Skip to content
Triangle logo TriangleGet started
← Full study record

NCT05061095 · OUTCOME

Content Validity of Best-Worst Scaling (BWS) Survey

Understanding What Matters Most to Patients: Establishing the Validity of a Best-Worst Scaling Survey · Source last updated 2024-12-27

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
Unit
Participants
Interval / dispersion
Not reported
Time frame
3 months after treatment decision

What was measured

Cognitive interviewing will be used to evaluate the content validity of using a BWS survey to quantify the preferences of older patients with hematologic malignancies at the point-of-care. BWS survey asks patients a series of questions where they choose one attribute as best and one as worst - the 7 included in this survey are maintaining usual activities, living longer, avoiding dependence on others, avoiding short-term side effects, avoiding long-term side effects, avoiding hospitalizations, and avoiding high out-of-pocket costs.

Analysis population: Participants with newly-diagnosed hematologic malignancies who completed cognitive interviews.

Groups in this outcome

Qualitative Interviews

Participants (subset of the entire cohort) who completed cognitive interviews to establish the content validity of the BWS survey.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Qualitative Interviews10

Reported measurements

Participants who were able to accurately define each attribute and reported no missing domains.
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Qualitative Interviews10Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Participants who could not define attributes or reported missing domains.
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Qualitative Interviews0Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Complete source fields
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        10
    title
    Participants who were able to accurately define each attribute and reported no missing domains.
  2. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        0
    title
    Participants who could not define attributes or reported missing domains.
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      10
    units
    Participants
description
Cognitive interviewing will be used to evaluate the content validity of using a BWS survey to quantify the preferences of older patients with hematologic malignancies at the point-of-care. BWS survey asks patients a series of questions where they choose one attribute as best and one as worst - the 7 included in this survey are maintaining usual activities, living longer, avoiding dependence on others, avoiding short-term side effects, avoiding long-term side effects, avoiding hospitalizations, and avoiding high out-of-pocket costs.
groups
  1. description
    Participants (subset of the entire cohort) who completed cognitive interviews to establish the content validity of the BWS survey.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Qualitative Interviews
param Type
COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
population Description
Participants with newly-diagnosed hematologic malignancies who completed cognitive interviews.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
3 months after treatment decision
title
Content Validity of Best-Worst Scaling (BWS) Survey
type
PRIMARY
unit Of Measure
Participants

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-25a395029948b04d52b1253f

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice