Skip to content
← Lung Carcinoma

NCT01459653 · STUDY IN CONTEXT

Multi-level Evaluation of Chemotherapy-induced Febrile Neutropenia Prophylaxis, Outcomes, and Determinants With Granulocyte-colony Stimulating Factor

Draft scope assessment: narrower. Linked by condition-string match at the cancer-entity level. The study's eligibility - stage, biomarker, treatment line and prior therapy - has not been reconciled against this page's definition, so its population is narrower than this page in ways not yet recorded. The condition was transformed or resolved through the terminology hierarchy to reach this cancer type, so the link itself is a candidate a reviewer must confirm. Found by searching ClinicalTrials.gov for this cancer type, restricted to studies that have posted results to the registry. No FDA notice, FDA label or NCI summary held by this site cites this study. Because the search asked for posted results, studies without posted results were never looked for, so their absence from this page means nothing.

Read the full study record and all posted results →

Linked outcomes

Measures are not ranked. Open each original source section for treatment groups, denominators, units and results.

primary · POSTED

Objective 1: To describe the cancer patients requiring chemotherapy who, in their treating physician's best clinical judgment, are receiving EP2006 for the primary or secondary prophylaxis of FN in terms of demographics, clinical status, medical history, concomitant comorbid conditions and current status of disease, and prior and concomitant medications. Chemotherapy regimens were classified for FN risk (\<10% risk, 10-20% risk or \>20% risk) according to the published rates in the EORTC Guidelines under consideration of agent(s) and schedules. ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count; CIN=Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN=Febrile Neutropenia;

The evaluable sample includes all patients in the safety sample (all patients who received at least one dose of the study medication) who had no major protocol violation and have a minimum of enrollment cycle and either one follow-up cycle or study end data with valid outcome data. Please refer to baseline characteristics tables as well.

→

primary · POSTED

Objective 1: To describe the cancer patients requiring chemotherapy who, in their treating physician's best clinical judgment, are receiving EP2006 for the primary or secondary prophylaxis of FN in terms of demographics, clinical status, medical history, concomitant comorbid conditions and current status of disease, and prior and concomitant medications. ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count; CIN=Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN=Febrile Neutropenia;

The evaluable sample includes all patients in the safety sample (all patients who received at least one dose of the study medication) who had no major protocol violation and have a minimum of enrollment cycle and either one follow-up cycle or study end data with valid outcome data (i.e., ANC or completed CIN/FN data).

→

primary · POSTED

Objective 1: To describe the cancer patients requiring chemotherapy who, in their treating physician's best clinical judgment, are receiving EP2006 for the primary or secondary prophylaxis of FN in terms of demographics, clinical status, medical history, concomitant comorbid conditions and current status of disease, and prior and concomitant medications. ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count; CIN=Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN=Febrile Neutropenia;

Evaluable consists of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug, who had no major protocol violations and have a minimum of enrollment cycle and either one follow-up cycle or study end data with valid outcome data (i.e. ANC or completed CIN/FN data).

→

primary · POSTED

Objective 1: To describe the cancer patients requiring chemotherapy who, in their treating physician's best clinical judgment, are receiving EP2006 for the primary or secondary prophylaxis of FN in terms of demographics, clinical status, medical history, concomitant comorbid conditions and current status of disease, and prior and concomitant medications. ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count; CIN=Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN=Febrile Neutropenia

The evaluable sample includes all patients in the safety sample (all patients who received at least one dose of the study medication) who had no major protocol violation and have a minimum of enrollment cycle and either one follow-up cycle or study end data with valid outcome data (i.e., ANC or completed CIN/FN data)

→

primary · POSTED

Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.

Delayed Primary: EP2006 initiated in cycle 2 or later with no CIN/FN in prior cycle. True secondary: EP2006 initiated in cycle 2 or later following CIN/FN in prior cycle.

→

primary · POSTED

Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.

Evaluable sample by gender

→

Reported safety

Serious events are not the same as severe events. Compare the original safety groups and their at-risk populations.

Open the study safety table →

Quality of life and patient-reported measures

EORTC QLQ · Chemotherapy Toxicity (%FN Risk)

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-lung-carcinoma
nct id
NCT01459653
qol key
qol-0000
source section id
NCT01459653-om-0000
source outcome index
0
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Chemotherapy Toxicity (%FN Risk)
measure definition
Objective 1: To describe the cancer patients requiring chemotherapy who, in their treating physician's best clinical judgment, are receiving EP2006 for the primary or secondary prophylaxis of FN in terms of demographics, clinical status, medical history, concomitant comorbid conditions and current status of disease, and prior and concomitant medications. Chemotherapy regimens were classified for FN risk (\<10% risk, 10-20% risk or \>20% risk) according to the published rates in the EORTC Guidelines under consideration of agent(s) and schedules. ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count; CIN=Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN=Febrile Neutropenia;
time frame
Enrollment cycle. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.
analysis role
primary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
The evaluable sample includes all patients in the safety sample (all patients who received at least one dose of the study medication) who had no major protocol violation and have a minimum of enrollment cycle and either one follow-up cycle or study end data with valid outcome data. Please refer to baseline characteristics tables as well.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Percentage of Patients With Each EORTC-identified Risk Factors for FN at Baseline

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-lung-carcinoma
nct id
NCT01459653
qol key
qol-0041
source section id
NCT01459653-om-0041
source outcome index
41
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Percentage of Patients With Each EORTC-identified Risk Factors for FN at Baseline
measure definition
Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. \* Advanced disease is defined as Stage IV (Stage III or IV if multiple myeloma) AND prior chemotherapy in metastatic setting. The PRS is a quantification of eight individual patient risk factors (EORTC guidelines-2010). CV: cardiovascular; EORTC: European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer; FN: febrile neutropenia; Hb: hemoglobin
time frame
Enrollment cycle. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.
analysis role
primary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
Evaluable sample
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Percentage of Patients With Each EORTC-identified Risk Factors for FN in Patients With Chemotherapy Risk 10-20% at Baseline

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-lung-carcinoma
nct id
NCT01459653
qol key
qol-0042
source section id
NCT01459653-om-0042
source outcome index
42
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Percentage of Patients With Each EORTC-identified Risk Factors for FN in Patients With Chemotherapy Risk 10-20% at Baseline
measure definition
Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. \* Advanced disease is defined as Stage IV (Stage III or IV if multiple myeloma) AND prior chemotherapy in metastatic setting CV: cardiovascular; EORTC: European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer; FN: febrile neutropenia; Hb: hemoglobin
time frame
Enrollment cycle. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.
analysis role
primary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
Patients with chemotherapy risk 10-20% in evaluable sample
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Patient Risk Score (PRS) for All Patients

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-lung-carcinoma
nct id
NCT01459653
qol key
qol-0045
source section id
NCT01459653-om-0045
source outcome index
45
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Patient Risk Score (PRS) for All Patients
measure definition
Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. Patient risk score (PRS) shows the individual patient risk for FN.The PRS is a sum of eight weighted individual patient risk factors for FN and results in a possible score of 0 to 11 (highest risk for FN). The risk factors were assigned weights based on the level of risk specified by guidelines and SC consensus (age \> 65 years: 3.0; advanced disease: 1.5; history of FN: 3.0; No antibiotic prophylaxis: 0.5; poor performance/nutritional status: 1.5; female gender: 0.5; Hb\<12g/dL: 0.5; Renal, CV or liver disease: 0.5). Advanced disease: Stage IV or Stage III + prior chemotherapy in metastatic setting; CV: cardiovascular; EORTC: European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer; FN: febrile neutropenia
time frame
Enrollment cycle. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.
analysis role
primary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
Evaluable sample
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Patient Risk Score (PRS) for Patients Receiving Chemotherapy With 10-20% FN Risk by Tumor Type

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-lung-carcinoma
nct id
NCT01459653
qol key
qol-0046
source section id
NCT01459653-om-0046
source outcome index
46
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Patient Risk Score (PRS) for Patients Receiving Chemotherapy With 10-20% FN Risk by Tumor Type
measure definition
Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. Patient risk score (PRS) shows the individual patient risk for FN.The PRS is a sum of eight weighted individual patient risk factors for FN and results in a possible score of 0 to 11 (highest risk for FN). The risk factors were assigned weights based on the level of risk specified by guidelines and SC consensus (age \> 65 years: 3.0; advanced disease: 1.5; history of FN: 3.0; No antibiotic prophylaxis: 0.5; poor performance/nutritional status: 1.5; female gender: 0.5; Hb\<12g/dL: 0.5; Renal, CV or liver disease: 0.5). Advanced disease: Stage IV or Stage III + prior chemotherapy in metastatic setting; CV: cardiovascular; EORTC: European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer; FN: febrile neutropenia
time frame
Enrollment cycle. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.
analysis role
primary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
Patients with chemotherapy with 10-20% risk of FN in the evaluable sample by tumor type
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Percentage of Patients With Each Prophylaxis Decision by Chemotherapy-associated FN Risk

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-lung-carcinoma
nct id
NCT01459653
qol key
qol-0047
source section id
NCT01459653-om-0047
source outcome index
47
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Percentage of Patients With Each Prophylaxis Decision by Chemotherapy-associated FN Risk
measure definition
Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. FN: Febrile Neutropenia; EORTC: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer
time frame
All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
analysis role
primary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
Source null
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Percentage of Patients With Each Chemotherapy Risk Score (CRS) Result by Tumor Type

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-lung-carcinoma
nct id
NCT01459653
qol key
qol-0048
source section id
NCT01459653-om-0048
source outcome index
48
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Percentage of Patients With Each Chemotherapy Risk Score (CRS) Result by Tumor Type
measure definition
Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. The CRS quantifies whether the decision to initiate EP2006 as either primary or secondary prophylaxis is consistent with the EORTC guideline (2010) recommendation based upon the patient's chemotherapy toxicity (\<10%, 10-20% or \>20% risk of FN) and the PRS. There are three possible results: under-treated, correctly treated, over-treated
time frame
All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
analysis role
primary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
Evaluable sample: total and by tumor type
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · EP2006 Day of Initiation Relative to Guidelines by Cancer Type

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-lung-carcinoma
nct id
NCT01459653
qol key
qol-0049
source section id
NCT01459653-om-0049
source outcome index
49
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
EP2006 Day of Initiation Relative to Guidelines by Cancer Type
measure definition
Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. \^ 168 cycles in which ZARZIO® was initiated on day 4 or later involved regimens deemed by the Study Steering Committee to be suitable for GCSF initiation any day after chemotherapy (day 1 or later), e.g., etoposide; hence, these patients were re-classified as being within guidelines DLBCL- Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Guidelines refers to EORTC 2010 guidelines
time frame
All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
analysis role
primary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
Number of cycles with initiation on different days during chemotherapy for evaluable sample. A patient may have initiated EP2006 during chemotherapy on different days for different cycles. The categories therefore are not mutually exclusive on a patient level and the sum of patients may therefore exceed the sample size.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · GCSF Initiation Score (GIS)

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-lung-carcinoma
nct id
NCT01459653
qol key
qol-0050
source section id
NCT01459653-om-0050
source outcome index
50
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
GCSF Initiation Score (GIS)
measure definition
Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count; GIS Score 0 (EP2006 initiated on day 0 of chemotherapy or on day 10 or later); GIS Score 0.50 (EP2006 initiated on days 7-9 of chemotherapy); GIS Score 0.75 (EP2006 initiated on days 4-6 of chemotherapy); GIS Score 1.00 (EP2006 initiated per EORTC guidelines (2010) on days 1-3 after chemotherapy) ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count; CIN=Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; EORTC=European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer; FN=Febrile Neutropenia; GCSF=Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; GIS=Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Initiation Score
time frame
All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
analysis role
primary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
The evaluable sample consists of all patients who received at least one dose of study medication, had no major protocol violation and have a minimum of enrollment cycle and either one follow-up cycle or study end data with valid outcome data (i.e., ANC or completed CIN/FN data)
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · GCSF Persistence Score (GPS)

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-lung-carcinoma
nct id
NCT01459653
qol key
qol-0051
source section id
NCT01459653-om-0051
source outcome index
51
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
GCSF Persistence Score (GPS)
measure definition
Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. The GPS grades persistence based on the number of cycles in the line of chemotherapy in which EP2006 was administered, D, relative to the number of cycles in which it should have been continued, C. Thus, the GPS = D/C and ranges from 0 to 1.0 ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count; CIN=Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; EORTC=European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer; FN=Febrile Neutropenia; GCSF=Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
time frame
All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
analysis role
primary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
Patients in the evaluable sample with a GCSF persistence score (GPS).
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · GCSF Congruence Score (GCS)

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-lung-carcinoma
nct id
NCT01459653
qol key
qol-0052
source section id
NCT01459653-om-0052
source outcome index
52
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
GCSF Congruence Score (GCS)
measure definition
Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. The GCS is computed at the patient level as an overall grade of how congruent actual GCSF treatment is to recommended treatment. The GCS is computed as follows and scores range from 0 to 3: GCS = Σ(CRS + mean GIS over all cycles + GPS), with higher scores indicating higher congruence. CRS: Chemotherapy Risk Score (0 or 1 with 1 best); FN: febrile neutropenia; GCSF: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; GIS=GCSF Initiation Score (0 to 1 with 1 best); GPS=GCSF persistence score (0 to 1 with 1 best);
time frame
All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
analysis role
primary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
Evaluable sample with GCSF congruence score by tumor type
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Incidence of Outcomes by Chemotherapy Risk: Patient Level

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-lung-carcinoma
nct id
NCT01459653
qol key
qol-0057
source section id
NCT01459653-om-0057
source outcome index
57
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Incidence of Outcomes by Chemotherapy Risk: Patient Level
measure definition
Objective 5: To describe the distribution of chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, and cancellations, and mortality (GCSF-related; FN-related; cancer-related; not related to GCSF, FN, or cancer; all-cause); and estimate the time-to-event for such events over the course of EP2006 treatment. Table presents incidences of different outcomes and composite outcome by chemotherapy risk group. \^Composite endpoint includes any of CIN grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization and CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance. CIN: Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN: Febrile Neutropenia; ANC: Absolute Neutrophil count; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score; Prophylaxis decision mentioned below are relative to EORTC guidelines (2010).
time frame
All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
analysis role
primary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
Evaluable sample by chemotherapy risk
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Incidence of CIN/FN-related Chemotherapy Disturbance by EP2006 Prophylaxis Type: Patient Level

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-lung-carcinoma
nct id
NCT01459653
qol key
qol-0058
source section id
NCT01459653-om-0058
source outcome index
58
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Incidence of CIN/FN-related Chemotherapy Disturbance by EP2006 Prophylaxis Type: Patient Level
measure definition
Objective 5: To describe the distribution of chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, and cancellations, and mortality (GCSF-related; FN-related; cancer-related; not related to GCSF, FN, or cancer; all-cause); and estimate the time-to-event for such events over the course of EP2006 treatment. CIN: Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN: Febrile Neutropenia; ANC: Absolute Neutrophil count; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score; Prophylaxis decision mentioned below are relative to EORTC guidelines (2010).
time frame
All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
analysis role
primary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
Evaluable sample by prophylaxis type
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Incidence of CIN/FN-related Hospitalization Outcomes by EP2006 Practice Patterns (Relative to Guidelines): Patient Level

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-lung-carcinoma
nct id
NCT01459653
qol key
qol-0059
source section id
NCT01459653-om-0059
source outcome index
59
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Incidence of CIN/FN-related Hospitalization Outcomes by EP2006 Practice Patterns (Relative to Guidelines): Patient Level
measure definition
Objective 5: To describe the distribution of chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, and cancellations, and mortality (GCSF-related; FN-related; cancer-related; not related to GCSF, FN, or cancer; all-cause); and estimate the time-to-event for such events over the course of EP2006 treatment. Table presents incidences of different outcomes and composite outcome by prophylaxis decision (relative to guidelines). \^Composite endpoint includes any of CIN grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization and CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance. CIN: Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN: Febrile Neutropenia; ANC: Absolute Neutrophil count; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score; Prophylaxis decision mentioned below are relative to EORTC guidelines (2010).
time frame
All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
analysis role
primary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
Evaluable sample by prophylaxis decision (relative to guidelines)
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Incidence of CIN Grade 4 Episodes by EP2006 Dose: Patient Level

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-lung-carcinoma
nct id
NCT01459653
qol key
qol-0060
source section id
NCT01459653-om-0060
source outcome index
60
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Incidence of CIN Grade 4 Episodes by EP2006 Dose: Patient Level
measure definition
Objective 5: To describe the distribution of chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, and cancellations, and mortality (GCSF-related; FN-related; cancer-related; not related to GCSF, FN, or cancer; all-cause); and estimate the time-to-event for such events over the course of EP2006 treatment. CIN: Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN: Febrile Neutropenia; ANC: Absolute Neutrophil count; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score; Prophylaxis decision mentioned below are relative to EORTC guidelines (2010).
time frame
All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
analysis role
primary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
Evaluable sample by study drug dose
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Incidence of Outcomes by Mean GIS: Patient Level

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-lung-carcinoma
nct id
NCT01459653
qol key
qol-0061
source section id
NCT01459653-om-0061
source outcome index
61
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Incidence of Outcomes by Mean GIS: Patient Level
measure definition
Objective 5: To describe the distribution of chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, and cancellations, and mortality (GCSF-related; FN-related; cancer-related; not related to GCSF, FN, or cancer; all-cause); and estimate the time-to-event for such events over the course of EP2006 treatment. Table presents incidences of outcomes by day (mean GIS over all visits). \^Composite outcome includes CIN grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization and CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance CIN: Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN: Febrile Neutropenia; ANC: Absolute Neutrophil count; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score; Prophylaxis decision mentioned below are relative to EORTC guidelines (2010).
time frame
All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
analysis role
primary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
Evaluable sample by mean GIS
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Incidence of Outcomes: Cycles Level

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-lung-carcinoma
nct id
NCT01459653
qol key
qol-0062
source section id
NCT01459653-om-0062
source outcome index
62
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Incidence of Outcomes: Cycles Level
measure definition
Objective 5: To describe the distribution of chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, and cancellations, and mortality (GCSF-related; FN-related; cancer-related; not related to GCSF, FN, or cancer; all-cause); and estimate the time-to-event for such events over the course of EP2006 treatment. Table presents incidences of outcomes on a cycle level. \^Composite outcome includes CIN grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization and CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance CIN: Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN: Febrile Neutropenia; ANC: Absolute Neutrophil count; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score; Prophylaxis decision mentioned below are relative to EORTC guidelines (2010).
time frame
All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
analysis role
primary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
Source null
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Incidence of Outcomes by Day of Study Drug Initiation: Cycle Level

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-lung-carcinoma
nct id
NCT01459653
qol key
qol-0063
source section id
NCT01459653-om-0063
source outcome index
63
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Incidence of Outcomes by Day of Study Drug Initiation: Cycle Level
measure definition
Objective 5: To describe the distribution of chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, and cancellations, and mortality (GCSF-related; FN-related; cancer-related; not related to GCSF, FN, or cancer; all-cause); and estimate the time-to-event for such events over the course of EP2006 treatment. Table presents incidences of outcomes on a cycle level by day of study drug initiation. \^Composite outcome includes CIN grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization and CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance CIN: Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN: Febrile Neutropenia; ANC: Absolute Neutrophil count; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score; Prophylaxis decision mentioned below are relative to EORTC guidelines (2010). \*Day of EP2006 initiation- Day 0 (during chemotherapy); \*\*Day of EP2006 initiation- Days 1-3 (per guidelines)
time frame
All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
analysis role
primary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
Evaluable sample by day of study drug initiation. As these are cycle-level analyses and since patients can be in more than one category over the course of the study, the sum of patients of all three categories may exceed the sample size.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
FACT · Modeling Grade 4 CIN Episode: Cycle Level

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-lung-carcinoma
nct id
NCT01459653
qol key
qol-0078
source section id
NCT01459653-om-0078
source outcome index
78
instrument
FACT
instrument basis
matched 'factor' in the study's own wording
scale title
Modeling Grade 4 CIN Episode: Cycle Level
measure definition
Objective 8: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who responded and those who did not respond to primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Objective 9: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who had chemotherapy dose delays or reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, and radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, or cancellations vs. no such events during the course of primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006 Only results with a p-value of \<0.05 are added as statistical analyses appendices. CI: confidence interval; CIN: chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; GCSF: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score
time frame
All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
Number of cycles in evaluable sample with any grade 4 CIN data
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
FACT · Modeling CIN/FN-related Chemotherapy Disturbance: Cycle Level

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-lung-carcinoma
nct id
NCT01459653
qol key
qol-0084
source section id
NCT01459653-om-0084
source outcome index
84
instrument
FACT
instrument basis
matched 'factor' in the study's own wording
scale title
Modeling CIN/FN-related Chemotherapy Disturbance: Cycle Level
measure definition
Objective 8: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who responded and those who did not respond to primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Objective 9: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who had chemotherapy dose delays or reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, and radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, or cancellations vs. no such events during the course of primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Only results with a p-value of \<0.05 are shown in the statistical appendices. CI: confidence interval; CIN: chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; GCSF: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score; Chemotherapy disturbance=dose reduction, delay, and/or cancellation
time frame
All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
Cycles of patients in evaluable sample with CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance with data
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
FACT · Modeling Composite Outcome (Any of CIN Grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related Hospitalization, CIN/FN-related Chemotherapy Disturbance): Cycle Level

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-lung-carcinoma
nct id
NCT01459653
qol key
qol-0086
source section id
NCT01459653-om-0086
source outcome index
86
instrument
FACT
instrument basis
matched 'factor' in the study's own wording
scale title
Modeling Composite Outcome (Any of CIN Grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related Hospitalization, CIN/FN-related Chemotherapy Disturbance): Cycle Level
measure definition
Objective 8: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who responded and those who did not respond to primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Objective 9: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who had chemotherapy dose delays or reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, and radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, or cancellations vs. no such events during the course of primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Only results with a p-value of \<0.05 are shown in the statistical appendices. CI: confidence interval; CIN: chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; FN: febrile neutropenia; GCSF: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score.
time frame
All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
Cycles of patients from evaluable sample with composite outcome data
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
FACT · Modeling Composite Outcome (Any of CIN Grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related Hospitalization, CIN/FN-related Chemotherapy Disturbance): Patient Level

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-lung-carcinoma
nct id
NCT01459653
qol key
qol-0087
source section id
NCT01459653-om-0087
source outcome index
87
instrument
FACT
instrument basis
matched 'factor' in the study's own wording
scale title
Modeling Composite Outcome (Any of CIN Grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related Hospitalization, CIN/FN-related Chemotherapy Disturbance): Patient Level
measure definition
Objective 8: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who responded and those who did not respond to primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Objective 9: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who had chemotherapy dose delays or reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, and radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, or cancellations vs. no such events during the course of primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Only results with a p-value of \<0.05 are shown in the statistical appendices. CI: confidence interval; CIN: chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; FN: febrile neutropenia; GCSF: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score. H/o repeated infections refers at enrollment; H/o: History of
time frame
All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
analysis role
secondary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
Patients in evaluable sample with composite outcome data
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
EORTC QLQ · Incidence of Outcomes

Score direction: Not stated by the study. Direction is never inferred from an instrument name.

release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-lung-carcinoma
nct id
NCT01459653
qol key
qol-0091
source section id
NCT01459653-om-0091
source outcome index
91
instrument
EORTC QLQ
instrument basis
matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
scale title
Incidence of Outcomes
measure definition
Objective 5: To describe the distribution of chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, and cancellations, and mortality (GCSF-related; FN-related; cancer-related; not related to GCSF, FN, or cancer; all-cause); and estimate the time-to-event for such events over the course of EP2006 treatment. Table presents incidences of different outcomes and composite outcome by chemotherapy risk group. \^Composite endpoint includes any of CIN grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization and CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance. CIN: Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN: Febrile Neutropenia; ANC: Absolute Neutrophil count; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score; Prophylaxis decision mentioned below are relative to EORTC guidelines (2010).
time frame
All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
analysis role
primary
reporting status
POSTED
higher is better
Source null
direction quote
Source null
population note
Evaluable sample
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
Open the exact result →
Full draft applicability and source-link record
trial
release id
clinical-indications-draft-1
disease state id
ds-lung-carcinoma
nct id
NCT01459653
trial label
Multi-level Evaluation of Chemotherapy-induced Febrile Neutropenia Prophylaxis, Outcomes, and Determinants With Granulocyte-colony Stimulating Factor
applicability
narrower
applicability note
Linked by condition-string match at the cancer-entity level. The study's eligibility - stage, biomarker, treatment line and prior therapy - has not been reconciled against this page's definition, so its population is narrower than this page in ways not yet recorded. The condition was transformed or resolved through the terminology hierarchy to reach this cancer type, so the link itself is a candidate a reviewer must confirm.
curation status
draft
reviewed by
Source null
reviewed at
Source null
created at
2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
provenance class
registry-condition-search
discovery note
Found by searching ClinicalTrials.gov for this cancer type, restricted to studies that have posted results to the registry. No FDA notice, FDA label or NCI summary held by this site cites this study. Because the search asked for posted results, studies without posted results were never looked for, so their absence from this page means nothing.
outcome Count
6
harms Count
1
qol Count
23
outcomes
  1. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-lung-carcinoma
    nct id
    NCT01459653
    outcome key
    om-0000
    source section id
    NCT01459653-om-0000
    source outcome index
    0
    endpoint
    Chemotherapy Toxicity (%FN Risk)
    endpoint definition
    Objective 1: To describe the cancer patients requiring chemotherapy who, in their treating physician's best clinical judgment, are receiving EP2006 for the primary or secondary prophylaxis of FN in terms of demographics, clinical status, medical history, concomitant comorbid conditions and current status of disease, and prior and concomitant medications. Chemotherapy regimens were classified for FN risk (\<10% risk, 10-20% risk or \>20% risk) according to the published rates in the EORTC Guidelines under consideration of agent(s) and schedules. ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count; CIN=Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN=Febrile Neutropenia;
    time origin
    Enrollment cycle. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.
    analysis role
    primary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    The evaluable sample includes all patients in the safety sample (all patients who received at least one dose of the study medication) who had no major protocol violation and have a minimum of enrollment cycle and either one follow-up cycle or study end data with valid outcome data. Please refer to baseline characteristics tables as well.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  2. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-lung-carcinoma
    nct id
    NCT01459653
    outcome key
    om-0001
    source section id
    NCT01459653-om-0001
    source outcome index
    1
    endpoint
    Cancer Treatment Type - Ever Received During Study
    endpoint definition
    Objective 1: To describe the cancer patients requiring chemotherapy who, in their treating physician's best clinical judgment, are receiving EP2006 for the primary or secondary prophylaxis of FN in terms of demographics, clinical status, medical history, concomitant comorbid conditions and current status of disease, and prior and concomitant medications. ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count; CIN=Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN=Febrile Neutropenia;
    time origin
    All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
    analysis role
    primary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    The evaluable sample includes all patients in the safety sample (all patients who received at least one dose of the study medication) who had no major protocol violation and have a minimum of enrollment cycle and either one follow-up cycle or study end data with valid outcome data (i.e., ANC or completed CIN/FN data).
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  3. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-lung-carcinoma
    nct id
    NCT01459653
    outcome key
    om-0002
    source section id
    NCT01459653-om-0002
    source outcome index
    2
    endpoint
    Fever and Infections Ever During the Study
    endpoint definition
    Objective 1: To describe the cancer patients requiring chemotherapy who, in their treating physician's best clinical judgment, are receiving EP2006 for the primary or secondary prophylaxis of FN in terms of demographics, clinical status, medical history, concomitant comorbid conditions and current status of disease, and prior and concomitant medications. ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count; CIN=Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN=Febrile Neutropenia;
    time origin
    All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
    analysis role
    primary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    Evaluable consists of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug, who had no major protocol violations and have a minimum of enrollment cycle and either one follow-up cycle or study end data with valid outcome data (i.e. ANC or completed CIN/FN data).
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  4. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-lung-carcinoma
    nct id
    NCT01459653
    outcome key
    om-0003
    source section id
    NCT01459653-om-0003
    source outcome index
    3
    endpoint
    Clinical Events Ever During Study (Frequency Threshold: 5%)
    endpoint definition
    Objective 1: To describe the cancer patients requiring chemotherapy who, in their treating physician's best clinical judgment, are receiving EP2006 for the primary or secondary prophylaxis of FN in terms of demographics, clinical status, medical history, concomitant comorbid conditions and current status of disease, and prior and concomitant medications. ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count; CIN=Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN=Febrile Neutropenia
    time origin
    All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
    analysis role
    primary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    The evaluable sample includes all patients in the safety sample (all patients who received at least one dose of the study medication) who had no major protocol violation and have a minimum of enrollment cycle and either one follow-up cycle or study end data with valid outcome data (i.e., ANC or completed CIN/FN data)
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  5. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-lung-carcinoma
    nct id
    NCT01459653
    outcome key
    om-0004
    source section id
    NCT01459653-om-0004
    source outcome index
    4
    endpoint
    Type of EP2006 Prophylaxis
    endpoint definition
    Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
    time origin
    All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
    analysis role
    primary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    Delayed Primary: EP2006 initiated in cycle 2 or later with no CIN/FN in prior cycle. True secondary: EP2006 initiated in cycle 2 or later following CIN/FN in prior cycle.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  6. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-lung-carcinoma
    nct id
    NCT01459653
    outcome key
    om-0005
    source section id
    NCT01459653-om-0005
    source outcome index
    5
    endpoint
    Type of EP2006 Prophylaxis by Gender
    endpoint definition
    Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
    time origin
    All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
    analysis role
    primary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    data cutoff
    Source null
    population note
    Evaluable sample by gender
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
arms
  1. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-lung-carcinoma
    nct id
    NCT01459653
    outcome key
    om-0000
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    EP2006
    regimen
    Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
    analyzed count
    1447
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT01459653-om-0000#groups/OG000
  2. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-lung-carcinoma
    nct id
    NCT01459653
    outcome key
    om-0001
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    EP2006
    regimen
    Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
    analyzed count
    1447
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT01459653-om-0001#groups/OG000
  3. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-lung-carcinoma
    nct id
    NCT01459653
    outcome key
    om-0002
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    EP2006
    regimen
    Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
    analyzed count
    1447
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT01459653-om-0002#groups/OG000
  4. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-lung-carcinoma
    nct id
    NCT01459653
    outcome key
    om-0003
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    EP2006
    regimen
    Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
    analyzed count
    1447
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT01459653-om-0003#groups/OG000
  5. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-lung-carcinoma
    nct id
    NCT01459653
    outcome key
    om-0004
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    EP2006
    regimen
    Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
    analyzed count
    1447
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT01459653-om-0004#groups/OG000
  6. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-lung-carcinoma
    nct id
    NCT01459653
    outcome key
    om-0005
    arm key
    OG000
    arm label
    EP2006: Male
    regimen
    Male cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
    analyzed count
    561
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT01459653-om-0005#groups/OG000
  7. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-lung-carcinoma
    nct id
    NCT01459653
    outcome key
    om-0005
    arm key
    OG001
    arm label
    EP2006: Female
    regimen
    Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
    analyzed count
    886
    analyzed unit
    Participants
    is comparator
    Source null
    source pointer
    NCT01459653-om-0005#groups/OG001
harms
  1. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-lung-carcinoma
    nct id
    NCT01459653
    harm key
    EG000
    source section id
    NCT01459653-ae
    event group key
    EG000
    event group label
    EP2006
    serious affected
    4
    serious at risk
    1496
    other affected
    36
    other at risk
    1496
    frequency threshold
    0.5
    collection period
    Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
    event definition
    The occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) not including not-related (S)AEs was sought by non-directive questioning of the patient at each visit during the study. Only Adverse events with a suspected relationship to EP2006 were collected.
    undenominated note
    Source null
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
quality of life
  1. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-lung-carcinoma
    nct id
    NCT01459653
    qol key
    qol-0000
    source section id
    NCT01459653-om-0000
    source outcome index
    0
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Chemotherapy Toxicity (%FN Risk)
    measure definition
    Objective 1: To describe the cancer patients requiring chemotherapy who, in their treating physician's best clinical judgment, are receiving EP2006 for the primary or secondary prophylaxis of FN in terms of demographics, clinical status, medical history, concomitant comorbid conditions and current status of disease, and prior and concomitant medications. Chemotherapy regimens were classified for FN risk (\<10% risk, 10-20% risk or \>20% risk) according to the published rates in the EORTC Guidelines under consideration of agent(s) and schedules. ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count; CIN=Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN=Febrile Neutropenia;
    time frame
    Enrollment cycle. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.
    analysis role
    primary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    Source null
    direction quote
    Source null
    population note
    The evaluable sample includes all patients in the safety sample (all patients who received at least one dose of the study medication) who had no major protocol violation and have a minimum of enrollment cycle and either one follow-up cycle or study end data with valid outcome data. Please refer to baseline characteristics tables as well.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  2. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-lung-carcinoma
    nct id
    NCT01459653
    qol key
    qol-0041
    source section id
    NCT01459653-om-0041
    source outcome index
    41
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Percentage of Patients With Each EORTC-identified Risk Factors for FN at Baseline
    measure definition
    Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. \* Advanced disease is defined as Stage IV (Stage III or IV if multiple myeloma) AND prior chemotherapy in metastatic setting. The PRS is a quantification of eight individual patient risk factors (EORTC guidelines-2010). CV: cardiovascular; EORTC: European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer; FN: febrile neutropenia; Hb: hemoglobin
    time frame
    Enrollment cycle. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.
    analysis role
    primary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    Source null
    direction quote
    Source null
    population note
    Evaluable sample
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  3. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-lung-carcinoma
    nct id
    NCT01459653
    qol key
    qol-0042
    source section id
    NCT01459653-om-0042
    source outcome index
    42
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Percentage of Patients With Each EORTC-identified Risk Factors for FN in Patients With Chemotherapy Risk 10-20% at Baseline
    measure definition
    Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. \* Advanced disease is defined as Stage IV (Stage III or IV if multiple myeloma) AND prior chemotherapy in metastatic setting CV: cardiovascular; EORTC: European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer; FN: febrile neutropenia; Hb: hemoglobin
    time frame
    Enrollment cycle. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.
    analysis role
    primary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    Source null
    direction quote
    Source null
    population note
    Patients with chemotherapy risk 10-20% in evaluable sample
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  4. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-lung-carcinoma
    nct id
    NCT01459653
    qol key
    qol-0045
    source section id
    NCT01459653-om-0045
    source outcome index
    45
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Patient Risk Score (PRS) for All Patients
    measure definition
    Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. Patient risk score (PRS) shows the individual patient risk for FN.The PRS is a sum of eight weighted individual patient risk factors for FN and results in a possible score of 0 to 11 (highest risk for FN). The risk factors were assigned weights based on the level of risk specified by guidelines and SC consensus (age \> 65 years: 3.0; advanced disease: 1.5; history of FN: 3.0; No antibiotic prophylaxis: 0.5; poor performance/nutritional status: 1.5; female gender: 0.5; Hb\<12g/dL: 0.5; Renal, CV or liver disease: 0.5). Advanced disease: Stage IV or Stage III + prior chemotherapy in metastatic setting; CV: cardiovascular; EORTC: European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer; FN: febrile neutropenia
    time frame
    Enrollment cycle. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.
    analysis role
    primary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    Source null
    direction quote
    Source null
    population note
    Evaluable sample
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  5. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-lung-carcinoma
    nct id
    NCT01459653
    qol key
    qol-0046
    source section id
    NCT01459653-om-0046
    source outcome index
    46
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Patient Risk Score (PRS) for Patients Receiving Chemotherapy With 10-20% FN Risk by Tumor Type
    measure definition
    Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. Patient risk score (PRS) shows the individual patient risk for FN.The PRS is a sum of eight weighted individual patient risk factors for FN and results in a possible score of 0 to 11 (highest risk for FN). The risk factors were assigned weights based on the level of risk specified by guidelines and SC consensus (age \> 65 years: 3.0; advanced disease: 1.5; history of FN: 3.0; No antibiotic prophylaxis: 0.5; poor performance/nutritional status: 1.5; female gender: 0.5; Hb\<12g/dL: 0.5; Renal, CV or liver disease: 0.5). Advanced disease: Stage IV or Stage III + prior chemotherapy in metastatic setting; CV: cardiovascular; EORTC: European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer; FN: febrile neutropenia
    time frame
    Enrollment cycle. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.
    analysis role
    primary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    Source null
    direction quote
    Source null
    population note
    Patients with chemotherapy with 10-20% risk of FN in the evaluable sample by tumor type
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  6. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-lung-carcinoma
    nct id
    NCT01459653
    qol key
    qol-0047
    source section id
    NCT01459653-om-0047
    source outcome index
    47
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Percentage of Patients With Each Prophylaxis Decision by Chemotherapy-associated FN Risk
    measure definition
    Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. FN: Febrile Neutropenia; EORTC: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer
    time frame
    All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
    analysis role
    primary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    Source null
    direction quote
    Source null
    population note
    Source null
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  7. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-lung-carcinoma
    nct id
    NCT01459653
    qol key
    qol-0048
    source section id
    NCT01459653-om-0048
    source outcome index
    48
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Percentage of Patients With Each Chemotherapy Risk Score (CRS) Result by Tumor Type
    measure definition
    Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. The CRS quantifies whether the decision to initiate EP2006 as either primary or secondary prophylaxis is consistent with the EORTC guideline (2010) recommendation based upon the patient's chemotherapy toxicity (\<10%, 10-20% or \>20% risk of FN) and the PRS. There are three possible results: under-treated, correctly treated, over-treated
    time frame
    All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
    analysis role
    primary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    Source null
    direction quote
    Source null
    population note
    Evaluable sample: total and by tumor type
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  8. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-lung-carcinoma
    nct id
    NCT01459653
    qol key
    qol-0049
    source section id
    NCT01459653-om-0049
    source outcome index
    49
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    EP2006 Day of Initiation Relative to Guidelines by Cancer Type
    measure definition
    Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. \^ 168 cycles in which ZARZIO® was initiated on day 4 or later involved regimens deemed by the Study Steering Committee to be suitable for GCSF initiation any day after chemotherapy (day 1 or later), e.g., etoposide; hence, these patients were re-classified as being within guidelines DLBCL- Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Guidelines refers to EORTC 2010 guidelines
    time frame
    All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
    analysis role
    primary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    Source null
    direction quote
    Source null
    population note
    Number of cycles with initiation on different days during chemotherapy for evaluable sample. A patient may have initiated EP2006 during chemotherapy on different days for different cycles. The categories therefore are not mutually exclusive on a patient level and the sum of patients may therefore exceed the sample size.
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  9. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-lung-carcinoma
    nct id
    NCT01459653
    qol key
    qol-0050
    source section id
    NCT01459653-om-0050
    source outcome index
    50
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    GCSF Initiation Score (GIS)
    measure definition
    Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count; GIS Score 0 (EP2006 initiated on day 0 of chemotherapy or on day 10 or later); GIS Score 0.50 (EP2006 initiated on days 7-9 of chemotherapy); GIS Score 0.75 (EP2006 initiated on days 4-6 of chemotherapy); GIS Score 1.00 (EP2006 initiated per EORTC guidelines (2010) on days 1-3 after chemotherapy) ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count; CIN=Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; EORTC=European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer; FN=Febrile Neutropenia; GCSF=Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; GIS=Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Initiation Score
    time frame
    All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
    analysis role
    primary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    Source null
    direction quote
    Source null
    population note
    The evaluable sample consists of all patients who received at least one dose of study medication, had no major protocol violation and have a minimum of enrollment cycle and either one follow-up cycle or study end data with valid outcome data (i.e., ANC or completed CIN/FN data)
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  10. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-lung-carcinoma
    nct id
    NCT01459653
    qol key
    qol-0051
    source section id
    NCT01459653-om-0051
    source outcome index
    51
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    GCSF Persistence Score (GPS)
    measure definition
    Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. The GPS grades persistence based on the number of cycles in the line of chemotherapy in which EP2006 was administered, D, relative to the number of cycles in which it should have been continued, C. Thus, the GPS = D/C and ranges from 0 to 1.0 ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count; CIN=Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; EORTC=European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer; FN=Febrile Neutropenia; GCSF=Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
    time frame
    All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
    analysis role
    primary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    Source null
    direction quote
    Source null
    population note
    Patients in the evaluable sample with a GCSF persistence score (GPS).
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  11. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-lung-carcinoma
    nct id
    NCT01459653
    qol key
    qol-0052
    source section id
    NCT01459653-om-0052
    source outcome index
    52
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    GCSF Congruence Score (GCS)
    measure definition
    Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. The GCS is computed at the patient level as an overall grade of how congruent actual GCSF treatment is to recommended treatment. The GCS is computed as follows and scores range from 0 to 3: GCS = Σ(CRS + mean GIS over all cycles + GPS), with higher scores indicating higher congruence. CRS: Chemotherapy Risk Score (0 or 1 with 1 best); FN: febrile neutropenia; GCSF: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; GIS=GCSF Initiation Score (0 to 1 with 1 best); GPS=GCSF persistence score (0 to 1 with 1 best);
    time frame
    All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
    analysis role
    primary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    Source null
    direction quote
    Source null
    population note
    Evaluable sample with GCSF congruence score by tumor type
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
  12. release id
    clinical-indications-draft-1
    disease state id
    ds-lung-carcinoma
    nct id
    NCT01459653
    qol key
    qol-0057
    source section id
    NCT01459653-om-0057
    source outcome index
    57
    instrument
    EORTC QLQ
    instrument basis
    matched 'eortc' in the study's own wording
    scale title
    Incidence of Outcomes by Chemotherapy Risk: Patient Level
    measure definition
    Objective 5: To describe the distribution of chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, and cancellations, and mortality (GCSF-related; FN-related; cancer-related; not related to GCSF, FN, or cancer; all-cause); and estimate the time-to-event for such events over the course of EP2006 treatment. Table presents incidences of different outcomes and composite outcome by chemotherapy risk group. \^Composite endpoint includes any of CIN grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization and CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance. CIN: Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN: Febrile Neutropenia; ANC: Absolute Neutrophil count; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score; Prophylaxis decision mentioned below are relative to EORTC guidelines (2010).
    time frame
    All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
    analysis role
    primary
    reporting status
    POSTED
    higher is better
    Source null
    direction quote
    Source null
    population note
    Evaluable sample by chemotherapy risk
    curation status
    draft
    reviewed by
    Source null
    reviewed at
    Source null
    created at
    2026-09-10T00:00:00Z
setting source links

    Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice