HEALTH PROFESSIONAL · SOURCE READING
Chemotherapy
Source: Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version, National Cancer Institute.
Source updated: March 14, 2025 · Captured 2026-09-09.
Selected source text with whitespace normalised. This Triangle page is not an NCI PDQ summary.
Chemotherapy for AML is divided into the following two general categories:
Intensive remission-induction chemotherapy.
Nonintensive chemotherapy.
One of the following combination chemotherapy regimens may be used as intensive remission induction therapy:
Cytarabine plus mitoxantrone.[7]
Source links and citations
Cytarabine plus anthracycline plus midostaurin.[8]
Source links and citations
Cytarabine plus anthracycline plus gemtuzumab ozogamicin.[9]
Source links and citations
Liposomal daunorubicin-cytarabine (CPX-351).[10]
Source links and citations
Intrathecal cytarabine or methotrexate may be used to treat central nervous system (CNS) leukemia, if present.
The two-drug regimen of cytarabine given as a continuous infusion for 7 days and a 3-day course of anthracycline (the so-called 7 + 3 induction therapy) results in a complete response rate of approximately 65%. In most instances, there is no further clinical benefit when adding potentially non-cross−resistant drugs (such as fludarabine, topoisomerase inhibitors, thioguanine, mitoxantrone, histone deacetylases inhibitors, or clofarabine) to a 7 + 3 regimen. Cladribine, when added to 7 + 3 induction chemotherapy, showed improved remission rates [11] and survival rates [12] across two randomized controlled trials, but this regimen has not been widely adopted in the absence of confirmatory trials. The addition of midostaurin and gemtuzumab ozogamicin to intensive induction chemotherapy is discussed below.
The choice of anthracycline and the dose-intensity of anthracycline may influence the survival of patients with AML. Idarubicin appeared to be more effective than daunorubicin, particularly in younger adults, although the doses of idarubicin and daunorubicin may not have been equivalent.[3-6] No significant survival difference between daunorubicin and mitoxantrone has been reported.[13]
Continue within this section
Publication references
Read the original reference and check its publication notices.
- PubMed 14999298 · Original source
- PubMed 1730080 · Original source
- PubMed 1824249 · Original source
- PubMed 1829918 · Original source
- PubMed 2179638 · Original source
- PubMed 22508825 · Original source
- PubMed 25008258 · Original source
- PubMed 28644114 · Original source
- PubMed 30024784 · Original source
- PubMed 6953986 · Original source
- PubMed 9508168 · Original source
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle