Skip to content
← Mantle Cell Lymphoma

HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING

Treatment for Patients With Highest-Risk Disease

Source: Mantle Cell Lymphoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.

Source updated: May 12, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.

Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary.

Context: Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Evidence (treatment for patients with highest-risk disease with blastoid morphology, Ki-67 ≥30%, a TP53 pathogenic variant, or progression of disease <2 years after initial therapy):

A prospective randomized trial of patients with relapsed or refractory MCL compared ibrutinib plus venetoclax (the BCL-2 inhibitor) versus ibrutinib alone. TP53 pathogenic variants were present in 49% of patients.[18]

Source links and citations

A prospective randomized trial of patients with relapsed or refractory MCL compared ibrutinib plus venetoclax (the BCL-2 inhibitor) versus ibrutinib alone. TP53 pathogenic variants were present in 49% of patients.[18]

With a median follow-up of 51.2 months, the PFS favored the ibrutinib combination compared with ibrutinib alone (31.9 months vs. 22.1 months; HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47–0.88; P = .0052). This benefit was seen for the patients with blastoid morphology or TP53 pathogenic variants.[18][Level of evidence B1]

Source links and citations

A prospective randomized trial of patients with relapsed or refractory MCL compared ibrutinib plus venetoclax (the BCL-2 inhibitor) versus ibrutinib alone. TP53 pathogenic variants were present in 49% of patients.[18]

The complete response rate was 54% in the combination group and 32% in the ibrutinib-alone group (P = .004).[18][Level of evidence C3]

Source links and citations

A prospective randomized trial of patients with relapsed or refractory MCL compared ibrutinib plus venetoclax (the BCL-2 inhibitor) versus ibrutinib alone. TP53 pathogenic variants were present in 49% of patients.[18]

The median OS was 44.9 months for the ibrutinib-plus-venetoclax arm and 38.6 months for the ibrutinib-alone arm, but this was not statistically significant (P = .346).

A prospective randomized trial of patients with relapsed or refractory MCL compared ibrutinib plus venetoclax (the BCL-2 inhibitor) versus ibrutinib alone. TP53 pathogenic variants were present in 49% of patients.[18]

The triple combination of obinutuzumab, ibrutinib, and venetoclax is being studied in clinical trials for the highest-risk patients with relapsed or refractory MCL.

Publication references

Read the original reference and check its publication notices.

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice