HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING
Duration of AI therapy
Source: Breast Cancer Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: April 25, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.
Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary.
The optimal duration of AI therapy is uncertain, and multiple trials have evaluated courses longer than 5 years.
Evidence regarding extension of endocrine therapy beyond 5 years of initial AI-based adjuvant therapy:
A double-blind, randomized, phase III trial assessed the effect of an additional 5 years of letrozole versus placebo in 1,918 women who had received 5 years of an AI.[81] Patients who received previous tamoxifen therapy were included. Most women on the study (70.6%) had received 4.5 to 6 years of adjuvant tamoxifen, but a significant proportion of them (20.7%) had been treated initially with an AI. The primary study end point was DFS.
Source links and citations
A double-blind, randomized, phase III trial assessed the effect of an additional 5 years of letrozole versus placebo in 1,918 women who had received 5 years of an AI.[81] Patients who received previous tamoxifen therapy were included. Most women on the study (70.6%) had received 4.5 to 6 years of adjuvant tamoxifen, but a significant proportion of them (20.7%) had been treated initially with an AI. The primary study end point was DFS.
At a median follow-up of 6.3 years, DFS was significantly improved in patients randomly assigned to receive letrozole (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48–0.91; P = .01). The 5-year DFS rate was improved from 91% to 95%.[81][Level of evidence B1]
Source links and citations
A double-blind, randomized, phase III trial assessed the effect of an additional 5 years of letrozole versus placebo in 1,918 women who had received 5 years of an AI.[81] Patients who received previous tamoxifen therapy were included. Most women on the study (70.6%) had received 4.5 to 6 years of adjuvant tamoxifen, but a significant proportion of them (20.7%) had been treated initially with an AI. The primary study end point was DFS.
OS rates showed no difference (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.73–1.28; P = .83). More patients who received letrozole had fractures (14%) than did patients who received placebo (9%) (P = .001).
A double-blind, randomized, phase III trial assessed the effect of an additional 5 years of letrozole versus placebo in 1,918 women who had received 5 years of an AI.[81] Patients who received previous tamoxifen therapy were included. Most women on the study (70.6%) had received 4.5 to 6 years of adjuvant tamoxifen, but a significant proportion of them (20.7%) had been treated initially with an AI. The primary study end point was DFS.
QOL was assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Menopause-Specific QOL (MENQOL) instruments. More than 85% of participants completed yearly assessments over a 5-year period.
A double-blind, randomized, phase III trial assessed the effect of an additional 5 years of letrozole versus placebo in 1,918 women who had received 5 years of an AI.[81] Patients who received previous tamoxifen therapy were included. Most women on the study (70.6%) had received 4.5 to 6 years of adjuvant tamoxifen, but a significant proportion of them (20.7%) had been treated initially with an AI. The primary study end point was DFS. › QOL was assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Menopause-Specific QOL (MENQOL) instruments. More than 85% of participants completed yearly assessments over a 5-year period.
No between-group differences were found on the four MENQOL subscales or on the SF-36 summary score.
A double-blind, randomized, phase III trial assessed the effect of an additional 5 years of letrozole versus placebo in 1,918 women who had received 5 years of an AI.[81] Patients who received previous tamoxifen therapy were included. Most women on the study (70.6%) had received 4.5 to 6 years of adjuvant tamoxifen, but a significant proportion of them (20.7%) had been treated initially with an AI. The primary study end point was DFS. › QOL was assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Menopause-Specific QOL (MENQOL) instruments. More than 85% of participants completed yearly assessments over a 5-year period.
SF-36 role-emotional and bodily pain scores were statistically significantly worse (P = .03) among patients receiving letrozole, but the differences observed were fewer than the minimum clinically important differences for the SF-36 instrument.
A randomized phase III study assessed the effect of an additional 2.5 years of letrozole versus 5 years of letrozole in 1,824 women who received 5 years of an AI.[Level of evidence B1] [82]
Source links and citations
A randomized phase III study assessed the effect of an additional 2.5 years of letrozole versus 5 years of letrozole in 1,824 women who received 5 years of an AI.[Level of evidence B1] [82]
DFS events were similar in both groups (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.74–1.16). The distant metastasis-free interval was also similar (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.78–1.45).
A randomized phase III study assessed the effect of an additional 2.5 years of letrozole versus 5 years of letrozole in 1,824 women who received 5 years of an AI.[Level of evidence B1] [82]
A subgroup analysis did not identify patients who benefited from 5-year extended therapy.
A randomized phase III study assessed the effect of an additional 2.5 years of letrozole versus 5 years of letrozole in 1,824 women who received 5 years of an AI.[Level of evidence B1] [82]
This study did not show that 10 years of AI therapy was superior to 7.5 years of AI therapy.
A phase III trial (NSABP-B42 [NCT00382070]) randomly assigned, in a double-blind fashion, 3,966 women who received 5 years of initial adjuvant therapy with an AI or received tamoxifen for 2 to 3 years followed by an AI to receive 5 mg of letrozole or placebo for 5 additional years.[83][Level of evidence B1] The planned analysis of DFS was carried out after a median follow-up of 6.9 years.
Source links and citations
A phase III trial (NSABP-B42 [NCT00382070]) randomly assigned, in a double-blind fashion, 3,966 women who received 5 years of initial adjuvant therapy with an AI or received tamoxifen for 2 to 3 years followed by an AI to receive 5 mg of letrozole or placebo for 5 additional years.[83][Level of evidence B1] The planned analysis of DFS was carried out after a median follow-up of 6.9 years.
The 7-year DFS rate was 81.3% in the placebo group and 84.7% in the letrozole group (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73–0.999; P = .048). The observed difference was not statistically significant when interim analyses were accounted for.
A phase III trial (NSABP-B42 [NCT00382070]) randomly assigned, in a double-blind fashion, 3,966 women who received 5 years of initial adjuvant therapy with an AI or received tamoxifen for 2 to 3 years followed by an AI to receive 5 mg of letrozole or placebo for 5 additional years.[83][Level of evidence B1] The planned analysis of DFS was carried out after a median follow-up of 6.9 years.
There were no statistically significant differences in adverse events between the arms.
A phase III trial conducted by the IBCSG (SOLE [NCT00553410]) included 4,851 receptor-positive postmenopausal women who had completed 5 years of adjuvant therapy with an AI, a selective estrogen receptor (ER) modulator, or both. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 2.5 mg of letrozole daily for 5 years or to an intermittent schedule in which there was a 3-month break at the end of each of the first 4 years, but not in the final year.[84]
A phase III trial conducted by the IBCSG (SOLE [NCT00553410]) included 4,851 receptor-positive postmenopausal women who had completed 5 years of adjuvant therapy with an AI, a selective estrogen receptor (ER) modulator, or both. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 2.5 mg of letrozole daily for 5 years or to an intermittent schedule in which there was a 3-month break at the end of each of the first 4 years, but not in the final year.[84]
There was no observed advantage to the intermittent schedule with respect to DFS (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.93–1.26; P = .31) or in the frequency of adverse events.[84][Level of evidence B1]
Source links and citations
A phase III trial conducted by the Dutch Breast Cancer Study Group (DATA [NCT00301457]) randomly assigned 1,860 eligible receptor-positive postmenopausal women who had received 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen to receive either 3 or 6 years of anastrozole (1 mg daily).[85]
A phase III trial conducted by the Dutch Breast Cancer Study Group (DATA [NCT00301457]) randomly assigned 1,860 eligible receptor-positive postmenopausal women who had received 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen to receive either 3 or 6 years of anastrozole (1 mg daily).[85]
At 3 years, 1,660 of these women were free of disease: among them, DFS was observed to be improved, but not statistically significantly so, on the extended-therapy arm (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.62–1.02).[85][Level of evidence B1] Myalgia and osteoporosis/osteopenia were more frequent on the extended-therapy arm.
Source links and citations
A phase III, open-label, Italian trial (NCT01064635) included 2,056 hormone receptor–positive postmenopausal women who had received 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen treatment. Patients were randomly assigned to receive letrozole for either 2 to 3 years (control) or 5 years (extended therapy). The primary end point was IDFS.[86]
Source links and citations
A phase III, open-label, Italian trial (NCT01064635) included 2,056 hormone receptor–positive postmenopausal women who had received 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen treatment. Patients were randomly assigned to receive letrozole for either 2 to 3 years (control) or 5 years (extended therapy). The primary end point was IDFS.[86]
After 11.7 years of follow-up, the 12-year DFS rate was 62% in the control group and 67% in the extended-therapy group (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65–0.93; P = .0064). These results were confirmed in a landmark analysis that excluded patients who experienced a DFS event or who were lost to follow-up before treatment divergence (2–3 years after randomization).
A phase III, open-label, Italian trial (NCT01064635) included 2,056 hormone receptor–positive postmenopausal women who had received 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen treatment. Patients were randomly assigned to receive letrozole for either 2 to 3 years (control) or 5 years (extended therapy). The primary end point was IDFS.[86]
The 12-year OS rate was 84% in the control group and 88% in the extended-therapy group (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60–0.98; P = .036).[86][Level of evidence A1]
Source links and citations
A phase III, open-label, Italian trial (NCT01064635) included 2,056 hormone receptor–positive postmenopausal women who had received 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen treatment. Patients were randomly assigned to receive letrozole for either 2 to 3 years (control) or 5 years (extended therapy). The primary end point was IDFS.[86]
Grade 3 or greater arthralgia and myalgia were slightly more frequent in the extended-therapy group than in the control group (3.0% vs. 2.2% and 0.9% vs. 0.7%, respectively).
The phase III ABCSG-16 study enrolled 3,484 postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer who had completed 5 years of endocrine therapy with tamoxifen and/or an AI to either 2 or 5 years of extended therapy with anastrozole. The primary end point was DFS in the 3,208 patients who remained in the study after 2 years. Secondary end points included OS, time to contralateral breast cancer, time to second primary cancer, fractures, and toxicity.[87]
Source links and citations
The phase III ABCSG-16 study enrolled 3,484 postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer who had completed 5 years of endocrine therapy with tamoxifen and/or an AI to either 2 or 5 years of extended therapy with anastrozole. The primary end point was DFS in the 3,208 patients who remained in the study after 2 years. Secondary end points included OS, time to contralateral breast cancer, time to second primary cancer, fractures, and toxicity.[87]
After 10 years of follow-up, there was no difference in DFS between the two arms (73.6% for the 2-year course vs. 73.9% for the 5-year course [HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.85–1.15; P = .90]). In addition, there was no difference in OS, time to second primary cancer, and time to contralateral breast cancer between the arms.[87][Level of evidence B1]
Source links and citations
The phase III ABCSG-16 study enrolled 3,484 postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer who had completed 5 years of endocrine therapy with tamoxifen and/or an AI to either 2 or 5 years of extended therapy with anastrozole. The primary end point was DFS in the 3,208 patients who remained in the study after 2 years. Secondary end points included OS, time to contralateral breast cancer, time to second primary cancer, fractures, and toxicity.[87]
There was a trend toward more fractures in the 5-year arm (4.7% vs. 6.3%; HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.00–1.84).
An open-label trial in Japan included 1,697 patients who had received either (1) 5 years of anastrozole or (2) 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen, followed by 2 to 3 years of anastrozole. Patients were randomly assigned to either discontinue anastrozole or continue it for 5 years. The primary end point was DFS.[88]
Source links and citations
An open-label trial in Japan included 1,697 patients who had received either (1) 5 years of anastrozole or (2) 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen, followed by 2 to 3 years of anastrozole. Patients were randomly assigned to either discontinue anastrozole or continue it for 5 years. The primary end point was DFS.[88]
In an analysis done after all patients had completed protocol therapy, DFS was improved in the continued-therapy group (5-year DFS rate, 91% vs. 86%; HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.46–0.83; P < .0010).[88][Level of evidence B1]
Source links and citations
An open-label trial in Japan included 1,697 patients who had received either (1) 5 years of anastrozole or (2) 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen, followed by 2 to 3 years of anastrozole. Patients were randomly assigned to either discontinue anastrozole or continue it for 5 years. The primary end point was DFS.[88]
There was no difference in distant DFS or OS.
Studies cited in this source section
Source citation is not a determination that a study applies to you.
Publication references
Read the original reference and check its publication notices.
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle