Skip to content
← Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING

Obinutuzumab alone or in combination with cytotoxic agents used in front-line therapy

Source: Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.

Source updated: May 14, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.

Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary. Independent clinical review is pending.

Context: Treatment of Indolent, Recurrent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma / Treatment Options for Indolent, Recurrent B-Cell NHL

Obinutuzumab is a CD20-binding monoclonal antibody with alternative epitope binding.

Evidence (obinutuzumab):

A randomized prospective trial (NCT01059630) included 396 patients with rituximab-refractory indolent lymphoma (mostly follicular lymphoma). Patients received obinutuzumab plus bendamustine, followed by obinutuzumab maintenance therapy, for 2 years versus bendamustine alone with no maintenance therapy.[19,20][Level of evidence A1]

Source links and citations

A randomized prospective trial (NCT01059630) included 396 patients with rituximab-refractory indolent lymphoma (mostly follicular lymphoma). Patients received obinutuzumab plus bendamustine, followed by obinutuzumab maintenance therapy, for 2 years versus bendamustine alone with no maintenance therapy.[19,20][Level of evidence A1]

With a median follow-up of 31.8 months, the 2-year OS rate favored the obinutuzumab combination (74.5% vs. 65.1%) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47–0.96; P = .027). The median PFS also favored the obinutuzumab combination (25.8 months [95% CI, 19.5–41.1] vs. 14.1 months [95% CI, 12.6–16.0]) (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.44–0.73; P < .001).[20][Level of evidence A1]

Source links and citations

A randomized prospective trial (NCT01059630) included 396 patients with rituximab-refractory indolent lymphoma (mostly follicular lymphoma). Patients received obinutuzumab plus bendamustine, followed by obinutuzumab maintenance therapy, for 2 years versus bendamustine alone with no maintenance therapy.[19,20][Level of evidence A1]

The contribution of maintenance therapy to the outcome could not be assessed in this design.

Studies cited in this source section

Source citation is not a determination that a study applies to you.

Publication references

Read the original reference and check its publication notices.

Preserved source evidence · Independent clinical review pending · Not medical advice