HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING
Treatment Options for Extranodal Natural Killer/T-Cell Lymphoma
Source: Peripheral T-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 13, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.
Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary. Independent clinical review is pending.
Context: Treatment of Extranodal Natural Killer/T-Cell Lymphoma
The management of localized ENKL with nasal involvement involves combined modality therapy with chemotherapy and radiation therapy for those fit for chemotherapy or radiation therapy alone for those unfit for chemotherapy. The management of nonlocalized nasal ENKL and all cases of extranasal ENKL involves combination chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy.[6] Because ENKL frequently expresses P-glycoprotein which confers multidrug resistance and reduces the efficacy of traditional anthracycline-based regimens, asparaginase is typically incorporated into the chemotherapy regimens.[7,8] Various asparaginase-based combination chemotherapy regimens have been used.
Evidence (asparaginase-based combination chemotherapy):
A phase II study included 28 patients with newly diagnosed stage IV or relapsed or refractory ENKL. Patients received steroids, methotrexate, ifosfamide, [L-]asparaginase, and etoposide (SMILE).[9] Despite no head-to-head studies, this regimen is used more often in clinical practice, in patients with advanced-stage disease, or in combination with radiation therapy for patients with localized disease. Other asparaginase-based regimens which have been studied include gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and pegaspargase (P-GEMOX);[10] gemcitabine, etoposide, pegaspargase, and dexamethasone (GELAD);[11] and dexamethasone, cisplatin, gemcitabine, and pegaspargase (DDGP).[12]For patients who may not tolerate or who have reactions to asparaginase, a nonasparaginase regimen may be given with concurrent radiation therapy.[13][Level of evidence C3]
A phase II study included 28 patients with newly diagnosed stage IV or relapsed or refractory ENKL. Patients received steroids, methotrexate, ifosfamide, [L-]asparaginase, and etoposide (SMILE).[9] Despite no head-to-head studies, this regimen is used more often in clinical practice, in patients with advanced-stage disease, or in combination with radiation therapy for patients with localized disease. Other asparaginase-based regimens which have been studied include gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and pegaspargase (P-GEMOX);[10] gemcitabine, etoposide, pegaspargase, and dexamethasone (GELAD);[11] and dexamethasone, cisplatin, gemcitabine, and pegaspargase (DDGP).[12]For patients who may not tolerate or who have reactions to asparaginase, a nonasparaginase regimen may be given with concurrent radiation therapy.[13][Level of evidence C3]
The overall response rate after two cycles was 79% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65%–89%), and the complete response rate was 45%. The 1-year overall survival (OS) rate was 55% (95% CI, 38%–69%).
A phase II study included 28 patients with newly diagnosed stage IV or relapsed or refractory ENKL. Patients received steroids, methotrexate, ifosfamide, [L-]asparaginase, and etoposide (SMILE).[9] Despite no head-to-head studies, this regimen is used more often in clinical practice, in patients with advanced-stage disease, or in combination with radiation therapy for patients with localized disease. Other asparaginase-based regimens which have been studied include gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and pegaspargase (P-GEMOX);[10] gemcitabine, etoposide, pegaspargase, and dexamethasone (GELAD);[11] and dexamethasone, cisplatin, gemcitabine, and pegaspargase (DDGP).[12]For patients who may not tolerate or who have reactions to asparaginase, a nonasparaginase regimen may be given with concurrent radiation therapy.[13][Level of evidence C3]
Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 92% of patients, and grade 3 or 4 infections were seen in 61% of patients.[9]
Source links and citations
A phase II study included 28 patients with newly diagnosed stage IV or relapsed or refractory ENKL. Patients received steroids, methotrexate, ifosfamide, [L-]asparaginase, and etoposide (SMILE).[9] Despite no head-to-head studies, this regimen is used more often in clinical practice, in patients with advanced-stage disease, or in combination with radiation therapy for patients with localized disease. Other asparaginase-based regimens which have been studied include gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and pegaspargase (P-GEMOX);[10] gemcitabine, etoposide, pegaspargase, and dexamethasone (GELAD);[11] and dexamethasone, cisplatin, gemcitabine, and pegaspargase (DDGP).[12]For patients who may not tolerate or who have reactions to asparaginase, a nonasparaginase regimen may be given with concurrent radiation therapy.[13][Level of evidence C3]
A modification to the SMILE regimen (mSMILE) incorporating pegylated asparaginase has demonstrated reduced toxicity.[10]
Source links and citations
A retrospective study (NCT02733458) included 35 patients with newly diagnosed stage III to IV, relapsed, or refractory ENKL. Patients received P-GEMOX.[10]
Source links and citations
A retrospective study (NCT02733458) included 35 patients with newly diagnosed stage III to IV, relapsed, or refractory ENKL. Patients received P-GEMOX.[10]
The overall response rate was 80.0%, and the complete response rate was 51.4%. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 38.6%, and the 3-year OS rate was 64.7%.[10][Level of evidence C3]
Source links and citations
A prospective multicenter study (NCT02733458) included 52 patients with newly diagnosed stage IE/IIE ENKL who received two cycles of GELAD followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (50–56 Gy in 25–58 fractions) and two additional courses of GELAD.[11]
Source links and citations
A prospective multicenter study (NCT02733458) included 52 patients with newly diagnosed stage IE/IIE ENKL who received two cycles of GELAD followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (50–56 Gy in 25–58 fractions) and two additional courses of GELAD.[11]
With a median follow-up of 32 months, the estimated 4-year OS rate was 94.2% (95% CI, 83.2%–93.1%), and the 4-year PFS rate was 90.4% (95% CI, 78.4%–95.9%).[11][Level of evidence C3]
Source links and citations
A prospective multicenter study (NCT02733458) included 52 patients with newly diagnosed stage IE/IIE ENKL who received two cycles of GELAD followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (50–56 Gy in 25–58 fractions) and two additional courses of GELAD.[11]
The overall response rate was 94.2%, and the complete response rate was 92.3%.
A retrospective study included 80 patients with newly diagnosed (n = 48), refractory (n = 23), or first-relapse (n = 9) ENKL. Patients received DDGP.[12]
Source links and citations
A retrospective study included 80 patients with newly diagnosed (n = 48), refractory (n = 23), or first-relapse (n = 9) ENKL. Patients received DDGP.[12]
The overall response rate was 91.3% (95% CI, 85.0%–96.3%), and the complete response rate was 60.0% (95% CI, 48.8%–71.3%). The 2-year PFS rate was 81.4% (95% CI, 76.3%–86.5%), and the 2-year OS rate was 87.1% (95% CI, 83.4%–91.4%).[12][Level of evidence C3]
Source links and citations
A phase I/II study of 27 patients with newly diagnosed stage IE or contiguous IIE disease studied the nonasparaginase-based regimen DeVIC (dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide, and carboplatin). Patients received three cycles of DeVIC at the recommended phase II dosing and concurrent radiotherapy dosed at 50 Gy.[13]
Source links and citations
A phase I/II study of 27 patients with newly diagnosed stage IE or contiguous IIE disease studied the nonasparaginase-based regimen DeVIC (dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide, and carboplatin). Patients received three cycles of DeVIC at the recommended phase II dosing and concurrent radiotherapy dosed at 50 Gy.[13]
With a median follow-up of 32 months, the 2-year OS rate was 78% (95% CI, 57%–89%). The overall response rate was 81%, and the complete response rate was 77%.[13][Level of evidence C3]
Source links and citations
A phase I/II study of 27 patients with newly diagnosed stage IE or contiguous IIE disease studied the nonasparaginase-based regimen DeVIC (dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide, and carboplatin). Patients received three cycles of DeVIC at the recommended phase II dosing and concurrent radiotherapy dosed at 50 Gy.[13]
The most common grade 3 or higher nonhematologic toxicity was mucositis related to radiation, which occurred in 30% of patients.
Radiation therapy is an essential component of treatment for localized ENKL, nasal type, whether given as a monotherapy or as part of combined modality therapy.
Evidence (radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy):
A retrospective review included 1,273 patients with early-stage disease. Patients were stratified into a low-risk group and high-risk group using stage, age, lactate dehydrogenase level, performance status, and primary tumor invasion.
A retrospective review included 1,273 patients with early-stage disease. Patients were stratified into a low-risk group and high-risk group using stage, age, lactate dehydrogenase level, performance status, and primary tumor invasion.
Low-risk patients fared best with radiation therapy alone,[14] while high-risk patients fared best with a strategy of radiation therapy combined with chemotherapy.[15-17][Level of evidence C3]
Source links and citations
A retrospective review included 303 previously untreated patients from an international consortium who received nonanthracycline chemotherapy.[18]
Source links and citations
A retrospective review included 303 previously untreated patients from an international consortium who received nonanthracycline chemotherapy.[18]
The OS rates were identical (72%−74% at 5 years) for patients with early-stage disease who received either concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy or chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy.[18][Level of evidence C3]
Source links and citations
Higher doses of radiation therapy administered at more than 50 Gy are associated with improved outcomes according to anecdotal reports.[17] The highly aggressive course, with poor response and short survival with standard therapies, especially for patients with advanced-stage disease or extranasal presentation, has led some investigators to recommend autologous or allogeneic peripheral stem cell transplant consolidation.[19-24][Level of evidence C3]
Source links and citations
For patients with relapsed or refractory disease, therapies targeting programmed death 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have demonstrated promising results.
Evidence (immunotherapy):
In a phase II trial, the anti–PD-L1 antibody avelumab was given to 21 patients with relapsed or refractory disease.[25]
Source links and citations
In a phase II trial, the anti–PD-L1 antibody avelumab was given to 21 patients with relapsed or refractory disease.[25]
The complete response rate was 24%, and the overall response rate was 38%. The responses correlated with tumor PD-L1 expression.[25][Level of evidence C3]
Source links and citations
Treatment with pembrolizumab, an anti–PD-1 antibody, resulted in similar responses in patients with relapsed or refractory disease.[26][Level of evidence C3]
Source links and citations
A single-arm multicenter phase II study (GEMSTONE-201 [NCT03595657]) included 80 patients with relapsed or refractory ENKL. Patients received the anti–PD-L1 monoclonal antibody sugemalimab.
Source links and citations
A single-arm multicenter phase II study (GEMSTONE-201 [NCT03595657]) included 80 patients with relapsed or refractory ENKL. Patients received the anti–PD-L1 monoclonal antibody sugemalimab.
The objective response rate was 44.9% (95% CI, 33.6%–56.6%), and the complete response rate was 35.9%. The 12-month duration of response rate was 82.5% (95% CI, 62.0%–92.6%).[27][Level of evidence B3]
Source links and citations
Studies cited in this source section
Source citation is not a determination that a study applies to you.
Publication references
Read the original reference and check its publication notices.
- PubMed 14604284 · Original source
- PubMed 16156856 · Original source
- PubMed 19805668 · Original source
- PubMed 21990393 · Original source
- PubMed 26109206 · Original source
- PubMed 27093153 · Original source
- PubMed 27517317 · Original source
- PubMed 27893001 · Original source
- PubMed 28188133 · Original source
- PubMed 28380259 · Original source
- PubMed 29077846 · Original source
- PubMed 29602763 · Original source
- PubMed 32766875 · Original source
- PubMed 32844695 · Original source
- PubMed 34806163 · Original source
- PubMed 36996373 · Original source
- PubMed 7884427 · Original source
Preserved source evidence · Independent clinical review pending · Not medical advice
Triangle