Skip to content
Triangle logo TriangleGet started
← Full study record

NCT05700747 · OUTCOME

Participant Satisfaction

Health Through Activity: A Pilot Study of a Rehabilitation Intervention for People Living With Multiple Myeloma · Source last updated 2025-12-16

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
Unit
Participants
Interval / dispersion
Not reported
Time frame
Up to 4 months

What was measured

Assessed by the Satisfaction survey which is a 7-item survey that is rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Any item on the Satisfaction survey that generates a mean score of \< 4 will trigger consideration of modification to the HTA program.

Analysis population: 5/5 participants engaged in one-on-one semi-structured qualitative interviews following completion of intervention which allowed us to gauge overall participant experiences/satisfaction within the study and intervention. Unfortunately, a protocol deviation (reported to the IRB) resulted in the 7-item satisfaction survey not being included in the data collection materials. This measure will not be collected as participants had already completed the program and study will be closed to enrollment.

Groups in this outcome

Health Through Activity (HTA) Intervention

Participants will undergo study procedures as outlined: * Complete a baseline survey regarding activity level and quality of life. * Attend 6 weekly study visits at the MGH Institute of Health Professions IMPACT Practice Center. * Attend final study visit and complete the Satisfaction survey and an individual, semi-structured interview with site staff to supply feedback about the program. * After six weeks, complete the Satisfaction survey again.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Health Through Activity (HTA) Intervention5

Reported measurements

Participants felt well supported by the interventionists
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Health Through Activity (HTA) Intervention5Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Participants described feeling connected to the interventionists.
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Health Through Activity (HTA) Intervention3Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Optimism and openness of interventionists kept participants engaged
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Health Through Activity (HTA) Intervention3Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Participants felt the program structure was both effective and adaptable to their needs
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Health Through Activity (HTA) Intervention5Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Participants identified areas of growth
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Health Through Activity (HTA) Intervention5Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
The program catalyzed participants to stay engaged, take action, and reflect on progress
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Health Through Activity (HTA) Intervention5Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Suggestion to tailor messaging/advertising for better clarity of target audience.
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Health Through Activity (HTA) Intervention1Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Suggestion to highlight that the program can be adapted to various performance levels
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Health Through Activity (HTA) Intervention2Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Suggestion to explain why program addresses a wide range of health aspects vs going deep on one
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Health Through Activity (HTA) Intervention3Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Complete source fields
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        5
    title
    Participants felt well supported by the interventionists
  2. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        3
    title
    Participants described feeling connected to the interventionists.
  3. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        3
    title
    Optimism and openness of interventionists kept participants engaged
  4. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        5
    title
    Participants felt the program structure was both effective and adaptable to their needs
  5. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        5
    title
    Participants identified areas of growth
  6. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        5
    title
    The program catalyzed participants to stay engaged, take action, and reflect on progress
  7. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        1
    title
    Suggestion to tailor messaging/advertising for better clarity of target audience.
  8. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        2
    title
    Suggestion to highlight that the program can be adapted to various performance levels
  9. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        3
    title
    Suggestion to explain why program addresses a wide range of health aspects vs going deep on one
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      5
    units
    Participants
description
Assessed by the Satisfaction survey which is a 7-item survey that is rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Any item on the Satisfaction survey that generates a mean score of \< 4 will trigger consideration of modification to the HTA program.
groups
  1. description
    Participants will undergo study procedures as outlined: * Complete a baseline survey regarding activity level and quality of life. * Attend 6 weekly study visits at the MGH Institute of Health Professions IMPACT Practice Center. * Attend final study visit and complete the Satisfaction survey and an individual, semi-structured interview with site staff to supply feedback about the program. * After six weeks, complete the Satisfaction survey again.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Health Through Activity (HTA) Intervention
param Type
COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
population Description
5/5 participants engaged in one-on-one semi-structured qualitative interviews following completion of intervention which allowed us to gauge overall participant experiences/satisfaction within the study and intervention. Unfortunately, a protocol deviation (reported to the IRB) resulted in the 7-item satisfaction survey not being included in the data collection materials. This measure will not be collected as participants had already completed the program and study will be closed to enrollment.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Up to 4 months
title
Participant Satisfaction
type
SECONDARY
unit Of Measure
Participants

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-25a395029948b04d52b1253f

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice