Skip to content
← Uterine Sarcoma

HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING

Treatment Options for Stage III Uterine Sarcoma

Source: Uterine Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.

Source updated: December 17, 2024 · Captured 2026-09-09.

Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary.

Context: Treatment of Stage III Uterine Sarcoma

Treatment options for stage III uterine sarcoma include:

Surgery (total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic and periaortic selective lymphadenectomy, and resection of all gross tumor).

Surgery plus pelvic radiation therapy (under clinical evaluation).

Surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy (under clinical evaluation).

Phase II chemotherapy studies by the Gynecologic Oncology Group have documented some antitumor activity for cisplatin, doxorubicin, and ifosfamide.[1,2] These studies have also documented differences in response leading to separate trials for patients with carcinosarcomas and leiomyosarcomas. In patients previously untreated with chemotherapy, ifosfamide had a 32.2% response rate in patients with carcinosarcomas [3] and a 17.2% partial response rate in patients with leiomyosarcomas.[2]

Source links and citations

GOG-108 was a randomized trial that examined the use of ifosfamide with or without cisplatin as first-line therapy for patients with measurable advanced or recurrent carcinosarcomas. Patients in the combination arm had a higher response rate (54% vs. 34%) and longer progression-free survival (PFS) (6 months vs. 4 months). However, patients did not have a significant improvement in survival (9 months vs. 8 months).[4][Level of evidence A1] The follow-up GOG-0161 study [NCT00003128] used 3-day ifosfamide regimens (instead of the more toxic 5-day regimen in the preceding study) given alone or in combination with paclitaxel (with filgrastim starting on day 4).[5] The combination was superior in response rates (45% vs. 29%), PFS (8.4 months vs. 5.8 months), and overall survival (13.5 months vs. 8.4 months). The hazard ratio for death favored the combination (0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.49–0.97).[5][Level of evidence A1] In this study, 52% of 179 evaluable patients had recurrent disease, 18% had stage III disease, and 30% had stage IV disease. In addition, imbalances were present in the sites of disease and in the use of prior radiation therapy, and 30 patients were excluded for wrong pathology.

Source links and citations

A role for chemotherapy as an adjuvant to surgery has not been established.

Studies cited in this source section

Source citation is not a determination that a study applies to you.

Publication references

Read the original reference and check its publication notices.

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice