Skip to content
← Late Effects of Treatment for Childhood Cancer (PDQ®)

HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING

COG long-term follow-up guidelines for childhood and AYA cancer survivors

Source: Late Effects of Treatment for Childhood Cancer (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.

Source updated: April 14, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.

Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary.

Context: General Information About Late Effects of Treatment for Childhood Cancer / Transition to Survivor Care

To facilitate survivor and provider access to succinct information to guide risk-based care, COG investigators have organized a compendium of exposure- and risk-based health surveillance recommendations, with the goal of standardizing the care of childhood cancer survivors.[72]

Source links and citations

The compendium of resources includes the following:

Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines. COG Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines for Survivors of Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancers are appropriate for asymptomatic survivors presenting for routine exposure-based medical evaluation 2 or more years after completion of therapy.

Source links and citations

Health Links. Patient education materials called Health Links provide detailed information on guideline-specific topics to enhance health maintenance and promotion among this population of cancer survivors.[73]

Source links and citations

Information concerning late effects is summarized in tables throughout this summary.

Several groups have undertaken research to evaluate the yield from risk-based screening as recommended by the COG and other pediatric oncology cooperative groups.[7,74,75] Pertinent considerations in interpreting the results of these studies include the following:

Source links and citations

Variability in the cohort’s age at treatment.

Age at screening.

Time from cancer treatment.

Participation bias.

Collectively, these studies demonstrate that screening identifies a substantial proportion of individuals with previously unrecognized, treatment-related health complications of varying degrees of severity. Study results have also identified low-yield evaluations that have encouraged revisions of screening recommendations. Ongoing research is evaluating the cost effectiveness of screening in the context of consideration of benefits, risks, and harms.

Publication references

Read the original reference and check its publication notices.

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice