NCT05061095 · OUTCOME
Preliminary Efficiency of Best-Worst Scaling (BWS) Survey
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
- Measure
- COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
- Unit
- Participants
- Interval / dispersion
- Not reported
- Time frame
- Up to 7 days after treatment decision
What was measured
Number of patients who respond moderately effective/very affective to "how effective was the survey to help you and your doctor choose a treatment that was consistent with your goals?"
Analysis population: Participants with newly-diagnosed hematologic malignancies who completed survey.
Groups in this outcome
Pilot Testing:
Participants with newly-diagnosed hematologic malignancies who participated in the questionnaire portion of the study.
| Group | Source count |
|---|---|
| Pilot Testing: | 19 |
Reported measurements
Source class 1
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pilot Testing: | 9 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
Complete source fields
- classes
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 9
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 19
- units
- Participants
- description
- Number of patients who respond moderately effective/very affective to "how effective was the survey to help you and your doctor choose a treatment that was consistent with your goals?"
- groups
- description
- Participants with newly-diagnosed hematologic malignancies who participated in the questionnaire portion of the study.
- id
- OG000
- title
- Pilot Testing:
- param Type
- COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
- population Description
- Participants with newly-diagnosed hematologic malignancies who completed survey.
- reporting Status
- POSTED
- time Frame
- Up to 7 days after treatment decision
- title
- Preliminary Efficiency of Best-Worst Scaling (BWS) Survey
- type
- SECONDARY
- unit Of Measure
- Participants
Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-25a395029948b04d52b1253f
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle