HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING
Treatment of epithelioid hemangioendothelioma
Source: Childhood Vascular Tumors Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 17, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.
Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary.
Treatment options for epithelioid hemangioendothelioma include the following:
Observation.
Surgery.
Immunotherapy.
Targeted therapy.
Chemotherapy.
Radiation therapy.
For indolent cases, observation is warranted. Surgery is performed when resection is possible. Liver transplant has been used with aggressive liver lesions, both with and without metastases.[3,11-13]
For more aggressive cases, several different drugs have been used, including interferon, thalidomide, sorafenib, pazopanib, and sirolimus.[11,14,15] The most aggressive cases are treated with angiosarcoma-type chemotherapy.
A multi-institutional case series reported on 24 patients aged 2 to 26 years with epithelioid hemangioendothelioma.[8][Level of evidence C2]
Source links and citations
Three patients who were treated with sirolimus had stable disease or partial responses for more than 2.5 years.
A report from 2020 that investigated sirolimus treatment in children aimed to add to the previous experience of sirolimus in adults. A retrospective review identified six pediatric patients with disseminated epithelioid hemangioendothelioma who were treated with sirolimus.[16]
Source links and citations
Four of the six patients demonstrated partial responses or disease stabilization.
A report from the European paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group analyzed ten patients with localized disease and one patient with metastatic disease from two studies.[17] The median age was 14.3 years (range, 9.0–18.8 years). Local therapy was initial primary surgery in seven patients, and five patients received systemic therapy. No patients received radiation therapy.
Source links and citations
After a median follow-up of 50 months (range, 6–176 months), nine patients remained alive and off therapy and two patients died.
The 5-year progression-free survival rate was 77.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.5%–93.9%).
The 5-year overall survival rate was 74.1% (95% CI, 28.1%–93.0%).
Patients or families who desire additional disease-directed therapy should consider entering trials of novel therapeutic approaches because no standard agents have demonstrated clinically significant activity.
Regardless of whether a decision is made to pursue disease-directed therapy at the time of progression, palliative care remains a central focus of management. This ensures that quality of life is maximized while attempting to reduce symptoms and stress related to the terminal illness.
Publication references
Read the original reference and check its publication notices.
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle