HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING
Principles of Surgery
Source: Neuroblastoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 28, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.
Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary.
Context: Treatment Option Overview for Neuroblastoma
In patients without metastatic disease, the standard of care is to perform an initial surgery. This surgery aims to accomplish the following, based on the disease stage and the risk group:
Obtain tissue for diagnosis. Incisional or core biopsy only is recommended for patients with L2 disease,[5][Level of evidence C1] and an up-front resection should generally not be attempted. For more information about image-defined risk factors (IDRFs), see the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Staging System (INRGSS) section.
Source links and citations
Obtain tissue for diagnosis. Incisional or core biopsy only is recommended for patients with L2 disease,[5][Level of evidence C1] and an up-front resection should generally not be attempted. For more information about image-defined risk factors (IDRFs), see the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Staging System (INRGSS) section.
Either incisional biopsy or percutaneous core needle biopsy are acceptable for patients with L2 disease. In a multi-institutional retrospective study, there was no significant difference in the ability to accurately obtain a primary diagnosis by percutaneous core needle biopsy compared with incisional biopsy (95.7% vs. 98.9%, P = .314) or determine MYCN copy number (92.4% vs. 97.8%; P = .111). The yield for loss of heterozygosity and tumor ploidy was lower with percutaneous core needle biopsy (dependent on the number of cores/volume of tissue obtained) than with incisional biopsy (56.1% vs. 90.9%, P < .05; and 58.0% vs. 88.5%, P < .05). Complications did not differ between the groups.[6][Level of evidence C1]
Source links and citations
Near-total or total resection (80%–90%) of the primary tumor is recommended based on stage.
Near-total or total resection (80%–90%) of the primary tumor is recommended based on stage.
This is standard for patients with low-risk (excluding prenatally diagnosed infants who are candidates for observation) and intermediate-risk disease. In patients with L1 tumors (defined as having no image-defined surgical risk factors), the tumors are resectable with low risk of nephrectomy or life-threatening complications. Unilateral adrenal gland primary tumors, thoracic L1 disease, or neck L1 disease should be resected up front (per the surgeons’ discretion).[5][Level of evidence C1]
Source links and citations
Near-total or total resection (80%–90%) of the primary tumor is recommended based on stage.
Minimally invasive surgery may be considered in highly selected patients with neuroblastoma if it is performed by a pediatric surgical oncologist who has expertise using this technique.[7][Level of evidence C1]; [8,9]
Source links and citations
The COG reported that expectant observation in infants younger than 6 months with small (L1) adrenal masses resulted in an excellent EFS and OS while avoiding surgical intervention in a large majority of patients.[10] According to the surgical guidelines described in the intermediate-risk neuroblastoma clinical trial (ANBL0531 [NCT00499616]), the primary tumor is not routinely resected in patients with 4S neuroblastoma. German studies of selected groups of patients have biopsied tissue and observed infants with both L1 and L2 tumors without MYCN amplification, avoiding additional surgery and chemotherapy in most patients.[11]
Source links and citations
Whether there is any advantage to gross-total resection (>90%) of the primary tumor mass after chemotherapy in patients older than 18 months with stage 4 disease remains controversial.[12-17] A meta-analysis of patients with stage 3 versus stage 4 neuroblastoma, at all ages combined, found an advantage for gross-total resection (>90%) over subtotal resection in stage 3 neuroblastoma only.[18] A small study suggested that after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, completeness of resection was affected by the number of IDRFs remaining.[19] When an experienced surgeon performed the procedure, a 90% or greater resection of the primary tumor in stage 4 neuroblastoma resulted in a higher local control rate, but it did not have a statistically significant impact on OS.[20]
For more information about IDRFs, see the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Staging System (INRGSS) section.
Source links and citations
Studies cited in this source section
Source citation is not a determination that a study applies to you.
Publication references
Read the original reference and check its publication notices.
- PubMed 10705019 · Original source
- PubMed 15185228 · Original source
- PubMed 18349403 · Original source
- PubMed 22964741 · Original source
- PubMed 25247398 · Original source
- PubMed 25820608 · Original source
- PubMed 27870572 · Original source
- PubMed 27955728 · Original source
- PubMed 32072730 · Original source
- PubMed 34489122 · Original source
- PubMed 36695959 · Original source
- PubMed 36978162 · Original source
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle