HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING
Surgery, Chemotherapy, and Radiation Therapy (Multimodality Therapy)
Source: Childhood Central Nervous System Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumor Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: March 3, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.
Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary.
Context: Treatment of Childhood CNS Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumor
The extent of surgical resection may affect survival. Data from the Central Nervous System Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumor Registry (AT/RT Registry) suggest that patients who have had a complete resection may have a longer median survival. However, complete surgical resection is often difficult because of the invasive nature of the tumor.[1]
Source links and citations
Chemotherapy has been the main adjuvant therapy for very young children with AT/RT. Cooperative group studies that included children younger than 36 months demonstrated poor survival with standard chemotherapeutic regimens alone.[2] The Children’s Cancer Group reported a 2-year event-free survival (EFS) rate of 14% for 28 children younger than 36 months who were treated with multiagent chemotherapy.[3]
Intensive regimens that use varying combinations of high-dose chemotherapy,[4][Level of evidence C1]; [5,6][Level of evidence C2] intrathecal chemotherapy, and radiation therapy have led to prolonged survival for some patients.
Source links and citations
Only two prospective trials for children with CNS AT/RT have been completed. In an institutional prospective trial, children were treated with a modified Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study-III (IRS-III) protocol, using intrathecal chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Of the subset of 20 children who completed therapy, the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 53%, and the overall survival (OS) rate was 70%. Survival was better for patients who had a complete resection.[7][Level of evidence C1] In the Children's Oncology Group (COG) ACNS0333 (NCT00653068) study, patients were treated with intensive induction chemotherapy, followed by high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue and radiation therapy. The 4-year PFS rate was 37%, and the OS rate was 43%.[8][Level of evidence B4]
Source links and citations
Thirteen patients in the AT/RT Registry were treated with high-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell rescue as part of initial therapy.[1] Four of these patients, two of whom also received radiation, were alive without progressive disease 21.5 to 90 months after diagnosis at last report. Of 15 evaluable children (all younger than 32 months at diagnosis) who were on a chemotherapy Head Start III protocol, 2 survived for more than 47 months.[9][Level of evidence C1]
Source links and citations
Radiation therapy appears to have a positive impact on survival for patients with AT/RT.[10,11]
Evidence (radiation therapy):
Of the 42 patients in the AT/RT Registry, 13 (31%) received radiation therapy in addition to chemotherapy as part of their primary therapy.[1] The radiation field was to the primary tumor bed in nine children, and the radiation field was to the tumor bed and the craniospinal axis in four children.
Source links and citations
Of the 42 patients in the AT/RT Registry, 13 (31%) received radiation therapy in addition to chemotherapy as part of their primary therapy.[1] The radiation field was to the primary tumor bed in nine children, and the radiation field was to the tumor bed and the craniospinal axis in four children.
The median survival of these patients was 48 months, compared with 16.75 months for all patients in the registry.
In a retrospective series of 31 patients with AT/RT from the St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, the following results were reported:[12]
Source links and citations
In a retrospective series of 31 patients with AT/RT from the St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, the following results were reported:[12]
The 2-year EFS rate was 78% for patients older than 3 years, which was considerably better than the EFS rate of 11% for patients younger than 3 years.
In a retrospective series of 31 patients with AT/RT from the St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, the following results were reported:[12]
All but one of the surviving patients (seven of eight) in the older group received craniospinal irradiation and intensive chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplant.
In a retrospective series of 31 patients with AT/RT from the St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, the following results were reported:[12]
Only 3 of the 22 younger patients received any form of radiation therapy, 2 of whom were disease free.
In a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program registry review, radiation therapy was associated with improved survival in children younger than 3 years.[13]
Source links and citations
In the European Registry for rhabdoid tumors series, the following results were observed:[14][Level of evidence C1]
Source links and citations
In the European Registry for rhabdoid tumors series, the following results were observed:[14][Level of evidence C1]
Radiation therapy was also associated with improved survival, with a 6-year OS rate of 66% (± 0.1%) in patients who received this treatment.
In the European Registry for rhabdoid tumors series, the following results were observed:[14][Level of evidence C1]
The significant benefit of radiation therapy was corroborated in an extension of this series.[15]
Source links and citations
Evidence (multimodality therapy):
The IRS-III study used radiation therapy, intrathecal methotrexate, cytarabine, hydrocortisone, and systemic multiagent chemotherapy. The results of this small retrospective series were encouraging,[16,17] leading to the first prospective study of multimodality treatment in this group of patients.
On the basis of the previous pilot series, a prospective multi-institutional trial was conducted for children with newly diagnosed CNS AT/RT. Treatment was divided into five phases: preirradiation, chemoradiation, consolidation, maintenance, and continuation therapy. Intrathecal chemotherapy was administered, alternating intralumbar and intraventricular routes. Radiation therapy was either focal (54 Gy) or craniospinal (36 Gy, plus primary boost), depending on the child's age and extent of disease at diagnosis.[7]
Source links and citations
On the basis of the previous pilot series, a prospective multi-institutional trial was conducted for children with newly diagnosed CNS AT/RT. Treatment was divided into five phases: preirradiation, chemoradiation, consolidation, maintenance, and continuation therapy. Intrathecal chemotherapy was administered, alternating intralumbar and intraventricular routes. Radiation therapy was either focal (54 Gy) or craniospinal (36 Gy, plus primary boost), depending on the child's age and extent of disease at diagnosis.[7]
The 2-year PFS rate was 53% (± 13%), and the 2-year OS rate was 70% (± 10%).
On the basis of the previous pilot series, a prospective multi-institutional trial was conducted for children with newly diagnosed CNS AT/RT. Treatment was divided into five phases: preirradiation, chemoradiation, consolidation, maintenance, and continuation therapy. Intrathecal chemotherapy was administered, alternating intralumbar and intraventricular routes. Radiation therapy was either focal (54 Gy) or craniospinal (36 Gy, plus primary boost), depending on the child's age and extent of disease at diagnosis.[7]
Results were most favorable for children who were older, had a gross-total resection, and had no metastatic disease at presentation.
On the basis of the previous pilot series, a prospective multi-institutional trial was conducted for children with newly diagnosed CNS AT/RT. Treatment was divided into five phases: preirradiation, chemoradiation, consolidation, maintenance, and continuation therapy. Intrathecal chemotherapy was administered, alternating intralumbar and intraventricular routes. Radiation therapy was either focal (54 Gy) or craniospinal (36 Gy, plus primary boost), depending on the child's age and extent of disease at diagnosis.[7]
Six of the eight children without progressive disease at the time of the report had received conformal radiation therapy, and two children had received craniospinal radiation therapy. Seven children had a gross-total resection, and only one child had metastatic disease (this child had persistent, stable disease 1.5 years from diagnosis).
The COG performed a prospective single-arm study of 65 children. Fifty-four of the children were younger than 36 months and received two courses of methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and etoposide followed by three courses of high-dose carboplatin and thiotepa supported by peripheral stem cell rescue. For patients with nondisseminated disease, focal involved-field radiation therapy was mandated after either induction or consolidation, depending on age. For patients with disseminated disease, craniospinal radiation at the end of therapy was recommended but not mandated.[8]
Source links and citations
The COG performed a prospective single-arm study of 65 children. Fifty-four of the children were younger than 36 months and received two courses of methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and etoposide followed by three courses of high-dose carboplatin and thiotepa supported by peripheral stem cell rescue. For patients with nondisseminated disease, focal involved-field radiation therapy was mandated after either induction or consolidation, depending on age. For patients with disseminated disease, craniospinal radiation at the end of therapy was recommended but not mandated.[8]
For all patients, the 4-year EFS rate was 37%, and the 4-year OS rate was 43%.
The COG performed a prospective single-arm study of 65 children. Fifty-four of the children were younger than 36 months and received two courses of methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and etoposide followed by three courses of high-dose carboplatin and thiotepa supported by peripheral stem cell rescue. For patients with nondisseminated disease, focal involved-field radiation therapy was mandated after either induction or consolidation, depending on age. For patients with disseminated disease, craniospinal radiation at the end of therapy was recommended but not mandated.[8]
For children younger than 36 months at diagnosis, the 4-year EFS rate was 35%, compared with 6.4% in a historical cohort of patients who received chemotherapy alone (P < .0005).
The COG performed a prospective single-arm study of 65 children. Fifty-four of the children were younger than 36 months and received two courses of methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and etoposide followed by three courses of high-dose carboplatin and thiotepa supported by peripheral stem cell rescue. For patients with nondisseminated disease, focal involved-field radiation therapy was mandated after either induction or consolidation, depending on age. For patients with disseminated disease, craniospinal radiation at the end of therapy was recommended but not mandated.[8]
For the 11 children aged 36 months or older at diagnosis, the 4-year EFS rate was 48%, and the 4-year OS rate was 57%.
The COG performed a prospective single-arm study of 65 children. Fifty-four of the children were younger than 36 months and received two courses of methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and etoposide followed by three courses of high-dose carboplatin and thiotepa supported by peripheral stem cell rescue. For patients with nondisseminated disease, focal involved-field radiation therapy was mandated after either induction or consolidation, depending on age. For patients with disseminated disease, craniospinal radiation at the end of therapy was recommended but not mandated.[8]
Toxicity from this regimen was significant. Four treatment-related deaths (6% of the patients) resulting from sepsis, respiratory failure, or CNS necrosis were reported.
On the basis of the two prospective studies summarized above, multimodality therapy with surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy seems to be the best treatment to optimize the survival of children with AT/RT. However, toxicities can be significant, and the most effective regimen and the optimal sequencing of therapies still need to be determined.
Studies cited in this source section
Source citation is not a determination that a study applies to you.
Publication references
Read the original reference and check its publication notices.
- PubMed 12142780 · Original source
- PubMed 15254056 · Original source
- PubMed 15735125 · Original source
- PubMed 15803379 · Original source
- PubMed 16234523 · Original source
- PubMed 18381756 · Original source
- PubMed 19064966 · Original source
- PubMed 19936623 · Original source
- PubMed 20495479 · Original source
- PubMed 22213196 · Original source
- PubMed 23934933 · Original source
- PubMed 27228363 · Original source
- PubMed 31883020 · Original source
- PubMed 32105509 · Original source
- PubMed 37073482 · Original source
- PubMed 38246248 · Original source
- PubMed 7743242 · Original source
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle