Skip to content
← Childhood Acute Myeloid Leukemia

HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING

Immunotherapeutic approaches (gemtuzumab ozogamicin)

Source: Childhood Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.

Source updated: April 15, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.

Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary.

Context: Treatment of Recurrent or Refractory Childhood AML / Refractory Childhood AML (Induction Failure) / Treatment of refractory AML

Evidence (treatment of refractory childhood AML with gemtuzumab ozogamicin):

In the SJCRH AML02 (NCT00136084) trial, gemtuzumab ozogamicin was given alone (n = 17), typically where MRD was low but still detectable (0.1%–5.6%), or in combination with chemotherapy (n = 29) to patients with high MRD (1%–97%) after the first induction cycle.[55]

Source links and citations

In the SJCRH AML02 (NCT00136084) trial, gemtuzumab ozogamicin was given alone (n = 17), typically where MRD was low but still detectable (0.1%–5.6%), or in combination with chemotherapy (n = 29) to patients with high MRD (1%–97%) after the first induction cycle.[55]

When given alone, 13 of 17 patients became MRD negative.

In the SJCRH AML02 (NCT00136084) trial, gemtuzumab ozogamicin was given alone (n = 17), typically where MRD was low but still detectable (0.1%–5.6%), or in combination with chemotherapy (n = 29) to patients with high MRD (1%–97%) after the first induction cycle.[55]

When given in combination with chemotherapy, 13 of 29 patients became MRD negative and 28 of 29 patients had reductions in MRD.

In the SJCRH AML02 (NCT00136084) trial, gemtuzumab ozogamicin was given alone (n = 17), typically where MRD was low but still detectable (0.1%–5.6%), or in combination with chemotherapy (n = 29) to patients with high MRD (1%–97%) after the first induction cycle.[55]

Compared with a nonrandomized cohort of patients with 1% to 25% MRD after induction 1, addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin to chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone resulted in significant differences in MRD (P = .03); MRD was eliminated or reduced in all patients who received gemtuzumab ozogamicin versus in only 82% of patients who did not receive gemtuzumab ozogamicin. This result was seen despite higher postinduction 1 MRD levels in the cohort of patients who received gemtuzumab ozogamicin (median, 9.5% vs. 2.9% in the no gemtuzumab ozogamicin group; P < .01). There was a nonstatistically significant improvement in 5-year OS rates (55% ± 13.9% vs. 36.4% ± 9.7%; P = .28) and EFS rates (50% ± 9.3% vs. 31.8% ± 13.4%; P = .28).

In the SJCRH AML02 (NCT00136084) trial, gemtuzumab ozogamicin was given alone (n = 17), typically where MRD was low but still detectable (0.1%–5.6%), or in combination with chemotherapy (n = 29) to patients with high MRD (1%–97%) after the first induction cycle.[55]

No impact on HSCT treatment-related mortality was seen.

A phase II trial of gemtuzumab ozogamicin alone for children with relapsed/refractory AML that did not respond to previous reinduction attempts demonstrated the following results:[25]

Source links and citations

A phase II trial of gemtuzumab ozogamicin alone for children with relapsed/refractory AML that did not respond to previous reinduction attempts demonstrated the following results:[25]

Of 30 patients, 11 achieved a CR or partial CR. The 3-year OS rate was 27% for responders versus 0% for nonresponders (P = .001).

Studies cited in this source section

Source citation is not a determination that a study applies to you.

Publication references

Read the original reference and check its publication notices.

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice