Skip to content
← Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING

Alectinib

Source: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.

Source updated: May 15, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.

Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary.

Context: Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Stage IV, Relapsed, and Recurrent NSCLC / Treatment Options for Newly Diagnosed Stage IV, Relapsed, and Recurrent NSCLC (First-Line Therapy) / ALK inhibitors (for patients with ALK translocations)

Evidence (alectinib):

In an open-label, randomized, phase III study (the ALEX trial [NCT02075840]), 303 patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC received either alectinib (600 mg twice a day) or crizotinib (250 mg twice a day).[64] The primary end point was investigator-assessed PFS.

Source links and citations

In an open-label, randomized, phase III study (the ALEX trial [NCT02075840]), 303 patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC received either alectinib (600 mg twice a day) or crizotinib (250 mg twice a day).[64] The primary end point was investigator-assessed PFS.

The rate of PFS was significantly higher with alectinib than crizotinib; the 12-month event-free survival rate was 68.4% for the alectinib group (95% CI, 61.0%–75.9%) compared with 48.7% for the crizotinib group (95% CI, 40.4%–56.9%) (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.34–0.65; P < .001). The median PFS was not reached with alectinib. The results of independent review committee-assessed PFS were consistent.[64][Level of evidence B1]

Source links and citations

In an open-label, randomized, phase III study (the ALEX trial [NCT02075840]), 303 patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC received either alectinib (600 mg twice a day) or crizotinib (250 mg twice a day).[64] The primary end point was investigator-assessed PFS.

CNS progression events were less frequent with alectinib (12%) than with crizotinib (45%) (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.10–0.28; P <.001).

In an open-label, randomized, phase III study (the ALEX trial [NCT02075840]), 303 patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC received either alectinib (600 mg twice a day) or crizotinib (250 mg twice a day).[64] The primary end point was investigator-assessed PFS.

The response rate was similar for both groups, 82.9% for the alectinib group compared with 75.5% for the crizotinib group (P = .09).

In an open-label, randomized, phase III study (the ALEX trial [NCT02075840]), 303 patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC received either alectinib (600 mg twice a day) or crizotinib (250 mg twice a day).[64] The primary end point was investigator-assessed PFS.

Grade 3 to 5 adverse events were less frequent with alectinib (41%) than with crizotinib (50%).

A second, open-label, randomized, phase III trial (J-ALEX) recruited 207 ALK-inhibitor–naïve Japanese patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who were chemotherapy-naïve or had received one previous chemotherapy regimen. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive alectinib (300 mg twice daily, which is the dose approved in Japan and is lower than the 600 mg twice daily dose approved elsewhere) versus crizotinib (250 mg twice daily).[65] The primary end point was PFS-assessed by an independent review committee.

Source links and citations

A second, open-label, randomized, phase III trial (J-ALEX) recruited 207 ALK-inhibitor–naïve Japanese patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who were chemotherapy-naïve or had received one previous chemotherapy regimen. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive alectinib (300 mg twice daily, which is the dose approved in Japan and is lower than the 600 mg twice daily dose approved elsewhere) versus crizotinib (250 mg twice daily).[65] The primary end point was PFS-assessed by an independent review committee.

At data cutoff for the second primary interim analysis, the independent data monitoring committee determined that the primary end point was met (HR, 0.34; 99.7% CI, 0.17–0.71; P <.0001) and recommended immediate release of the data. Median PFS had not been reached with alectinib but was reached at 10.2 months with crizotinib.

A second, open-label, randomized, phase III trial (J-ALEX) recruited 207 ALK-inhibitor–naïve Japanese patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who were chemotherapy-naïve or had received one previous chemotherapy regimen. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive alectinib (300 mg twice daily, which is the dose approved in Japan and is lower than the 600 mg twice daily dose approved elsewhere) versus crizotinib (250 mg twice daily).[65] The primary end point was PFS-assessed by an independent review committee.

Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred less frequently with alectinib (26% occurrence rate) than with crizotinib (52% occurrence rate).

Studies cited in this source section

Source citation is not a determination that a study applies to you.

Publication references

Read the original reference and check its publication notices.

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice