Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT01459653 · OUTCOME

Modeling Composite Outcome (Any of CIN Grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related Hospitalization, CIN/FN-related Chemotherapy Disturbance): Patient Level

Multi-level Evaluation of Chemotherapy-induced Febrile Neutropenia Prophylaxis, Outcomes, and Determinants With Granulocyte-colony Stimulating Factor · Source last updated 2016-01-11

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
NUMBER
Unit
participants
Interval / dispersion
Not reported
Time frame
All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days

What was measured

Objective 8: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who responded and those who did not respond to primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Objective 9: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who had chemotherapy dose delays or reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, and radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, or cancellations vs. no such events during the course of primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Only results with a p-value of \<0.05 are shown in the statistical appendices. CI: confidence interval; CIN: chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; FN: febrile neutropenia; GCSF: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score. H/o repeated infections refers at enrollment; H/o: History of

Analysis population: Patients in evaluable sample with composite outcome data

Groups in this outcome

EP2006

Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
EP20061291

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
EP2006323Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    1.152
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    2.281
    group Description
    Female gender as patient-level predictor for composite outcome (any of CIN Grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization, CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance)
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    p Value
    0.006
    param Type
    Odds Ratio (OR)
    param Value
    1.621
    statistical Method
    Regression, Logistic
    tested Non Inferiority
    false
  2. ci Lower Limit
    1.209
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    2.979
    group Description
    History of CIN4 at enrollment as patient-level predictor for composite outcome (any of CIN Grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization, CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance)
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    p Value
    0.005
    param Type
    Odds Ratio (OR)
    param Value
    1.898
    statistical Method
    Regression, Logistic
    tested Non Inferiority
    false
  3. ci Lower Limit
    1.200
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    5.984
    group Description
    History of repeated infections at enrollment as patient-level predictor for composite outcome (any of CIN Grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization, CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance)
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    p Value
    0.016
    param Type
    Odds Ratio (OR)
    param Value
    2.680
    statistical Method
    Regression, Logistic
    tested Non Inferiority
    false
  4. ci Lower Limit
    0.291
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.660
    group Description
    Over- vs. correctly prophylacted as patient-level predictor for composite outcome (any of CIN Grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization, CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance)
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    p Value
    <0.001
    param Type
    Odds Ratio (OR)
    param Value
    0.438
    statistical Method
    Regression, Logistic
    tested Non Inferiority
    false
  5. ci Lower Limit
    1.295
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    3.256
    group Description
    Under- vs. over-prophylacted as patient-level predictor for composite outcome (any of CIN Grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization, CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance)
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    p Value
    0.002
    param Type
    Odds Ratio (OR)
    param Value
    2.053
    statistical Method
    Regression, Logistic
    tested Non Inferiority
    false
  6. ci Lower Limit
    0.332
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.939
    group Description
    GIS at enrollment (1 vs. 0) as patient-level predictor for composite outcome (any of CIN Grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization, CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance)
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    p Value
    0.028
    param Type
    Odds Ratio (OR)
    param Value
    0.558
    statistical Method
    Regression, Logistic
    tested Non Inferiority
    false
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    1.152
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    2.281
    group Description
    Female gender as patient-level predictor for composite outcome (any of CIN Grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization, CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance)
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    p Value
    0.006
    param Type
    Odds Ratio (OR)
    param Value
    1.621
    statistical Method
    Regression, Logistic
    tested Non Inferiority
    false
  2. ci Lower Limit
    1.209
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    2.979
    group Description
    History of CIN4 at enrollment as patient-level predictor for composite outcome (any of CIN Grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization, CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance)
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    p Value
    0.005
    param Type
    Odds Ratio (OR)
    param Value
    1.898
    statistical Method
    Regression, Logistic
    tested Non Inferiority
    false
  3. ci Lower Limit
    1.200
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    5.984
    group Description
    History of repeated infections at enrollment as patient-level predictor for composite outcome (any of CIN Grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization, CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance)
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    p Value
    0.016
    param Type
    Odds Ratio (OR)
    param Value
    2.680
    statistical Method
    Regression, Logistic
    tested Non Inferiority
    false
  4. ci Lower Limit
    0.291
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.660
    group Description
    Over- vs. correctly prophylacted as patient-level predictor for composite outcome (any of CIN Grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization, CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance)
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    p Value
    <0.001
    param Type
    Odds Ratio (OR)
    param Value
    0.438
    statistical Method
    Regression, Logistic
    tested Non Inferiority
    false
  5. ci Lower Limit
    1.295
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    3.256
    group Description
    Under- vs. over-prophylacted as patient-level predictor for composite outcome (any of CIN Grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization, CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance)
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    p Value
    0.002
    param Type
    Odds Ratio (OR)
    param Value
    2.053
    statistical Method
    Regression, Logistic
    tested Non Inferiority
    false
  6. ci Lower Limit
    0.332
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.939
    group Description
    GIS at enrollment (1 vs. 0) as patient-level predictor for composite outcome (any of CIN Grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization, CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance)
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY_OR_OTHER
    p Value
    0.028
    param Type
    Odds Ratio (OR)
    param Value
    0.558
    statistical Method
    Regression, Logistic
    tested Non Inferiority
    false
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        323
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      1291
    units
    Participants
description
Objective 8: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who responded and those who did not respond to primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Objective 9: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who had chemotherapy dose delays or reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, and radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, or cancellations vs. no such events during the course of primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Only results with a p-value of \<0.05 are shown in the statistical appendices. CI: confidence interval; CIN: chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; FN: febrile neutropenia; GCSF: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score. H/o repeated infections refers at enrollment; H/o: History of
groups
  1. description
    Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
    id
    OG000
    title
    EP2006
param Type
NUMBER
population Description
Patients in evaluable sample with composite outcome data
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
title
Modeling Composite Outcome (Any of CIN Grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related Hospitalization, CIN/FN-related Chemotherapy Disturbance): Patient Level
type
SECONDARY
unit Of Measure
participants

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-25a395029948b04d52b1253f

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice