Skip to content
← Childhood Acute Myeloid Leukemia

HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING

Intermediate-risk patients

Source: Childhood Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.

Source updated: April 15, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.

Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary.

Context: Treatment of Childhood AML / Postremission Therapy for AML / HSCT / Risk stratification for transplant

There is conflicting evidence regarding the role of allogeneic HSCT in first remission for patients with intermediate-risk characteristics (neither low-risk or high-risk cytogenetics or molecular variants).

Evidence (allogeneic HSCT in first remission for patients with intermediate-risk AML):

A study combining the results of the POG-8821, CCG-2891, COG-2961 (NCT00002798), and MRC AML10 studies reported the following:[65]

Source links and citations

A study combining the results of the POG-8821, CCG-2891, COG-2961 (NCT00002798), and MRC AML10 studies reported the following:[65]

A DFS and OS advantage for allogeneic HSCT in patients with intermediate-risk AML but not favorable-risk (inv(16) and t(8;21)) or poor-risk AML (del(5q), monosomy 5 or 7, or more than 15% blasts after first induction for POG/CCG studies).

A study combining the results of the POG-8821, CCG-2891, COG-2961 (NCT00002798), and MRC AML10 studies reported the following:[65]

The MRC study included patients with 3q abnormalities and complex cytogenetics in the high-risk category.

A study combining the results of the POG-8821, CCG-2891, COG-2961 (NCT00002798), and MRC AML10 studies reported the following:[65]

Weaknesses of this study include the large percentage of patients not assigned to a risk group and the relatively low EFS and OS rates for patients with intermediate-risk AML assigned to chemotherapy, compared with results of more recent clinical trials.[1,13]

Source links and citations

The AML99 clinical trial from the Japanese Childhood AML Cooperative Study Group observed a significant difference in DFS for intermediate-risk patients assigned to MFD HSCT, but there was no significant difference in OS.[76]

Source links and citations

The AML-BFM 99 clinical trial demonstrated no significant difference in either DFS or OS for intermediate-risk patients assigned to MFD HSCT compared with patients assigned to chemotherapy.[71]

Source links and citations

Given the improved outcome for patients with intermediate-risk AML in recent clinical trials and the burden of acute and chronic toxicities associated with allogeneic transplant, many childhood AML treatment groups (including the COG) employ chemotherapy for intermediate-risk patients in first remission and reserve allogeneic HSCT for use after potential relapses.[1,76,77]

Source links and citations

Studies cited in this source section

Source citation is not a determination that a study applies to you.

Publication references

Read the original reference and check its publication notices.

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice