Skip to content
← Agnostic Cancer Therapies (PDQ®)

HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING

Selpercatinib

Source: Agnostic Cancer Therapies (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.

Source updated: February 12, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.

Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary. Independent clinical review is pending.

Context: RET Gene Fusion–Positive Solid Tumors

Indication. Selpercatinib is indicated for adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors with a RET gene fusion whose disease meets either of the following criteria: disease progressed during or after prior systemic treatment, or disease with no satisfactory alternative treatment options. This indication is not approved for the pediatric population.

Evidence. Forty-one patients with RET gene fusion–positive tumors (other than non-small cell lung cancer [NSCLC] and thyroid cancer) with disease progression during or after prior systemic treatment or who had no satisfactory alternative treatment options were evaluated in the multicenter, open-label, multicohort LIBRETTO-001 trial (NCT03157128).[1,2][Level of evidence C3]

Source links and citations

Efficacy. For the 41 evaluable patients with cancers other than NSCLC or thyroid cancer, the objective response rate was 44% (95% confidence interval, 28%–60%). A total of 16 patients had a partial response and 2 patients had a complete response, with a median follow-up of 14.9 months.[1,2]

Source links and citations

Identification of biomarker. Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) or CLIA-equivalent locally obtained molecular testing was performed at a certified laboratory, with the use of either next-generation sequencing, fluorescence in situ hybridization, or polymerase chain reaction assay.

Studies cited in this source section

Source citation is not a determination that a study applies to you.

Publication references

Read the original reference and check its publication notices.

Preserved source evidence · Independent clinical review pending · Not medical advice