Skip to content
← Childhood Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING

Treatment options for PTLD

Source: Childhood Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.

Source updated: April 17, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.

Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary.

Treatment options for PTLD include the following:

For localized resectable disease, surgical resection and, if possible, reduction of immunosuppressive therapy.

Rituximab therapy alone.[22]

Source links and citations

Standard or slightly modified lymphoma-specific chemotherapy regimens for the specific histology, with or without rituximab for B-cell PTLD.[23-26]

Source links and citations

For EBV-positive B-cell PTLD, low-dose chemotherapy with or without rituximab.[19]; [27][Level of evidence C2]

Source links and citations

First-line therapy for patients with PTLD is to reduce immunosuppressive therapy as much as possible.[27,28] However, this may not be possible because of the increased risk of organ rejection or graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).

Source links and citations

Rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody, has been used in the posttransplant setting. Rituximab as a single agent to treat PTLD after organ transplant has demonstrated efficacy in adult patients, but data are lacking in pediatric patients.

Evidence (rituximab):

A study of 144 children and adults who developed post-HSCT PTLD reported the following:[22][Level of evidence C1]

Source links and citations

A study of 144 children and adults who developed post-HSCT PTLD reported the following:[22][Level of evidence C1]

Approximately 70% of the patients who received rituximab survived.

A study of 144 children and adults who developed post-HSCT PTLD reported the following:[22][Level of evidence C1]

Survival was also associated with reduction of immunosuppression.

A study of 144 children and adults who developed post-HSCT PTLD reported the following:[22][Level of evidence C1]

Older age, extranodal disease, and acute GVHD were predictors of poor outcome.

For more information, see the Polymorphic Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder section in Aggressive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Treatment.

Source links and citations

Low-intensity chemotherapy has been effective in patients with EBV-positive, CD20-positive B-lineage PTLD.[19,29] An event-free survival (EFS) rate of 67% was demonstrated in a Children's Oncology Group study using rituximab plus cyclophosphamide and prednisone in children with PTLD after solid organ transplant in whom immune suppression was reduced.[19][Level of evidence B4]

Source links and citations

Some studies suggest that modified conventional lymphoma therapy is effective for patients who have PTLD with MYC translocations and Burkitt lymphoma histology.[24,25][Level of evidence C2] A multicenter retrospective review summarized the treatments and outcomes of 35 patients with PTLD-BL. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) detected the MYC translocation in 95% of cases. Treatments ranged from rituximab only to FAB/LMB therapy. The 3-year EFS and OS rates for all patients were 66.2% and 88.0%, respectively. The most commonly used therapy was a low-dose chemotherapy approach that is similar to the COG regimen (cyclophosphamide, prednisone, and rituximab [CPR]; n = 13). Using this approach, the EFS rate was 52.7%, and the OS rate was 84.6%.[26]

Source links and citations

Patients with T-cell or Hodgkin-like PTLD are usually treated with standard lymphoma-specific chemotherapy regimens.[30-33]

Source links and citations

Antirejection therapy is usually decreased or discontinued when chemotherapy is given to avoid excessive toxicity. There are no data to guide the re-initiation of immunosuppressive therapy after chemotherapy treatment. There is little evidence of benefit for chemotherapy after HSCT.

Adoptive immunotherapy with either donor lymphocytes or ex vivo–generated EBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (EBV-CTLs) has been effective in treating patients with PTLD after blood or bone marrow transplant.[34,35] To make this approach more broadly applicable, banks of off-the-shelf, third-party, allogeneic EBV-CTLs derived from healthy donors have been developed.[36,37] EBV-CTLs were evaluated in 46 patients with PTLD that had either progressed during rituximab treatment, not fully responded to rituximab treatment, or had recurred after a previous response. The following results were observed:[38]

Source links and citations

The lymphomas were monomorphic diffuse large B-cell lymphomas in 24 of 33 patients who underwent HSCT and in 8 of 13 patients who underwent solid organ transplants.

EBV-CTLs were selected for having at least one HLA allele shared between the donor EBV-CTLs and the lymphoma.

The objective response rate after one cycle of EBV-CTLs was 39% (9 complete responses [CRs] and 9 partial responses [PRs] among 46 patients). With additional cycles of therapy, 29 of 45 evaluable patients (64%) achieved CRs or sustained PRs.

Three of five recipients with progressive disease after their first cycle of EBV-CTLs achieved CRs or durable PRs after receiving EBV-CTLs from a different donor.

Of 11 patients with CNS involvement, 5 achieved CRs and 4 achieved durable PRs.

Factors associated with favorable response included previous treatment with rituximab only (i.e., no prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy), absence of extranodal disease, and more extensive in vivo expansion of the EBV-CTLs.

Publication references

Read the original reference and check its publication notices.

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice