HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING
Summary of Therapy for MCL
Source: Mantle Cell Lymphoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 12, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.
Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary.
Context: Treatment Option Overview for Mantle Cell Lymphoma
The following agents, alone or in combination, represent targeted biological therapy options that may enable chemotherapy-free treatment strategies for most patients with MCL:[3]
Source links and citations
BTK inhibitors: acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib, ibrutinib, and pirtobrutinib.
Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies: rituximab and obinutuzumab.
BCL-2 inhibitor: venetoclax.
Immune stimulator: lenalidomide.
Chemoimmunotherapy with BR (bendamustine and rituximab) or with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone)/R-DHAP (rituximab, dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin) is still considered a standard option for younger fit patients. Most patients can avoid autologous stem cell transplant (SCT), but maintenance therapy with rituximab for at least 2 to 3 years remains the standard of care after first-line induction therapy. The highest-risk patients may best respond to combinations of biological targeted therapies, followed by consolidation with allogeneic SCT or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.[4,5]
Routine administration of central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis in patients with high-risk MCL has never been studied in a prospective randomized trial. The use of intrathecal or intravenous high-dose methotrexate or the use of systemic therapies with CNS penetration such as BTK inhibitors, high-dose cytarabine, or venetoclax have not been studied or proven efficacious in this situation.[6]
Source links and citations
Outside the context of clinical trials, the use of measurable residual disease (MRD) testing has not been shown to be predictive for directing therapy for patients with MCL. In a retrospective analysis of a prospective randomized clinical trial, while MRD negativity after rituximab maintenance therapy was prognostic for a better outcome, continuation of maintenance rituximab prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival the most among patients with MRD-negative disease.[7][Level of evidence C1] Stopping maintenance rituximab was not indicated in patients with MRD-negative disease, negating any possible change in therapy based on that status.
Source links and citations
Publication references
Read the original reference and check its publication notices.
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle