 300 mg
    regimen
    Participants received 300 mg of LGX818 orally once daily for each 28 day treatment cycle until PD as confirmed by BIRC, withdrawal of consent, intolerable toxicity, study discontinuation, lost to follow-up or death.
    analyzed count
    194
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT01909453-om-0001#groups/OG001
  5. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    outcome key
    om-0002
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    Part 2: LGX818 300 mg QD+MEK162 45 mg BID (Combo 300)
    regimen
    Participants received 300 mg of LGX818 orally once daily along with 45 mg of MEK162 twice daily for each 28 day treatment cycle until PD as confirmed by BIRC, withdrawal of consent, intolerable toxicity, study discontinuation, lost to follow-up or death.
    analyzed count
    258
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT01909453-om-0002#groups/OG000
  6. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    outcome key
    om-0002
    arm key
    OG001
    arm label
    Part 2: LGX818 300 mg
    regimen
    Participants received 300 mg of LGX818 orally once daily for each 28 day treatment cycle until PD as confirmed by BIRC, withdrawal of consent, intolerable toxicity, study discontinuation, lost to follow-up or death.
    analyzed count
    86
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT01909453-om-0002#groups/OG001
  7. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    outcome key
    om-0002
    arm key
    OG002
    arm label
    Part 1 + Part 2: LGX818 300 mg
    regimen
    Participants of Part 1 and 2 received 300 mg of LGX818 orally once daily for each 28 day treatment cycle until PD as confirmed by BIRC, withdrawal of consent, intolerable toxicity, and study discontinuation, lost to follow-up or death.
    analyzed count
    280
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT01909453-om-0002#groups/OG002
  8. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    outcome key
    om-0003
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    Part 1: LGX818 450 mg QD+MEK162 45 mg BID (Combo 450)
    regimen
    Participants received 450 milligram (mg) of LGX818 orally once daily (QD) along with 45 mg of MEK162 twice daily (BID) for each 28 day treatment cycle until progressive disease (PD) as confirmed by Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC), withdrawal of consent, intolerable toxicity, study discontinuation, lost to follow-up or death.
    analyzed count
    192
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT01909453-om-0003#groups/OG000
  9. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    outcome key
    om-0003
    arm key
    OG001
    arm label
    Part 1: LGX818 300 mg
    regimen
    Participants received 300 mg of LGX818 orally once daily for each 28 day treatment cycle until PD as confirmed by BIRC, withdrawal of consent, intolerable toxicity, study discontinuation, lost to follow-up or death.
    analyzed count
    194
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT01909453-om-0003#groups/OG001
  10. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    outcome key
    om-0003
    arm key
    OG002
    arm label
    Part 1: Vemurafenib 960 mg BID
    regimen
    Participants received 960 mg of Vemurafenib according to the locally approved prescribing information twice daily for each 28 day treatment cycle until PD as confirmed by BIRC, withdrawal of consent, intolerable toxicity, study discontinuation, lost to follow-up or death.
    analyzed count
    191
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT01909453-om-0003#groups/OG002
  11. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    outcome key
    om-0004
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    Part 1:LGX818 450 mg QD+MEK162 45 mg BID (Combo 450)
    regimen
    Participants received 450 milligram (mg) of LGX818 orally once daily (QD) along with 45 mg of MEK162 twice daily (BID) for each 28 day treatment cycle until progressive disease (PD) as confirmed by Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC), withdrawal of consent, intolerable toxicity, study discontinuation, lost to follow-up or death.
    analyzed count
    192
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT01909453-om-0004#groups/OG000
  12. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    outcome key
    om-0004
    arm key
    OG001
    arm label
    Part 1: LGX818 300 mg
    regimen
    Participants received 300 mg of LGX818 orally once daily for each 28 day treatment cycle until PD as confirmed by BIRC, withdrawal of consent, intolerable toxicity, study discontinuation, lost to follow-up or death.
    analyzed count
    192
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT01909453-om-0004#groups/OG001
harms
  1. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    harm key
    EG000
    source section id
    NCT01909453-ae
    event group key
    EG000
    event group label
    Part 2: LGX818 300 mg QD +MEK162 45 mg BID (Combo 300)
    serious affected
    98
    serious at risk
    257
    other affected
    252
    other at risk
    257
    frequency threshold
    5
    collection period
    Baseline up to 30 days from last dose of study drug (P1: up to 117.8 M for LGX818+MEK162 [combo 450]; up to 111.4 M for LGX818 300mg; up to 110.5 M for Vemurafenib 960mg; P2: up to 106.3 M for LGX818+MEK162 45mg [combo 300]; up to 98.4 M for LGX818 300mg)
    event definition
    Same event may appear as non-SAE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
    undenominated note
    Source null
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  2. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    harm key
    EG001
    source section id
    NCT01909453-ae
    event group key
    EG001
    event group label
    Part 1: LGX818 450 mg QD+MEK162 45 mg BID (Combo 450)
    serious affected
    84
    serious at risk
    192
    other affected
    189
    other at risk
    192
    frequency threshold
    5
    collection period
    Baseline up to 30 days from last dose of study drug (P1: up to 117.8 M for LGX818+MEK162 [combo 450]; up to 111.4 M for LGX818 300mg; up to 110.5 M for Vemurafenib 960mg; P2: up to 106.3 M for LGX818+MEK162 45mg [combo 300]; up to 98.4 M for LGX818 300mg)
    event definition
    Same event may appear as non-SAE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
    undenominated note
    Source null
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  3. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    harm key
    EG002
    source section id
    NCT01909453-ae
    event group key
    EG002
    event group label
    Part 1: LGX818 300 mg
    serious affected
    71
    serious at risk
    192
    other affected
    190
    other at risk
    192
    frequency threshold
    5
    collection period
    Baseline up to 30 days from last dose of study drug (P1: up to 117.8 M for LGX818+MEK162 [combo 450]; up to 111.4 M for LGX818 300mg; up to 110.5 M for Vemurafenib 960mg; P2: up to 106.3 M for LGX818+MEK162 45mg [combo 300]; up to 98.4 M for LGX818 300mg)
    event definition
    Same event may appear as non-SAE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
    undenominated note
    Source null
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  4. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    harm key
    EG003
    source section id
    NCT01909453-ae
    event group key
    EG003
    event group label
    Part 2: LGX818 300 mg
    serious affected
    31
    serious at risk
    84
    other affected
    82
    other at risk
    84
    frequency threshold
    5
    collection period
    Baseline up to 30 days from last dose of study drug (P1: up to 117.8 M for LGX818+MEK162 [combo 450]; up to 111.4 M for LGX818 300mg; up to 110.5 M for Vemurafenib 960mg; P2: up to 106.3 M for LGX818+MEK162 45mg [combo 300]; up to 98.4 M for LGX818 300mg)
    event definition
    Same event may appear as non-SAE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
    undenominated note
    Source null
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  5. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    harm key
    EG004
    source section id
    NCT01909453-ae
    event group key
    EG004
    event group label
    Part 1: Vemurafenib 960 mg BID
    serious affected
    78
    serious at risk
    186
    other affected
    185
    other at risk
    186
    frequency threshold
    5
    collection period
    Baseline up to 30 days from last dose of study drug (P1: up to 117.8 M for LGX818+MEK162 [combo 450]; up to 111.4 M for LGX818 300mg; up to 110.5 M for Vemurafenib 960mg; P2: up to 106.3 M for LGX818+MEK162 45mg [combo 300]; up to 98.4 M for LGX818 300mg)
    event definition
    Same event may appear as non-SAE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis population evaluated.
    undenominated note
    Source null
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
quality of life
  1. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    qol key
    qol-0023
    source section id
    NCT01909453-om-0023
    source outcome index
    23
    instrument
    FACT
    instrument basis
    matched 'fact-m' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Part 1 and Part 2: Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in the Function Assessment Cancer Therapy-melanoma (FACT-M) Subscale
    measure definition
    FACT-M:melanoma specific questionnaire to assess participant health-related quality of life(QoL).Melanoma specific 16 subscale :signs,symptoms,physical/social activities most relevant to participants with advanced-stage melanoma.Other items :physical,functional and social/family well-being(7 items each),emotional well-being(6 items),surgery specific concerns related to melanoma(8 items,not included in this study).Each item range 0(not at all)to 4(very much),combined to produce subscale scores.Total score range for FACT-M excluding surgery specific items is 0 to172,higher scores:better QoL.Melanoma subscale score range from0(worst)to 64(best response),higher score:better QoL.Time to definitive 10% deterioration:time from date of randomization to date of event with at least 10% relative to baseline worsening of corresponding scale score with no later improvement or death due to any cause.All collected data up to pre-specified collection period(i.e.,end of study)are reported for this OM.
    time frame
    Date of randomization to date of event or death due to any cause, which ever occurred first (up to 29 months for Part 1, excluding Part 1: LGX818 300 mg group; up to 35 months for Part 2 and Part 1 LGX 300 mg group)
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher scores:better
    population note
    FAS included all randomized participants. It was planned to report combined result data of Part 1 and Part 2 for LGX818 300 mg arm.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  2. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    qol key
    qol-0024
    source section id
    NCT01909453-om-0024
    source outcome index
    24
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Part 1 and Part 2: Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in the Global Health Status Score of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
    measure definition
    EORTC QLQ-C30 is 30 item questionnaire composed of 5 multi-item functional subscales (physical,role,cognitive,emotional,social functioning), 3 multi-item symptom scales (fatigue,nausea/vomiting, and pain),global health/quality of life (QOL) subscale and 6 single items assessing other cancer related symptoms (dyspnea,sleep disturbance, appetite, diarrhea, constipation and financial impact of cancer). It employed twenty-eight 4 point Likert scales with responses from "not at all" to "very much" and two 7 point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Global health status scale score ranged from 0 to 100. Higher score: better level of functioning. Time to definitive 10% deterioration: time from date of randomization to date of event with at least 10% relative to baseline worsening of corresponding scale score with no later improvement or death due to any cause. All collected data up to the pre-specified collection period (i.e., end of study) are reported for this outcome measure.
    time frame
    Date of randomization to date of event or death due to any cause, which ever occurred first (maximum up to 29 months for Part 1, excluding Part 1: LGX818 300 mg group; up to 35 months for Part 2 and Part 1 LGX 300 mg group)
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    Higher score: better
    population note
    FAS included all randomized participants. It was planned to report combined result data of Part 1 and Part 2 for LGX818 300 mg arm.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  3. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    qol key
    qol-0025
    source section id
    NCT01909453-om-0025
    source outcome index
    25
    instrument
    FACT
    instrument basis
    matched 'fact-m' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in the FACT-M Subscale at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit
    measure definition
    FACT-M: melanoma specific questionnaire to assess participant health-related quality of life. Melanoma specific subscale consists of 16 items related to signs, symptoms, physical/social activities most relevant to participants with advanced-stage melanoma. Other items include physical, functional and social/family well-being (7 items each), emotional well-being (6 items), surgery specific concerns related to melanoma (8 items, not included in this study). Each item ranged from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much), combined to produce subscale scores. Total score range for FACT-M excluding surgery specific items is 0 to 172, higher scores represented better quality of life. Melanoma subscale score ranged from 0 (worst response) to 64 (best response), higher score indicated better quality of life.
    time frame
    Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and end of treatment visit (within14 days after the last dose of study drug)
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher scores represented better
    population note
    FAS included all randomized participants. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for each specified row. It was planned to report combined result data of Part 1 and Part 2 for LGX818 300 mg arm.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  4. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    qol key
    qol-0026
    source section id
    NCT01909453-om-0026
    source outcome index
    26
    instrument
    EQ-5D
    instrument basis
    matched 'eq-5d' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit
    measure definition
    EQ-5D-5L is a standardized participant completed questionnaire that measures health status in terms of a single index value or utility score. EQ-5D-5L consisted of two components: a health state profile (descriptive system) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) in which participants rate their overall health status from 0 (worst imaginable) to 100 (best imaginable), where higher scores indicated better health status. EQ-5D health state profile is comprised of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. EQ-5D-5L health status index score range between 0 to 1. Higher score indicated better health status.
    time frame
    Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and end of treatment visit (within14 days after the last dose of study drug)
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher scores indicated better
    population note
    FAS included all randomized participants. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for each specified row. It was planned to report combined result data of Part 1 and Part 2 for LGX818 300 mg arm.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  5. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    qol key
    qol-0027
    source section id
    NCT01909453-om-0027
    source outcome index
    27
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit
    measure definition
    EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items and is composed of multi-item and single-item measures. These include 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact) and a global health status/quality of life (QOL) scale. The questionnaire employs 28 4-point Likert scales with responses from "not at all" to "very much" and two 7-point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Responses to all items converted to 0 to 100 scale. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represent a better level of functioning/QOL. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represents more severe symptoms.
    time frame
    Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and end of treatment visit (within14 days after the last dose of study drug)
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher scores represent a better
    population note
    FAS included all randomized participants. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for each specified row. It was planned to report combined result data of Part 1 and Part 2 for LGX818 300 mg arm.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  6. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    qol key
    qol-0028
    source section id
    NCT01909453-om-0028
    source outcome index
    28
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in Emotional Functioning Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30 at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit
    measure definition
    EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items and is composed of multi-item and single-item measures. These include 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact) and a global health status/ QOL scale. The questionnaire employs 28 4-point Likert scales with responses from "not at all" to "very much" and two 7-point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Responses to all items converted to 0 to 100 scale. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represent a better level of functioning/QOL. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represented more severe symptoms.
    time frame
    Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and end of treatment visit (within14 days after the last dose of study drug)
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher scores represent a better
    population note
    FAS included all randomized participants. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for each specified row. It was planned to report combined result data of Part 1 and Part 2 for LGX818 300 mg arm.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  7. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    qol key
    qol-0029
    source section id
    NCT01909453-om-0029
    source outcome index
    29
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30 at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit
    measure definition
    EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items and is composed of multi-item and single-item measures. These include 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact) and a global health status/QOL scale. The questionnaire employs 28 4-point Likert scales with responses from "not at all" to "very much" and two 7-point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Responses to all items converted to 0 to 100 scale. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represented a better level of functioning/QOL. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represented more severe symptoms.
    time frame
    Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and end of treatment visit (within14 days after the last dose of study drug)
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher scores represented a better
    population note
    FAS included all randomized participants. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for each specified row. It was planned to report combined result data of Part 1 and Part 2 for LGX818 300 mg arm.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  8. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-melanoma-tecentriq-a8c67f44
    nct id
    NCT01909453
    qol key
    qol-0030
    source section id
    NCT01909453-om-0030
    source outcome index
    30
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in Social Functioning Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30 at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit
    measure definition
    EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items and is composed of multi-item and single-item measures. These include 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact) and a global health status/QOL scale. The questionnaire employs 28 4-point Likert scales with responses from "not at all" to "very much" and two 7-point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Responses to all items converted to 0 to 100 scale. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represented a better level of functioning/QOL. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represented more severe symptoms.
    time frame
    Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and end of treatment visit (within14 days after the last dose of study drug)
    analysis role
    secondary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    1
    direction quote
    higher scores represented a better
    population note
    FAS included all randomized participants. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for each specified row. It was planned to report combined result data of Part 1 and Part 2 for LGX818 300 mg arm.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
setting source links

    Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice