HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING
Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy
Source: Laryngeal Cancer Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 14, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.
Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary.
Context: Treatment Option Overview for Laryngeal Cancer
Concurrent chemoradiation therapy is a standard treatment option for patients with locally advanced (stage III and stage IV) laryngeal cancer.
Evidence (concurrent chemoradiation therapy):
A meta-analysis of 93 randomized prospective head and neck cancer trials published between 1965 and 2000 showed the following:[8][Level of evidence B4]
Source links and citations
A meta-analysis of 93 randomized prospective head and neck cancer trials published between 1965 and 2000 showed the following:[8][Level of evidence B4]
The subset of patients receiving chemotherapy and radiation therapy had a 4.5% absolute survival advantage.
A meta-analysis of 93 randomized prospective head and neck cancer trials published between 1965 and 2000 showed the following:[8][Level of evidence B4]
Patients who received concurrent chemotherapy had a greater survival benefit than those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
In a randomized trial of patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer, curative-intent radiation therapy alone (213 patients) was compared with radiation therapy plus weekly cetuximab (211 patients).[9] The initial dose of cetuximab was 400 mg/m2 of body-surface area 1 week before radiation therapy was started, followed by a weekly dose of 250 mg/m2 of body-surface area for the duration of the radiation therapy. This study allowed altered-fractionation regimens to be used in both arms.[9,10][Level of evidence A1]
Source links and citations
In a randomized trial of patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer, curative-intent radiation therapy alone (213 patients) was compared with radiation therapy plus weekly cetuximab (211 patients).[9] The initial dose of cetuximab was 400 mg/m2 of body-surface area 1 week before radiation therapy was started, followed by a weekly dose of 250 mg/m2 of body-surface area for the duration of the radiation therapy. This study allowed altered-fractionation regimens to be used in both arms.[9,10][Level of evidence A1]
At a median follow-up of 54 months, patients treated with cetuximab and radiation therapy demonstrated significantly higher progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] for disease progression or death, 0.70; P = .006).
In a randomized trial of patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer, curative-intent radiation therapy alone (213 patients) was compared with radiation therapy plus weekly cetuximab (211 patients).[9] The initial dose of cetuximab was 400 mg/m2 of body-surface area 1 week before radiation therapy was started, followed by a weekly dose of 250 mg/m2 of body-surface area for the duration of the radiation therapy. This study allowed altered-fractionation regimens to be used in both arms.[9,10][Level of evidence A1]
Patients in the cetuximab arm experienced higher rates of acneiform rash and infusion reactions, although the incidence of other grade 3 or higher toxicities, including mucositis, did not differ significantly between the two groups.
For more information about oral toxicities, see Oral Complications of Cancer Therapies.
Source links and citations
Publication references
Read the original reference and check its publication notices.
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle