Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT05198934 · OUTCOME

Change From Baseline for All Subscales of the BPI-SF

Sotorasib and Panitumumab Versus Investigator's Choice for Participants With Kirsten Rat Sarcoma (KRAS) p.G12C Mutation · Source last updated 2026-07-22

This outcome was registered, but no numerical results were posted in the captured record.

Measure
Not reported
Unit
Not reported
Interval / dispersion
Not reported
Time frame
Baseline and Week 8

What was measured

The BPI-SF was a 9-item questionnaire which included 2 body diagrams, four items to assess pain severity, four items to assess pain interference and one question about percentage of pain relief by analgesics. The level of pain and pain interference assessed could be divided into categories based on score of mild (1 to 4), moderate (5 to 6), and severe (7 to 10). An increase in score from baseline indicated a worsening of pain. A decrease in score from baseline indicated a lessening of pain.

Groups in this outcome

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Reported measurements

No numerical measurement classes were posted for this outcome. Missing is not zero.

Complete source fields
anticipated Posting Date
2027-04
denom Units Selected
Participants
description
The BPI-SF was a 9-item questionnaire which included 2 body diagrams, four items to assess pain severity, four items to assess pain interference and one question about percentage of pain relief by analgesics. The level of pain and pain interference assessed could be divided into categories based on score of mild (1 to 4), moderate (5 to 6), and severe (7 to 10). An increase in score from baseline indicated a worsening of pain. A decrease in score from baseline indicated a lessening of pain.
reporting Status
NOT_POSTED
time Frame
Baseline and Week 8
title
Change From Baseline for All Subscales of the BPI-SF
type
SECONDARY

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Independent clinical review pending · Not medical advice