Skip to content
← Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING

Testicular involvement at diagnosis

Source: Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.

Source updated: April 21, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.

Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary.

Context: Risk-Based Treatment Assignment / Prognostic Factors Affecting Risk-Based Treatment / Patient and clinical disease characteristics

Overt testicular involvement at the time of diagnosis occurs in approximately 2% of males,[61,62] with a higher frequency in patients with T-ALL than in patients with B-ALL.[62]

Source links and citations

In early ALL trials, testicular involvement at diagnosis was an adverse prognostic factor. With more aggressive initial therapy, however, it does not appear to have prognostic significance.[61,62] For example, a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial (EORTC-58881) reported no adverse prognostic significance for overt testicular involvement at diagnosis.[62]

Source links and citations

The role of radiation therapy for testicular involvement is unclear. A study from St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (SJCRH) suggests that a good outcome can be achieved with aggressive conventional chemotherapy without radiation.[61] The COG has also adopted this strategy for boys with testicular involvement that resolves completely by the end of induction therapy. The COG considers patients with testicular involvement to be high risk regardless of other presenting features, but most other large clinical trial groups in the United States and Europe do not consider testicular disease to be a high-risk feature.

Source links and citations

Publication references

Read the original reference and check its publication notices.

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice