HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING
Response to remission induction chemotherapy
Source: Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 21, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.
Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary.
More than 95% of children with newly diagnosed ALL will achieve a CR within the first 4 weeks of treatment. Of those who fail to achieve CR within the first 4 weeks, approximately one-half will experience a toxic death during the induction phase (usually caused by infection) and the other half will have resistant disease (persistent morphological leukemia).[34-36]; [37][Level of evidence C1]
Source links and citations
Remission is classically defined as an end-induction bone marrow examination by routine microscopic cytomorphology with fewer than 5% lymphoblasts at the end of induction (M1). The Ponte de Legno consortium includes approximately 15 large national and international cooperative groups devoted to the study and treatment of childhood ALL. This group published a consensus definition of complete remission, as follows:[38]
Source links and citations
Achievement of MRD levels of less than 1% and/or M1 cytomorphology.
Achievement of MRD levels of less than 1% and/or M1 cytomorphology.
MRD is the gold standard and takes precedence over cytomorphology.
Achievement of MRD levels of less than 1% and/or M1 cytomorphology.
MRD is determined by either flow cytometry or polymerase chain reaction techniques.
Resolution of extramedullary disease, assessed no earlier than the end of induction.
Most patients with persistence of morphologically detectable leukemia at the end of the 4-week induction phase have a poor prognosis and may benefit from an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) once CR is achieved.[4,39,40] In a retrospective study of 1,041 patients with persistent disease after induction therapy (induction failure) who were treated between 1985 and 2000, the 10-year OS rate was 32%.[41] A trend for superior outcome with allogeneic HSCT compared with chemotherapy alone was observed in patients with T-cell phenotype (any age) and B-ALL patients older than 6 years. B-ALL patients who were aged 1 to 5 years at diagnosis and did not have any adverse cytogenetic abnormalities (KMT2A rearrangement, BCR::ABL1) had a relatively favorable prognosis, without any advantage in outcome with the utilization of HSCT compared with chemotherapy alone.[41]
A follow-up retrospective study reported the outcomes of 325 children and adolescents with T-ALL and initial induction failure who were treated between 2000 and 2018.[42] The 10-year OS rate was 54.7%, which was significantly better than the rates of patients in historical cohorts who were treated between 1985 and 2000 (10-year OS rate, 27.6%). Complete remission was eventually achieved in 93% of patients with T-ALL and initial induction failure. Of the patients who achieved complete remission, 72% underwent HSCT. Adjusting for time to transplant, the 10-year OS rate was 66.2% for these patients, compared with 50.8% for those who did not undergo transplants.
Source links and citations
The incorporation of nelarabine may be of value for patients with T-ALL and have induction failure. The COG AALL0434 (NCT00408005) study included 43 patients with more than 25% blasts in an end-induction bone marrow aspirate. Of these patients, 23 patients were nonrandomly assigned to therapy that included high-dose methotrexate and nelarabine as part of a multidrug regimen, and 20 patients underwent allogeneic transplant. The 5-year EFS rate was 53.1% (± 9.4%) for the patients who received high-dose methotrexate and nelarabine. There was no difference in outcome for these two groups (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.24–1.83; P = .423).[43]
Source links and citations
For patients who achieve CR, measures of the rapidity of blast clearance and MRD determinations have important prognostic significance, particularly the following:
The percentage of morphologically detectable marrow blasts at 7 and 14 days after starting multiagent remission induction therapy has been correlated with relapse risk,[44] and has been used in the past by the COG to risk-stratify patients. However, in multivariate analyses, when end-induction MRD is included, these early marrow findings lose their prognostic significance.[45,46]
End-induction levels of submicroscopic MRD, assessed by multiparameter flow cytometry, polymerase chain reaction, or next-generation sequencing assays strongly correlates with long-term outcome.[45,47-50] Intensification of postinduction therapy for patients with high levels of end-induction MRD is a common component of most ALL treatment regimens. In a randomized trial conducted by the United Kingdom Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (UKALL) group, augmented postinduction therapy was shown to improve outcome for standard-risk and intermediate-risk patients with high end-induction MRD.[51]
MRD levels earlier in induction (e.g., days 8 and 15) and at later postinduction time points (e.g., week 12 after starting therapy) have also been shown to have prognostic significance in both B-ALL and T-ALL.[45,46,49,52-55]
Nearly all patients with a positive end-of-induction MRD will become MRD negative at the end of 4 to 8 weeks of consolidation therapy. In a COG study, patients with high-risk B-ALL who had a positive end-of-induction MRD but a negative end-of-consolidation MRD had a significantly improved DFS compared with patients who were MRD positive at end of consolidation (5-year DFS rate, 79.5% vs. 39.5%).[46]
Source links and citations
For more information, see the Response to initial treatment section.
Source links and citations
For specific information about CNS therapy to prevent CNS relapse in children with newly diagnosed ALL, see the CNS-Directed Therapy for Childhood ALL section.
Source links and citations
Studies cited in this source section
Source citation is not a determination that a study applies to you.
Publication references
Read the original reference and check its publication notices.
- PubMed 10189148 · Original source
- PubMed 12070008 · Original source
- PubMed 15251979 · Original source
- PubMed 16112299 · Original source
- PubMed 17003366 · Original source
- PubMed 18349402 · Original source
- PubMed 18388178 · Original source
- PubMed 19212332 · Original source
- PubMed 20154213 · Original source
- PubMed 22494120 · Original source
- PubMed 24146872 · Original source
- PubMed 24924991 · Original source
- PubMed 26124497 · Original source
- PubMed 29284596 · Original source
- PubMed 32813610 · Original source
- PubMed 34192312 · Original source
- PubMed 37487146 · Original source
- PubMed 9351539 · Original source
- PubMed 9848348 · Original source
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle