Skip to content
← Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING

Prevention of relapse or failure after CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy

Source: Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.

Source updated: April 21, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.

Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary.

Context: Treatment of Relapsed Childhood ALL / Immunotherapeutic Approaches for Relapsed or Refractory ALL / CAR T-cell therapy / CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy

Investigators have examined several strategies to prevent relapse after initial CAR T-cell infusions. These strategies include repeating CAR T-cell infusions for various indications and risk groups, giving maintenance chemotherapy, and infusing a different type of CAR T cell.[185,198]

Source links and citations

Second infusion of the first CAR T cells.

Second infusion of the first CAR T cells.

A retrospective study from the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia analyzed the outcomes of 81 repeat CAR T-cell infusions (CARTr) for three indications: (1) relapse prevention in at-risk patients (peripheral B-cell recovery [BCR] or emergence of CD19-positive hematogones), (2) CD19-positive MRD emergence or relapse, and (3) failure to go into remission after initial CAR T-cell infusion.[199]

Source links and citations

Second infusion of the first CAR T cells. › A retrospective study from the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia analyzed the outcomes of 81 repeat CAR T-cell infusions (CARTr) for three indications: (1) relapse prevention in at-risk patients (peripheral B-cell recovery [BCR] or emergence of CD19-positive hematogones), (2) CD19-positive MRD emergence or relapse, and (3) failure to go into remission after initial CAR T-cell infusion.[199]

Of 63 patients who received CARTr for relapse prevention, 52% achieved CR (BCR, 15 of 40 [38%]; hematogones, 18 of 23 [78%]).

Second infusion of the first CAR T cells. › A retrospective study from the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia analyzed the outcomes of 81 repeat CAR T-cell infusions (CARTr) for three indications: (1) relapse prevention in at-risk patients (peripheral B-cell recovery [BCR] or emergence of CD19-positive hematogones), (2) CD19-positive MRD emergence or relapse, and (3) failure to go into remission after initial CAR T-cell infusion.[199] › Of 63 patients who received CARTr for relapse prevention, 52% achieved CR (BCR, 15 of 40 [38%]; hematogones, 18 of 23 [78%]).

Lymphodepletion was associated with response to CARTr for BCR (odds ratio [OR], 33.57; P = .015) but not hematogones (OR, 0.30; P = .291).

Second infusion of the first CAR T cells. › A retrospective study from the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia analyzed the outcomes of 81 repeat CAR T-cell infusions (CARTr) for three indications: (1) relapse prevention in at-risk patients (peripheral B-cell recovery [BCR] or emergence of CD19-positive hematogones), (2) CD19-positive MRD emergence or relapse, and (3) failure to go into remission after initial CAR T-cell infusion.[199] › Of 63 patients who received CARTr for relapse prevention, 52% achieved CR (BCR, 15 of 40 [38%]; hematogones, 18 of 23 [78%]).

The cumulative incidence of relapse was 29% at 24 months for CR, compared with 61% for nonresponse to CARTr (P = .259).

Second infusion of the first CAR T cells. › A retrospective study from the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia analyzed the outcomes of 81 repeat CAR T-cell infusions (CARTr) for three indications: (1) relapse prevention in at-risk patients (peripheral B-cell recovery [BCR] or emergence of CD19-positive hematogones), (2) CD19-positive MRD emergence or relapse, and (3) failure to go into remission after initial CAR T-cell infusion.[199]

For MRD/relapse, the CR rate after CARTr was 50% (5 of 10). However, no CRs were observed in the eight patients who had their initial CAR T-cell infusion fail.

Publication references

Read the original reference and check its publication notices.

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice