HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING
Treatment of Childhood Myxopapillary Ependymoma
Source: Childhood Ependymoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: January 6, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.
Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary.
Myxopapillary ependymoma, considered to be a histological subtype of ependymoma, has a relatively high incidence of central nervous system (CNS) tumor dissemination at diagnosis and at follow-up. Imaging of the complete craniospinal axis at the time of diagnosis and during follow-up is indicated.[1,2] According to the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the CNS, myxopapillary ependymoma is now considered WHO grade 2 rather than grade 1 because its recurrence rate is similar to conventional spinal ependymoma and exceeds the rate typical of grade 1 tumors.[3]
Standard treatment options for newly diagnosed childhood myxopapillary ependymoma include the following:
Surgery with or without adjuvant radiation therapy.
Historically, the management of myxopapillary ependymoma consisted of an attempt at en bloc resection of the tumor with no further treatment in the case of a gross-total resection.[4]; [5][Level of evidence C2] However, some practitioners now favor the use of radiation therapy after surgical resection of the primary mass. This practice is based on the finding that dissemination of these tumors to other parts of the neuraxis can occur, particularly after partial resection, and evidence that focal radiation therapy may improve progression-free survival (PFS).[1,4]; [6-8][Level of evidence C2]
Source links and citations
With the exception of an en bloc gross-total resection where the utility of adjuvant radiation therapy has been debated, radiation therapy is often considered for patients with less than a gross-total resection, a piecemeal resection, or locally recurrent disease after surgery alone. A retrospective single-institution review included 18 pediatric patients with myxopapillary ependymoma.[9]
Source links and citations
The study reported poor 5-year and 10-year event-free survival (EFS) rates of 52% and 26%, respectively.
However, these patients had an excellent 10-year overall survival (OS) rate of 100%.
Fifty percent of the patients had metastatic disease at diagnosis and 50% had subtotal resections, but only three patients received radiation therapy (two received focal and one received craniospinal).
The extent of resection did not affect the EFS rate.
Metastatic disease was associated with a worse EFS (10-year EFS rate, 13%), compared with localized disease (57%; P = .07).
This study concluded that despite the high risk of recurrence, patients with myxopapillary ependymoma have an excellent long-term survival. Therefore, radiation therapy should be reserved for patients with symptomatic recurrences to avoid long-term complications from radiation exposure.
However, two reports provided some support for the use of radiation therapy for patients with multifocal spinal myxopapillary ependymoma. The first study included 12 children (aged <21 years) who were treated with limited-volume brain-sparing proton radiation therapy. The median age of patients was 13.5 years. Radiation therapy was given as adjuvant therapy after primary surgery in five patients and for recurrence in seven patients. No patient had previously received radiation therapy. Of the 12 patients, 11 (92%) had evidence of gross disease at the time of radiation therapy, and all but one patient received 54 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of radiation therapy.[10]
Source links and citations
With a median follow-up of 3.6 years (range, 1.8–10.6 years), the 5-year local control rate was 100%, the PFS rate was 92%, and the OS rate was 100%.
One patient developed grade 3 spinal kyphosis after combined surgery and radiation therapy, and one patient developed grade 2 unilateral L5 neuropathy.
A second multi-institutional retrospective study of 60 pediatric and adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients also suggested a benefit of radiation therapy (2000–2020). The median age at radiation therapy was 14.8 years (range, 7.1–26.5 years). The population was high risk because the indications for radiation therapy included gross residual disease, microscopic residual disease, or recurrent or multifocal disease.[11]
Source links and citations
At the time of radiation therapy, 45 patients (75.0%) had gross residual disease, and 35 patients (58.3%) had multifocal disease.
Forty-eight patients (80.0%) received involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT), seven (11.7%) received cranial-spinal radiation therapy, and five (8.3%) received whole-spine radiation therapy.
With a median follow-up of 6.2 years (range, 0.6–21.0 years), the 5-year OS rate was 100%, the PFS rate was 60.8%, and the cumulative incidence of local in-field progression rate was 4.1%.
The two local recurrences were in sites of gross residual disease. Of the 18 out-of-field recurrences after radiation therapy, all were superior to the initial treatment field. Nine of these patients experienced intracranial relapse (five of whom had isolated intracranial relapses).
For patients with metastatic myxopapillary ependymoma, there was no significant difference in PFS between patients treated with IFRT (to all sites) and those treated with whole-brain or craniospinal irradiation (P = .283).
On univariate analysis, distant-only recurrence before radiation therapy was significantly associated with shorter time to progression (HR, 4.00; 95% CI, 1.54–10.43; P = .005).
Conclusions from this report include: 1) the risk of recurrence within the radiation field is low, and 2) pediatric and AYA patients with high-risk myxopapillary ependymoma remain at risk for recurrences in the spine above the radiation fields and intracranially after radiation therapy.
Publication references
Read the original reference and check its publication notices.
- PubMed 16206735 · Original source
- PubMed 16648988 · Original source
- PubMed 17465358 · Original source
- PubMed 19207953 · Original source
- PubMed 19221818 · Original source
- PubMed 19250760 · Original source
- PubMed 26468139 · Original source
- PubMed 33226179 · Original source
- PubMed 34185076 · Original source
- PubMed 37437812 · Original source
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle