Ifosfamide and Doxorubicin, Radiation Therapy, and/or Surgery in Treating Young Patients With Localized Soft Tissue Sarcoma
Childhood Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma of Bone, Sarcoma
ClinicalTrials.gov recordTREATMENT READING
Source sections for this topic, with the original link and date. Patient and professional reading are labelled separately.
Not medical advice · Not a complete treatment or trial directory
Made by Triangle.
Selected text from the National Cancer Institute, with the original link and date. Made by Triangle. This page is not an NCI PDQ summary. Source topics may be broader than an individual diagnosis.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Synovial sarcoma appears to be more sensitive to chemotherapy than many other soft tissue sarcomas. Children with synovial sarcoma seem to have a better prognosis than adults with synovial sarcoma.[11,28,32-37]
The most commonly used chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of synovial sarcoma incorporate ifosfamide and doxorubicin.[19,35,38] Response rates to the ifosfamide and doxorubicin regimen are higher than in other NRSTS.[39]
Evidence (surgery and chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy):
Several treatment centers advocate chemotherapy after resection and radiation therapy for children and young adults with synovial sarcoma.[19,20,40-42]
The International Society of Pediatric Oncology-Malignant Mesenchymal Tumors studies showed that select patients (young age, <5 cm resected tumors) with nonmetastatic synovial sarcoma treated with chemotherapy can have excellent outcomes in the absence of radiation therapy. However, it is still unclear whether that approach obviates an advantage of radiation for local or regional control.[41]
Sources: 41
A German trial suggested a benefit for postoperative chemotherapy in children with synovial sarcoma.[42]
Sources: 42
A meta-analysis also suggested that chemotherapy may provide benefit.[19]
Sources: 19
The COG reported an analysis of the subset of patients with synovial sarcoma treated on the ARST0332 (NCT00346164) trial. This was a prospective treatment assignment trial for patients younger than 30 years with NRSTS.[43] They analyzed the outcomes of 138 eligible patients.
Sources: ARST0332 (NCT00346164) · 43
The COG reported an analysis of the subset of patients with synovial sarcoma treated on the ARST0332 (NCT00346164) trial. This was a prospective treatment assignment trial for patients younger than 30 years with NRSTS.[43] They analyzed the outcomes of 138 eligible patients.
Overall, R0 resection or R1 resection (microscopically positive margins) of the primary tumor was achieved in 129 patients (93.5%): 69 patients (53.5%) at study entry and 60 patients (46.5%) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Of these, 104 patients (80.6%) had an R0 resection: 55 patients (53%) at study entry and 49 patients (47%) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
In the 60 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, response was evaluable in 55 patients. Two patients (3.6%) had complete responses, 9 (16.4%) had partial responses, 41 (74.6%) had stable disease, and 3 (5.5%) had progressive disease. The tissue from 57 tumors was centrally reviewed after definitive resection. Forty-one tumors (72%) had less than 90% necrosis, and 16 tumors (28%) had 90% necrosis or more.
The study prospectively defined three risk groups:
The COG reported an analysis of the subset of patients with synovial sarcoma treated on the ARST0332 (NCT00346164) trial. This was a prospective treatment assignment trial for patients younger than 30 years with NRSTS.[43] They analyzed the outcomes of 138 eligible patients. › The study prospectively defined three risk groups:
Low risk (about 50% of population): Patients with nonmetastatic, grossly resected tumors, except patients who had tumors that were both high grade and >5 cm in maximal diameter.
Intermediate risk (about 35% of population): Patients with nonmetastatic tumors that were both high grade and >5 cm in maximal diameter and patients with nonmetastatic, nonresectable tumors regardless of grade and size.
High risk (about 15% of population): Patients with metastatic tumors, including those with metastases restricted to regional lymph nodes.
The COG reported an analysis of the subset of patients with synovial sarcoma treated on the ARST0332 (NCT00346164) trial. This was a prospective treatment assignment trial for patients younger than 30 years with NRSTS.[43] They analyzed the outcomes of 138 eligible patients.
For the 46 patients in the low-risk group, the 5-year EFS rate was 81.9% (95% CI, 69%–94.8%), and the OS rate was 97.7% (95% CI, 92.7%–100%).
For the 23 patients in the intermediate-risk group (treatment arm C), the 5-year EFS rate was 64% (95% CI, 42.4%–85.8%), and the OS rate was 89.5% (95% CI, 75.3%–100%).
For the 49 patients in the intermediate-risk group (treatment arm D), the 5-year EFS rate was 71.2% (95% CI, 56.5%–85.9%), and the OS rate was 86.5% (95% CI, 75.6%–97.3%).
For the 21 patients in the high-risk group, the 5-year EFS rate was 7.6% (95% CI, 0%–22%), and the OS rate was 12.5% (95% CI, 0%–28.7%).
The EpSSG performed a prospective study of patients younger than 21 years with synovial sarcoma (CCLG-EPSSG-NRSTS-2005 [NCT00334854]).[44][Level of evidence C1] Patients were stratified into the following three risk groups and nonrandomly assigned to treatment by risk group:Outcomes for patients treated on the CCLG-EPSSG-NRSTS-2005 trial are described in Table 12.
Sources: NCT00334854 · 44 · Level of evidence C1 · Table 12
The EpSSG performed a prospective study of patients younger than 21 years with synovial sarcoma (CCLG-EPSSG-NRSTS-2005 [NCT00334854]).[44][Level of evidence C1] Patients were stratified into the following three risk groups and nonrandomly assigned to treatment by risk group:Outcomes for patients treated on the CCLG-EPSSG-NRSTS-2005 trial are described in Table 12.
Low-risk patients had IRS group I tumors less than 5 cm in size and nonaxial primary tumors.
Intermediate-risk patients had no axial primary tumors and IRS group I tumors greater than 5 cm or IRS group II tumors.
High-risk patients included all patients with axial primary sites (head and neck, lung and pleura, trunk, retroperitoneal), IRS group III tumors, or N1 tumors.
| Risk Group | Treatment | 3-Year EFS Rate (%) | 3-Year OS Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| IRS = Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study; RT = radiation therapy. | |||
| aChemotherapy was ifosfamide/doxorubicin, with doxorubicin omitted during radiation therapy. | |||
| b59.4 Gy in cases without the option of secondary resection; 50.4 Gy as preoperative radiation therapy; 50.4, 54, and 59.4 Gy as postoperative radiation therapy, in the case of R0, R1, and R2 resections, respectively (no additional radiation therapy in the case of secondary complete resections with free margins, in children younger than 6 years). | |||
| Low | Surgery alone | 92 | 100 |
| Intermediate | Surgery, 3–6 cycles chemotherapya, ± RTb | 91 | 100 |
| High (IRS group III) | 3 cycles of chemotherapya, surgery, 3 additional cycles of chemotherapy, ± RTb | 77 | 94 |
| High (axial primary sites) | Surgery, 6 cycles of chemotherapya, RTb | 78 | 100 |
The CWS reported results from a prospective trial for the treatment of patients with synovial sarcoma. Eligibility was restricted to patients with localized tumors with macroscopic residual disease after first surgery, before the initiation of systemic therapy (IRS III) and no clinically detectable metastatic disease. There were 145 patients in the study with a median age of 14.5 years (range, 0.2–33.2 years). The protocols recommended but did not require radiation therapy to be given before definitive tumor resection. Radiation therapy was administered to 115 patients (79%), and 23 patients did not receive radiation therapy (no information documented for 7 patients). Of the 115 irradiated patients, 57 were irradiated before tumor excision and 52 after tumor excision.[45]
Sources: 45
The CWS reported results from a prospective trial for the treatment of patients with synovial sarcoma. Eligibility was restricted to patients with localized tumors with macroscopic residual disease after first surgery, before the initiation of systemic therapy (IRS III) and no clinically detectable metastatic disease. There were 145 patients in the study with a median age of 14.5 years (range, 0.2–33.2 years). The protocols recommended but did not require radiation therapy to be given before definitive tumor resection. Radiation therapy was administered to 115 patients (79%), and 23 patients did not receive radiation therapy (no information documented for 7 patients). Of the 115 irradiated patients, 57 were irradiated before tumor excision and 52 after tumor excision.[45]
In this nonrandomized comparison, the sequencing of radiation therapy before definitive resection was associated with a statistically significant improvement in local recurrence-free survival rates, compared with definitive surgery before radiation therapy.
Omission of radiation therapy was associated with an inferior outcome.
Outcomes for patients are described in Table 13.
Sources: Table 13
| Radiation Therapy | Patients (No.) | 5-Year EFS Rate | 5-Year OS Rate | 5-Year Local Recurrence-Free Survival Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFS = event-free survival; OS = overall survival. | ||||
| No radiation therapy | 23 | 44% | 57% | 76% |
| Radiation therapy before surgery | 57 | 70% | 83% | 98% |
| Radiation therapy after surgery | 52 | 73% | 82% | 86% |
This page is made by Triangle. The reading above is selected source text, not a treatment recommendation, and it is not medical advice.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
For patients with recurrent synovial sarcoma, the survival rate after relapse is poor (30%–40% at 5 years). Factors associated with outcome after relapse include duration of first remission (> or ≤ 18 months) and lack of a second remission.[46,47]
In a German experience, surgical resection of metastatic disease was the most common way to achieve a second complete remission.[47] Maintenance chemotherapy with oral trofosfamide, idarubicin, and etoposide or oral cyclophosphamide and intravenous vinblastine was administered on an individual basis.
Sources: 47
A consortium of six European referral centers reported a retrospective review of patients younger than 21 years with recurrent synovial sarcoma. Among 41 patients, the first relapses occurred within 3 to 132 months (median, 18 months) after first diagnoses. The relapses were local in 34% of patients, metastatic in 54%, and both in 12%. Treatments at first relapse included surgery in 56% of patients, radiation therapy in 34%, and systemic therapy in 88%. In all, 36 patients received second-line medical treatment, which included chemotherapy in 32 patients (with 10 different regimens) and targeted therapy in 4 patients. No patient was included in early-phase clinical trials as second-line therapy. The overall response rate was 42%. The median EFS was 12 months, and the postrelapse 5-year EFS rate was 15.8%. The median OS was 30 months, and the postrelapse 5-year OS rate was 22.2%. In a Cox multivariable regression analysis, OS was significantly associated with time and type of relapse.[48]
Sources: 48
Radiation therapy (stereotactic body radiation therapy) can be used to target select pulmonary metastases. This is usually considered after a minimum of one resection to confirm metastatic disease. Radiation therapy is particularly appropriate for patients with lesions that threaten air exchange because of their location adjacent to bronchi or cause pain by invading the chest wall.[49]
Sources: stereotactic body radiation therapy · 49
Between 70% to 80% of synovial sarcomas express NY-ESO-1, an immunogenic cancer testis antigen.[50] NY-ESO-1 can be targeted with adoptive transfer of T cells engineered to express NY-ESO-1c259, an affinity-enhanced T-cell receptor (TCR) targeting NY-ESO-1/LAGE1a.[51] The procedure to produce the genetically engineered T cells restricts their reactivity to a single HLA type. All clinical trials of this technology chose HLA-A*02 as the initial target and limited eligibility to patients whose tumors expressed NY-ESO-1 and who had HLA-A*02. In a multi-institutional trial, confirmed antitumor responses occurred in 50% of patients (6 of 12) and were characterized by tumor shrinkage over several months. Circulating NY-ESO-1c259 T cells were present postinfusion in all patients, and the cells persisted for at least 6 months in all responders.[52]
An open-label, international, phase II study enrolled patients with previously treated metastatic or unresectable synovial sarcoma and myxoid round cell liposarcoma.[53] Fifty-two patients with HLA-A*02 and tumors that expressed melanoma-associated antigen A4 (MAGE-A4) received a single intravenous dose of afamitresgene autoleucel (afami-cel) after lymphodepletion. Afami-cel is a MAGE-A4–directed, genetically modified, autologous T-cell immunotherapy. The overall response rate (the primary end point of the study) was 37% (19 of 52; 95% CI, 24%–51%), 39% (17 of 44; 95% CI, 24%–55%) for patients with synovial sarcoma, and 25% (2 of 8; 95% CI, 3%–65%) for patients with myxoid round cell liposarcoma. Cytokine release syndrome and cytopenias were the most frequent side effects. The authors concluded that afami-cel treatment resulted in durable responses in heavily pretreated eligible patients with synovial sarcoma.[53] These data led to FDA approval of afami-cel in adults with unresectable or metastatic synovial sarcoma who have received prior chemotherapy, are HLA-A*02 positive, and whose tumors express the MAGE-A4 antigen.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Information about National Cancer Institute (NCI)-supported clinical trials can be found on the NCI website. For information about clinical trials sponsored by other organizations, see the ClinicalTrials.gov website.
Sources: NCI website · ClinicalTrials.gov website
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Epithelioid sarcoma is a rare mesenchymal tumor of uncertain histogenesis that displays multilineage differentiation.[54]
Sources: 54
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Epithelioid sarcoma commonly presents as a slowly growing firm nodule based in the deep soft tissue. The proximal type predominantly affects adults and involves the axial skeleton and proximal sites. The tumor is highly aggressive and has a propensity for lymph node metastases.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Treatment options for epithelioid sarcoma include the following:
Surgery with or without chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy.
Sources: Surgery with or without chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy
Targeted therapy.
Sources: Targeted therapy
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Surgical removal of primary and recurrent tumor(s) is the most effective treatment.[57][Level of evidence C1] Because of the propensity of this disease to have occult metastasis to the lymph nodes, sentinel lymph node biopsy is recommended for epithelioid sarcoma of the extremities or buttocks in the absence of clinically (by imaging or physical examination) enlarged lymph nodes.[58]
Sources: 57 · Level of evidence C1 · 58
Evidence (surgery with or without chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy):
In a German CWS retrospective analysis of 67 children, adolescents, and young adults (median age, 14 years) with epithelioid sarcoma, 53 patients presented with localized disease and 14 patients presented with metastatic disease.[59][Level of evidence C1] Fifty-eight of 67 patients were treated with primary resections. Resections were microscopically complete in 35 patients, microscopically incomplete in 12 patients, and macroscopically incomplete in 20 patients. Forty-nine patients received chemotherapy, and 33 patients received radiation therapy.
Sources: 59 · Level of evidence C1
In a German CWS retrospective analysis of 67 children, adolescents, and young adults (median age, 14 years) with epithelioid sarcoma, 53 patients presented with localized disease and 14 patients presented with metastatic disease.[59][Level of evidence C1] Fifty-eight of 67 patients were treated with primary resections. Resections were microscopically complete in 35 patients, microscopically incomplete in 12 patients, and macroscopically incomplete in 20 patients. Forty-nine patients received chemotherapy, and 33 patients received radiation therapy.
Complete remission was achieved in 45 of 53 patients (85%) with localized disease.
Twenty-seven patients with localized disease had local (n = 16), metastatic (n = 6), or combined (n = 4) relapses after a median time of 0.9 years (range, 0.1–2.3 years) after complete response of disease (45 of 63).
Patients with localized disease had a 5-year EFS rate of 35% (95% CI, ±12%) and an OS rate of 48% (95% CI, ±14%).
Patients with metastatic disease had a 5-year EFS rate of 7% (95% CI, ±14%) and an OS rate of 9% (95% CI, ±16%).
Smaller tumor size, lower IRS group, less tumor invasiveness, negative nodal status, and microscopically complete resection correlated with a favorable prognosis in patients with localized disease.
A retrospective analysis reviewed COG and EpSSG prospective clinical trials that enrolled patients younger than 30 years with epithelioid sarcoma.[60][Level of evidence B4] The analysis identified 63 patients who were treated between July 2005 and November 2015. Patients were stratified into three risk groups using a combination of clinical features and treatment received. Low-risk patients (n = 34) underwent surgery with or without radiation therapy and included predominantly patients with nonmetastatic widely or marginally resected tumors 5 cm or smaller. The intermediate-risk group included patients (n = 16) with nonmetastatic, high-grade, and larger than 5 cm tumors or unresectable tumors. Patients with nodal or distant metastatic disease were at high risk (n = 13) , regardless of tumor grade or size.
Sources: 60 · Level of evidence B4
A retrospective analysis reviewed COG and EpSSG prospective clinical trials that enrolled patients younger than 30 years with epithelioid sarcoma.[60][Level of evidence B4] The analysis identified 63 patients who were treated between July 2005 and November 2015. Patients were stratified into three risk groups using a combination of clinical features and treatment received. Low-risk patients (n = 34) underwent surgery with or without radiation therapy and included predominantly patients with nonmetastatic widely or marginally resected tumors 5 cm or smaller. The intermediate-risk group included patients (n = 16) with nonmetastatic, high-grade, and larger than 5 cm tumors or unresectable tumors. Patients with nodal or distant metastatic disease were at high risk (n = 13) , regardless of tumor grade or size.
Partial responses were observed in 11 of 22 patients (50%) who received neoadjuvant therapy.
Events were local recurrence (n = 10) and distant recurrence (n = 15).
The estimated 5-year OS rates were 86.4% for low-risk patients, 63.5% for intermediate-risk patients, and 0% for high-risk patients.
Locoregional nodal involvement, invasive tumor, high grade, and lesser extent of resection predicted poorer EFS in patients without metastases.
A review of 30 pediatric patients with epithelioid sarcoma (median age at presentation, 12 years) reported the following results:[61]
Sources: 61
A review of 30 pediatric patients with epithelioid sarcoma (median age at presentation, 12 years) reported the following results:[61]
Responses to chemotherapy were reported in 40% of patients using sarcoma-based treatment regimens.
Sixty percent of patients were alive at 5 years after initial diagnosis.
A single-institution retrospective review of 20 patients, which included children and adults (median age, 27.3 years), reported the following:[57]
Sources: 57
A single-institution retrospective review of 20 patients, which included children and adults (median age, 27.3 years), reported the following:[57]
There was no difference in the probability of recurrence between patients who received chemotherapy and those who did not receive chemotherapy.
The authors suggested that radiation therapy may be useful.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Evidence (tazemetostat):
In a phase II trial of 62 adult patients with epithelioid sarcoma and documented loss of INI1 by immunohistochemistry or biallelic SMARCB1 (the gene that encodes INI1) alterations, tazemetostat showed clinical activity.[62]
Sources: 62
In a phase II trial of 62 adult patients with epithelioid sarcoma and documented loss of INI1 by immunohistochemistry or biallelic SMARCB1 (the gene that encodes INI1) alterations, tazemetostat showed clinical activity.[62]
There were 9 of 62 confirmed partial responses, with an objective response rate of 15% and a disease control rate of 26%.
In January 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted accelerated approval to tazemetostat for adult and pediatric patients aged 16 years and older with metastatic or locally advanced epithelioid sarcoma who were not eligible for complete resection.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Information about NCI-supported clinical trials can be found on the NCI website. For information about clinical trials sponsored by other organizations, see the ClinicalTrials.gov website.
Sources: NCI website · ClinicalTrials.gov website
The following is an example of a national and/or institutional clinical trial that is currently being conducted:
PEPN2121 (NCT05286801) (Tiragolumab and Atezolizumab for the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory SMARCB1- or SMARCA4-Deficient Tumors): This study is evaluating the combination of a PD-L1 targeting antibody (atezolizumab) with a TIGIT targeting antibody (tiragolumab) for patients with SMARCB1- or SMARCA4-deficient tumors. Patients with epithelioid sarcoma may be eligible for this study.
Sources: PEPN2121 (NCT05286801)
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Alveolar soft part sarcomas account for 1.4% of soft tissue sarcomas in patients younger than 20 years (see Table 1).
Sources: Table 1
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
The median age at presentation is 25 years for patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma. This tumor most commonly arises in the extremities but can occur in the oral and maxillofacial region.[63-65] Alveolar soft part sarcoma in children can present with evidence of metastatic disease.[66] Delayed metastases to the brain and lung are uncommon.[63]
In a series of 61 patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma who were treated in four consecutive CWS trials and the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Registry (SoTiSaR), 46 patients presented with localized disease and 15 patients had evidence of metastasis at diagnosis.[67]
Sources: 67
Sixty-nine patients younger than 30 years with alveolar soft part sarcoma were treated between 1980 and 2014 at four major institutions. The median age at diagnosis was 17 years, and 64% of patients were female. The most common site of disease was the lower extremity, and 26 patients had an ASPSCR1::TFE3 gene translocation.[68]
Sources: 68
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Alveolar soft part sarcoma in children may have an indolent course.[66] Patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma may relapse several years after a prolonged period of apparent remission.[67,71]
In a series of 19 treated patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma, one study reported a 5-year OS rate of 80%. The OS rate was 91% for patients with localized disease, 100% for patients with tumors 5 cm or smaller, and 31% for patients with tumors larger than 5 cm.[72]
Sources: 72
In another series of 33 patients, the OS rate was 68% at 5 years from diagnosis and 53% at 10 years from diagnosis. Survival was better for patients with smaller tumors (≤5 cm) and completely resected tumors.[73][Level of evidence C1]
Sources: 73 · Level of evidence C1
A retrospective review of children and young adults younger than 30 years (median age, 17 years; range, 1.5–30 years) from four institutions identified 69 patients treated primarily with surgery between 1980 and 2014.[68][Level of evidence C1] The ASPSCR1::TFE3 translocation was present in all 26 patients tested. There were 19 patients with IRS group I tumors (28%), 7 patients with IRS group II tumors (10%), 5 patients with IRS group III tumors (7%), and 38 patients with IRS group IV tumors (55%). The 5-year EFS rate was 80%, and the OS rate was 87% for the 31 patients with localized tumors (IRS postsurgical groups I, II, and III). The 5-year EFS rate was 7%, and the OS rate was 61% for the 38 patients with metastatic tumors (IRS group IV).
Sources: 68 · Level of evidence C1
In a series of patients treated on consecutive studies from Germany, 15 of 61 patients (25%) presented with metastases, often miliary in nature. Despite lack of response to chemotherapy, the 5-year OS rate was 61%, with an EFS rate of 20%.[67]
Sources: 67
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Treatment options for alveolar soft part sarcoma include the following:
Surgery with or without radiation therapy and chemotherapy.[29,30]
Sources: Surgery with or without radiation therapy and chemotherapy · 29 · 30
Targeted therapy (tyrosine kinase inhibitors and checkpoint inhibitors).[74]
Sources: Targeted therapy · 74
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
The standard treatment approach is complete resection of the primary lesion.[72] If complete excision is not feasible, radiation therapy is administered.
Sources: 72
Evidence (surgery with or without chemotherapy):
A study from China reported on 18 patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma of the oral and maxillofacial region. Fifteen patients were younger than 30 years. Surgical removal with negative margins was the primary treatment.[65][Level of evidence C2]
Sources: 65 · Level of evidence C2
A study from China reported on 18 patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma of the oral and maxillofacial region. Fifteen patients were younger than 30 years. Surgical removal with negative margins was the primary treatment.[65][Level of evidence C2]
All patients survived, and only one patient had metastatic disease recurrence.
In a series of patients treated on consecutive studies from Germany, the following was reported:[67]
Sources: 67
In a series of patients treated on consecutive studies from Germany, the following was reported:[67]
Progression-free survival (PFS) for patients without metastases on presentation appeared to improve with complete resection of the primary tumor.
The 5-year EFS rate was 100% for patients with completely resected tumors, compared with 50% for patients with microscopic or gross residual disease.
In a series of 51 pediatric patients aged 0 to 21 years with alveolar soft part sarcoma, the following was reported:[63][Level of evidence C1]
Sources: 63 · Level of evidence C1
In a series of 51 pediatric patients aged 0 to 21 years with alveolar soft part sarcoma, the following was reported:[63][Level of evidence C1]
The OS rate was 78% at 10 years, and the EFS rate was about 63%.
Patients with localized disease (n = 37) had a 10-year OS rate of 87%.
The 14 patients with metastases at diagnosis had a 10-year OS rate of 44%, partly resulting from the surgical removal of the primary tumor and lung metastases in some patients.
Only 3 of 18 patients (17%) with measurable disease had a response to conventional antisarcoma chemotherapy, but two of four patients treated with sunitinib had a partial response.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Studies of targeted therapy (tyrosine kinase inhibitors and checkpoint inhibitors) have been done.
Sunitinib
Evidence (sunitinib):
A small retrospective study of nine adult patients with metastatic alveolar soft part sarcoma treated with sunitinib reported partial responses in five patients and stable disease in two patients.[75][Level of evidence C3]
Sources: 75 · Level of evidence C3
In another study, 15 adult patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma were treated with sunitinib. Five patients were treated with sunitinib for longer than 2 years.[76][Level of evidence C1]
Sources: 76 · Level of evidence C1
In another study, 15 adult patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma were treated with sunitinib. Five patients were treated with sunitinib for longer than 2 years.[76][Level of evidence C1]
Six patients experienced partial responses.
The median PFS was 19 months, and the median OS was 56 months.
The 5-year OS rate was 49%.
Cediranib
Cediranib is an inhibitor of all three known vascular epidermal growth factor receptors.
Evidence (cediranib):
In a pediatric phase II trial of cediranib, using 70% of the adult maximum tolerated dose in patients younger than 16 years, the following was reported:[77][Level of evidence B4]
Sources: 77 · Level of evidence B4
In a pediatric phase II trial of cediranib, using 70% of the adult maximum tolerated dose in patients younger than 16 years, the following was reported:[77][Level of evidence B4]
Five of seven patients had stable disease for 14 months or longer.
An international group performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, phase II trial of cediranib in adolescent and adult patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma.[78][Level of evidence A1]
Sources: 78 · Level of evidence A1
An international group performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, phase II trial of cediranib in adolescent and adult patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma.[78][Level of evidence A1]
Median percentage change in sum of target marker lesion diameters for the evaluable population was -8.3% (interquartile range [IQR], -26.5 to 5.9) for patients who received cediranib therapy, compared with 13.4% (IQR, 1.1–21.3) for patients who received the placebo (one-sided P = .0010).
The authors concluded that cediranib is an active agent in patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma.
In a phase II trial of cediranib, 15 of 43 adult patients (35%) with metastatic alveolar soft part sarcoma had partial responses.[79][Level of evidence C3]
Sources: 79 · Level of evidence C3
Pazopanib
Evidence (pazopanib):
In an open-label trial that evaluated the efficacy of pazopanib in six adult patients, one patient achieved a partial response and five patients had stable disease.[80]
Sources: 80
Another trial included 30 adult patients who were treated with pazopanib.[81]
Sources: 81
Another trial included 30 adult patients who were treated with pazopanib.[81]
One patient experienced a complete response, seven patients experienced partial responses, and 17 patients had stable disease.
The median PFS was 13.6 months.
Axitinib and pembrolizumab
Axitinib is a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Pembrolizumab is an anti–PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor.
Evidence (axitinib and pembrolizumab):
In one trial, adult patients with advanced sarcomas were treated with a combination of axitinib and pembrolizumab.[74]
Sources: 74
In one trial, adult patients with advanced sarcomas were treated with a combination of axitinib and pembrolizumab.[74]
For the 12 patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma, the 3-month PFS rate was 73%.
Six of eleven patients with evaluable disease had partial responses to axitinib.
Atezolizumab
Atezolizumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against PD-1 and PD-L1.
Evidence (atezolizumab):
In a phase II trial, 52 patients older than 2 years with advanced alveolar soft part sarcoma were treated with atezolizumab.[82]
Sources: 82
In a phase II trial, 52 patients older than 2 years with advanced alveolar soft part sarcoma were treated with atezolizumab.[82]
Nineteen patients experienced a response, 18 had partial responses and 1 had a complete response.
Based on these data, the FDA approved the use of atezolizumab in children older than 2 years with unresectable or metastatic alveolar soft part sarcoma.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
There have been sporadic reports of objective responses to treatment with interferon-alpha and bevacizumab.[63,83,84]
Because these tumors are rare, all children with alveolar soft part sarcoma should be considered for enrollment in prospective clinical trials. Information about ongoing clinical trials is available from the NCI website.
Sources: NCI website
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Information about NCI-supported clinical trials can be found on the NCI website. For information about clinical trials sponsored by other organizations, see the ClinicalTrials.gov website.
Sources: NCI website · ClinicalTrials.gov website
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Clear cell sarcoma (formerly called malignant melanoma of soft parts) is a rare soft tissue sarcoma that typically involves the deep soft tissues of the extremities. It is also called clear cell sarcoma of tendons and aponeuroses. The tumor often affects adolescents and young adults.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
The tumor most commonly affects the lower extremity, particularly the foot, heel, and ankle.[85,86] It has a high propensity for nodal dissemination, especially metastases to regional lymph nodes (12%–43%).[86,87]
The tumor typically has an indolent clinical course. Patients who have small, localized tumors with low mitotic rate and intermediate histological grade have the best outcomes.[88]
Sources: 88
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Treatment options for clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue include the following:
Surgery with or without radiation therapy.[29,30]
Sources: Surgery with or without radiation therapy · 29 · 30
Targeted therapy.
Sources: Targeted therapy
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Surgery with or without radiation therapy is the treatment of choice and offers the best chance for cure.
Evidence (surgery with or without radiation therapy):
In a series of 28 pediatric patients reported by the Italian and German Soft Tissue Cooperative Studies, the median age at diagnosis was 14 years and the lower extremity was the most common primary site (50%).[91]; [92][Level of evidence C2]
Sources: 91 · 92 · Level of evidence C2
In a series of 28 pediatric patients reported by the Italian and German Soft Tissue Cooperative Studies, the median age at diagnosis was 14 years and the lower extremity was the most common primary site (50%).[91]; [92][Level of evidence C2]
In this series, 12 of 13 patients with completely resected tumors were cured.
For patients with more advanced disease, the outcome is poor and chemotherapy is rarely effective.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Evidence (targeted therapy):
In a study by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, 26 patients with clear cell sarcoma who had metastatic disease and documented EWSR1 rearrangements were treated with crizotinib.[93]
Sources: 93
In a study by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, 26 patients with clear cell sarcoma who had metastatic disease and documented EWSR1 rearrangements were treated with crizotinib.[93]
One patient had a partial response, and 17 patients had stable disease.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma is relatively rare among soft tissue sarcomas, representing only 2.3% of all soft tissue sarcomas.[94] It has been reported in children and adolescents.[95]
The tumor has traditionally been considered to have low-grade malignant potential.[96] However, reports from large institutions showed that extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma has significant malignant potential, especially if patients are monitored for a long time.[97,98] Patients tend to have slow protracted courses. Nodal involvement has been well described. Local recurrence (57%) and metastatic spread to lungs (26%) have been reported.[98]
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma is a multinodular neoplasm. The rounded cells are arranged in cords and strands in a chondroitin sulfate myxoid background. Several cytogenetic abnormalities have been identified (see Table 2), with the most frequent being the EWSR1::NR4A3 gene fusion.[99]
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Treatment options for extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma include the following:
Surgery.
Radiation therapy.
Aggressive local control and resection of metastases led to OS rates of 87% at 5 years and 63% at 10 years. Tumors were relatively resistant to radiation therapy.[97] The therapeutic benefit of chemotherapy has not been established.
Sources: 97
There may be potential genetic targets for small molecules, but these need to be studied as part of a clinical trial. In an adult study, six of ten patients who received sunitinib achieved partial responses.[100]
Sources: 100
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Almost one-fifth of patients with Ewing sarcoma will present with nonbone primary sites (extraosseous). Treatment for this tumor is the same as it is for patients with bone primary tumors.[101] For more information, see Ewing Sarcoma and Undifferentiated Small Round Cell Sarcomas of Bone and Soft Tissue Treatment.
Sources: 101 · Ewing Sarcoma and Undifferentiated Small Round Cell Sarcomas of Bone and Soft Tissue Treatment
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Desmoplastic small round cell tumor is a rare primitive sarcoma.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Desmoplastic small round cell tumor most frequently involves the peritoneum in the abdomen, pelvis, and/or peritoneum into the scrotal sac, but it may occur in the kidney or other solid organs.[102-106] Dozens to hundreds of intraperitoneal implants are often found. The tumor occurs predominantly in males (85%) and may spread to the lungs and elsewhere.[106,107]
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
A large single-institution series of 65 patients compared computed tomography (CT) scans (n = 54) with positron emission tomography (PET)-CT scans (n = 11). PET-CT scans produced very few false-negative results and detected metastatic sites missed on conventional CT scans.[107]
Sources: 107
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Cytogenetic studies of these tumors have demonstrated the recurrent translocation t(11;22)(p13;q12), which has been characterized as a fusion of the WT1 and EWSR1 genes.[105,108] The EWSR1::WT1 fusion confirms the diagnosis of desmoplastic small round cell tumor. The average tumor variant burden is low for desmoplastic small round cell tumor (<1 variant per megabase), and recurring gene alterations other than the EWSR1::WT1 fusion are uncommon.[109] A small percentage of cases (approximately 3%) have activating variants in FGFR4, with amplification of FGFR4 observed at similar frequency.[109,110] Inactivating variants in TP53 and ARID1A are observed in a small percentage of desmoplastic small round cell tumor cases.[109,110]
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
The overall prognosis for patients with desmoplastic small round cell tumor remains extremely poor, with reported rates of death at 90%. Greater than 90% tumor resection either at presentation or after preoperative chemotherapy may be a favorable prognostic factor for OS.[111,112]; [113][Level of evidence C1] Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and complete resection (near 100%) is associated with improved outcome.[106,114]
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
There is no standard approach to the treatment of desmoplastic small round cell tumor.
Treatment options for desmoplastic small round cell tumor include the following:
Multimodality therapy (chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy).
Sources: Multimodality therapy
Surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).
Sources: Surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)
Other treatment options.
Sources: Other treatment options
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Complete surgical resections are rare and usually performed in highly specialized centers, but are critical for any improved survival. Successful treatment modalities include neoadjuvant Ewing-type chemotherapy, followed by complete surgical resection of the extensive intra-abdominal tumors, followed by total abdominal radiation therapy. With this multimodality approach, survival can be achieved in 30% to 40% of patients at 5 years.[102,103,111,115-118]
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
HIPEC is a local treatment method that may control more of the microscopic intra-abdominal disease. The theory is that the heated chemotherapy that is instilled in the abdominal cavity after surgical resection (at the time of surgery) provides synergistic cytotoxicity to any microscopic cells remaining in the abdomen.[119]
Sources: 119
The addition of HIPEC to complete surgical resection (cytoreductive surgery) is a new technique first applied to children in 2006 in a phase I clinical trial. Cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for desmoplastic small round cell tumors is part of a multidisciplinary approach and is only being done in highly specialized centers. Surgeries can last more than 12 hours, and technical aspects of this unique tumor resection should be considered.[119]
Sources: 119
Evidence (surgery with HIPEC):
A single-institution phase II study showed HIPEC to be a potentially promising addition to complete surgical resection. Fourteen patients with desmoplastic small round cell tumor and five patients with other sarcomas were enrolled. These highly selected patients had tumor limited to the abdominal cavity. They demonstrated a partial response to neoadjuvant Ewing-type chemotherapy, had complete surgical resections and received HIPEC using cisplatin. They also received adjuvant total-abdominal radiation therapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy.[119]
Sources: 119
A single-institution phase II study showed HIPEC to be a potentially promising addition to complete surgical resection. Fourteen patients with desmoplastic small round cell tumor and five patients with other sarcomas were enrolled. These highly selected patients had tumor limited to the abdominal cavity. They demonstrated a partial response to neoadjuvant Ewing-type chemotherapy, had complete surgical resections and received HIPEC using cisplatin. They also received adjuvant total-abdominal radiation therapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy.[119]
With this standardized approach, patients with desmoplastic small round cell tumors had an OS rate of 80% at 30 months and 40% at 50 months.
Patients with desmoplastic small round cell tumors without liver metastasis had no intra-abdominal recurrences, whereas 87% of patients with liver metastasis or portal disease had a recurrence.
In a retrospective study from centers in France, patients were treated with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. Twenty-two patients were selected, and the median age at diagnosis was 14.8 years (range, 4.2–17.6 years). Seven patients had peritoneal mesotheliomas, seven patients had desmoplastic small round cells tumors, and eight patients had other histological tumor types. A complete macroscopic resection (CC-0, where CC is completeness of cytoreduction) was achieved in 16 cases (73%). Four of the seven patients with desmoplastic small round cell tumors had complete resections.[120][Level of evidence C1]
Sources: 120 · Level of evidence C1
In a retrospective study from centers in France, patients were treated with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. Twenty-two patients were selected, and the median age at diagnosis was 14.8 years (range, 4.2–17.6 years). Seven patients had peritoneal mesotheliomas, seven patients had desmoplastic small round cells tumors, and eight patients had other histological tumor types. A complete macroscopic resection (CC-0, where CC is completeness of cytoreduction) was achieved in 16 cases (73%). Four of the seven patients with desmoplastic small round cell tumors had complete resections.[120][Level of evidence C1]
Sixteen patients (72%) experienced relapses after a median time of 9.6 months (range, 1.4–86.4 months).
Nine patients (41%) died of relapsed disease after a median time of 5.3 months (range, 0.1–36.1 months).
Another study from France reviewed the use of cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for the treatment of patients with desmoplastic small round cell tumors who had disease limited to the abdomen. In 107 patients with desmoplastic small round cell tumors, 48 had no extraperitoneal metastasis and underwent cytoreductive surgery. Of 48 patients (mean age, 22 years), 38 (79%) received preoperative and/or postoperative chemotherapy, and 23 (48%) received postoperative whole-abdominopelvic radiation therapy. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy was administered to 11 patients (23%), 2 of whom received early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) and 9 of whom received HIPEC.[121]
Sources: 121
Another study from France reviewed the use of cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for the treatment of patients with desmoplastic small round cell tumors who had disease limited to the abdomen. In 107 patients with desmoplastic small round cell tumors, 48 had no extraperitoneal metastasis and underwent cytoreductive surgery. Of 48 patients (mean age, 22 years), 38 (79%) received preoperative and/or postoperative chemotherapy, and 23 (48%) received postoperative whole-abdominopelvic radiation therapy. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy was administered to 11 patients (23%), 2 of whom received early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) and 9 of whom received HIPEC.[121]
After a median follow-up of 30 months, the median OS of the entire cohort was 42 months.
The 2-year OS rate was 72%, and the 5-year OS rate was 19%.
The 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 30%, and the 5-year DFS rate was 12%.
Whole-abdominopelvic radiation therapy was the only variable associated with longer peritoneal recurrence-free survival and DFS after cytoreductive surgery.
Of 11 patients who received intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC or EPIC), six different chemotherapy regimens were used. The survival or outcome of this group is not reported in the manuscript.
The influence of HIPEC/EPIC on OS and DFS was not statistically significant, but standardized regimens were not used in all patients, making results difficult to determine.
A single-institutional retrospective study reported on nine patients (median age, 19 years) with desmoplastic small round cell tumor. Most patients had widespread disease, including four patients with extra-abdominal disease and five patients with liver involvement. These nine patients underwent ten cytoreductive and HIPEC treatments. Additionally, seven patients also received radiation therapy, and three patients underwent stem cell transplant.[122]
Sources: 122
A single-institutional retrospective study reported on nine patients (median age, 19 years) with desmoplastic small round cell tumor. Most patients had widespread disease, including four patients with extra-abdominal disease and five patients with liver involvement. These nine patients underwent ten cytoreductive and HIPEC treatments. Additionally, seven patients also received radiation therapy, and three patients underwent stem cell transplant.[122]
The 3-year relapse-free survival rate was 13%, and the OS rate was 55%.
Therapy was often associated with prolonged hospitalizations.
Long-term parenteral nutrition was required in eight patients for a median of 261 days.
Other long-term complications included gastroparesis (n = 1), small bowel obstruction (n = 3), and hemorrhagic cystitis (n = 2).
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
The Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research analyzed patients with desmoplastic small round cell tumor in their registry who received consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell reconstitution.[123] While this retrospective registry analysis suggested some benefit to this approach, other investigators have abandoned the approach because of excessive toxicity and lack of efficacy.[111]
A single-institution study reported that five of five patients with recurrent desmoplastic small round cell tumor had partial responses to treatment with the combination of vinorelbine, cyclophosphamide, and temsirolimus.[124]
Sources: 124
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Malignant rhabdoid tumors were first described in children with renal tumors in 1981. These tumors were later found in a variety of extrarenal sites. These tumors are uncommon and highly malignant, especially in children younger than 2 years. For more information, see the Rhabdoid Tumors of the Kidney section in Wilms Tumor and Other Childhood Kidney Tumors Treatment.
Sources: Rhabdoid Tumors of the Kidney
Extrarenal (extracranial) rhabdoid tumors account for 2% of soft tissue sarcomas in patients younger than 20 years (see Table 1).
Sources: Table 1
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
The first sizeable series of children with extrarenal extracranial malignant rhabdoid tumor of soft tissues came from 26 patients enrolled on the IRS I through III studies during a review of pathology material. Only five patients (19%) were alive without disease beyond 2 years.[125]
Sources: 125
Investigation of children with atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors of the brain, as well as those with renal and extrarenal malignant rhabdoid tumors, found germline pathogenic variants and acquired variants of the SMARCB1 gene in all 29 tumors tested.[126] Rhabdoid tumors may be associated with germline pathogenic variants of the SMARCB1 gene and may be inherited from an apparently unaffected parent.[127] This observation was extended to 32 malignant rhabdoid tumors at all sites in patients whose mean age at diagnosis was 12 months.[128]
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Germline analysis should be considered for individuals of all ages with rhabdoid tumors. Genetic counseling is also part of the treatment plan, given the low-but-actual risk of familial recurrence. In cases of variants, parental screening should be considered, although such screening carries a low probability of positivity. Prenatal diagnosis can be performed in situations where a specific SMARCB1 variant or deletion has been documented in the family.[127]
Sources: 127
To date, there is little evidence regarding the effectiveness of surveillance for patients with rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome type 1 caused by loss-of-function germline SMARCB1 pathogenic variants. However, because of the aggressive nature of the tumors with significant lethality and young age of onset in SMARCB1 carriers with truncating variants, consensus recommendations have been developed. These recommendations were developed by a group of pediatric cancer genetic experts (including oncologists, radiologists, and geneticists). They have not been formally studied to confirm the benefit of monitoring patients with germline SMARCB1 pathogenic variants. Given the potential survival benefit of surgically resectable disease, it is postulated that early detection might improve OS.[129-131]
Surveillance for patients with germline SMARCB1 pathogenic variants includes the following:
Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) every 3 months from birth (or diagnosis) until age 5 years.
Abdominal ultrasonography with a focus on the kidneys every 3 months.
For information about SMARCB1 and rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome type 1, see Rhabdoid Tumor Predisposition Syndrome Type 1.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Young age and metastatic disease at presentation are associated with poor outcomes in children with extracranial rhabdoid tumors.
One study that used data from the National Cancer Database identified 202 patients (aged younger than 18 years) with non–central nervous system (CNS) malignant rhabdoid tumors. The primary site of the malignant rhabdoid tumor was soft tissue (46%), kidney (45%), and liver (9%).[132]
Sources: 132
The 1-year OS rate was 48.8%, and the 5-year OS rate was 35.9%.
The multivariate analysis demonstrated that age younger than 1 year and presence of metastasis were negative prognostic indications (P = .058).
In the cohort of surgical patients (n = 143), there was a trend for an association between the presence of residual disease and a clinically significant worse outcome (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.88–2.69; P = .13).
A SEER study examined 229 patients with renal, CNS, and extrarenal malignant rhabdoid tumor. Patients aged 2 to 18 years, patients with a limited extent of tumor, and patients who received radiation therapy had favorable outcomes compared with other patients (P < .002 for each comparison). Site of the primary tumor was not prognostically significant. The OS rate was 33% at 5 years.[133]
Sources: 133
A European registry for extracranial rhabdoid tumors identified 100 patients from 14 countries between 2009 and 2018.[134] Half of the patients were younger than 1 year at diagnosis. In 30 patients (30%), the tumor was located in the kidneys. Extracranial, extrarenal malignant rhabdoid tumor was found in 70% of patients (70 of 100), and the most common locations were in the cervical region, thoracic region, and liver. Nine patients demonstrated synchronous tumors. Distant metastases at diagnosis were present in 35% of patients (35 of 100). SMARCB1 germline pathogenic variants were detected in 21% of patients (17 of 81 evaluable). The 5-year OS rate was 45.8% (± 5.4%), and the EFS rate was 35.2% (± 5.1%). In an adjusted multivariate model, presence of a germline pathogenic variant, metastasis, and lack of a gross-total resection were the strongest significant negative predictors of outcome.
Sources: 134
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Treatment options for extrarenal (extracranial) rhabdoid tumor include the following:[135-137][Level of evidence C1]
Sources: 135 · 137 · Level of evidence C1
Surgical removal when possible.
Chemotherapy as used for soft tissue sarcomas (but no single regimen is currently accepted as best).
Radiation therapy.
Responses to alisertib have been documented in four patients with CNS atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors.[138] For more information about CNS atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors, see Childhood Central Nervous System Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumor Treatment.
Sources: 138 · Childhood Central Nervous System Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumor Treatment
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Information about NCI-supported clinical trials can be found on the NCI website. For information about clinical trials sponsored by other organizations, see the ClinicalTrials.gov website.
Sources: NCI website · ClinicalTrials.gov website
The following is an example of a national and/or institutional clinical trial that is currently being conducted:
PEPN2121 (NCT05286801) (Tiragolumab and Atezolizumab for the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory SMARCB1- or SMARCA4-Deficient Tumors): This study is evaluating the combination of a PD-L1 targeting antibody (atezolizumab) with a TIGIT targeting antibody (tiragolumab) for patients with SMARCB1- or SMARCA4-deficient tumors. Patients with extrarenal (extracranial) rhabdoid tumors may be eligible for this study.
Sources: PEPN2121 (NCT05286801)
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
PEComas occur in various rare gastrointestinal, pulmonary, gynecological, and genitourinary sites. Soft tissue, visceral, and gynecological PEComas are more commonly seen in middle-aged female patients and are usually not associated with the tuberous sclerosis complex.[139] The disease course may be indolent.
Sources: 139
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Benign PEComas are common in patients with tuberous sclerosis, an autosomal dominant syndrome that also predisposes to renal cell cancer and brain tumors. Tuberous sclerosis is caused by germline pathogenic inactivation of either TSC1 (9q34) or TSC2 (16p13.3), and the same tumor suppressor genes are inactivated somatically in sporadic PEComas.[140] Inactivation of either gene results in stimulation of the mTOR pathway, providing the basis for the treatment of nonsurgically curable tumors with similar genetic inactivation (lymphangioleiomyomatosis and angiomyolipoma) with mTOR inhibitors.[141,142] A small proportion of PEComas have TFE3 rearrangements with fusions involving various genes, including SFPQ and RAD51B.[143]
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Most PEComas have a benign clinical course, but malignant behavior has been reported and can be predicted based on the size of the tumor, mitotic rate, and presence of necrosis.[144]
Sources: 144
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
There are no standard treatment options. Treatment may include surgery or observation followed by surgery when the tumor is large.[145]
Sources: 145
In tumors with evidence of mTORC1 activation and TSC1 or TSC2 loss, including lymphangioleiomyomatosis and angiomyolipoma,[141] clinical activity using mTOR inhibitors, such as sirolimus, has been well documented. In a small case series, three adult patients with PEComas responded to sirolimus.[146]
In a phase II trial, 34 patients with metastatic or locally advanced malignant PEComas were treated with sirolimus protein-bound particles for injectable suspension (albumin-bound) (nab-sirolimus). Of the 31 patients eligible for efficacy analysis, 12 (39%) had a response (1 complete response and 11 partial responses), 16 (52%) had stable disease, and 3 (10%) had progressive disease. Responses were rapid and durable. The median duration of response was not reached after a median follow-up of 2.5 years. Treatment was ongoing for 7 of 12 patients who responded to treatment (range, 5.6 months to longer than 47.2 months). Tumor variant profiling was completed for 25 specimens. Eight of nine patients with TSC2 variants responded to treatment, while only 2 of 16 patients without TSC2 variants responded. In addition, responses were noted in 10 of 17 patients with phospho-S6 (pS6) expression. No response was noted in eight patients without pS6 expression. The absence of pS6 expression reflects the lack of mTORC1 activation.[147][Level of evidence C1] In 2021, the FDA approved nab-sirolimus for adult patients with PEComas.
Sources: 147 · Level of evidence C1
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
From 1972 to 2006, patients with undifferentiated soft tissue sarcoma were eligible for participation in rhabdomyosarcoma trials coordinated by the IRS group and the COG. The rationale was that patients with undifferentiated soft tissue sarcoma had sites of disease and outcomes that were similar to those in patients with alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. Therapeutic trials for adults with soft tissue sarcoma include patients with undifferentiated soft tissue sarcoma and other histologies, which are treated similarly, using ifosfamide and doxorubicin, and sometimes with other chemotherapy agents, surgery, and radiation therapy.
In the COG ARST0332 (NCT00346164) trial, patients with high-grade undifferentiated sarcoma were treated with an ifosfamide- and doxorubicin-based regimen. Results for the patients with high-grade undifferentiated sarcoma were reported together with all high-grade soft tissue sarcomas in the trial. The estimated 5-year EFS rate was 64% and the OS rate was 77% for sarcomas classified as high grade by the Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre Le Cancer (FNCLC).[5][Level of evidence C1]
Sources: ARST0332 (NCT00346164) · 5 · Level of evidence C1
In a report of 32 patients with undifferentiated soft tissue sarcomas who were enrolled on the ARST0332 (NCT00346164) trial, the median age at enrollment was 13.6 years, and two-thirds of the patients were male. The most common primary sites were the paraspinal region and extremities. Five patients presented with metastatic disease.[148]
Sources: ARST0332 (NCT00346164) · 148
The 5-year EFS rate was 71%, and the OS rate was 83%.
Of the nine children with low-risk disease (localized low-grade resected disease or localized high-grade disease <5 cm resected with negative margins) who were treated with surgery or radiation therapy only, the 5-year EFS rate was 65% and the OS rate was 100%, suggesting that patients with low-risk disease can be salvaged if the disease recurs.
The remaining 23 patients had either intermediate-risk disease (resected high-grade tumor >5 cm, unresected high-grade tumor >5 cm) or high-risk disease (metastasis to lymph nodes or distant sites) and were treated with chemoradiation therapy and delayed surgery when feasible. The 5-year EFS rate was 73%, and the OS estimate was 77%.
Copy number aberrations were common, most frequently involving loss of 1p (25%), gain of 1q (25%), gain of chromosome 8 (25%), and gain of chromosome 2 (16%). These alterations were more commonly seen in patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk tumors, and there was a strong association between loss of chromosome 1p or gain of chromosome 1q and inferior clinical outcomes. Co-occurrence of 1q gain and 1p loss was associated with a particularly poor clinical outcome (5-year EFS and OS rates of 20%). Next-generation sequencing identified oncogenic fusions in eight of ten tumor samples, which included BCOR and CIC rearrangements, as well as COL1A1::PDGFB, KIAA1549::BRAF, and SAMD5::SASH1 gene fusions.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
At one time, malignant fibrous histiocytoma was the single most common histotype among adults with soft tissue sarcomas. Since it was first recognized in the early 1960s, malignant fibrous histiocytoma has been controversial, in terms of both its histogenesis and its validity as a clinico-pathological entity. The World Health Organization (WHO) classification no longer includes malignant fibrous histiocytoma as a distinct diagnostic category but rather as a subtype of an undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma.[149,150]
This entity accounts for 2% to 6% of all childhood soft tissue sarcomas.[151]
Sources: 151
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
These tumors occur mainly in the second decade of life. In a series of ten patients, the median age was 10 years, and the tumor was most commonly located in the extremities. In this series, all tumors were localized, and five of nine patients (for whom follow-up was available) were alive and in first remission.[151]
Sources: 151
In another series of 17 pediatric patients with malignant fibrous histiocytoma (now classified as undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma), the median age at diagnosis was 5 years and the extremities were involved in eight cases.[152] All patients with metastatic disease died, and two patients experienced a clinical response to a doxorubicin-based regimen.
Sources: 152
For more information about the treatment of malignant fibrous histiocytoma of bone, see Osteosarcoma and Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma of Bone Treatment.
Sources: Osteosarcoma and Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma of Bone Treatment
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
These tumors can arise in previously irradiated sites or as a second malignancy in patients with retinoblastoma.[153]
Sources: 153
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
An analysis of 70 patients who were diagnosed with malignant fibrous histiocytosis of no specific type, storiform or pleomorphic malignant fibrous histiocytoma, pleomorphic sarcoma, or undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma showed a highly complex karyotype with no specific recurrent aberrations.[154]
Sources: 154
Undifferentiated sarcomas with 12q13–15 amplification, including MDM2 and CDK4, are best classified as dedifferentiated liposarcomas.[154] The relationship between this tumor and the family of undifferentiated/unclassified tumors with spindle cell morphology remains relatively undefined.
Sources: 154
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
For information about the treatment of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of bone, see Osteosarcoma and Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma of Bone Treatment.
Sources: Osteosarcoma and Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma of Bone Treatment
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Treatment options for recurrent or refractory pleomorphic sarcoma include the following:
Pembrolizumab.
The Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration conducted a phase II trial of the checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab in patients aged 18 years and older with recurrent soft tissue sarcoma.[155][Level of evidence C3]
Sources: 155 · Level of evidence C3
Seven of 40 patients (18%) with soft tissue sarcoma had an objective response.
Four of ten patients (40%) with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, two of ten patients (20%) with liposarcoma, and one of ten patients (10%) with synovial sarcoma had objective responses.
No patients with leiomyosarcoma (n = 10) had an objective response.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Intracranial mesenchymal tumor, with the FET::CREB gene fusion, has previously been called angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma (AFP) or intracranial myxoid mesenchymal tumor. The molecular findings suggest that these tumors are histological variants of intracranial mesenchymal tumor.[156] In one study, the tumors of 20 patients were separated into two epigenetic subgroups. Group A tumors clustered nearest to but independent of solitary fibrous tumor and occurred in adolescents and young adults. Group B tumors clustered nearest to but independent of clear cell sarcoma and occurred in children. Patients with group B tumors had an inferior survival compared with patients with group A tumors (4.5 vs. 49 months; P = .001).[157]
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
See the sections on Undifferentiated Small Round Cell Sarcomas With BCOR Genetic Alterations and Genomics of Ewing Sarcoma in Ewing Sarcoma and Undifferentiated Small Round Cell Sarcomas of Bone and Soft Tissue Treatment.
Sources: Undifferentiated Small Round Cell Sarcomas With BCOR Genetic Alterations · Genomics of Ewing Sarcoma
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
See the sections on Undifferentiated Small Round Cell Sarcomas With CIC Genetic Alterations and Genomics of Ewing Sarcoma in Ewing Sarcoma and Undifferentiated Small Round Cell Sarcomas of Bone and Soft Tissue Treatment.
Sources: Undifferentiated Small Round Cell Sarcomas With CIC Genetic Alterations · Genomics of Ewing Sarcoma
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
See the Undifferentiated Small Round Cell Sarcomas With EWSR1::non-ETS Fusions section in Ewing Sarcoma and Undifferentiated Small Round Cell Sarcomas of Bone and Soft Tissue Treatment.
Sources: Undifferentiated Small Round Cell Sarcomas With EWSR1::non-ETS Fusions
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Vascular tumors vary from hemangiomas, which are always considered benign, to angiosarcomas, which are highly malignant.[1] Malignant vascular tumors include the following subtypes:
Sources: 1
Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma not otherwise specified (NOS).
Sources: Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma not otherwise specified (NOS)
Angiosarcoma.
Sources: Angiosarcoma
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma was first described in soft tissue by Weiss and Enzinger in 1982. These tumors can occur in younger patients, but the peak incidence is in the fourth and fifth decades of life. The number of pediatric patients reported in the literature is limited.
Epithelioid hemangioendotheliomas can have an indolent or very aggressive course, with an overall survival rate of 73% at 5 years. There are case reports of patients with untreated multiple lesions who have a very benign course. However, other patients have a very aggressive course. Some pathologists have tried to stratify patients to evaluate risks and adjust treatment, but more research is needed.[2-8]
A multi-institutional case series reported on 24 patients aged 2 to 26 years with epithelioid hemangioendotheliomas.[9][Level of evidence C2] Most patients presented with multiorgan disease. Progression was seen in 63% of patients, with a mean time to progression of 18.4 months (range, 0–72 months).
Sources: 9 · Level of evidence C2
The presence of effusions, tumor size larger than 3 cm, and a high mitotic index (>3 mitoses/50 high-power fields) have been associated with unfavorable outcomes.[4]
Sources: 4
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Common sites of involvement are liver alone (21%), liver plus lung (18%), lung alone (12%), and bone alone (14%).[4,10,11] Clinical presentation depends on the site of involvement, as follows:
Liver: Hepatic nodules have central vascularity on ultrasound, contrast-enhancing lesions by computed tomography, and low T1 signal and moderate T2 signal on magnetic resonance imaging. These may be incidental findings in asymptomatic patients, but most patients commonly present with signs or symptoms of cholestasis, including pruritus, jaundice, or scleral icterus.
Lung: Pulmonary epithelioid hemangioendothelioma may be an asymptomatic finding on chest x-ray or be associated with pleuritic pain, hemoptysis, anemia, and fibrosis.
Bone: Bone metastasis may be associated with pathological fracture. On x-rays, they are well-defined osteolytic lesions and can be multiple or solitary.
Soft tissue: Thirty percent of soft tissue cases are associated with metastases. When present, metastatic disease can be very aggressive and have a limited response to chemotherapy.
Skin: Cutaneous lesions can be raised and nodular or can be warm, red-brown plaques.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
WWTR1::CAMTA1 gene fusions have been found in most patients. Less commonly, YAP1::TFE3 gene fusions have been reported.[2] These gene fusions are not directly targetable with current medications. Monoclonality has been described in multiple liver lesions, suggesting a metastatic process.
Sources: 2
Histologically, these lesions are characterized as epithelioid lesions arranged in nests, strands, and trabecular patterns, with infrequent vascular spaces. Features that may be associated with aggressive clinical behavior include cellular atypia, one or more mitoses per 10 high-power fields, an increased proportion of spindled cells, focal necrosis, and metaplastic bone formation.[4]
Sources: 4
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Treatment options for epithelioid hemangioendothelioma include the following:
Observation.
Surgery.
Immunotherapy.
Targeted therapy.
Chemotherapy.
Radiation therapy.
For indolent cases, observation is warranted. Surgery is performed when resection is possible. Liver transplant has been used with aggressive liver lesions, both with and without metastases.[4,12-14]
For more aggressive cases, several different drugs have been used, including interferon, thalidomide, sorafenib, pazopanib, and sirolimus.[12,15,16] The most aggressive cases are treated with angiosarcoma-type chemotherapy.
A multi-institutional case series reported on 24 patients aged 2 to 26 years with epithelioid hemangioendothelioma.[9][Level of evidence C2]
Sources: 9 · Level of evidence C2
Three patients who were treated with sirolimus had stable disease or partial responses for more than 2.5 years.
A report from 2020 that investigated sirolimus treatment in children aimed to add to the previous experience of sirolimus in adults. A retrospective review identified six pediatric patients with disseminated epithelioid hemangioendothelioma who were treated with sirolimus.[17]
Sources: 17
Four of the six patients demonstrated partial responses or disease stabilization.
A report from the European paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group analyzed ten patients with localized disease and one patient with metastatic disease from two studies.[18] The median age was 14.3 years (range, 9.0–18.8 years). Local therapy was initial primary surgery in seven patients, and five patients received systemic therapy. No patients received radiation therapy.
Sources: 18
After a median follow-up of 50 months (range, 6–176 months), nine patients remained alive and off therapy and two patients died.
The 5-year progression-free survival rate was 77.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.5%–93.9%).
The 5-year overall survival rate was 74.1% (95% CI, 28.1%–93.0%).
Patients or families who desire additional disease-directed therapy should consider entering trials of novel therapeutic approaches because no standard agents have demonstrated clinically significant activity.
Regardless of whether a decision is made to pursue disease-directed therapy at the time of progression, palliative care remains a central focus of management. This ensures that quality of life is maximized while attempting to reduce symptoms and stress related to the terminal illness.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Information about National Cancer Institute (NCI)–supported clinical trials can be found on the NCI website. For information about clinical trials sponsored by other organizations, see the ClinicalTrials.gov website.
Sources: NCI website · ClinicalTrials.gov website
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Angiosarcomas are rare (accounting for 2% of sarcomas), aggressive, vascular tumors that can arise in any part of the body but is more common in soft tissues. Angiosarcoma has an estimated incidence of 2 cases per 1 million people. In the United States, it affects approximately 600 people annually, who are typically aged 60 to 70 years.[19]
Sources: 19
Angiosarcomas are extremely rare in children. It is unclear if the pathophysiology of angiosarcomas in children differs from that of angiosarcomas in adults. Cases have been reported in neonates and toddlers, with presentation of multiple cutaneous lesions and liver lesions, some of which are GLUT1 positive.[20-23] Most angiosarcomas involve the skin and superficial soft tissue, although the liver, spleen, and lung can be affected; bone is rarely affected.
Nomenclature of these liver lesions has been difficult and confusing with use of outdated terminology proposed in 1971 (e.g., type I hemangioendothelioma: infantile hemangioma; type II hemangioendothelioma: low-grade angiosarcoma; type III hemangioendothelioma: high-grade angiosarcoma).[21] A report of eight cases of liver angiosarcomas in children highlighted the misuse of the term hemangioendothelioma and the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of these tumors.[24]
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Established risk factors include the following:[25]
Sources: 25
Vinyl chloride exposure.
Radiation exposure.
Chronic lymphedema from any cause, including Stewart-Treves syndrome.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Angiosarcomas are largely aneuploid tumors. The rare cases of angiosarcoma that arise from benign lesions such as hemangiomas have a distinct pathway that needs to be investigated. MYC amplification is seen in radiation-induced angiosarcoma. KDR variants and FLT4 amplifications have been seen with a frequency of less than 50%.[25]
Sources: 25
Histopathological diagnosis can be very difficult because there can be areas of varied atypia. A common feature of angiosarcoma is an irregular network of channels in a dissective pattern along dermal collagen bundles. There is varied cellular shape, size, mitosis, endothelial multilayering, and papillary formation. Epithelioid cells can also be present. Necrosis and hemorrhage are common. Tumors stain for factor VIII, CD31, and CD34. Some liver lesions can mimic infantile hemangiomas and have focal GLUT1 positivity.[21]
Sources: 21
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Treatment options for angiosarcoma include the following:
Surgery (localized disease).
Sources: Surgery (localized disease)
Radiation therapy (localized cutaneous disease in adults).
Sources: Radiation therapy (localized cutaneous disease in adults)
Surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy (metastatic disease).
Sources: Surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy (metastatic disease)
Palliative care.
Sources: Palliative care
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Localized disease can be cured by aggressive surgery. Complete surgical excision appears to be crucial for the long-term survival of patients with angiosarcomas and lymphangiosarcomas, despite evidence of tumor shrinkage in some patients who were treated with local or systemic therapy.[22,26-28] Data on liver transplant for localized angiosarcomas are limited.[29][Level of evidence C1]
Sources: 22 · 26 · 28 · 29 · Level of evidence C1
Evidence (surgery):
A review of 222 patients (median age, 62 years; range, 15–90 years) reported the following:[28]
Sources: 28
A review of 222 patients (median age, 62 years; range, 15–90 years) reported the following:[28]
An overall disease-specific survival (DSS) rate of 38% at 5 years.
The 5-year DSS rate was 44% in 138 patients with localized, resected tumors but only 16% in 43 patients with metastases at diagnosis.
One case report suggested that liver transplant may contribute to prolonged disease-free survival.[30][Level of evidence C2]
Sources: 30 · Level of evidence C2
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Localized disease, especially cutaneous angiosarcomas, can be treated with radiation therapy or combined chemotherapy (e.g., paclitaxel) and radiation therapy.[31] Most of these reported cases are in adults.[32] When radiation is used, the doses are high (50–70 Gy), the cutaneous volumes are extensive because of the infiltrating nature of the disease, and regional (draining) nodes are often included, even if clinically negative.[33,34] Because of these factors, radiation therapy is rarely used to treat children.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Multimodal treatment with surgery, systemic chemotherapy, and radiation therapy is used for metastatic disease, although it is rarely curative.[34,35] Disease control is the objective in patients with metastatic angiosarcomas. Published progression-free survival is between 3 months and 7 months,[36] and the median overall survival (OS) is 14 to 18 months.[37] In both adults and children, the 5-year OS rates are between 20% and 35%.[22,23,38]
One child who was diagnosed with angiosarcoma secondary to malignant transformation from infantile hemangioma responded to treatment with bevacizumab (a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor) combined with systemic chemotherapy.[20,35]
Biologic agents that inhibit angiogenesis have shown activity in adults with angiosarcomas.[21,38]
There is one case report of a pediatric patient with metastatic cardiac angiosarcoma who was successfully treated with conventional chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, and targeted therapies, including pazopanib.[39]
Sources: 39
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Regardless of whether a decision is made to pursue disease-directed therapy at the time of progression, palliative care remains a central focus of management. This ensures that quality of life is maximized while attempting to reduce symptoms and stress related to the terminal illness.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Patients or families who desire additional disease-directed therapy should consider entering trials of novel therapeutic approaches because no standard agents have demonstrated clinically significant activity.
Information about National Cancer Institute (NCI)–supported clinical trials can be found on the NCI website. For information about clinical trials sponsored by other organizations, see the ClinicalTrials.gov website.
Sources: NCI website · ClinicalTrials.gov website
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Standard treatment options for metastatic childhood soft tissue sarcoma include the following:
Multimodality therapy using chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgical resection of pulmonary metastases.
For treatment options, see the individual tumor type sections of the summary.
The prognosis for children with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas is poor.[1-6] In a prospective randomized trial, chemotherapy with vincristine, dactinomycin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide, with or without dacarbazine, led to tumor responses in one-third of patients with unresectable or metastatic disease. However, the estimated 4-year survival rate was poor. Less than one-third of children survived.[6-8]
Targeted (stereotactic body) radiation therapy is an option for sites of metastasis, particularly the lung.[9] Targeted radiation therapy is also an option for local control or sites of metastasis, including the lungs, bones, and brain,[10,11] particularly in patients for whom the morbidity of resection is a concern or whose life expectancy is limited.[9]
In a prospective trial of children with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma, patients were randomly assigned to receive multiagent chemotherapy with or without the addition of bevacizumab.[12] There was no difference in event-free survival or overall survival between the two study arms.
Sources: 12
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Generally, a surgical procedure, with resection of all gross disease, should be considered for children with isolated pulmonary metastases.[13] For patients with multiple or recurrent pulmonary metastases, additional surgical procedures can be performed if the morbidity is deemed acceptable. In a retrospective review, patients with synovial sarcoma and pulmonary metastases who underwent complete resection of all metastatic lung lesions had better survival than patients who did not undergo complete resections.[13][Level of evidence C1] Formal segmentectomy, lobectomy, and mediastinal lymph node dissection are unnecessary.[14]
Sources: 13 · 13 · Level of evidence C1 · 14
An alternative approach is focused radiation therapy (fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy), which has been successfully used in adults to control lesions. The estimated 5-year survival rate after thoracotomy for pulmonary metastasectomy has ranged from 10% to 58% in adult studies.[9]
Sources: stereotactic radiation therapy · 9
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
With the possible exception of infants with infantile fibrosarcoma, the prognosis for patients with progressive or recurrent disease is poor. No prospective trial has demonstrated that enhanced local control of pediatric soft tissue sarcomas will ultimately improve survival. Therefore, treatment should be individualized for the site of recurrence, biological characteristics of the tumor (e.g., grade, invasiveness, and size), previous therapies, and individual patient considerations. All patients with recurrent tumors should consider participating in clinical trials.
Published results of two studies addressed the outcomes of children with relapsed synovial sarcoma. Most patients in one study had distant relapse (29 of 44 patients),[1] while most patients in the second study had local relapse (27 of 37 patients).[2] Distant recurrence was a poor prognostic variable, while tumor resectability at relapse (as manifested by extremity recurrence) was associated with a better outcome in both studies.
Resection is the standard treatment for recurrent pediatric nonrhabdomyosarcomatous soft tissue sarcomas. If the patient has not yet received radiation therapy, postoperative radiation should be considered after local excision of the recurrent tumor. Limb-sparing procedures with postoperative brachytherapy have been evaluated in adults but have not been studied extensively in children. For some children with extremity sarcomas who have received previous radiation therapy, amputation may be the only therapeutic option.
Treatment options for progressive or recurrent disease include the following:
Surgery.
Sources: Surgery
Chemotherapy.
Sources: Chemotherapy
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Sources: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors
Immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Sources: Immune checkpoint inhibitors
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Evidence (surgery):
Surgical excision of local recurrence.
Surgical excision of local recurrence.
An Italian review of 73 patients with recurrent malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors found that most relapses were local.[3][Level of evidence C1]
Sources: 3 · Level of evidence C1
Surgical excision of local recurrence. › An Italian review of 73 patients with recurrent malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors found that most relapses were local.[3][Level of evidence C1]
Multivariate analysis showed that the factors associated with improved survival were no tumor invasiveness at initial diagnosis (stage T1), time of recurrence more than 12 months after initial diagnosis, and achievement of a second complete response with surgical removal of the recurrence(s).
Only 15.8% of patients who had complete surgical excisions of local recurrence(s) were alive at 5 years.
Surgical excision of isolated pulmonary occurrence.
Surgical excision of isolated pulmonary occurrence.
Pulmonary metastasectomy may achieve prolonged disease control for some patients.[4]
Sources: 4
Surgical excision of isolated pulmonary occurrence. › Pulmonary metastasectomy may achieve prolonged disease control for some patients.[4]
A large, retrospective analysis showed that patients with recurrent soft tissue sarcoma and isolated local relapse had a better prognosis and resection of pulmonary metastases improved the probability of survival.[5]
Sources: 5
In 31 children and adolescents younger than 23 years with pulmonary metastases from synovial sarcoma, complete resection of lung metastases appeared to prolong survival when compared with ten other patients who were not candidates for metastasectomy.[6][Level of evidence C1]
Sources: 6 · Level of evidence C1
Surgical excision of local recurrence followed by radiation therapy or brachytherapy (if no previous radiation therapy was given).
Limb amputation (only for some children with extremity sarcomas that have already received radiation therapy).
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Evidence (tyrosine kinase inhibitors):
Pazopanib. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved pazopanib for use in patients with recurrent soft tissue sarcoma. The clinical trial that led to the approval was limited to adults. The study demonstrated disease stabilization and prolonged time to progression; it did not demonstrate improved overall survival.[11]
Sources: 11
Pazopanib. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved pazopanib for use in patients with recurrent soft tissue sarcoma. The clinical trial that led to the approval was limited to adults. The study demonstrated disease stabilization and prolonged time to progression; it did not demonstrate improved overall survival.[11]
A phase I trial of pazopanib reported one partial response in a patient with desmoplastic small round cell tumor and prolonged disease stabilization in eight patients with recurrent sarcomas.[12][Level of evidence B4]
Sources: 12 · Level of evidence B4
One 13-year-old boy and one 14-year-old girl with multiply recurrent synovial sarcoma and lung metastases had responses to pazopanib for 14 and 15 months, respectively.[13][Level of evidence C2]
Sources: 13 · Level of evidence C2
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Evidence (immune checkpoint inhibitors):
Pembrolizumab. The Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration conducted a phase II trial of the checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab in patients aged 18 years and older with recurrent soft tissue sarcoma.[14][Level of evidence C3]
Sources: 14 · Level of evidence C3
Pembrolizumab. The Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration conducted a phase II trial of the checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab in patients aged 18 years and older with recurrent soft tissue sarcoma.[14][Level of evidence C3]
Seven of 40 patients (18%) with soft tissue sarcoma had objective responses.
Four of ten patients (40%) with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, two of ten patients (20%) with liposarcoma, and one of ten patients (10%) with synovial sarcoma had objective responses.
No patients with leiomyosarcoma (n = 10) had an objective response.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Information about National Cancer Institute (NCI)–supported clinical trials can be found on the NCI website. For information about clinical trials sponsored by other organizations, see the ClinicalTrials.gov website.
Sources: NCI website · ClinicalTrials.gov website
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
A pediatric oncologist, a doctor who specializes in treating children with cancer, oversees treatment for soft tissue sarcoma. The pediatric oncologist works with other health care providers who are experts in treating children with soft tissue sarcoma and who specialize in certain areas of medicine. These may include a pediatric surgeon with special training in the removal of soft tissue sarcomas. Other specialists may include:
Sources: pediatric surgeon
pediatrician
Sources: pediatrician
radiation oncologist
Sources: radiation oncologist
pathologist
Sources: pathologist
pediatric nurse specialist
Sources: pediatric nurse specialist
rehabilitation specialist
Sources: rehabilitation specialist
psychologist
Sources: psychologist
social worker
Sources: social worker
child-life specialist
Sources: child-life specialist
fertility specialist
Sources: fertility specialist
nutritionist
Sources: nutritionist
There are different types of treatment for children and adolescents with soft tissue sarcoma. You and your child's cancer care team will work together to decide treatment. Often, the treatments depend on the type of soft tissue sarcoma. Many other factors will be considered, such as your child's overall health and whether the cancer is newly diagnosed or has come back.
Your child's treatment plan will include information about the cancer, the goals of treatment, treatment options, and the possible side effects. It will be helpful to talk with your child's cancer care team before treatment begins about what to expect. For help every step of the way, visit our booklet, Children with Cancer: A Guide for Parents.
Types of treatment your child might have include:
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Surgery to completely remove the soft tissue sarcoma is done when possible. If the tumor is very large, radiation therapy or chemotherapy may be given first, to make the tumor smaller and decrease the amount of tissue that needs to be removed during surgery. This is called neoadjuvant (preoperative) therapy.
Sources: radiation therapy · chemotherapy · neoadjuvant (preoperative) therapy
The following types of surgery may be used:
Wide local excision removes the tumor along with some normal tissue around it.
Sources: Wide local excision
Amputation removes all or part of the arm or leg with cancer.
Lymphadenectomy removes the lymph nodes with cancer.
Sources: Lymphadenectomy
Mohs surgery is used to treat cancer in the skin. Individual layers of cancer tissue are removed and checked under a microscope one at a time until all cancer tissue has been removed. This type of surgery is used to treat dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. It is also called Mohs micrographic surgery.
Sources: Mohs surgery · dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans
A second-look surgery may be needed to:
Sources: second-look surgery
remove any remaining cancer cells
check the area around where the tumor was removed for cancer cells and then remove more tissue, if needed
After the doctor removes all the cancer that can be seen at the time of the surgery, some patients may be given chemotherapy or radiation therapy after surgery to kill any cancer cells that are left. Treatment given after the surgery, to lower the risk that the cancer will come back, is called adjuvant therapy.
Sources: adjuvant therapy
Learn more about Surgery to Treat Cancer.
Sources: Surgery to Treat Cancer
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Radiation therapy is a cancer treatment that uses high-energy x-rays or other types of radiation to kill cancer cells or keep them from growing. There are different types of radiation therapy:
External radiation therapy uses a machine outside the body to send radiation toward the area of the body with cancer. Certain ways of giving radiation therapy can help keep radiation from damaging nearby healthy tissue. This type of radiation therapy may include:
Sources: External radiation therapy
External radiation therapy uses a machine outside the body to send radiation toward the area of the body with cancer. Certain ways of giving radiation therapy can help keep radiation from damaging nearby healthy tissue. This type of radiation therapy may include:
Stereotactic body radiation therapy uses special equipment to place the patient in the same position for each radiation treatment. Once a day for several days, a radiation machine aims a larger than usual dose of radiation directly at the tumor. By having the patient in the same position for each treatment, there is less damage to nearby healthy tissue. This procedure is also called stereotactic external-beam radiation therapy and stereotaxic radiation therapy.
Conformal radiation therapy uses a computer to make a 3-dimensional (3-D) picture of the tumor and shapes the radiation beams to fit the tumor. This allows a high dose of radiation to reach the tumor and causes less damage to nearby healthy tissue.
Sources: 3-dimensional
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is a type of 3-D radiation therapy that uses a computer to make pictures of the size and shape of the tumor. Thin beams of radiation of different intensities (strengths) are aimed at the tumor from many angles. This type of external radiation therapy causes less damage to nearby healthy tissue.
Proton beam radiation therapy is a type of high-energy, external radiation therapy that uses streams of protons (tiny particles with a positive charge) to kill tumor cells. This type of treatment can lower the amount of radiation damage to healthy tissue near a tumor.
Sources: protons
Internal radiation therapy uses a radioactive substance sealed in needles, seeds, wires, or catheters that are placed directly into or near the cancer.
Sources: Internal radiation therapy · seeds · catheters
The way radiation therapy is given depends on the type and stage of the cancer being treated, if any cancer cells remain after surgery, and the expected side effects of treatment. External and internal radiation therapy are used to treat childhood soft tissue sarcoma.
Sources: stage
Learn more about Radiation Therapy to Treat Cancer.
Sources: Radiation Therapy to Treat Cancer
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Chemotherapy (also called chemo) uses drugs to stop the growth of cancer cells. Chemotherapy either kills the cancer cells or stops them from dividing. Chemotherapy may be given alone or with other types of treatment, such as radiation therapy.
For children with soft tissue sarcoma, chemotherapy is taken by mouth or injected into a vein. When given this way, the drugs enter the bloodstream to reach cancer cells throughout the body.
Sources: injected
The way the chemotherapy is given depends on the type of soft tissue sarcoma being treated. Some types of soft tissue sarcoma may respond to treatment with chemotherapy.
Sources: respond
Chemotherapy that may be used alone or in combination includes:
cisplatin
Sources: cisplatin
cyclophosphamide
Sources: cyclophosphamide
dactinomycin
Sources: dactinomycin
doxorubicin
Sources: doxorubicin
hydroxyurea
Sources: hydroxyurea
ifosfamide
Sources: ifosfamide
methotrexate
Sources: methotrexate
vinblastine
Sources: vinblastine
vincristine
Sources: vincristine
vinorelbine
Sources: vinorelbine
Other chemotherapy drugs not listed here may also be used.
Learn more about how chemotherapy works, how it is given, common side effects, and more at Chemotherapy to Treat Cancer.
Sources: Chemotherapy to Treat Cancer
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Observation is closely monitoring a person's condition without giving any treatment until signs or symptoms appear or change. Observation may be done when:
complete removal of the tumor is not possible
no other treatments are available
the tumor is not likely to damage any vital organs
Sources: vital
Observation may be used for epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, infantile fibrosarcoma, or PEComa.
Sources: epithelioid hemangioendothelioma · infantile fibrosarcoma · PEComa
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Targeted therapy uses drugs or other substances to block the action of specific enzymes, proteins, and other molecules involved in the growth and spread of cancer cells. Targeted therapies used to treat soft tissue sarcoma include:
Atezolizumab is used to treat children older than 2 years with alveolar soft part sarcoma that can't be removed with surgery or has spread to other places in the body.
Sources: Atezolizumab · alveolar soft part sarcoma
Larotrectinib is used to treat infantile fibrosarcoma.
Sources: Larotrectinib
Sirolimus may be used to treat PEComas.
Sources: Sirolimus
Tazemetostat is used to treat epithelioid sarcoma.
Sources: Tazemetostat · epithelioid sarcoma
Learn more about Targeted Therapy to Treat Cancer.
Sources: Targeted Therapy to Treat Cancer
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Immunotherapy is a treatment that uses the person's immune system to fight cancer. Pembrolizumab may be used to treat undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (malignant fibrous histiocytoma) and progressive and recurrent soft tissue sarcoma.
Learn more about Immunotherapy to Treat Cancer.
Sources: Immunotherapy to Treat Cancer
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
For some children, joining a clinical trial may be an option. There are different types of clinical trials for childhood cancer. For example, a treatment trial tests new treatments or new ways of using current treatments. Supportive care and palliative care trials look at ways to improve quality of life, especially for those who have side effects from cancer and its treatment.
You can use the clinical trial search to find NCI-supported cancer clinical trials accepting participants. The search allows you to filter trials based on the type of cancer, your child's age, and where the trials are being done. Clinical trials supported by other organizations can be found on the ClinicalTrials.gov website.
Sources: clinical trial search · ClinicalTrials.gov
Learn more about clinical trials, including how to find and join one, at Clinical Trials Information for Patients and Caregivers.
Sources: Clinical Trials Information for Patients and Caregivers
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
To learn about the treatments listed below, visit Types of treatment for childhood soft tissue sarcoma.
Sources: Types of treatment for childhood soft tissue sarcoma
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Treatment of newly diagnosed epithelioid hemangioendothelioma may include:
Sources: epithelioid hemangioendothelioma
surgery to remove the tumor, when possible
immunotherapy (interferon) for tumors that are likely to spread
targeted therapy (pazopanib or sirolimus) for tumors that are likely to spread
chemotherapy
radiation therapy
palliative care
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Treatment of newly diagnosed angiosarcoma may include:
Sources: angiosarcoma
surgery to completely remove the tumor
a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy for angiosarcomas that have spread
palliative care
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Treatment of newly diagnosed extraskeletal osteosarcoma is surgery to completely remove the tumor, followed by chemotherapy.
Sources: extraskeletal osteosarcoma
Learn more at Osteosarcoma Treatment.
Sources: Osteosarcoma Treatment
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Treatment of newly diagnosed extraskeletal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma may include:
Surgery to completely remove the tumor. Radiation therapy may be given before and/or after surgery.
Chemotherapy, followed by surgery. Chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy is given after surgery.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Treatment of newly diagnosed liposarcoma may include:
Sources: liposarcoma
Surgery to completely remove the tumor. If the cancer is not completely removed, a second surgery may be done.
Chemotherapy to shrink the tumor, followed by surgery.
Radiation therapy before or after surgery.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Treatment of newly diagnosed dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans may include:
Sources: dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans
Surgery to completely remove the tumor, when possible. This may include Mohs surgery.
Sources: Mohs surgery
Radiation therapy before or after surgery.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Treatment of newly diagnosed infantile fibrosarcoma may include:
Sources: infantile fibrosarcoma
targeted therapy (larotrectinib)
Sources: larotrectinib
surgery to remove the tumor before or after targeted therapy
chemotherapy before or after surgery and targeted therapy
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Treatment of adult-type newly diagnosed fibrosarcoma is surgery to completely remove the tumor, when possible.
Sources: fibrosarcoma
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Treatment of newly diagnosed myxofibrosarcoma is surgery to completely remove the tumor.
Sources: myxofibrosarcoma
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Treatment of newly diagnosed low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma is surgery to completely remove the tumor.
Sources: low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Treatment of newly diagnosed infantile hemangiopericytoma is usually chemotherapy.
Sources: infantile hemangiopericytoma
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Learn more at Childhood Rhabdomyosarcoma Treatment.
Sources: Childhood Rhabdomyosarcoma Treatment
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Treatment of newly diagnosed ectomesenchymoma may include:
Sources: ectomesenchymoma
surgery
chemotherapy
radiation therapy
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Treatment of newly diagnosed plexiform fibrohistiocytic tumor is surgery to completely remove the tumor.
Sources: plexiform fibrohistiocytic tumor
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Other summaries with information related to Carney complex include:
Sources: Carney complex
Childhood Heart Tumors
Sources: Childhood Heart Tumors
Childhood Testicular Cancer
Sources: Childhood Testicular Cancer
Childhood Thyroid Cancer
Sources: Childhood Thyroid Cancer
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Treatment of newly diagnosed epithelioid sarcoma may include:
Sources: epithelioid sarcoma
surgery to remove the tumor, when possible
chemotherapy
radiation therapy before or after surgery
targeted therapy (tazemetostat)
Sources: tazemetostat
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Treatment of newly diagnosed extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma may include:
Sources: extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma
surgery to remove the tumor, when possible
radiation therapy
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Learn more at Ewing Sarcoma Treatment.
Sources: Ewing Sarcoma Treatment
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Treatment of newly diagnosed perivascular epithelioid cell tumors may include:
Sources: perivascular epithelioid cell tumors
surgery to remove the tumor
observation, followed by surgery
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Treatment of newly diagnosed undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma may include surgery. Treatment of recurrent or refractory undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma may include immunotherapy (pembrolizumab).
Sources: pembrolizumab
Learn more about the treatment of malignant fibrous histiocytoma of bone at Osteosarcoma Treatment.
Sources: malignant fibrous histiocytoma · Osteosarcoma Treatment
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Treatment of childhood soft tissue sarcoma that has spread to other parts of the body at diagnosis is chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Surgery may be done to remove tumors that have spread to the lung.
To learn more about the treatment of specific tumor types, visit Treatment of Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma.
Use our clinical trial search to find NCI-supported cancer clinical trials that are accepting patients. You can search for trials based on the type of cancer, the age of the patient, and where the trials are being done. General information about clinical trials is also available.
Sources: clinical trial search · General information
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
To learn about the treatments listed below, visit Types of treatment for childhood soft tissue sarcoma.
Sources: Types of treatment for childhood soft tissue sarcoma
Treatment of progressive or recurrent childhood soft tissue sarcoma may include:
Sources: progressive · recurrent
surgery to remove cancer that has come back where it first formed or that has spread to the lungs
surgery followed by external or internal radiation therapy, if radiation therapy has not already been given
Sources: external · internal radiation therapy
chemotherapy
Use our clinical trial search to find NCI-supported cancer clinical trials that are accepting patients. You can search for trials based on the type of cancer, the age of the patient, and where the trials are being done. General information about clinical trials is also available.
Sources: clinical trial search · General information
Source: Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma (PDQ®)–Patient Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: May 9, 2025. Captured 2026-09-09.
Cancer treatments can cause side effects. Which side effects your child might have depends on the type of treatment they receive, the dose, and how their body reacts. Talk with your child's treatment team about which side effects to look for and ways to manage them.
To learn more about side effects that begin during treatment for cancer, visit Side Effects.
Sources: Side Effects
Problems from cancer treatment that begin 6 months or later after treatment and continue for months or years are called late effects. Late effects of cancer treatment may include:
physical problems
changes in mood, feelings, thinking, learning, or memory
second cancers (new types of cancer)
Some late effects may be treated or controlled. It is important to talk with your child's doctors about the effects cancer treatment can have on your child. Learn more about Late Effects of Treatment for Childhood Cancer.
Childhood Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma of Bone, Sarcoma
ClinicalTrials.gov recordSarcoma, Wilm's Tumor, Lymphoma, Neuroblastoma
ClinicalTrials.gov recordNeuroblastoma, Rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing's Sarcoma, Ewing's Tumor, Sarcoma, Ewing's, Sarcomas, Epitheliod, Sarcoma, Soft Tissue, Sarcoma, Spindle Cell, Melanoma, Malignant...
ClinicalTrials.gov recordAlveolar Soft Part Sarcoma, Angiomatoid Fibrous Histiocytoma, Atypical Fibroxanthoma, Clear Cell Sarcoma of Soft Tissue, Epithelioid Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor,...
ClinicalTrials.gov recordRefractory or Recurrent Solid Tumors, Rhabdomyosarcoma, Non-Rhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Ewing Sarcoma
ClinicalTrials.gov recordRelapsed/Refractory Rhabdomyosarcoma, Non-rhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Ewing Sarcoma
ClinicalTrials.gov recordMedullary Thyroid Cancer, Infantile Myofibromatosis, Infantile Fibrosarcoma, Papillary Thyroid Cancer, Soft Tissue Sarcoma
ClinicalTrials.gov recordNerve Sheath Tumors
ClinicalTrials.gov recordCancer
ClinicalTrials.gov recordHepatoblastoma, Previously Treated Childhood Rhabdomyosarcoma, Recurrent Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Recurrent Childhood Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Recurrent Childhood...
ClinicalTrials.gov recordLymphoma, Childhood Lymphoma, Solid Tumor, Childhood Solid Tumor, Neuroblastoma, Ewing Sarcoma, Hodgkin Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Rhabdomyosarcoma, Soft Tissue Sarcoma,...
ClinicalTrials.gov recordAdrenal Cortical Carcinoma, Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma, Central Nervous System Neoplasm, Childhood Clear Cell Sarcoma of Soft Tissue, Clear Cell Sarcoma of Soft Tissue, Ewing...
ClinicalTrials.gov recordAdvanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Recurrent Childhood Ependymoma, Recurrent Childhood Malignant Germ Cell Tumor, Recurrent Childhood Medulloblastoma, Recurrent Childhood...
ClinicalTrials.gov recordAdvanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Ann Arbor Stage III Childhood Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Ann Arbor Stage IV Childhood Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Low Grade Glioma, Malignant Glioma,...
ClinicalTrials.gov recordTreatment of newly diagnosed pleomorphic sarcoma
Soft Tissue Sarcoma in children and adolescents
Treatment of Metastatic Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma
Chemotherapy, for unresectable or recurrent tumors
Recurrent MPNST