Skip to content
← Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING

Weight at diagnosis and during treatment

Source: Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.

Source updated: April 21, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.

Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary.

Context: Risk-Based Treatment Assignment / Prognostic Factors Affecting Risk-Based Treatment / Patient and clinical disease characteristics

Studies of the impact of obesity on the outcome of ALL have had variable results. In most of these studies, obesity is defined as weight above the 95th percentile for age and height.

Three studies did not demonstrate an independent effect of obesity on EFS.[98][Level of evidence B4]; [99,100][Level of evidence C2]

Source links and citations

Two studies showed obesity to be an independent prognostic factor only in patients older than 10 years or in patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk disease.[101,102][Level of evidence C2]

Source links and citations

The COG reported on the impact of obesity on outcome in 2,008 children, 14% of whom were obese, who were enrolled on a high-risk ALL trial (CCG-1961 [NCT00002812]).[103][Level of evidence B4] Obesity was found to be an independent variable for inferior outcome compared with nonobese patients (5-year EFS rates, 64% vs. 74%; P = .002). However, obese patients at diagnosis who then lost weight during the premaintenance period of treatment had outcomes similar to patients with normal weight at diagnosis.

Source links and citations

In a retrospective study of patients treated at a single institution, obesity at diagnosis was linked to an increased risk of having MRD at the end of induction and an inferior EFS.[104][Level of evidence C2]

Source links and citations

In a different retrospective study of 373 patients treated at a single institution, body mass index (BMI) at diagnosis was not associated with MRD at days 19 and 46, cumulative incidence of relapse, or EFS. OS was lower in patients with a high BMI, primarily resulting from treatment-related mortality and inferior salvage after relapse.[105][Level of evidence C1]

Source links and citations

In one study, obesity at diagnosis was associated with increased toxicity and truncated administration of asparaginase, especially in older children and adolescents.[106]

Source links and citations

In a study of 388 patients aged 15 to 50 years who were treated with Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) ALL consortium regimens, greater BMI was associated with higher rates of relapse and nonrelapse mortality, as well as inferior OS. Higher BMI was associated with increased rates of hepatotoxicity and hyperglycemia. The deleterious effect of elevated BMI was more pronounced in older patients. Among patients aged 15 to 29 years at diagnosis (n = 254), the 4-year OS rate was 73% for those with high BMI, compared with 83% for those with BMI in the reference range (P = .09).[107]

Source links and citations

In a study of 762 pediatric patients with ALL (aged 2–17 years), the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group found that those who were underweight at diagnosis (defined as BMI standard deviation score < -1.8; 8% of the population) had an almost twofold higher risk of relapse compared with patients who were not underweight (after adjusting for risk group and age), although this did not result in a difference in EFS or OS. Patients with a decrease in BMI during the first 32 weeks of treatment had similar rates of relapse as other patients, but had significantly worse OS, primarily because of poorer salvage rates after relapse.[108]

Source links and citations

Studies cited in this source section

Source citation is not a determination that a study applies to you.

Publication references

Read the original reference and check its publication notices.

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice