Skip to content
← Breast Cancer

HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING

Trastuzumab

Source: Breast Cancer Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.

Source updated: April 25, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.

Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary.

Context: Systemic Therapy for Stages I, II, and III Breast Cancer / Stages I, II, and III HER2-Positive Breast Cancer / Postoperative therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer

Several phase III clinical trials have addressed the role of the anti-HER2 antibody, trastuzumab, as adjuvant therapy for patients with HER2-overexpressing cancers. Study results confirm the benefit of 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab therapy.

Evidence (including duration of trastuzumab therapy for patients who have not been treated with preoperative systemic therapy):

The Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) (BIG-01-01 [NCT00045032]) trial examined the efficacy of trastuzumab as adjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer if used after completion of the primary treatment. For most patients, primary treatment consisted of an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimen given preoperatively or postoperatively, with or without locoregional radiation therapy. Trastuzumab was given every 3 weeks starting within 7 weeks of the completion of primary treatment.[128][Level of evidence A1] Patients were randomly assigned to one of three study arms:Of the patients in the group comparing 1 year of trastuzumab versus observation, the median age was 49 years, about 33% had node-negative disease, and nearly 50% had hormone receptor–negative disease.[129]The following results were observed for patients assigned to 1 year of trastuzumab versus patients assigned to observation:The following results were observed for patients assigned to 1 year of trastuzumab versus patients assigned to 2 years of trastuzumab:Symptomatic cardiac events occurred in 1% of the patients who received trastuzumab and in 0.1% of the observation group.

Source links and citations

The Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) (BIG-01-01 [NCT00045032]) trial examined the efficacy of trastuzumab as adjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer if used after completion of the primary treatment. For most patients, primary treatment consisted of an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimen given preoperatively or postoperatively, with or without locoregional radiation therapy. Trastuzumab was given every 3 weeks starting within 7 weeks of the completion of primary treatment.[128][Level of evidence A1] Patients were randomly assigned to one of three study arms:Of the patients in the group comparing 1 year of trastuzumab versus observation, the median age was 49 years, about 33% had node-negative disease, and nearly 50% had hormone receptor–negative disease.[129]The following results were observed for patients assigned to 1 year of trastuzumab versus patients assigned to observation:The following results were observed for patients assigned to 1 year of trastuzumab versus patients assigned to 2 years of trastuzumab:Symptomatic cardiac events occurred in 1% of the patients who received trastuzumab and in 0.1% of the observation group.

Observation (n = 1,693).

The Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) (BIG-01-01 [NCT00045032]) trial examined the efficacy of trastuzumab as adjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer if used after completion of the primary treatment. For most patients, primary treatment consisted of an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimen given preoperatively or postoperatively, with or without locoregional radiation therapy. Trastuzumab was given every 3 weeks starting within 7 weeks of the completion of primary treatment.[128][Level of evidence A1] Patients were randomly assigned to one of three study arms:Of the patients in the group comparing 1 year of trastuzumab versus observation, the median age was 49 years, about 33% had node-negative disease, and nearly 50% had hormone receptor–negative disease.[129]The following results were observed for patients assigned to 1 year of trastuzumab versus patients assigned to observation:The following results were observed for patients assigned to 1 year of trastuzumab versus patients assigned to 2 years of trastuzumab:Symptomatic cardiac events occurred in 1% of the patients who received trastuzumab and in 0.1% of the observation group.

1 year of trastuzumab (n = 1,694).

The Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) (BIG-01-01 [NCT00045032]) trial examined the efficacy of trastuzumab as adjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer if used after completion of the primary treatment. For most patients, primary treatment consisted of an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimen given preoperatively or postoperatively, with or without locoregional radiation therapy. Trastuzumab was given every 3 weeks starting within 7 weeks of the completion of primary treatment.[128][Level of evidence A1] Patients were randomly assigned to one of three study arms:Of the patients in the group comparing 1 year of trastuzumab versus observation, the median age was 49 years, about 33% had node-negative disease, and nearly 50% had hormone receptor–negative disease.[129]The following results were observed for patients assigned to 1 year of trastuzumab versus patients assigned to observation:The following results were observed for patients assigned to 1 year of trastuzumab versus patients assigned to 2 years of trastuzumab:Symptomatic cardiac events occurred in 1% of the patients who received trastuzumab and in 0.1% of the observation group.

2 years of trastuzumab (n = 1,694).

The Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) (BIG-01-01 [NCT00045032]) trial examined the efficacy of trastuzumab as adjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer if used after completion of the primary treatment. For most patients, primary treatment consisted of an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimen given preoperatively or postoperatively, with or without locoregional radiation therapy. Trastuzumab was given every 3 weeks starting within 7 weeks of the completion of primary treatment.[128][Level of evidence A1] Patients were randomly assigned to one of three study arms:Of the patients in the group comparing 1 year of trastuzumab versus observation, the median age was 49 years, about 33% had node-negative disease, and nearly 50% had hormone receptor–negative disease.[129]The following results were observed for patients assigned to 1 year of trastuzumab versus patients assigned to observation:The following results were observed for patients assigned to 1 year of trastuzumab versus patients assigned to 2 years of trastuzumab:Symptomatic cardiac events occurred in 1% of the patients who received trastuzumab and in 0.1% of the observation group.

After a median follow-up of 11 years,[129] 1 year of trastuzumab improved DFS (10-year DFS rate, 72% vs. 66%; HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68–0.86; P < .0001), despite a crossover of 52% of the patients on observation.

Source links and citations

The Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) (BIG-01-01 [NCT00045032]) trial examined the efficacy of trastuzumab as adjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer if used after completion of the primary treatment. For most patients, primary treatment consisted of an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimen given preoperatively or postoperatively, with or without locoregional radiation therapy. Trastuzumab was given every 3 weeks starting within 7 weeks of the completion of primary treatment.[128][Level of evidence A1] Patients were randomly assigned to one of three study arms:Of the patients in the group comparing 1 year of trastuzumab versus observation, the median age was 49 years, about 33% had node-negative disease, and nearly 50% had hormone receptor–negative disease.[129]The following results were observed for patients assigned to 1 year of trastuzumab versus patients assigned to observation:The following results were observed for patients assigned to 1 year of trastuzumab versus patients assigned to 2 years of trastuzumab:Symptomatic cardiac events occurred in 1% of the patients who received trastuzumab and in 0.1% of the observation group.

One year of trastuzumab also improved OS (12-year OS rate, 79% vs. 73%; HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64–0.86; P < .0001).[129][Level of evidence A1]

Source links and citations

The Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) (BIG-01-01 [NCT00045032]) trial examined the efficacy of trastuzumab as adjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer if used after completion of the primary treatment. For most patients, primary treatment consisted of an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimen given preoperatively or postoperatively, with or without locoregional radiation therapy. Trastuzumab was given every 3 weeks starting within 7 weeks of the completion of primary treatment.[128][Level of evidence A1] Patients were randomly assigned to one of three study arms:Of the patients in the group comparing 1 year of trastuzumab versus observation, the median age was 49 years, about 33% had node-negative disease, and nearly 50% had hormone receptor–negative disease.[129]The following results were observed for patients assigned to 1 year of trastuzumab versus patients assigned to observation:The following results were observed for patients assigned to 1 year of trastuzumab versus patients assigned to 2 years of trastuzumab:Symptomatic cardiac events occurred in 1% of the patients who received trastuzumab and in 0.1% of the observation group.

After a median follow-up of 11 years, there was no DFS benefit to an additional year of trastuzumab (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.89–1.17).

In the combined analysis of the NSABP-B-31 (NCT00004067) and intergroup NCCTG-N9831 (NCT00005970) trials, trastuzumab was given weekly, concurrently, or immediately after the paclitaxel component of the AC with paclitaxel regimen.[130,131][Level of evidence A1]

Source links and citations

In the combined analysis of the NSABP-B-31 (NCT00004067) and intergroup NCCTG-N9831 (NCT00005970) trials, trastuzumab was given weekly, concurrently, or immediately after the paclitaxel component of the AC with paclitaxel regimen.[130,131][Level of evidence A1]

The HERA results were confirmed in a joint analysis of the two studies, with a combined enrollment of 3,676 patients. A highly statistically significant improvement in DFS (3-year DFS rate, 87% vs. 75%; HR, 0.48; P < .001) was observed, as was a significant improvement in OS (3-year OS rate, 94.3% in the trastuzumab group vs. 91.7% in the control group; 4-year OS rate, 91.4% in the trastuzumab group vs. 86.6% in the control group; HR, 0.67; P = .015).[130]

Source links and citations

In the combined analysis of the NSABP-B-31 (NCT00004067) and intergroup NCCTG-N9831 (NCT00005970) trials, trastuzumab was given weekly, concurrently, or immediately after the paclitaxel component of the AC with paclitaxel regimen.[130,131][Level of evidence A1]

Patients treated with trastuzumab experienced a longer DFS, with a 52% lower risk of a DFS event (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.39–0.59; P < .001), corresponding to an absolute difference in DFS of 11.8% at 3 years and 18% at 4 years. The risk of distant recurrence in patients treated with trastuzumab was 53% lower (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.37–0.61; P < .001), and the risk of death was 33% lower (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48–0.93; P = .015).[130]

Source links and citations

In the combined analysis of the NSABP-B-31 (NCT00004067) and intergroup NCCTG-N9831 (NCT00005970) trials, trastuzumab was given weekly, concurrently, or immediately after the paclitaxel component of the AC with paclitaxel regimen.[130,131][Level of evidence A1]

In an updated analysis with a median follow-up of 8.4 years, the addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy led to a 37% relative improvement in OS (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.54–0.73; P < .001) and an increase in the 10-year OS rate from 75.2% to 84%.[132]

Source links and citations

In the BCIRG-006 trial (NCT00021255), 3,222 women with early-stage HER2-overexpressing breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive AC followed by docetaxel (AC-T), AC followed by docetaxel plus trastuzumab (AC-T plus trastuzumab), or docetaxel, carboplatin, plus trastuzumab (TCH, a non–anthracycline-containing regimen).[133][Level of evidence A1]

Source links and citations

In the BCIRG-006 trial (NCT00021255), 3,222 women with early-stage HER2-overexpressing breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive AC followed by docetaxel (AC-T), AC followed by docetaxel plus trastuzumab (AC-T plus trastuzumab), or docetaxel, carboplatin, plus trastuzumab (TCH, a non–anthracycline-containing regimen).[133][Level of evidence A1]

A significant DFS and OS benefit was seen in both groups treated with trastuzumab compared with the control group that did not receive trastuzumab.

In the BCIRG-006 trial (NCT00021255), 3,222 women with early-stage HER2-overexpressing breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive AC followed by docetaxel (AC-T), AC followed by docetaxel plus trastuzumab (AC-T plus trastuzumab), or docetaxel, carboplatin, plus trastuzumab (TCH, a non–anthracycline-containing regimen).[133][Level of evidence A1]

For patients receiving AC-T plus trastuzumab, the 5-year DFS rate was 84% (HR for the comparison with AC-T, 0.64; P < .001), and the OS rate was 92% (HR, 0.63; P < .001). For patients receiving TCH, the 5-year DFS rate was 81% (HR, 0.75; P = .04), and the OS rate was 91% (HR, 0.77; P = .04). The control group had a 5-year DFS rate of 75% and an OS rate of 87%.

In the BCIRG-006 trial (NCT00021255), 3,222 women with early-stage HER2-overexpressing breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive AC followed by docetaxel (AC-T), AC followed by docetaxel plus trastuzumab (AC-T plus trastuzumab), or docetaxel, carboplatin, plus trastuzumab (TCH, a non–anthracycline-containing regimen).[133][Level of evidence A1]

The authors stated that there was no significant difference in DFS or OS between the two trastuzumab-containing regimens. However, the study was not powered to detect equivalence between the two trastuzumab-containing regimens.

In the BCIRG-006 trial (NCT00021255), 3,222 women with early-stage HER2-overexpressing breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive AC followed by docetaxel (AC-T), AC followed by docetaxel plus trastuzumab (AC-T plus trastuzumab), or docetaxel, carboplatin, plus trastuzumab (TCH, a non–anthracycline-containing regimen).[133][Level of evidence A1]

The rates of congestive heart failure and cardiac dysfunction were significantly higher in the group receiving AC-T plus trastuzumab than in the TCH group (P < .001).

In the BCIRG-006 trial (NCT00021255), 3,222 women with early-stage HER2-overexpressing breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive AC followed by docetaxel (AC-T), AC followed by docetaxel plus trastuzumab (AC-T plus trastuzumab), or docetaxel, carboplatin, plus trastuzumab (TCH, a non–anthracycline-containing regimen).[133][Level of evidence A1]

These trial findings raise the question of whether anthracyclines are needed for the adjuvant treatment of HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. The group receiving AC-trastuzumab showed a small but not statistically significant benefit over TCH.

In the BCIRG-006 trial (NCT00021255), 3,222 women with early-stage HER2-overexpressing breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive AC followed by docetaxel (AC-T), AC followed by docetaxel plus trastuzumab (AC-T plus trastuzumab), or docetaxel, carboplatin, plus trastuzumab (TCH, a non–anthracycline-containing regimen).[133][Level of evidence A1]

This trial supports the use of TCH as an alternative adjuvant regimen for women with early-stage HER2-overexpressing breast cancer, particularly in those with concerns about cardiac toxic effects.

The Finland Herceptin (FINHER) study assessed the impact of a much shorter course of trastuzumab. In this trial, 232 women younger than 67 years with node-positive or high-risk (>2 cm tumor size) node-negative HER2-overexpressing breast cancer were given nine weekly infusions of trastuzumab concurrently with docetaxel or vinorelbine followed by FEC.[134][Level of evidence A1]

Source links and citations

The Finland Herceptin (FINHER) study assessed the impact of a much shorter course of trastuzumab. In this trial, 232 women younger than 67 years with node-positive or high-risk (>2 cm tumor size) node-negative HER2-overexpressing breast cancer were given nine weekly infusions of trastuzumab concurrently with docetaxel or vinorelbine followed by FEC.[134][Level of evidence A1]

At a 3-year median follow-up, the risk of recurrence and/or death was significantly reduced in patients receiving trastuzumab (3-year DFS rate, 89% vs. 78%; HR, 0.41; P = .01; 95% CI, 0.21–0.83).

The Finland Herceptin (FINHER) study assessed the impact of a much shorter course of trastuzumab. In this trial, 232 women younger than 67 years with node-positive or high-risk (>2 cm tumor size) node-negative HER2-overexpressing breast cancer were given nine weekly infusions of trastuzumab concurrently with docetaxel or vinorelbine followed by FEC.[134][Level of evidence A1]

The difference in OS (HR, 0.41) was not statistically significant (P = .07; 95% CI, 0.16–1.08).

Several studies have compared 6 months of trastuzumab administration to 12 months.[135-137]

Source links and citations

Several studies have compared 6 months of trastuzumab administration to 12 months.[135-137]

In an interim analysis of the PHARE trial (NCT00381901), the 2-year DFS rate was 93.8% (95% CI, 92.6%–94.9%) in the 12-month group and 91.1% (89.7%–92.4%) in the 6-month group (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.05–1.56; noninferiority, P = .29).[135][Level of evidence A1]

Source links and citations

Several studies have compared 6 months of trastuzumab administration to 12 months.[135-137] › In an interim analysis of the PHARE trial (NCT00381901), the 2-year DFS rate was 93.8% (95% CI, 92.6%–94.9%) in the 12-month group and 91.1% (89.7%–92.4%) in the 6-month group (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.05–1.56; noninferiority, P = .29).[135][Level of evidence A1]

In the final analysis, after 704 events were observed, the adjusted HR was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.93–1.25), and the prespecified noninferiority HR of 1.15 was not excluded.

Several studies have compared 6 months of trastuzumab administration to 12 months.[135-137]

Similar results were noted in a much smaller study of 481 patients led by the Hellenic Oncology Research Group.[136][Level of evidence A1]

Source links and citations

Several studies have compared 6 months of trastuzumab administration to 12 months.[135-137]

In contrast, the PERSEPHONE trial (NCT00712140), which enrolled 4,088 patients who experienced 512 DFS events at the time of analysis, excluded its prespecified noninferiority margin (HR, 1.07; 90% CI, 0.93−1.24; noninferiority, P = .011).[137][Level of evidence A1]

Source links and citations

The SOLD trial (NCT00593697) compared 9 weeks of trastuzumab with 1 year of trastuzumab in 2,174 women with HER2-positive breast cancer.[138]

Source links and citations

The SOLD trial (NCT00593697) compared 9 weeks of trastuzumab with 1 year of trastuzumab in 2,174 women with HER2-positive breast cancer.[138]

Noninferiority of the 9-week treatment could not be demonstrated for DFS (HR, 1.39; 2-sided 90% CI, 1.12−1.72).[138][Level of evidence B1]

Source links and citations

A meta-analysis that included these trials concluded that, with respect to OS, 1 year of trastuzumab was superior to a shorter duration of therapy; however, there was no significant benefit of 1 year of therapy in patients with low-risk disease.[139][Level of evidence A1]

Source links and citations

Several studies have evaluated the use of SQ trastuzumab in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings.

Source links and citations

Studies cited in this source section

Source citation is not a determination that a study applies to you.

Publication references

Read the original reference and check its publication notices.

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice