Skip to content
← Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING

Relapse or failure to respond after CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy

Source: Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.

Source updated: April 21, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.

Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary.

Context: Treatment of Relapsed Childhood ALL / Immunotherapeutic Approaches for Relapsed or Refractory ALL / CAR T-cell therapy / CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy

Retrospective studies have described outcomes and assessed factors associated with survival after relapse in patients who received CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy:

A study looked at 166 relapses occurring after CAR T-cell therapy using either 4-1BB or CD28 costimulatory domains.[196]

Source links and citations

A study looked at 166 relapses occurring after CAR T-cell therapy using either 4-1BB or CD28 costimulatory domains.[196]

Eighty-three patients (50%) were CD19 positive, 68 (41%) were CD19 negative, and 12 (7.2%) had lineage switch relapses.

A study looked at 166 relapses occurring after CAR T-cell therapy using either 4-1BB or CD28 costimulatory domains.[196]

The median OS was 11.9 months (95% CI, 9–17 months), with no difference between CD19-positive and CD19-negative relapses.

A study looked at 166 relapses occurring after CAR T-cell therapy using either 4-1BB or CD28 costimulatory domains.[196]

Patients with lineage switch relapses had a dismal prognosis, with no long-term survivors.

A study looked at 166 relapses occurring after CAR T-cell therapy using either 4-1BB or CD28 costimulatory domains.[196]

CD19-positive relapses were associated with a greater prior treatment burden, shown by a greater number of previous remissions.

A study looked at 166 relapses occurring after CAR T-cell therapy using either 4-1BB or CD28 costimulatory domains.[196]

CD19-negative relapses were associated with a greater pre-CAR T-cell infusion disease burden, prior nonresponse to blinatumomab, older age, and a 4-1BB costimulatory domain.

A study looked at 166 relapses occurring after CAR T-cell therapy using either 4-1BB or CD28 costimulatory domains.[196]

Lineage switch relapses were associated with the presence of KMT2A rearrangements.

A second study reviewed 80 patients (27 nonresponders and 53 who relapsed) who received 4-1BB-based CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy that failed to produce remissions.[197]

Source links and citations

A second study reviewed 80 patients (27 nonresponders and 53 who relapsed) who received 4-1BB-based CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy that failed to produce remissions.[197]

Of the nonresponders, 95% had high disease burden (>5% blasts) before CAR T-cell infusion.

A second study reviewed 80 patients (27 nonresponders and 53 who relapsed) who received 4-1BB-based CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy that failed to produce remissions.[197]

CD19-negative relapses were associated with a decreased OS rate at 1 year, compared with CD19-positive relapses (30% [95% CI, 14%–66%] vs. 68% [49%–92%]; P = .0068).

A second study reviewed 80 patients (27 nonresponders and 53 who relapsed) who received 4-1BB-based CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy that failed to produce remissions.[197]

Only treatment followed by HSCT if remission was obtained was associated with long-term survival.

Publication references

Read the original reference and check its publication notices.

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice