HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING
Chemotherapy
Source: Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 14, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.
Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary.
Context: Treatment of Recurrent SCLC / Treatment Options for Patients With Recurrent SCLC
Although second-line chemotherapy has produced tumor regression, responses are usually short lived. The median survival is rarely more than 12 months and usually less than 6 months after second-line therapy.[1] Response to first-line chemotherapy predicts subsequent response to second-line therapy.
Source links and citations
As in other chemosensitive tumors (e.g., Hodgkin lymphoma and ovarian epithelial cancer), two main categories of patients receiving second-line chemotherapy have been described: sensitive and resistant. Sensitive patients have a first-line response that lasted more than 90 days after treatment was completed. These patients have the greatest benefit from second-line chemotherapy. Patients with sensitive disease respond to the same initial regimen in approximately 50% of cases; however, cumulative toxic effects may ensue.[2] Resistant patients either did not respond to first-line chemotherapy or responded initially but relapsed within 90 days of completion of their primary therapy.[3] Results from phase II studies of drugs such as topotecan, irinotecan, and gemcitabine indicate that response rates to agents vary depending on whether patients have sensitive, resistant, or refractory disease.[4-8][Level of evidence C2]
Source links and citations
Topotecan is a standard chemotherapy for recurrent SCLC.[9,10] Lurbinectedin, a selective inhibitor of oncogenic transcription, is another option.[11] Patients with sensitive disease may achieve response to a number of agents including topotecan, irinotecan, taxanes, vinorelbine, paclitaxel, or gemcitabine.[4-8,12-14][Level of evidence C2] Response rates for combination agents are generally higher than those reported for single agents,[15,16] and one phase III study reported improved survival for patients with sensitive disease treated with combination cisplatin, etoposide, and irinotecan. However, higher rates of toxicity have been seen.[17]
Continue within this section
Publication references
Read the original reference and check its publication notices.
- PubMed 10080612 · Original source
- PubMed 11221015 · Original source
- PubMed 12697880 · Original source
- PubMed 15094178 · Original source
- PubMed 17065590 · Original source
- PubMed 17135646 · Original source
- PubMed 17513814 · Original source
- PubMed 27312053 · Original source
- PubMed 2824211 · Original source
- PubMed 2842464 · Original source
- PubMed 32224306 · Original source
- PubMed 8604245 · Original source
- PubMed 9461009 · Original source
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle